Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) for oesophageal cancer may reduce surgical complications compared with open oesophagectomy. MIO is, however, technically challenging and may impair optimal oncological resection. The aim of the present study was to assess if MIO for cancer is beneficial. METHODS: A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL was performed and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MIO with open oesophagectomy were included in a meta-analysis. Survival was analysed using individual patient data. Random-effects model was used for pooled estimates of perioperative effects. RESULTS: Among 3219 articles, six RCTs were identified including 822 patients. Three-year overall survival (56 (95 per cent c.i. 49 to 62) per cent for MIO versus 52 (95 per cent c.i. 44 to 60) per cent for open; P = 0.54) and disease-free survival (54 (95 per cent c.i. 47 to 61) per cent versus 50 (95 per cent c.i. 42 to 58) per cent; P = 0.38) were comparable. Overall complication rate was lower for MIO (odds ratio 0.33 (95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.53); P < 0.010) mainly due to fewer pulmonary complications (OR 0.44 (95 per cent c.i. 0.27 to 0.72); P < 0.010), including pneumonia (OR 0.41 (95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.77); P < 0.010). CONCLUSION: MIO for cancer is associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications compared with open resection. Overall and disease-free survival are comparable for the two techniques. LAY SUMMARY: Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated with a high risk of complications. A minimally invasive approach might be less traumatic, leading to fewer complications and may also improve oncological outcome. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive to open oesophagectomy was performed. The analysis showed that the minimally invasive approach led to fewer postoperative complications, in particular, fewer pulmonary complications. Survival after surgery was comparable for the two techniques.

Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated with a high risk of complications. A minimally invasive approach might be less traumatic, leading to fewer complications and may also improve oncological outcome. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive to open oesophagectomy was performed. The analysis showed that the minimally invasive approach led to fewer postoperative complications, in particular, fewer pulmonary complications. Survival after surgery was comparable for the two techniques.

Fit-for-Discharge Criteria after Esophagectomy: An International Expert Delphi Consensus.

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission.

Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process.

Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.

Impact of the Weekday of Surgery on Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients who Underwent D2-Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the weekday of surgery in major elective cases of the upper-GI has been discussed controversially. The objective of this study was to assess whether weekday of surgery influences outcome in patients undergoing D2-gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2016 were included. Weekday of surgery was recognized, and subgroups were analyzed regarding clinical and histopathological differences. Survival analysis was performed based on weekday of surgery, and early weekdays (Monday-Tuesday) were compared with late weekdays (Wednesday-Friday). RESULTS: In total, 460 patients, 71% male and 29% female, were included into analysis. The median age was 65 years. Distribution to each weekday was equal and ranged from 86 cases (Wednesday) to 96 cases (Tuesday). The pT, pN and M category and the rate of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment did not show significant differences (p = 0.641; p = 0.337; p = 0.752; p = 0.342, respectively). The subgroups did not differ regarding the number of dissected lymph nodes and rate of R-1/2 resections (p = 0.590; p = 0.241, respectively). Survival analysis showed a median survival of 43 months (95% CI 31-55 months), and there was no single weekday or a combination of weekdays (Mon/Tue vs Wed/Thu/Fri) with a significant favorable or worse outcome (p = 0.863; p = 0.30, respectively). The outcome did not differ regarding mortality within the first 90 days after surgery (p = 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: The present study does not show any evidence for a significant impact of weekday of surgery on short- and long-term outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic and histopathologic reflux-associated mucosal damage in the remnant esophagus following transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer-5-year long-term follow-up.

