Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 193, 2018 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855271

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adequate nutrition is essential during pregnancy and lactation to provide sufficient energy and nutrients to meet the nutritional requirements of the mother, fetus and infant. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of a maternal nutritional supplement enriched with probiotics during pregnancy and early lactation on the incidence of infant diarrhea. METHODS: Healthy, pregnant (24-28 weeks gestation) women were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either no supplement or two servings per day of an oral supplement (140 kcal/serving) providing 7.9 g protein, multivitamin/minerals, and enriched or not with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis, from the third trimester of pregnancy until at least 2 months post-delivery. Incidence of infant diarrhea until 12 months post-delivery was analyzed by Poisson regression. The effect on maternal health, fetal growth, and infant growth and morbidity were also evaluated and analyzed by ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 208 mother/infant pairs were included in the analysis. No significant difference in the incidence of infant diarrhea was observed between the three study groups. The mean maternal weight gains at delivery were similar among groups, despite an increase in caloric intake in the supplemented groups. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed in incidence of pregnancy-related or fetal adverse outcomes. Mean weight-, length-, BMI- and head circumference-for-age z-scores were below the WHO median value for all groups. Post-hoc analysis to compare the effect of the combined supplement groups versus the no supplement group on infant growth parameters showed, at 12 months, that the combined supplemented group had gained statistically significant more weight (8.97 vs. 8.61 kg, p = 0.001) and height (74.2 vs. 73.4 cm, p = 0.031), and had a higher weight-for-age z-score (- 0.62 vs. -0.88, p = 0.045) than the no supplement group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal nutritional supplement with or without probiotics given during late pregnancy and early lactation was well tolerated and safe. Even though no difference in incidence of infant diarrhea was observed between the three groups, the analysis of the combined supplemented groups showed beneficial effects of maternal supplementation on infant weight and length gains at 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01073033 . Registered 17.02.2010.


Assuntos
Bebidas , Suplementos Nutricionais , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição Materna , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Aleitamento Materno , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Desenvolvimento Fetal , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Saúde do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Lactação , Estado Nutricional , Filipinas/epidemiologia , Distribuição de Poisson , Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Análise de Regressão , Adulto Jovem
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (9): CD007855, 2010 Sep 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20824868

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria occurs in 5% to 10% of pregnancies and, if left untreated, can lead to serious complications. OBJECTIVES: To assess which antibiotic is most effective and least harmful as initial treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (March 2010) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing two antibiotic regimens for treating asymptomatic bacteriuria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently screened the studies for inclusion and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies involving 1140 women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. We did not perform meta-analysis; each trial examined different antibiotic regimens and so we were not able to pool results. In a study comparing a single dose of fosfomycin trometamol 3 g with a five-day course of cefuroxime, there was no significant difference in persistent infection (risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 7.75), shift to other antibiotics (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.45), or in allergy or pruritus (RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.11 to 65.24). A comparison of seven-day courses of 400 mg pivmecillinam versus 500 mg ampicillin, both given four times daily, showed no significant difference in persistent infection at two weeks or recurrent infection, but there was an increase in vomiting (RR 4.57, 95% CI 1.40 to 14.90) and women were more likely to stop treatment early with pivmecillinam (RR 8.82, 95% CI 1.16 to 66.95). When cephalexin 1 g versus Miraxid(R) (pivmecillinam 200 mg and pivampicillin 250 mg) were given twice-daily for three days, there was no significant difference in persistent or recurrent infection. A one- versus seven-day course of nitrofurantoin resulted in more persistent infection with the shorter course (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.40), but no significant difference in symptomatic infection at two weeks, nausea, or preterm birth. Comparing cycloserine with sulphadimidine, no significant differences in symptomatic, persistent, or recurrent infections were noted. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We cannot draw any definite conclusion on the most effective and safest antibiotic regimen for the initial treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. One study showed advantages with a longer course of nitrofurantoin, and another showed better tolerability with ampicillin compared with pivmecillinam; otherwise, there was no significant difference demonstrated between groups treated with different antibiotics. Given this lack of conclusive evidence, it may be useful for clinicians to consider factors such as cost, local availability and side effects in the selection of the best treatment option.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
5.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 145(1): 1-3, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785637
6.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 141(1): 2-4, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29388219
7.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 141(3): 284-286, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29536508
8.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 142(3): 257-259, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29943818
9.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 143(3): 264-266, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221371
11.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 138(3): 239-241, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28639272
12.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 136(3): 255-257, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28099746
13.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 137(3): 231-233, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369905
14.
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA