Effect of anteromedial and posterolateral anterior cruciate ligament bundles on resisting medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment subluxations.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the interaction of the anteromedial and posterolateral portions of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in resisting medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment subluxations under multiple loading conditions. METHODS: By use of a 6-df robotic simulator, 10 human cadaveric knees were tested in 3 states: intact ACL, partial ACL (loss of either the anteromedial bundle [AMB] or posterolateral bundle [PLB]), and deficient ACL. The testing profile involved anterior-posterior translation and internal-external rotation, as well as 3 pivot-shift loading conditions with varying internal rotation torque (1- or 5-Nm) and coupled anterior force (35- or 100-N). Digitization of anatomic landmarks provided tibiofemoral compartment translations and centers of tibial rotation. RESULTS: During pivot-shift testing (100-N anterior force, 1-Nm internal rotation torque, and 7-Nm valgus), the lateral and medial compartment anterior translation increased by a mean of 2.5 ± 0.8 mm (P = .016) and 3.4 ± 2.0 mm (P = .001), respectively, on AMB sectioning and 1.3 ± 0.9 mm (P = .329) and 0.6 ± 0.7 mm (P = .544), respectively, on PLB sectioning. Higher internal rotation torque (5 Nm v 1 Nm) on pivot-shift testing reduced central and medial anterior translation after ACL sectioning. There was no change in internal rotation on AMB or PLB sectioning. During the Lachman test (100-N), AMB and PLB sectioning increased central translation by 3.6 ± 1.6 mm (P = .001) and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm (P = .498), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACL bundles function synergistically in resisting medial and lateral compartment subluxations on the Lachman and pivot-shift tests. The AMB provided more restraint to anterior tibial translation during both tests as compared with the PLB. PLB sectioning produced no statistically significant change in anterior translation on the Lachman or pivot-shift test. Neither bundle contributed to resisting internal rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An ACL graft designed to duplicate the AMB would theoretically resist medial and lateral compartment anterior subluxations under multiple loading conditions. The PLB provides a secondary restraint at low flexion angles. Neither ACL bundle resists internal tibial rotation or allows a positive pivot-shift subluxation.

Anatomic Single-Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Restores Rotational Stability: A Robotic Study in Cadaveric Knees.

PURPOSE: First, we aimed to investigate the ability of a single bone-patellar tendon-bone graft placed in the anatomic center of the femoral and tibial attachment sites to restore normal tibiofemoral compartment translations and tibial rotation. Second, we aimed to investigate what combination of anterior load and internal rotation torque applied during a pivot-shift test produces maximal anterior tibiofemoral subluxations. METHODS: We used a 6-df robotic simulator to test 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens under anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact, ACL-sectioned, and ACL-reconstructed conditions measuring anterior translations of the medial, central, and lateral tibiofemoral compartments and degrees of tibial rotation. Specimens were loaded under Lachman, anterior limit, and internal rotation conditions, as well as 3 different pivot-shift conditions. RESULTS: On ACL sectioning, compartment translations in the Lachman and 3 pivot-shift tests increased significantly and were restored to ACL-intact values after single-graft ACL reconstruction. In the pivot-shift tests, the single graft restored lateral and medial compartment translations (e.g., group 3, within 1.3 ± 0.6 mm and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, of the ACL-intact state and internal rotation within 0.7° ± 1.2°). Anterior subluxation of the medial compartment during pivot-shift loading was reduced when internal rotation torque was increased from 1 to 5 Nm (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: A single-graft ACL reconstruction performed at the central femoral and tibial ACL attachment sites restored anterior-posterior translation and tibial rotation motion limits. In addition, rotational knee stability as defined by tibiofemoral compartment translations was restored under all simulated pivot-shift testing conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides in vitro evidence to support the clinical use of single-graft ACL reconstructions in restoring tibiofemoral compartment translations. It also shows the advantage of describing ACL insufficiency in terms of medial and lateral compartment subluxations as compared with the common approach of describing changes in central tibial translations and rotations.

One- and two-strand posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: cyclic fatigue testing.