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem following esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric interposition. Despite a routine prescription of proton pump inhibitors, reflux-associated mucosal damage in the remnant esophagus is frequently observed. Purpose of this study is to evaluate mucosal damage in the esophageal remnant during long-term follow-up and to compare the prevalence of this damage between the subgroups of esophageal squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. All patients undergoing transthoracic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively entered in our IRB approved database. All patients underwent a routine check-up program with yearly surveillance endoscopies following esophagectomy. Only patients with a complete follow-up were included into this study. Endoscopic and histopathologic mucosal changes of the remnant esophagus were analyzed in close intervals. A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 31 adenocarcinomas (AC) and 19 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Mucosal damage was already seen 1 year after surgery in 20 patients macroscopically (43%) and in 21 patients microscopically (45%). At 5-year follow-up the prevalence for macroscopic and microscopic damage was 55% and 60%, respectively. The prevalence of mucosal damage was higher in AC patients than in SCC patients (1y-FU: 51% [AC] vs. 28% [SCC]; 5y-FU: 68% [AC] vs. 35% [SCC], P < 0.05). Newly acquired Barrett's esophagus was seen in 10 patients (20%) with two of those patients (20%) showing histopathologic proof of neoplasia. This study shows a high prevalence of reflux-associated mucosal damage in the remnant esophagus one year out of surgery and only a moderate increase in prevalence in the following years. Mucosal damage was more frequently seen in AC patients and the occurrence of de-novo Barrett's esophagus and de-novo neoplasia was high. Endoscopic surveillance with targeted biopsies seems to be an indispensable tool to follow patients after esophagectomy appropriately.

A structured training program for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer- a Delphi consensus study in Europe.

Evidence suggests that structured training programs for laparoscopic procedures can ensure a safe standard of skill acquisition prior to independent practice. Although minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) is technically demanding, no consensus on requirements for training for the MIO procedure exists. The aim of this study is to determine essential steps required for a structured training program in MIO using the Delphi consensus methodology. Eighteen MIO experts from 13 European hospitals were asked to participate in this study. The consensus process consisted of two structured meetings with the expert panel, and two Delphi questionnaire rounds. A list of items required for training MIO were constructed for three key domains of MIO, including (1) requisite criteria for units wishing to be trained and (2) to proctor MIO, and (3) a framework of a MIO training program. Items were rated by the experts on a scale 1-5, where 1 signified 'not important' and 5 represented 'very important.' Consensus for each domain was defined as achieving Cronbach alpha ≥0.70. Items were considered as fundamental when ≥75% of experts rated it important (4) or very important (5). Both Delphi rounds were completed by 16 (89%) of the 18 invited experts, with a median experience of 18 years with minimally invasive surgery. Consensus was achieved for all three key domains. Following two rounds of a 107-item questionnaire, 50 items were rated as essential for training MIO. A consensus among European MIO experts on essential items required for training MIO is presented. The identified items can serve as directive principles and core standards for creating a comprehensive training program for MIO.

Management of Tracheo- or Bronchoesophageal Fistula After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: The development of tracheo- or bronchoesophageal fistula (TBF) after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy remains to be a rare complication associated with a high mortality rate. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the charts of patients with TBF after esophagectomy were analyzed in terms of individual patient characteristics, esophagotracheal complications, respiratory function, management, and outcome. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and December 2014, 1204 patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer; 13 patients (1.1 %) developed a TBF. In all 13 patients, a concomitant leakage of the intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy was evident, either prior to diagnosis of TBF (metachronous TBF) or simultaneously (synchronous TBF). TBF was predominantly located in the left main bronchus (n = 6, 46.1 %) or trachea (n = 5, 38.5 %). Management of TBF included re-thoracotomy (n = 7), interventional endoscopic (n = 10) or bronchoscopic therapy (n = 4). In the majority of patients (n = 8), management consisted of two subsequent treatment modalities. In 3 out of four patients, TBF was successfully treated by endoscopic stenting only. Five patients (38.5 %) died following a septic course with multiple organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: The development of TBF after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is always combined with anastomotic leakage of the esophagogastrostomy. Treatment options primarily depend on the vascularization of the gastric conduit, the severity of the concomitant aspiration pneumonia, and the volume of the air leakage.

