Virtual vs in-person otolaryngology evaluation: The patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient responses to validated satisfaction surveys for in-person vs virtual otolaryngology ambulatory evaluation. METHODS: National Research Corporation (NRC) Health patient survey answers between April 2020 and February 2021 were divided into in-person and virtual visit modalities. Responses were compared with two group t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Relationships between visit modality by gender, age, race, and sub-specialty visit type and satisfaction scores were examined by testing interactions with separate ANOVA models. RESULTS: 1242 in-person and 216 virtual patient satisfaction survey responses were highly favorable for all themes (communication, comprehension of treatment plan, and likelihood of future referral) with both visit modalities. Higher satisfaction for in-person evaluation was seen with communication ("care providers listened" 3.68 (0.67)-on a scale of 1-no to 4-yes, definitely) vs 3.57 (0.78), p = 0.0426; "courtesy/respect" 3.75 (0.62) vs 3.66 (0.69), p = 0.0265)), and comprehension of treatment plan ("enough info about treatment" 3.53 (0.79) vs 3.37 (0.92), p = 0.0120; "know what to do" 3.62 (0.76) vs 3.46 (0.88), p = 0.0023)). No differences were detected for future referral of clinic or provider. There was no association between visit modality and patient sociodemographic factors or sub-specialty visit types. Main effects were observed with respect to race, gender, and sub-specialty visit type. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction scores for virtual visit evaluation were high and comparable to in-person evaluation, with a slight preference for in-person. Future studies are needed to identify which patients and conditions are particularly suited for virtual vs in-person delivery of otolaryngology services.

Volume and Practice-Setting Shift of Laryngology Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Reg-ENT Database Analysis.

Objective: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed practice patterns throughout medicine. The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in the volume and location setting of laryngology procedures after the onset of COVID-19. Study Design: Retrospective database cohort study. Setting: Reg-ENT registry. Methods: Retrospective review from 2017 to 2022 of patients who underwent a laryngology procedure identified by procedure code categorized by site of service code-"ambulatory surgical" versus "office" setting. Based on March 2020 as the cutoff point, the procedures were designated as pre-COVID versus COVID time period. Results: A total of 5989 patients underwent laryngology procedures. Forty-two percent more procedures were performed in the COVID period (n = 3780) versus pre-COVID (n = 2209). Pre-COVID, the procedure distribution between office and ambulatory surgical setting was 70% (n = 1546) compared with 30% (663). This shifted to 77% (n = 2920) and 23% (n = 860) during COVID, P = .9. The most common diagnoses associated with laryngology procedures during the study period were vocal fold paralysis 47% (n = 2831), dysphonia 33% (n = 1392), and laryngotracheal stenosis 14% (n = 838). These trends remained in both pre-COVID and COVID time periods. After the start of the pandemic, among patients undergoing laryngology procedures, there was a 93% increase (n = 284-549) in the diagnosis of laryngotracheal stenosis, 70% increase (n = 520-882 patients) in dysphonia and 69% increase (n = 1054-1777) in vocal fold paralysis. Conclusion: An increase in laryngology procedures performed after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was identified with an overall procedural shift to the office-setting.

Risk of Post-Intubation Laryngotracheal Stenosis With Respect to COVID-19 Status in a Large Multicenter Cohort Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Occurrence of post-intubation laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) with respect to COVID-19 status. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional inpatient database. SETTING: Eleven Midwest academic and community hospitals, United States. PATIENTS: Adults, mechanically ventilated, from January 2020 to August 2022, who were subsequently readmitted within 6 months with a new diagnosis of LTS. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Six thousand eight hundred fifty-one COVID-19 negative and 1316 COVID-19 positive patients were intubated and had similar distribution by age (median 63.77 vs. 63.16 yr old), sex (male, 60.8%; n = 4173 vs. 60%; n = 789), endotracheal tube size (≥ 7.5, 75.8%; n = 5192 vs. 75.5%; n = 994), and comorbidities. The ICU length of stay (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 7.23 d [2.13-16.67 d] vs. 3.95 d [1.91-8.88 d]) and mechanical ventilation days (median [IQR], 5.57 d [1.01-14.18 d] vs. 1.37 d [0.35-4.72 d]) were longer in the COVID-19 positive group. The occurrence of LTS was double in the COVID-19 positive group (12.7%, n = 168 vs. 6.4%, n = 440; p < 0.001) and was most commonly diagnosed within 60 days of intubation. In multivariate analysis, the risk of LTS increased by 2% with each additional ICU day (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03; p < 0.001), by 3% with each additional day of ventilation (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; p < 0.001), and by 52% for each additional reintubation (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.71; p < 0.001). We observed no significant association COVID-19 status and risk of LTS. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of post-intubation LTS was double in a COVID-19 positive cohort, with higher risk with increasing number of days intubated, days in the ICU and especially with the number of reintubations. COVID-19 status was not an independent risk factor for LTS.

Endoscopic treatment of subglottic stenosis with flexible bronchoscopy via laryngeal mask airway.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment of subglottic stenosis with flexible bronchoscopy via laryngeal mask airway (LMA) approach. METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent endoscopic surgery for subglottic stenosis (SGS) from November 2019 to January 2023 at an academic medical center were reviewed with attention to demographics, patient comorbidities, airway stenosis characteristics, operative time details, surgical complications, and post-operative course. All patients, >18 years old, with one or more surgeries for SGS using (LMA) for intraoperative airway management were included. Surgeries with suspension microlaryngoscopy were excluded. Patients with glottic stenosis or tracheotomy were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients underwent 52 procedures meeting inclusion criteria. Mean age was 55 years (range 31-78, SD 13.3) and 33 patients (94%) were female. Mean BMI was 30.9 (range 18.4-60.5, SD 8.8). The most common etiology of stenosis was intubation injury in 17 patients (49%), followed by idiopathic in 13 patients (37%). Cotton-Meyer grade 3 (71-99% narrowing) was seen in 25 patients (71%). Mean anesthesia and surgical operative times were 75.9 min (SD 13.5 min) and 39.7 min (SD 11.0 min), respectively. Mean SpO2 nadir was 94.5% (SD 6.3%). No patients required intraoperative change to rigid laryngoscopy, intubation, or tracheotomy. There were no post-operative complications. Mean surgery-free interval was 12.2 months (SD 6.3). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of subglottic stenosis with flexible bronchoscopy and spontaneous ventilation via LMA approach is a safe and effective option, especially in patients with limitations for rigid laryngoscopy and elevated BMI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Four (case series) Laryngoscope, 2023.