This study examined how one- and two-strand posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions resist the return of posterior translation during repetitive knee cycling. The femoral attachment of the one-strand graft and the anterior strand of the two-strand (AD2) grafts were located within the anterior one-third of the femoral PCL footprint. The second strand was placed within the middle third of the femoral footprint in one of three locations: middle-distal (MD), middle-middle (MM), or middle-proximal (MP). During repetitive knee cycling from 5 degrees to 120 degrees flexion with a 100 N posterior force, the intact knee had less than 1mm of residual posterior translation after 2048 flexion-extension cycles. Under similar cyclic conditions, the AD2-MM reconstruction achieved the most cycles before failure; however, this two-strand configuration failed in less than 700 cycles. The other reconstructions, either one strand or two strand, failed in less than 350 cycles. The surface failure location for 19 of 25 graft strands was within the femoral one-third of the strand. We concluded that one- and two-strand reconstructions under moderate loading and a range of motion from 5 degrees to 120 degrees flexion have an unacceptably high cyclic failure rate suggesting modifications of the allowable postoperative knee flexion and loading.

Anterior cruciate ligament function in providing rotational stability assessed by medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations and subluxations.

BACKGROUND: Rotational knee stability provided by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the pivot-shift phenomena involves analysis of more complex robotic testing profiles and resulting tibiofemoral compartment kinematics and subluxations. HYPOTHESES: Using anterior-posterior tibial forces along with internal and valgus tibial moments will produce a major anterior subluxation of both tibiofemoral compartments not obtained with internal and valgus moments alone. Increasing the internal torque in pivot-shift testing will constrain the anterior subluxations of the medial and central tibial compartments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic knee testing system applied anterior translation and rotational loading profiles in 10 cadaveric knees before and after ACL sectioning. Changes in knee motion limits were measured, and medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations were determined by digitization of tibial plateau anatomic landmarks. Loading profiles simulated Lachman and tibial rotation tests as well as typical pivot-shift loading profiles from prior in vitro and in vivo studies. RESULTS: After ACL sectioning, anterior tibial translation increased by 10.3 ± 3.7 mm at 25° of flexion (P < .001). Internal tibial rotation increased by 1.6° ± 1.1° (5 N·m; P > .05). In pivot-shift tests (anterior translation, 100 N; internal rotation, 1 N·m; valgus, 7 N·m), the tibial rotation center shifted outside the medial tibial margin, with abnormal anterior translation of both compartments (medial, 12.9 ± 3.9 mm; lateral, 7.5 ± 3.7 mm; P < .001), with internal rotation decreasing by 4.1° ± 3.5° (P < .05). A greater internal rotation torque (5 vs 1 N·m) in the pivot-shift test constrained and limited anterior tibial translation and prevented anterior subluxation of the medial compartment (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Sectioning of the ACL produces major increases in tibiofemoral compartment translations and only small increases in internal tibial rotation. The simulation of the pivot shift requires a combined loading profile of anterior translation, internal rotation, and valgus, which produces the greatest anterior subluxation of the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. This testing profile is recommended to be included along with other loading profiles for future ACL studies. The application of a high internal rotation torque in cadaveric pivot-shift tests constrains anterior tibial subluxation of the medial and center compartments and appears less ideal for analysis of ACL function and graft reconstructions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be cautious in interpreting conclusions on ACL function and graft reconstructions without knowing the resulting tibiofemoral subluxations or loading conditions that may limit maximum anterior tibial femoral subluxations.

Reliability of a New Clinical Instrument for Measuring Internal and External Glenohumeral Rotation.

