RESUMO
AIMS: To demonstrate how the listening guide contributed to oral history data analysis. To better understand the continuing inclination of nurses to engage in humanitarian work, foregrounding the nurses' lives. BACKGROUND: The voice-centred relational method or listening guide is a method of qualitative data analysis used to analyse oral history data. DESIGN: A conventional approach to oral history interviews was adopted; intervention into the "flow" of participants' narrative was kept to a minimum. A small number of prompts, how they came into nursing, recruitment to, life with and since Médecins Sans Frontières, were used. METHODS: Oral history interviews were conducted with seven nurses who had worked for Médecins Sans Frontières. Interviews were digitally recorded. This paper will demonstrate the application of the listening guide to historical data analysis and critique its applicability and value. The listening guide advocates four readings (listenings) of the text. Firstly, locating the plot in the narrative; secondly, actively listening for the use of "I?" ("we", or "you"), the "self" in context of the story being told and "I poem" development; thirdly, listening for relationships and finally, locating accounts in relation to wider social, political and societal contexts. RESULTS: Analysis revealed: "becoming", "being" and "leaving" Médecins Sans Frontières as chronological thematic areas. At one extreme creating "I poems" foregrounded individual voices while cross-referencing to contemporaneous records of world events locates this in an International context. CONCLUSION: It is argued that subjecting historical data to the listening guide can enable legitimate, creative exploration and analysis of data.
RESUMO
AIM: To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England. BACKGROUND: The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England. DATA SOURCES: The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions. REVIEW METHODS: The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted. DISCUSSION: Kirkpatrick's ( 2006 ) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees' expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England's National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.