Preoperative airway colonization prior to transthoracic esophagectomy predicts postoperative pulmonary complications.

PURPOSE: Respiratory complications are responsible to a high degree for postoperative morbidity and mortality after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The etiology of respiratory failure is known to be multifactorial with preoperative impaired lung function being the most important one. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between preoperative airway colonization (PAC) and postoperative respiratory complications. METHODS: In this observational study, 64 patients with esophageal cancer were included. All patients underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with laparoscopic or open gastric mobilization. After induction of anesthesia and intubation with a double-lumen tube, bronchial exudate was collected by random endoluminal suction for further microbiological work-up. Length of postoperative mechanical ventilation (<24 h, 24-72 h, >72 h), re-intubation, and tracheostomy were recorded as primary and secondary study endpoints. RESULTS: In 13 of 64 study patients (20.3 %), pathological colonization of the bronchial airways could be proved prior to esophagectomy. Haemophilus species was the most frequently identified pathogen. PAC was associated with a longer history of smoking (p = 0.025), a lower preoperative forced expiratory volume (FEV1, p = 0.009) or vital capacity (VC, p = 0.038), a prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), and a higher frequency of re-intubation (p < 0.001) and tracheostomy (p = 0.017). In the multivariate analysis, PAC was identified as an independent predictor of respiratory failure (hazard ratio 11.4, 95 % confidence interval 2.6-54, p = 0.002). Mortality in the PAC group was 30.8 % compared to 0 % in patients without PAC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PAC is a significant risk factor for postoperative respiratory failure. A routine bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage as part of preoperative management prior to esophagectomy need to be discussed.

Management of upper intestinal leaks using an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC).

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforations and postoperative leakage of esophagogastrostomy are considered to be life-threatening conditions due to the development of mediastinitis and consecutive sepsis. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), a well-established treatment method for superficial infected wounds, is based on a negative pressure applied to the wound via a vacuum-sealed sponge. Endoluminal VAC (E-VAC) therapy is a novel method, and experience with its esophageal application is limited. METHODS: This retrospective study summarizes the experience of a center with a high volume of upper gastrointestinal surgery using E-VAC therapy for patients with leakages of the esophagus. The study investigated 14 patients who had esophageal defects treated with E-VAC. Three patients had a spontaneous defect; two patients had an iatrogenic defect; and nine patients had a postoperative esophageal defect. RESULTS: The average duration of application was 12.1 days, and an average of 3.9 E-VAC systems were used. For 6 of the 14 patients, E-VAC therapy was combined with the placement of self-expanding metal stents. Complete restoration of the esophageal defect was achieved in 12 (86 %) of the 14 patients. Two patients died due to prolonged sepsis. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates that E-VAC therapy adds an additional treatment option for partial esophageal wall defects. The combination of E-VAC treatment and endoscopic stenting is a successful novel procedure for achieving a high closure rate.

[Therapeutic decisions in patients with operable, non-metastatic oesophageal cancer]. / Therapieentscheidung bei Patienten mit operablem, nicht metastasiertem Ösophaguskarzinom.

BACKGROUND: Therapy for oesophageal carcinoma is a subject of controversial debate. The aim of this study is to answer the question how the therapeutic decision in patients with operable, non-metastatic oesophageal cancer should be made. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature research regarding different therapeutic strategies in patients with oesophageal cancer was undertaken. RESULTS: Multiple criteria influence the therapy for oesophageal carcinoma. Radical oesophagectomy in a multimodal setting is the therapy of choice. Definitive chemoradiation is a conservative option for high risk patients. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic decisions in patients with oesophageal cancer should only be made after standardised staging and accurate risk analysis.

MicroRNA profiling in locally advanced esophageal cancer indicates a high potential of miR-192 in prediction of multimodality therapy response.

