[ESR study of the state of manganganese in chloroplasts]. / Issledovanie sostoianiia margantes v khloroplastakh metodm EPR.

In chloroplasts isolated in tris-HCl buffer in the presence of 0.1 M NaCl or in the absence of salts an asymmetric ESR spectrum of Mn2+ was observed which differs in shape from the ESR spectrum of Mn2+ aquanions usually observed in chloroplasts treated with ultrasonics, reducer, 0.8 M tis-HCl buffer, pH 8. The transition from asymmmetric spectrum to the symetric one takes place in the presence of reducers and in some cases is induced with light. Causes of asymmetry of the ESR spectrum of Mn2+ in chloroplasts are discussed.

Local field potentials related to bimanual movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices.

We recorded local field potentials (LFP) in primary (MI) and supplementary (SMA) motor areas of rhesus monkey cortex in order to compare movement-evoked potentials (mEP) in bimanual and unimanual movements with single-unit activity recorded concurrently. The mEP was often different during bimanual and unimanual movements (a "bimanual-related" effect), but, unlike the single units, the size of the mEP in both MI and SMA was always greater during bimanual movements than during unimanual movements. This increase primarily reflected an increase in the late positive peak of the mEP, a result that may reflect greater overall cortical activation during bimanual movements. In addition, analysis of the mEP revealed differences between MI and SMA not seen in the single-unit activity. mEP in MI had greater contralateral preference than in SMA. Also, SMA mEP was more correlated to the single-unit activity than in MI. This greater correlation was also more apparent in the late peaks of the mEP than in the early peaks and may reflect a greater influence of recurrent activation in SMA than in MI. Our results further reinforce the idea that unimanual and bimanual movements are represented differently both in MI and in SMA and also show that a complex relationship between spikes of individual neurons and LFP may reflect the different input-output relations of different cortical areas.

Neural interactions between motor cortical hemispheres during bimanual and unimanual arm movements.

Cortico-cortical connections through the corpus callosum are a major candidate for mediating bimanual coordination. However, aside from the deficits observed after lesioning this connection, little positive evidence indicates its function in bimanual tasks. In order to address this issue, we simultaneously recorded neuronal activity at multiple sites within the arm area of motor cortex in both hemispheres of awake primates performing different bimanual and unimanual movements. By employing an adapted form of the joint peri-stimulus time histogram technique, we discovered rapid movement-related correlation changes between the local field potentials (LFPs) of the two hemispheres that escaped detection by time-averaged cross-correlation methods. The frequency and amplitude of dynamic modifications in correlations between the hemispheres were similar to those within the same hemisphere. As in previous EEG studies, we found that, on average, correlation decreased during movements. However, a subset of recording site pairs did show transiently increased correlations around movement onset (57% of all pairs and conditions in monkey G, 39% in monkey P). In interhemispheric pairs, these increases were consistently related to the mode of coupling between the two arms. Both the correlations between the movements themselves and the interhemispheric LFP correlation increases were strongest during bimanual symmetric movements, and weaker during bimanual asymmetric and unimanual movements. Increased correlations occurred mainly around movement onset, whilst decreases in correlation dominated during movement execution. The task-specific way in which interhemispheric correlations are modulated is compatible with the notion that interactions between the hemispheres contribute to behavioural coupling between the arms.

Neuronal populations in primary motor cortex encode bimanual arm movements.

Previous studies have shown that activity of neuronal populations in the primary motor cortex (MI), processed by the population vector method, faithfully predicts upcoming movements. In our previous studies we found that single neurons responded differently during movements of one arm vs. combined movements of the two arms. It was, therefore, not clear whether the population vector approach could produce reliable movement predictions also for bimanual movements. This study tests this question by comparing the predictive quality of population vectors for unimanual and bimanual arm movements. We designed a bimanual motor task that requires coordinated movements of the two arms, in which each arm may move in eight directions, and recorded single unit activity in the MI of two rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys during the performance of unimanual and bimanual arm movements. We analysed the activity of 212 MI cells from both hemispheres and found that, despite bimanual related activity, the directional tuning and preferred directions of most cells were preserved in unimanual and bimanual movements. We demonstrate that population vectors, constructed from the activity of MI cells, predict accurately the direction of movement both for unimanual and for bimanual movements even when the two arms move simultaneously in different directions.

Single-unit activity related to bimanual arm movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices.

Single units were recorded from the primary motor (MI) and supplementary motor (SMA) areas of Rhesus monkeys performing one-arm (unimanual) and two-arm (bimanual) proximal reaching tasks. During execution of the bimanual movements, the task related activity of about one-half the neurons in each area (MI: 129/232, SMA: 107/206) differed from the activity during similar displacements of one arm while the other was stationary. The bulk of this "bimanual-related" activity could not be explained by any linear combination of activities during unimanual reaching or by differences in kinematics or recorded EMG activity. The bimanual-related activity was relatively insensitive to trial-to-trial variations in muscular activity or arm kinematics. For example, trials where bimanual arm movements differed the most from their unimanual controls did not correspond to the ones where the largest bimanual neural effects were observed. Cortical localization established by using a mixture of surface landmarks, electromyographic recordings, microstimulation, and sensory testing suggests that the recorded neurons were not limited to areas specifically involved with postural muscles. By rejecting this range of alternative explanations, we conclude that neural activity in MI as well as SMA can reflect specialized cortical processing associated with bimanual movements.

Timing of bimanual movements in human and non-human primates in relation to neuronal activity in primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area.

This study investigates the timing of bimanual movements in a combined behavioral and physiological approach. Human subjects and rhesus monkeys performed the same bimanual task. In monkeys, we simultaneously recorded neuronal activity in the two hemispheres of primary motor cortex (MI) or supplementary motor area (SMA), and related it to bimanual coordination in the temporal domain. Both for monkeys and humans, the reaction times of bimanual movements never significantly exceeded the reaction times of the slower arm in unimanual movements. Consistent with this, the longest delay between neural activity onset in SMA and MI and movement initiation was observed in unimanual movements of the slower arm and not in bimanual movements. Both results suggest that the programming of bimanual movements does not require more processing time than unimanual movements. They are also consistent with the view that bimanual movements are programmed in a single process, rather than by combining two separate unimanual movement plans. In both humans and monkeys, movement initiation was highly correlated between the arms. However, once movements began, the temporal correlation between the arms progressively declined. Movement decorrelation was accompanied by a net decorrelation of neuronal population activity in MI and SMA, suggesting a functional connection between neuronal interactions and the level of bimanual coupling and decoupling. The similarity of neuronal activities in MI and SMA in relationship to behavioral timing lends support to the idea that both areas are involved in the temporal coordination of the arms.

Primary motor cortex is involved in bimanual coordination.

Many voluntary movements involve coordination between the limbs. However, there have been very few attempts to study the neuronal mechanisms that mediate this coordination. Here we have studied the activity of cortical neurons while monkeys performed tasks that required coordination between the two arms. We found that most neurons in the primary motor cortex (MI) show activity specific to bimanual movements (bimanual-related activity), which is strikingly different from the activity of the same neurons during unimanual movements. Moreover, units in the supplementary motor area (SMA; the area of cortex most often associated with bimanual coordination) showed no more bimanual-related activity than units in MI. Our results challenge the classic view that MI controls the contralateral (opposite) side of the body and that SMA is responsible for the coordination of the arms. Rather, our data suggest that both cortical areas share the control of bilateral coordination.