Safety and immunogenicity of a next-generation live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine produced in a Vero cell line in the USA: a phase 1 randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent outbreaks between 2015-17 and production delays have led to a yellow fever vaccine shortage. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new yellow fever vaccines with improved production scalability. A next-generation live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine candidate (vYF), produced in a Vero cell line has shown similar immunogenicity to licensed yellow fever vaccines in preclinical studies. In this study, we aimed to report the safety and immunogenicity of vYF in human clinical trial participants. METHODS: In this first in-human, phase 1 randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial conducted at a single centre in the USA (Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA), 72 healthy adults (aged 18-60 years), without a known history of flavivirus infection or vaccination were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using interactive response technology to receive one dose of either vYF at 4, 5 or 6 Log CCID50 or the licensed YF-VAX (18 individuals per group). The primary outcomes were safety, neutralising antibody (NAb) titres through D180 post-vaccination in the per-protocol analysis set (comprised of yellow fever-naive participants who received their intended vaccine and provided a valid post-vaccination blood sample), and occurrence, and level of yellow fever viraemia in each vaccine group through D14 post-vaccination. FINDINGS: All vYF doses had a safety and tolerability profile similar to YF-VAX. The most frequently reported solicited injection site reactions (vYF groups vs YF-VAX group) were pain (22% [12 of 54 participants, 95% CI 12-36] vs 28% [five of 18 participants, 10-54]), and erythema (13% [seven of 54 participants, 5-25] vs 39% [seven of 18 participants, 17-64]), with headache (32% [17 of 54 participants, 20-46] vs 44% [eight of 18 participants, 22-69]) and malaise (26% [14 of 54 participants, 15-40] vs 33% [six of 18 participants, 13-59]) as the most frequently reported solicited systemic reactions. One grade 3 solicited reaction (erythema) reported in the YF-VAX group resolved spontaneously. No serious unsolicited adverse events or deaths were reported. Viraemia was transiently detected in 50 participants between D4 and D10 in all groups and was observed in more participants or for a longer time in the vYF 6 Log CCID50 and YF-VAX groups. All yellow fever-naive vaccine recipients across the study groups seroconverted yielding four-fold increase from baseline in yellow fever NAb titres measured by yellow fever microneutralisation assay by D28 and were seroprotected with yellow fever NAb titres of at least 10 [1/dil]). Overall, 100% (18 of 18 participants, 95% CI 82-100), 89% (16 participants, 65-99), 100% (18 participants, 82-100), and 94% (17 participants, 73-100) of participants in the vYF 4 Log, vYF 5 Log, vYF 6 Log CCID50 groups, and YF-VAX group, respectively, remained seroprotected through D180. INTERPRETATION: vYF has a similar safety and immunogenicity profile to YF-VAX. In general, the vYF 5 Log CCID50 dose appeared to show optimal viraemia, safety, and immunogenicity, and was chosen for subsequent development. FUNDING: Sanofi.

A phase IIA extension study evaluating the effect of booster vaccination with a fractional dose of RTS,S/AS01E in a controlled human malaria infection challenge.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that RTS,S/AS01B and RTS,S/AS01E vaccination regimens including at least one delayed fractional dose can protect against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) model, and showed inferiority of a two-dose versus three-dose regimen. In this follow-on trial, we evaluated whether fractional booster vaccination extended or induced protection in previously protected (P-Fx) or non-protected (NP-Fx) participants. METHODS: 49 participants (P-Fx: 25; NP-Fx: 24) received a fractional (1/5th dose-volume) RTS,S/AS01E booster 12 months post-primary regimen. They underwent P. falciparum CHMI three weeks later and were then followed for six months for safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Overall vaccine efficacy against re-challenge was 53% (95% CI: 37-65%), and similar for P-Fx (52% [95% CI: 28-68%]) and NP-Fx (54% [95% CI: 29-70%]). Efficacy appeared unaffected by primary regimen or previous protection status. Anti-CS (repeat region) antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) increased post-booster vaccination. GMCs were maintained over time in primary three-dose groups but declined in the two-dose group. Protection after re-challenge was associated with higher anti-CS antibody responses. The booster was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A fractional RTS,S/AS01E booster given one year after completion of a primary two- or three-dose RTS,S/AS01 delayed fractional dose regimen can extend or induce protection against CHMI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03824236. linked to this article can be found on the Research Data as well as Figshare https://figshare.com/s/ee025150f9d1ac739361.

A first in human clinical trial assessing the safety and immunogenicity of transcutaneously delivered enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli fimbrial tip adhesin with heat-labile enterotoxin with mutation R192G.

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a leading cause of diarrhea among travelers and pediatric populations worldwide. The tip-localized adhesin of colonization factor antigen (CFA)/I fimbriae was engineered as a donor strand complemented variant (dscCfaE) and delivered via transcutaneous immunization. Preclinical vaccine testing demonstrated safety, immunogenicity and efficacy. A series of open-label dose-escalating phase 1 studies evaluated a 3-dose (days 0, 21, 42) regimen via a transcutaneous skin patch. A total of forty-six subjects were enrolled into one of four vaccine dose levels (10, 50, 250, or 1250 µg) co-administered with single-mutant heat-labile enterotoxin (LTR(192G)). At the 50 µg dose level, ten subjects received the dscCfaE vaccine without LT(R192G). The vaccine was well tolerated with mild local vaccine site reactions characterized by an erythematous papular rash and pruritus, which were less frequent and reactive in the group not receiving LT(R192G). The frequency of responses to dscCfaE were moderate, whereas anti-toxin responses (serum IgA/IgG) ranged from 75 to 100% across groups that received LT(R192G). Antigen-specific antibody-secreting cell responses were elicited at all dose levels, but were generally low. Follow-on studies will optimize construct and route of delivery and assess efficacy in an ETEC challenge study.