Systemic Steroids for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Disorders: An Evidence-Based Primer for Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To offer pragmatic, evidence-informed guidance on the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for common otolaryngologic disorders. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation clinical practice guidelines. REVIEW METHODS: A comprehensive search of published literature through November 2021 was conducted on the efficacy of SCS, alone or in combination with other treatments, for managing disorders in otolaryngology and the subdisciplines. Clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials, when available, were preferentially retrieved. Interventions and outcomes of SCS use were compiled to generate summary tables and narrative synthesis of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the effectiveness of SCS varies widely across otolaryngology disorders. High-level evidence supports SCS use for Bell's palsy, sinonasal polyposis, and lower airway disease. Conversely, evidence is weak or absent for upper respiratory tract infection, eustachian tube dysfunction, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, or nonallergic rhinitis. Evidence is indeterminate for acute laryngitis, acute pharyngitis, acute sinusitis, angioedema, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps, Ménière's disease, postviral olfactory loss, postoperative nerve paresis/paralysis, facial pain, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinicians should bring an evidence-informed lens to SCS prescribing to best counsel patients regarding the risks, anticipated benefits, and limited data on long-term effects. Alternate routes of corticosteroid administration-such as sprays, drops, inhalers, and intralesional injections-may be preferable for many disorders, particularly those that are self-limited or require a prolonged duration of therapy. Prudent use of SCS reduces the risk of medication-related adverse effects. Clinicians who are conversant with high-level evidence can achieve optimal outcomes and stewardship when prescribing SCS.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual vs In-Person Voice Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference in patient satisfaction between in-person and virtual voice therapy. METHODS: Patient satisfaction answers to the National Research Corporation (NRC) Health patient survey were retrieved for two separate 11 month periods. The first was for an in-person cohort, from April 2019 to February 2020. The second was for a virtual cohort between April 2020 and February 2021. Two group t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare responses between the in-person and virtual cohorts. The effect of modality of therapy by gender, age, and race was examined by testing interactions with separate ANOVA models. RESULTS: Responses were compared between 224 patient satisfaction surveys for the virtual cohort and 309 patient satisfaction surveys for the in-person cohort. Overall, responses were highly favorable in all categories. There were no differences between the in-person and virtual cohorts' responses with respect to three main categories: likelihood of future referral of clinic or provider; communication with provider; and comprehension of the treatment plan. The interaction between modality of therapy delivery and age was significant for the question, "Did you know what to do after your visit," with 18-44 year olds in the in-person group reporting a better understanding of the treatment plan compared to the 18-44 year olds in the virtual therapy cohort (P = 0.004). There were no interactions between modality of therapy and gender, or race. CONCLUSION: Virtual delivery of voice therapy was associated with comparable visit satisfaction scores to in-person delivery, with both delivery modalities demonstrating very high satisfaction. Future studies are needed to identify which patients and conditions are most suited for virtual versus in-person delivery of speech-language pathology services in voice clinics.

Three-dimensional vocal fold structural change due to implant insertion in medialization laryngoplasty.

Glottal insufficiency due to vocal fold paralysis, paresis, or atrophy often leads to degraded voice quality. One of the primary surgical intervention procedures to treat glottal insufficiency is medialization laryngoplasty, in which an implant is inserted through a lateral window on the thyroid cartilage to medialize the vocal folds. While the goal of medialization is to modify the vocal fold structure to restore normal phonation, few studies have attempted to quantify such structural changes of the vocal folds. The goal of this study is to quantify the three-dimensional structural changes of the vocal folds due to implant insertion in medialization laryngoplasty, and evaluate its potential effect on voice production. Medialization laryngoplasty were performed in excised human larynges using implants of different stiffness. Magnetic resonance images of the larynges were obtained with and without implant insertion. The results showed that implant insertion significantly changed the original body-cover structure of the vocal folds, with the implant taking over the large space used to be occupied by the original body layer and the vocal fold being stretched into a thin layer wrapped around the implant. The medial-lateral dimension of the vocal fold was significantly reduced from about 4 mm to 1 mm, and the vocal fold was stretched in the coronal plane by about 70%. It is hypothesized that use of implants with stiffness comparable to that of the vocal folds is beneficial because the degree of medialization can be adjusted without much negative effects on phonation frequency, phonation threshold pressure, or vibration amplitude.

Bridging bronchus (pseudocarina) and left pulmonary artery sling: A case report and literature review.

Congenital airway malformations can present with respiratory distress, cyanosis, and difficulty feeding in the neonate or infant. Clinical presentation may vary from asymptomatic to fatal airway obstruction. They may exist in isolation or in association with vascular rings and slings, bronchopulmonary malformations, and/or syndromes. We present an unusual case of bridging bronchus, complete bronchial rings, and left pulmonary artery sling presenting with recurrent croup, highlighting the importance of bronchoscopy and CT imaging to achieve an accurate diagnosis in patients with recurrent croup and/or respiratory failure not responding to usual treatment measures and a multidisciplinary treatment approach.