To identify possible predictive markers, our study aimed to characterize microRNA (miRNA) profiles of responder and nonresponder in the multimodality therapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Initially, a microarray-based approach was performed including eight patients with esophageal cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. Major histopathological response was defined if resected specimens contained less than 10% vital tumor cells (major/minor response: 4/4 patients). Intratumoral RNA was isolated from both, pretherapeutic tissue biopsies in addition to corresponding surgical specimens. The profile of 768 miRNAs was analyzed in 16 specimens (preneoadjuvant and postneoadjuvant therapy). Selected miRNAs were than analyzed on pretherapeutic and post-therapeutic biopsies of 80 patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent multimodality therapy (major/minor response: 30/50 patients). Comprehensive miRNA profiling identified miRNAs in pretherapeutic biopsies that were significantly different between major/minor responders. Based on the microarray results, miR-192, miR-194 and miR-622 were selected and the dysregulated miRNAs were studied on an extended series of esophageal cancer patients. The expression of miR-192, miR-194 and miR-622 was significantly reduced after neoadjuvant therapy confirming the array profiling data. Importantly, the pretherapeutic intratumoral expression of miR-192 and miR-194 was significantly associated with the histopathologic response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to multimodal therapeutic treatment. Therefore, in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy, miR-192 and miR-194 in pretherapeutic biopsies are considered as indicators of major histopathologic regression.

Vascular endothelial growth factor expression following ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit.

The partial devascularization of the stomach, necessary for esophageal reconstruction with a gastric conduit, impairs microcirculation in the anastomotic region of the gastric fundus. Ischemic conditioning of the gastric tube is considered as a possible approach to improve microcirculation in the gastric mucosa. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ischemic conditioning induces neo-angiogenesis in the gastric fundus by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Twenty patients with an esophageal carcinoma scheduled for esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction were included. To compare VEGF expression before and after ischemic conditioning, preoperative endoscopic biopsies were taken from the gastric fundus. The surgical procedure consisted of two separate steps, the complete gastric mobilization including partial devascularization of the stomach and after a delay of 4-5 days high transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic gastric reconstruction (Ivor-Lewis procedure). The second tissue sample was obtained from the donut of the stapled esophagogastrostomy. For further work-up, preoperative biopsies and the gastric donuts were fixed in liquid nitrogen. Preoperative and intraoperative VEGF expression was measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (VEGF×100/ß-actin) and results were compared using Wilcoxon test for paired samples. In all 40 specimens, a distinct expression of VEGF could be detected. Comparing the level of VEGF expression of the preoperative biopsies and postoperative tissue sample, no significant difference could be demonstrated following ischemic conditioning. In this model of ischemic conditioning with delayed reconstruction of 4-5 days, no induction of neo-angiogenesis could be demonstrated by measurement of VEGF expression.

Choosing the best treatment for esophageal cancer : criteria for selecting the best multimodal therapy.

The best multimodal therapy in esophageal cancer comprises neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy is only appropriate for patients with adenocarcinoma. However, the 2-year survival benefit by this induction therapy compared to surgery alone is only 5-9 %. Targeted drugs seem to be promising in order to improve the response rate. The choice of the best multimodal therapy by response prediction seems only to be possible in patients during chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma, whereas during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy a response prediction by FDG-PET is not possible. The principle item of multimodal therapy is still transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy which should be performed in high volume centers in order to guarantee stable and good results.

Evaluation of histological regression grading systems in the neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: do they have prognostic impact?

