Development of interferon beta-neutralising antibodies in multiple sclerosis--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Interferon beta (IFN-ß) is the drug of choice for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis and is known to reduce the frequency and severity of relapses. This systematic review determines the occurrence of neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against different formulations of IFN-ß: IFN-ß-1a Avonex™, IFN-ß-1a Rebif™ and IFN-ß-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™. METHODS: The databases used in the review included MEDLINE Ovid (from 1950 to March 2015), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to March 2015), CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4) and ClinicalTrials.gov (from 1997 to March 2015). All studies that compared the efficacy of the different formulations of IFN-ß in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis including IFN-ß-1a Avonex™, IFN-ß-1a Rebif™, IFN-ß-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™ and IFN-ß-1b Extavia™ were included. RESULTS: Assessment of randomised controlled trials demonstrated that Avonex™ was 76% less likely than Rebif™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Avonex™ was 88% less likely than Betaferon/Betaseron™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Similar findings were also observed in the non-randomised controlled studies, with Avonex™ having the lowest risk. The formation of NAbs was dose dependent: Avonex™ at 30 µg was 64% less risky than Avonex™ at 60 µg. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that 2.0-18.9% of patients developed NAbs to Avonex™, 16.5-35.4% of patients developed NAbs to Rebif™ and 27.3-53.3% of patients developed NAbs to Betaferon/Betaseron™.

Immunoglobulin G1 and immunoglobulin G4 antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients treated with IFNß interact with the endogenous cytokine and activate complement.

A subset of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) on therapy with interferon beta (IFNß) develop neutralising anti-drug antibodies (ADA) resulting in reduced, or loss of, therapeutic efficacy. The aims were to characterise the relative contributions of anti-IFNß antibody isotypes to drug neutralising activity, ability of these antibodies to cross-react with endogenous IFNß, to form immune complexes and activate complement. IFNß-specific ADA were measured in plasma from RRMS patients treated with IFNß1a (Rebif(®)). Neutralisation of endogenous and therapeutic IFNß by ADA was determined by IFNß bioassay. IFNß-ADA profile was predominantly comprised of IgG1 and IgG4 antibody isotypes. The contribution of IgG4-ADA towards neutralising activity was found to be minimal. Neutralising IFNß-ADA blocks endogenous IFNß activity. ADA interaction with therapeutic IFNß results in immune complex formation and complement activation. In summary, IgG1 and IgG4 IFNß-ADA have the ability to neutralise therapeutic and endogenous protein and to activate complement.

Safety pharmacology--current and emerging concepts.

Safety pharmacology (SP) is an essential part of the drug development process that aims to identify and predict adverse effects prior to clinical trials. SP studies are described in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) S7A and S7B guidelines. The core battery and supplemental SP studies evaluate effects of a new chemical entity (NCE) at both anticipated therapeutic and supra-therapeutic exposures on major organ systems, including cardiovascular, central nervous, respiratory, renal and gastrointestinal. This review outlines the current practices and emerging concepts in SP studies including frontloading, parallel assessment of core battery studies, use of non-standard species, biomarkers, and combining toxicology and SP assessments. Integration of the newer approaches to routine SP studies may significantly enhance the scope of SP by refining and providing mechanistic insight to potential adverse effects associated with test compounds.

Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions--including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity--pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Immunogenicity to biologics: mechanisms, prediction and reduction.

Currently, there is a significant rise in the development and clinical use of a unique class of pharmaceuticals termed as Biopharmaceuticals or Biologics, in the management of a range of disease conditions with, remarkable therapeutic benefits. However, there is an equally growing concern regarding development of adverse effects like immunogenicity in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) production and hypersensitivity. Immunogenicity to biologics represents a significant hurdle in the continuing therapy of patients in a number of disease settings. Efforts focussed on the identification of factors that contribute towards the onset of immunogenic response to biologics have led to reductions in the incidence of immunogenicity. An in-depth understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanism underpinning immunogenic responses will likely improve the safety profile of biologics. This review addresses the mechanistic basis of ADA generation to biologics, with emphasis on the role of antigen processing and presentation in this process. The article also addresses the potential contribution of complement system in augmenting or modulating this response. Identifying specific factors that influences processing and presentation of biologic-derived antigens in different genotype and disease background may offer additional options for intervention in the immunogenic process and consequently, the management of immunogenicity to biologics.