Association of PARP inhibitor treatment on the prevalence and progression of clonal hematopoiesis in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are approved for the treatment of some men with advanced prostate cancer. Rare but serious side effects include myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The impact of PARP inhibitors on clonal hematopoiesis (CH), a potential precursor lesion associated with MDS and AML, is incompletely understood in prostate cancer. We hypothesized that PARP inhibitors would increase CH prevalence and abundance. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled participants with advanced prostate cancer treated with PARP inhibitors. The presence of CH was assessed from leukocytes using an ultra-deep error-corrected dual unique molecular identifiers sequencing method targeting 49 genes most commonly mutated in CH and myeloid malignancies. Variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≥0.5% were considered clinically significant. Blood samples were collected before and after PARP inhibitor treatment. RESULTS: Ten men were enrolled; mean age of 67 years. Six patients had Gleason 7 disease, and four had Gleason ≥8 disease at diagnosis. Nine had localized disease at diagnosis, and eight had prior treatment with radiation. The mean time between pre- and post-treatment blood samples was 11 months (range 2.6-31 months). Six patients (60%) had CH identified prior to PARP inhibitor treatment, three with multiple clones. Of 11 CH clones identified in follow-up, 5 (45%) appeared or increased after treatment. DNMT3A, TET2, and PPM1D were the most common CH alterations observed. The largest post-treatment increase involved the PPM1D gene. CONCLUSION: CH alterations are frequently found after treatment with PARP inhibitors in patients with prostate cancer and this may be one mechanism by which PARP inhibitors lead to increased risk of MDS/AML.

Clonal hematopoiesis in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in autologous transplant recipients and allogeneic transplant donors has genetic features and clinical associations that are distinct from each other and from non-cancer populations. CH in the setting of autologous transplant is enriched for mutations in DNA damage response pathway genes and is associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm and inferior overall survival. Studies of CH in allogeneic transplant donors have yielded conflicting results but have generally shown evidence of potentiated alloimmunity in recipients, with some studies showing an association with favorable recipient outcomes.

Recipient clonal hematopoiesis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for lymphoid malignancies.

ABSTRACT: Allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (alloBMT) is increasingly being used in older patients with blood cancer. Aging is associated with an increasing incidence of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Although the effects of donor CH on alloBMT has been reported, the impact of recipient CH on alloBMT outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective study, alloBMT recipients age 60 and older with lymphoid malignancies were included. Among 97 consecutive patients who received alloBMT between 2017 and 2022, CH was detected in 60 (62%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51-72). CH was found in 45% (95% CI, 28-64) of patients aged 60 to 64, 64% (95% CI, 44-81) of patients aged 65% to 69%, and 73% (95% CI, 59-87) in those above 70. Pretransplant CH was associated with worse survival after alloBMT: 3-year overall survival (OS) was 78% (95% CI, 65-94) for patients without CH vs 47% (95% CI, 35-63) for those with CH, (unadjusted HR, 3.1; [95% CI, 1.4-6.8; P < .001]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was higher in patients with CH; cumulative incidence of NRM at 1-year was 11% (95% CI, 1-22) vs 35% (95% CI, 23-48), (HR, 3.4; [95% CI, 1.4-8.5], P = .009]). Among CH patients, worse OS and NRM was associated with CH burden and number of mutations. Recipient CH had no effect on relapse. In conclusion, older patients with CH experience worse outcomes after alloBMT, almost exclusively attributable to increased NRM. CH is a strong, independent predictor of outcomes. Novel strategies to ameliorate the adverse impacts of patient CH on transplant outcomes are being evaluated.