Magnesium Isoglycyrrhizinate Attenuates Anti-Tuberculosis Drug-Induced Liver Injury by Enhancing Intestinal Barrier Function and Inhibiting the LPS/TLRs/NF-κB Signaling Pathway in Mice.

Liver injury caused by first-line anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) drugs accounts for a high proportion of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and gut microbiota and intestinal barrier integrity have been shown to be involved in the development of DILI. Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MgIG) is the fourth-generation glycyrrhizic acid preparation, which is well documented to be effective against anti-TB DILI, but the underlying mechanism is largely unclear. In the present study, we established a BALB/c mice animal model of the HRZE regimen (39 mg/kg isoniazid (H), 77 mg/kg rifampicin (R), 195 mg/kg pyrazinamide (Z), and 156 mg/kg ethambutol (E))-induced liver injury to investigate the protective effect of MgIG against anti-TB DILI and underlying mechanisms. The results demonstrated that intraperitoneal injection of MgIG (40 mg/kg) significantly ameliorated HRZE-induced liver injury by reducing alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and improved liver pathological changes. Species composition analysis of gut microbiota showed that Lactobacillus was the only probiotic that was down-regulated by HRZE and recovered by MgIG. In addition, MgIG attenuated HRZE-induced intestinal pathology, significantly decreased HRZE-induced intestinal permeability by increasing the protein expression of tight junction protein 1 (ZO-1) and occludin, decreased HRZE-induced high lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels, and further markedly attenuated mRNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-6, TLR2, TLR4, and NF-κB. Supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus JYLR-005 (>109 CFU/day/mouse) alleviated HRZE-induced liver injury and inflammation in mice. In summary, MgIG effectively ameliorated HRZE-induced liver injury by restoring the abundance of Lactobacillus, enhancing intestinal barrier function, and further inhibiting the activation of the LPS/TLRs/NF-κB signaling pathway. Regulating gut microbiota and promoting the integrity of intestinal barrier function may become a new direction for the prevention and treatment of anti-TB DILI.

Comparative effectiveness of glycyrrhizic acid preparations aimed at preventing and treating anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury: A network meta-analysis of 97 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines and expert consensus do not yet recommend glycyrrhizic acid (GA) preparations, such as compound glycyrrhizin, diammonium glycyrrhizin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MGIG), et al., for the prevention of anti-tuberculosis(anti-TB) drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to insufficient evidence. Although these GA preparations are recommended for the treatment of anti-TB DILI, which one performs best is unclear. Previous conventional meta-analyses did not summarize the results of simultaneous comparisons of different glycyrrhizinate preparations. Therefore, we aimed to compare and rank different GA preparations on preventing and treating the anti-TB DILI by network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Chongqing VIP and, the Wanfang Database was performed up to December 19, 2020. The literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract important information. The outcomes were the incidence of liver injury (prevention section) and treatment response rate (treatment section). The NMA was conducted with a random-effects model under the Bayesian framework to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) using R software (version 3.6.1). RESULTS: From 1,411 publications, we included 97 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (10,923 participants). In terms of preventing anti-TB DILI (33 RCTs, comprising 5,762 patients), CGC, DGC, DGEC, and DGI, but not CGI, significantly reduced the incidence of liver injury than control group (RRs ranged from 0.26 to 0.58); CGC and DGEC were superior to DGC (RRs = 0.50 and 0.58, respectively). In terms of treating anti-TB DILI (64 RCTs, comprising 5,161 patients), MGIG was most effective among all regimens (RRs ranged from 1.15 to 1.72) while DGC ranked last (RRs ranged from 0.58 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: All GA preparations except for CGI were effective in preventing the incidence of anti-TB DILI and CGC was superior to DGC. MGIG seems to be the best choice among all GA preparations for the treatment of anti-TB DILI. Future clinical practice guidelines should factor in these novel findings to improve patient outcomes; however, further high-quality trials are needed to validate these results.

Pharmacomicrobiomics: Exploiting the Drug-Microbiota Interactions in Antihypertensive Treatment.

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and can reduce life expectancy. Owing to the widespread use of antihypertensive drugs, patients with hypertension have improved blood pressure control over the past few decades. However, for a considerable part of the population, these drugs still cannot significantly improve their symptoms. In order to explore the reasons behind, pharmacomicrobiomics provide unique insights into the drug treatment of hypertension by investigating the effect of bidirectional interaction between gut microbiota and antihypertensive drugs. This review discusses the relationship between antihypertensive drugs and the gut microbiome, including changes in drug pharmacokinetics and gut microbiota composition. In addition, we highlight how our current knowledge of antihypertensive drug-microbiota interactions to develop gut microbiota-based personalized ways for disease management, including antihypertensive response biomarker, microbial-targeted therapies, probiotics therapy. Ultimately, a better understanding of the impact of pharmacomicrobiomics in the treatment of hypertension will provide important information for guiding rational clinical use and individualized use.

Evaluating the role of GSTP1 genetic polymorphism (rs1695, 313A>G) as a predictor in cyclophosphamide-induced toxicities.

ABSTRACT: The association between Glutathione S-transferase Pi 1(GSTP1) genetic polymorphism (rs1695, 313A>G) and cyclophosphamide-induced toxicities has been widely investigated in previous studies, however, the results were inconsistent. This study was performed to further elucidate the association.A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wan Fang database up to January 5, 2020. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the association between GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and cyclophosphamide-induced hemotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, infection, and neurotoxicity.A total of 13 studies were eventually included. Compared with the GSTP1 rs1695 AA genotype carriers, patients with AG and GG genotypes had an increased risk of cyclophosphamide-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.18-2.19; P = .003) and infection (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.00-2.48; P = .05) in the overall population. In the subgroup analyses, there were significant associations between GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and the risk of cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.60-2.76; P < .00001), gastrointestinal toxicity (RR, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.25-2.53; P = .001), and infection (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.14-3.54; P = .02) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or lupus nephritis syndrome patients, but not in cancer patients.Our results confirmed an essential role for the GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism in the prediction of cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and infection in SLE or lupus nephritis syndrome patients. More studies are necessary to validate our findings in the future.