Analysis of bi-atrial function using CMR feature tracking and long-axis shortening approaches in patients with diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial function can be assessed using advancing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) post-processing methods: atrial feature tracking (FT) strain analysis or a long-axis shortening (LAS) technique. This study aimed to first compare the two FT and LAS techniques in healthy individuals and cardiovascular patients and then investigated how left (LA) and right atrial (RA) measurements are related to the severity of diastolic dysfunction or atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Sixty healthy controls and 90 cardiovascular disease patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation, underwent CMR. LA and RA were analyzed for standard volumetry as well as for myocardial deformation using FT and LAS for the different functional phases (reservoir, conduit, booster). Additionally, ventricular shortening and valve excursion measurements were assessed with the LAS module. RESULTS: The measurements for each of the LA and RA phases were correlated (p < 0.05) between the two approaches, with the highest correlation coefficients occurring in the reservoir phase (LA: r = 0.83, p < 0.01, RA: r = 0.66, p < 0.01). Both methods demonstrated reduced LA (FT: 26 ± 13% vs 48 ± 12%, LAS: 25 ± 11% vs 42 ± 8%, p < 0.01) and RA reservoir function (FT: 28 ± 15% vs 42 ± 15%, LAS: 27 ± 12% vs 42 ± 10%, p < 0.01) in patients compared to controls. Atrial LAS and FT decreased with diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation. This mirrored ventricular dysfunction measurements. CONCLUSION: Similar results were generated for bi-atrial function measurements between two CMR post-processing approaches of FT and LAS. Moreover, these methods allowed for the assessment of incremental deterioration of LA and RA function with increasing left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation. A CMR-based analysis of bi-atrial strain or shortening discriminates patients with early-stage diastolic dysfunction prior to the presence of compromised atrial and ventricular ejection fractions that occur with late-stage diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation. KEY POINTS: • Assessing right and left atrial function with CMR feature tracking or long-axis shortening techniques yields similar measurements and could potentially be used interchangeably based on the software capabilities of individual sites. • Atrial deformation and/or long-axis shortening allow for early detection of subtle atrial myopathy in diastolic dysfunction, even when atrial enlargement is not yet apparent. • Using a CMR-based analysis to understand the individual atrial-ventricular interaction in addition to tissue characteristics allows for a comprehensive interrogation of all four heart chambers. In patients, this could add clinically meaningful information and potentially allow for optimal therapies to be chosen to better target the dysfunction.

Direct comparison of whole heart quantifications between different retrospective and prospective gated 4D flow CMR acquisitions.

Introduction: 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a versatile technique to non-invasively assess cardiovascular hemodynamics. With developing technology, choice in sequences and acquisition parameters is expanding and it is important to assess if data acquired with these different variants can be directly compared, especially when combining datasets within research studies. For example, sequences may allow a choice in gating techniques or be limited to one method, yet there is not a direct comparison investigating how gating selection impacts quantifications of the great vessels, semilunar and atrioventricular valves and ventricles. Thus, this study investigated if quantifications across the heart from contemporary 4D flow sequences are comparable between two commonly used 4D flow sequences reliant on different ECG gating techniques. Methods: Forty participants (33 healthy controls, seven patients with coronary artery disease and abnormal diastolic function) were prospectively recruited into a single-centre observational study to undergo a 3T-CMR exam. Two acquisitions, a k-t GRAPPA 4D flow with prospective gating (4Dprosp) and a modern compressed sensing 4D flow with retrospective gating (4Dretro), were acquired in each participant. Images were analyzed for volumes, flow rates and velocities in the vessels and four valves, and for biventricular kinetic energy and flow components. Data was compared for group differences with paired t-tests and for agreement with Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation (ICC). Results: Measurements primarily occurring during systole of the great vessels, semilunar valves and both left and right ventricles did not differ between acquisition types (p > 0.05 from t-test) and yielded good to excellent agreement (ICC: 0.75-0.99). Similar findings were observed for the majority of parameters dependent on early diastole. However, measurements occurring in late diastole or those reliant on the entire-cardiac cycle such as flow component volumes along with diastolic kinetic energy values were not similar between 4Dprosp and 4Dretro acquisitions resulting in poor agreement (ICC < 0.50). Discussion: Direct comparison of measurements between two different 4D flow acquisitions reliant on different gating methods demonstrated systolic and early diastolic markers across the heart should be compatible when comparing these two 4D flow sequences. On the other hand, late diastolic and intraventricular parameters should be compared with caution.