In-hospital Pediatric Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Is Associated With Shorter Hospitalization for Children With Choledocholithiasis.

OBJECTIVES: Children with choledocholithiasis are frequently managed at tertiary children's hospitals that do not have available endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) proceduralists. We hypothesized that patients treated at hospitals without ERCP proceduralists would have a longer hospital length of stay (LOS) than those with ERCP proceduralists. METHODS: Charts were reviewed for patients who underwent cholecystectomy and ERCP at 3 tertiary children's hospitals over 10 years. Trauma and complicated pancreatitis patients were excluded. Comparisons between patients requiring and not requiring transfer for ERCP were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four children underwent ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis: 79 (48%) in the transfer group and 85 (52%) in the no transfer group.Median LOS was longer for patients requiring transfer (7 vs 5 days, P < 0.0001). One-third (34%) of the transfer patients had magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared to only 7% that did not require transfer (P < 0.0001). Among the 123 patients who underwent ERCP before cholecystectomy, 53% required (66/123) transfer and 47% (57/123) did not. Transfer group patients had longer median hospital LOS (P < 0.0001), more days between admission and ERCP (P < 0.0001), and more days between ERCP and surgery (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Overall median LOS was significantly shorter for patients who underwent ERCP at the admitting facility. Patients who underwent ERCP before cholecystectomy at hospitals without available ERCP proceduralists incurred longer LOS. There is a need for more pediatric proceduralists appropriately trained to perform ERCP in children.

Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest, Death in the Off Hours: A Report From Wake Up Safe, The Pediatric Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric perioperative cardiac arrest (CA) is a rare but catastrophic event. This case-control study aims to analyze the causes, incidence, and outcomes of all pediatric CA reported to Wake Up Safe. Factors associated with CA and mortality after arrest are examined and possible strategies for improving outcomes are considered. METHODS: CA in children was identified from the Wake Up Safe Pediatric Anesthesia Quality Improvement Initiative, a multicenter registry of adverse events in pediatric anesthesia. Incidence, demographics, underlying conditions, causes of CA, and outcomes were extracted. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to study the above factors associated with CA and mortality after CA. RESULTS: A total of 531 cases of CA occurred during 1,006,685 anesthetics. CA was associated with age (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] comparing ≥6 vs <6 months of 0.26 [0.22-0.32]; P = .014), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS III-V versus I-II, 9.24, 7.23-11.8; P < .001), and emergency status (3.55, 2.88-4.37; P < .001). Higher ASA PS was associated with increased mortality (ASA PS III-V versus I-II, 3.25, 1.20-8.81; P = .02) but anesthesia-related arrests were correlated with lower mortality (0.44, 0.26-0.74; P = .002). ASA emergency status (1.83, 1.05-3.19; P = .03) and off hours (night and weekend versus weekday, 2.17, 1.22-3.86; P = .008) were other factors associated with mortality after CA. CONCLUSIONS: The Wake Up Safe data validate single-institution studies' findings regarding incidence, factors associated with arrest, and outcomes of pediatric perioperative CA. However, CA occurring during the off hours had significantly worse outcomes, independent of patient physical status or emergency surgery. This suggests an opportunity for improved outcomes.

Timing of enterostomy closure for neonatal isolated intestinal perforation.

PURPOSE: No consensus guidelines exist for timing of enterostomy closure in neonatal isolated intestinal perforation (IIP). This study evaluated neonates with IIP closed during the initial admission (A1) versus a separate admission (A2) comparing total length of stay and total hospital cost. METHODS: Using 2012 to 2017 Pediatric Health information System (PHIS) data, 359 neonates with IIP were identified who underwent enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure. Two hundred sixty-five neonates (A1) underwent enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure during the same admission. Ninety-four neonates (A2) underwent enterostomy creation at initial admission and enterostomy closure during subsequent admission. For the A2 neonates, total hospital length of stay was calculated as the sum of hospital days for both admissions. A1 neonates were matched to A2 neonates in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Multivariate models were used to compare the two matched pair groups for length of stay and cost comparisons. RESULTS: Prior to matching, the basic demographics of our study population included a median birthweight of 960 g, mean gestational age of 29.5 weeks, and average age at admission of 4 days. Eighty-seven pairs of neonates with IIP were identified during the matching process. Neonates in A2 had 91% shorter total hospital length of stay compared to A1 neonates (HR: 1.91; 95% CI for HR: 1.44-2.53; p < .0001). The median length of stay for A1 was 95 days (95% CI: 78-102 days) versus A2 length of stay of 67 days (95% CI: 56-76 days). Adjusting for the same covariates, A2 neonates had a 22% reduction in the average total cost compared A1 neonates (RR: 0.78; 95% CI for RR: 0.64-0.95; p-value = 0.014). The average total costs were $245,742.28 for A2 neonates vs. $315,052.21 for A1 neonates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Neonates with IIP have a 28 day shorter hospital length of stay, $75,000 or 24% lower total hospital costs, and a 22 day shorter post-operative course following enterostomy closure when enterostomy creation and closure is performed on separate admissions. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

24-hour and 30-day perioperative mortality in pediatric surgery.

