Attitudes toward persons with epilepsy as friends: Results of a factorial survey.

OBJECTIVE: Discrimination against persons with epilepsy (PWEs) may persist. The aim of this study was to examine whether epilepsy is an obstacle to desired friendship. METHODS: A factorial survey (vignettes), which is less biased by social desirability, was applied to PWEs, their relatives, and lay persons. The vignettes described a person who was varied by the dimensions of age (younger, same age, older), gender (male, female), disease (healthy, mild epilepsy, severe epilepsy [generalized tonic-clonic seizures], diabetes), origin (German, non-German), contact (phone/internet, activities at home, activities outside), frequency of contacts (weekly, monthly), and distance (around the corner, 10 km away). Respondents rated their willingness to befriend the person on a 10-point Likert scale. Multivariate regression determined the contribution of each dimension on the judgment. RESULTS: Participants were 64 PWEs (age = 37.1 ± 14.0 years), 64 relatives of PWEs (age = 45.1 ± 13.6 years), and 98 controls without contact with PWEs (age = 24.4 ± 10.1 years). Controls were less interested in a friendship with a PWE with mild epilepsy (-3.4%) and even more avoided PWEs with severe epilepsy (-11.7%), whereas in PWEs with tonic-clonic seizures, a mild form of epilepsy was actually conducive to friendship (+7.0%). Controls preferred females (+5.0%) and disliked younger people (-12.3%) and contacts via the internet or telephone (-7.3%). PWEs were also less interested in younger people (-5.8%), and relatives of PWEs had a lower preference for friendships with longer distance (-2.3%). SIGNIFICANCE: PWEs still suffer from a risk of social avoidance, and this becomes more evident with generalized motor seizures.

Antiseizure medication and perceived "fair" cost allocation: A factorial survey among neurologists, persons with epilepsy, their relatives, and a control group.

OBJECTIVE: Because resources are limited in modern health care systems, the decision on the allocation of expensive drugs can be supported by a public consent. This study examines how various factors influence subjectively perceived "fair" pricing of antiseizure medication (ASM) among four groups including physicians, persons with epilepsy (PWEs), their relatives, and a control group. METHODS: We conducted a factorial survey. Vignettes featured a fictional PWE receiving a fictional ASM. The characteristics of the fictional PWE, ASM, and epilepsy varied. Participants were asked to assess the subjectively appropriate annual cost of ASM treatment per year for each scenario. RESULTS: Fifty-seven PWEs (mean age (SD) 37.7 ± 12.3, 45.6% female), 44 relatives (age 48.4 ± 15.7, 51.1% female), 46 neurologists (age 37.1 ± 9.6, 65.2% female), and 47 persons in the control group (age 31.2 ± 11.2, 68.1% female) completed the questionnaire. The amount of money that respondents were willing to spend for ASM treatment was higher than currently needed in Germany and increased with disease severity among all groups. All groups except for PWEs accepted higher costs of a drug with better seizure control. Physicians and the control group, but not PWEs and their relatives, tended to do so also for minor or no side effects. Physicians reduced the costs for unemployed patients and the control group spent less money for older patients. SIGNIFICANCE: ASM effectiveness appears to justify higher costs. However, the control group attributed less money to older PWEs and physicians allocated fewer drug costs to unemployed PWEs.

Ex vivo radiosensitivity is increased in non-cancer patients taking valproate.

BACKGROUND: Valproate (VPA) is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic drug for patients experiencing epileptic seizures due to brain tumors. VPA increases radiation sensitivity in various tumor cells in vitro due to complex mechanisms. This could make tumors more vulnerable to ionizing radiation or overcome radioresistance. Yet, clinical data on possible improvement of tumor control by adding VPA to tumor therapy is controversial. Potentially radiosensitizing effects of VPA on healthy tissue remain unclear. To determine individual radiosensitivity, we analyzed blood samples of individuals taking VPA. METHODS: Ex vivo irradiated blood samples of 31 adult individuals with epilepsy were studied using 3-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Aberrations in chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 were analyzed. Radiosensitivity was determined by the mean breaks per metaphase (B/M) and compared to age-matched (2:1) healthy donors. RESULTS: The patient cohort (n = 31; female: 38.7%) showed an increase of their average B/M value compared to healthy individuals (n = 61; female: 56.9%; B/M: 0.480 ± 0.09 vs. 0.415 ± 0.07; p = .001). The portion of radiosensitive (B/M >  0.500) and distinctly radiosensitive individuals (B/M >  0.600) was increased in the VPA group (54.9% vs. 11.3 and 9.7% vs. 0.0%; p < .001). In 3/31 patients, radiosensitivity was determined prior to and after VPA treatment and radiosensitivity was increased by VPA-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we confirmed that patients treated with VPA had an increased radiosensitivity compared to the control group. This could be considered in patients taking VPA prior to the beginning of radiotherapy to avoid toxic side effects of VPA-treatment.

WADA test for postoperative memory prediction in left TLE. Is it still useful in the 21st century?

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery offers an effective treatment to achieve seizure freedom in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Since left temporal lobe surgery can be associated with verbal memory deterioration, control of cognitive decline is a main goal of therapy. This study analyzes the prognostic value of intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Wada test) in addition to specific neuropsychological and clinical variables for postoperative memory changes. METHOD: Between 2013 and 2021 thirty-six patients (18 females, 18 males, mean age 41.0 years) from the Epilepsy Center Erlangen (ECE) with left hemispheric temporal lobe epilepsy underwent neuropsychological assessment preoperatively - including the Wada test - and six months postoperatively. In addition, a group of 92 patients (40 females, 52 males, mean age 36.1 years) with left or right hemispheric focus who underwent Wada test and surgery before 2013 was included as a standardization group. In all patients Wada test was carried out preoperatively to determine language dominance and memory capacity. RESULTS: Postoperative verbal memory scores showed no significant difference from preoperative performance. Preoperative verbal memory performance as well as the hippocampal resection extent is particularly important in predicting postoperative verbal memory change. After left temporal lobe surgery, a significantly higher postoperative functional level was shown for figural memory. Specifically, a good contralateral hemispheric performance level assessed by the Wada test proved to be a compensatory factor for postoperative losses. CONCLUSION: The Wada test is no longer necessary as a diagnostic tool for a broad group of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. However, it can be useful for a subgroup of patients with clinical indicators such as nonspecific or incongruent preoperative verbal and figural memory impairments. In this study, Wada test data about the functional level of the contralateral hemisphere specifically allowed estimation of postoperative figural memory changes.