RESUMO
ICER (inducible cAMP early repressor) isoforms are transcriptional repressors encoded by the Crem (cAMP responsive element modulator) gene. They were linked to the regulation of a multitude of cellular processes and pathophysiological mechanisms. Here, we show for the first time that two independent induction patterns for CREM repressor isoforms exist in the heart, namely for ICER and smICER (small ICER), which are induced in response to ß-adrenergic stimulation in a transient- and saturation-like manner, respectively. This time-shifted induction pattern, driven by two internal promoters in the Crem gene, leads to the predominant transcription of smIcer after prolonged ß-adrenergic stimulation. Using an ICER knockout mouse model with preserved smICER induction, we show that the transient-like induction of Icer itself has minor effects on gene regulation, cardiac hypertrophy or contractile function in the heart. We conclude that the functions previously linked to ICER may be rather attributed to smICER, also beyond the cardiac background.
Assuntos
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Modulador de Elemento de Resposta do AMP Cíclico/genética , Receptores Adrenérgicos beta/genética , Animais , Cardiomegalia/tratamento farmacológico , Linhagem Celular , Feminino , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/genética , Células HEK293 , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Camundongos Knockout , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/efeitos dos fármacos , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Transcrição Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Transcrição Gênica/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib, as inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAK), interrupts the transmission of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Therefore, tofacitinib provides a potent option to treat ulcerative colitis (UC). Besides the anti-inflammatory potential, inhibition of widespread JAKs carries the risk of side effects. Macrophages are involved in the form of different subtypes in inflammation, wound healing, and even coagulation. This study aimed to explore the balanced use of tofacitinib in M1-like as well as M2-like macrophages of healthy donors and patients with IBD. METHODS: Monocytes of healthy donors and patients with chronic courses of IBD were obtained from blood samples. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)-derived macrophages were treated with tofacitinib (1 µM, 5 µM, 10 µM) and polarized with either lipopolysaccharide and interferon (IFN)-γ towards M1-like-phenotype or with interleukin (IL)-4 towards M2-like-phenotype. ELISA and flow cytometry were used to evaluate cytokine levels and surface molecules. RESULTS: Tofacitinib had a modulating effect on M1-like macrophages whereby the effect on pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1ß, IL-12, IL-23) was less pronounced than the induction of anti-inflammatory IL-10. However, during M2-like polarization tofacitinib impaired the development of the corresponding phenotype becoming evident through decreased IL-10 levels and CD206 expression in treated macrophages. In both phenotypes, tofacitinib strongly downregulated the expression of immunostimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, CD83, CD40). Furthermore, a dose-dependent correlation between treatment with tofacitinib and expressed tissue factor was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib influences both polarizations (M1/M2) and the expression of tissue factor in a dose-dependent manner.
This study revealed a dose-dependent effect of tofacitinib on both M1-like and M2-like polarization, resulting in a decreased development of the corresponding phenotype. Furthermore, the applied dose of tofacitinib correlated with the expressed tissue factor in M1-like macrophages.