PURPOSE: The low perioperative mortality rate in pediatric surgery precludes effective analysis of mortality at individual institutions. Therefore, analysis of multi-institutional data is essential to determine any patterns of perioperative death in children. The aim of this study was to determine diagnoses associated with 24-hour and 30-day perioperative mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of the 2012-2015 Pediatric Participant Use Data File (PUF) was performed. Statistical comparisons were made between survivors and nonsurvivors and between those with 24-hour and 30-day mortality using Fischer's exact tests. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: 103,444 patients who underwent a pediatric surgical operation were evaluated. There were 732 deaths with a 30-day perioperative mortality of 0.7% (732/103,444). Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was the diagnosis associated with the highest 30-day perioperative mortality (175/901, 19%). A significantly higher proportion NEC deaths occurred in the first 24 hours (67% (118/175) vs 33% (57/175) 30 day mortality, p<0.001). Compared to patients who survived following operation for NEC, those who died were statistically more likely to require inotropic support (56% vs. 15%, p<0.001), be diagnosed with sepsis (52% vs. 22%, p < 0.001), and undergo blood transfusion within 48 hours of operation (49% vs. 34%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the overall pediatric surgical operative mortality rate is low, the largest proportion of perioperative deaths occur secondary to NEC. Based on the high immediate mortality, optimization of operative care for septic patients with NEC should be targeted. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Barriers to Breastfeeding in Female Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Breast milk is considered the normative nutrition for human infants, and exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life is recommended by several national and global societies. Female physicians are a high-risk group for early unintended weaning. We aimed to assess and compare the most common barriers to successful breastfeeding perceived by female physicians in various stages of training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female faculty physicians and trainees (medical students, resident physicians, and fellows) affiliated with a large medical university in 2016 were surveyed via an anonymous web-based survey distributed through institutional e-mail lists. The three-item survey assessed role, breastfeeding experience, and perceived barriers to successful breastfeeding. Comparisons between groups were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 1,301 women with 223 responses included in analysis. The majority (57%) of respondents had never breastfed; of those, 87% reported plans to breastfeed in the future. Ninety-seven percent of women with breastfeeding experience reported at least one perceived barrier to successful breastfeeding. Trainees identified more barriers compared with faculty physicians (median count 5 versus 3, p = 0.014). No individual barrier reached statistical significance when comparing between faculty and trainees. The most frequently identified barriers to breastfeeding were lack of time and appropriate place to pump breast milk, unpredictable schedule, short maternity leave, and long working hours. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and medical students who breastfeed face occupation-related barriers that could lead to early unintended weaning. Trainees and faculty report similar barriers. Institutional support may help improve some barriers to successful breastfeeding in female physicians.

Pediatric vascular trauma practice patterns and resource availability: A survey of American College of Surgeon-designated pediatric trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Variation exists in pediatric vascular trauma management. We aim to determine practice patterns for vascular trauma management at American College of Surgeons verified pediatric trauma centers and evaluate the resources available for management of vascular trauma at both freestanding children's hospitals (FSCH) and pediatric hospitals within general adult hospitals. METHODS: Pediatric surgeons and trauma medical directors at American College of Surgeons designated pediatric surgery trauma centers completed a survey designed to evaluate anticipated management of traumatic arterial injuries and resource availability. Hospital setting comparisons were made using Fisher exact tests and t tests. Binomial tests were used to compare pediatric and vascular surgeons' responses to clinical vignettes. p Values of 0.05 or less were significant. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six (42%) of 414 pediatric surgeons participated. Vascular surgeons are more likely to operatively manage vascular trauma at all anatomic sites except subclavian artery when compared to pediatric surgeons, regardless of hospital setting (p <0.001). Forty-eight percent of the pediatric trauma medical directors completed their portion of the survey. At FSCHs, 36% did not have a fellowship-trained vascular surgeon on-call schedule, 27% did not have endovascular capabilities, and 18% did not have a radiology technologist always available. CONCLUSION: Vascular surgeons are more likely to manage pediatric vascular trauma regardless of hospital setting. However, FSCH have fewer resources available to provide optimal care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, level IV.

Resource utilization and indications for helicopter transport of head-injured children.

INTRODUCTION: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) have provided benefit for severely injured patients. However, HEMS are likely overused for the transportation of both adult and pediatric trauma patients. In this study, we aim to evaluate the degree of overuse of helicopter as a mode of transport for head-injured children. In addition, we propose criteria that can be used to determine if a particular patient is suitable for air versus ground transport. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who were transported to our facility for head injuries. We included only those patients who were transported from another facility and who were seen by the neurosurgical service. We recorded a number of data points including age, gender, race, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and intubation status. We also collected data on a number of imaging findings such as mass effect, edema, intracranial hemorrhage, and skull fractures. Patients undergoing emergent nonneurosurgical intervention were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 373 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 116 (31.1%) underwent a neurosurgical procedure or died and were deemed appropriate for helicopter transport. The remaining 68.9% of patients survived their injuries without neurosurgical intervention and were deemed nonappropriate for helicopter transport. Multivariable logistic regression identified GCS 3-8 and/or presence of mass effect, edema, epidural hematoma (EDH), and open-depressed skull fracture as appropriate indications for helicopter transport. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients transported to our facility by helicopter survived their head injury without need for neurosurgical intervention. Only those patients meeting clinical (GCS 3-8) or radiographic (mass effect, edema, EDH, open-depressed skull fracture) criteria should be transported by air. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Diagnostic Study).