BACKGROUND: The shoulder plays a critical role in many overhead athletic activities. Several studies have shown alterations in shoulder range of motion (ROM) in the dominant shoulder of overhead athletes and correlation with significantly increased risk of injury to the shoulder and elbow. The purpose of this study was to measure isolated glenohumeral joint internal/external rotation (IR/ER) to determine inter- and intraobserver reliability of a new clinical device. HYPOTHESIS: (1) Inter- and intraobserver reliability would exceed 90% for measures of glenohumeral joint IR, ER, and total arc of motion; (2) the dominant arm would exhibit significantly increased ER, significantly decreased IR, and no difference in total arc of motion compared with the nondominant shoulder; and (3) a significant difference exists in total arc between male and female patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects (mean age, 23 years; range, 13-54 years) were tested by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. A single test consisted of 1 arc of motion from neutral to external rotation to internal rotation and back to neutral within preset torque limits. Each examiner performed 3 tests on the dominant and nondominant shoulders. Each examiner completed 2 installations. RESULTS: Testing reliability demonstrated that neither trial, installation, nor observer were significant sources of variation. The maximum standard deviation was 1.3° for total arc of motion and less than 2° for most other measurements. Dominant arm ER was significantly greater than nondominant arm ER (P = 0.02), and dominant arm IR was significantly less than nondominant arm IR (P = 0.00). Mean total rotation was 162°, with no significant differences in total rotation between dominant and nondominant arms (P = 0.34). Mean total arc of motion was 45° greater in female subjects. Differences in total arc of motion between male and female subjects was statistically significant (P < 0.00). CONCLUSION: This simple, clinical device allows for both inter- and intraobserver reliability measurements of glenohumeral internal and external rotation.

Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement.

BACKGROUND: Clinically, one-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions frequently result in the return of abnormal posterior translation. We hypothesized that the return of posterior translation is caused by a nonuniform distribution of load among the graft fibers. The purpose of the present study was to determine how the femoral attachment location of the second bundle of a two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects the anterior bundle tension and the load distribution between the graft bundles. METHODS: One and two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (one one-bundle type and three two-bundle types) were performed in nineteen cadaveric knees. The grafts were tensioned to restore posterior translation to within +/-1 mm of that of the intact knee at 90 degrees of flexion while a 100-N posterior force was applied to the proximal part of the tibia. For each reconstruction, the total graft tension was a minimum of 2.3 times larger than the applied posterior force. Bundle tension and knee motions were measured as the knee was cycled from 5 degrees to 120 degrees of flexion while a 100-N posterior force was applied. Analysis of variance was used to compare the four reconstructions, and post hoc testing was performed with use of Fischer's protected least significant difference method. RESULTS: Two-bundle reconstructions involving a middle-distal or middle-middle second bundle significantly reduced the tension in the anterior bundle in comparison with the tension in the one-bundle (anterior-distal) reconstruction. The peak anterior-bundle tensions with the middle-distal and middle-middle second bundles were 43% and 37% less than the peak bundle tension for the one-bundle reconstruction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). With the exception of the average bundle tension, the tension parameters calculated for the middle bundle decreased as the distance from the articular cartilage increased. The peak tensions for the middle-middle and middle-proximal bundles were 32% and 61% less than that for the middle-distal bundle (p = 0.028 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The femoral position of the second bundle significantly affected the tension in the anterior bundle and the load distribution. A second bundle placed in a middle or distal position resulted in a significant reduction in anterior bundle tension and in cooperative load-sharing (with the bundles functioning together). A proximal second bundle resulted in reciprocal loading (with one bundle functioning in flexion and one in extension), but the tension in the anterior bundle was not different from the tension in the one-bundle reconstruction.

Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures.

BACKGROUND: Previous descriptions of the insertion site of the posterior cruciate ligament are inadequate. HYPOTHESIS: More than one reference system is required to adequately represent the anatomy of the femoral attachment. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive anatomic study. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric specimens were evaluated by using two measurement methods relative to the femoral articular cartilage margin and two methods relative to the intercondylar femoral roof. RESULTS: Reference lines perpendicular to the articular cartilage best defined the 12- and 1-o'clock positions, and those perpendicular to the articular cartilage or parallel to the femoral shaft best defined the 2-, 3-, and 4-o'clock positions. The angle of the proximal attachment to the roof was 88 degrees +/- 5.5 degrees. The posterior cruciate ligament was a continuum of fibers rather than two distinct bundles, and its attachment showed variability in shape and thickness, extending past the midline in the notch (11:21 +/- 15 minutes to 4:12 +/- 20 minutes, right knee). CONCLUSIONS: More than one measurement system is required to accurately describe the femoral origin of the posterior cruciate ligament. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate assessment of the anatomy is crucial for successful surgical reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament femoral attachment.