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant treatment options have been developed to improve survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. As only patients with a major histopatholocial response benefit from this preoperative therapy, several tumor regression grading systems have been developed. However, currently no accepted comprehensive grading system for clinical use is available. Therefore, we studied the impact of four histological regression grading systems in the neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 85 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. All patients received a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgical resection. The histological regression grading was evaluated using four classification systems: (1) grading system by the Japanese society of colorectal cancer, (2) grading system by Junker-Müller, (3) grading system by Dworak, (4) Cologne grading system. The four classification systems were analyzed for their prognostic impact. RESULTS: The following significant correlations were detected between the four classification systems and the ypTNM categories: (1) patients with a ypT3/4 category had significantly more often a worse histopathologic response in all four grading systems (p = 0.001); (2) a ypN0 category was significantly correlated with good histopathologic response only in the Cologne grading system; (3) in the Junker-Müller and Dworak grading systems, a ypM0 category was significantly correlated with a good histopathologic response (p = 0.046; p = 0.03). However, none of the used classification systems had a prognostic impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, none of the analyzed histological regression grading systems is effective for clinical use.

Prognostic factors in definitive radiochemotherapy of advanced inoperable esophageal cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and prognostic factors of definitive radiochemotherapy (RCT) for inoperable esophageal cancer. Between 1995 and 2005 all patients with inoperable esophageal cancer that underwent concurrent RCT were included in this retrospective study. Conventional computed tomography-based treatment planning as well as 3D-conformal radiotherapy (RT) was used. Maximum radiotherapy dose was 63 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) d1-5 and 29-33) and 5-FU (650-1000 mg/m(2) d1-5 and 29-33). Patients not suitable for RCT received radiotherapy alone. Toxicity was measured according to common toxicity criteria (CTC). Two hundred three consecutive patients with inoperable esophageal cancer that received definitive therapy were identified in this time period (160 with squamous cell carcinoma and 43 with adenocarcinoma). The 2-year overall survival probability was 21.2% whereas the progression-free survival at 2 years was 13.8% for all patients. In the univariate analysis, type of histology, T-stage, N-stage, application of chemotherapy, and the radiation dose were significantly correlated with overall/progression-free survival. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed an independent prognostic impact for N-stage, radiation dose, and concurrent chemotherapy. Definitive RCT is an important palliative treatment option for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. N-stage, radiation dose, and concurrent chemotherapy are important prognostic factors for survival.

[Carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and stomach. Cooperation between pathology and surgery]. / Karzinome des Ösophagus, ösophagogastralen Übergangs und Magens. Kooperation von Pathologie und Chirurgie.

Cooperation between pathology and surgery plays a decisive role in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and stomach. Preoperatively, the carcinoma is confirmed and the histologic type, grading, type of extension (stomach) and immunohistochemical or molecular-biological parameters, if necessary, are determined. For exclusion or diagnosis of distant metastases, peritoneal carcinosis, or secondary tumors, further biopsies or cytological examinations may be required. All results contribute to the individualized treatment. In case of endoscopic treatment, the completeness of resection of the carcinoma and the depth of infiltration must be identified with extraordinary diligence. Postoperative proof of tumor, location, histological type, completeness of resection and safety margin have to be identified. Detailed T-status, N-status with declaration of the ratio of affected and nonaffected number of lymph nodes, location of affected lymph nodes, extracapsular lymph node spread, invasion of lymphatic and vascular vessels and perineural sheets are important parameters. The description of tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment (histomorphological response) is of special interest.

[Complications and management of complications in oesophageal surgery]. / Komplikationen und Komplikationsmanagement in der Ösophaguschirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Prevention, early recognition and an adequate management of perioperative complications in resectional oesophageal surgery are the keys to an increased safety of these complex procedures. RECOGNITION, DIAGNOSTICS, MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT: Preoperative registration and - if required - pretreatment of specific risk factors can considerably decrease the complication rate. The precise implementation of significant preoperative score systems in patients with high operative risk can lead to a negative risk-benefit consideration concerning the indication for an operation. The patients will then be assigned to an alternative treatment process. Anastomotic leakage is the most frequent technical-surgical complication. A precise suturing technique with the prevention of tension and the avoidance of reduction of perfusion of the conduit (stomach, colon, small intestine) can reduce the rate of such insufficiencies. The most frequent non-surgical complication is postoperative pneumonia, which can be avoided or combated through effective pain-relieving therapy like peridural anaesthesia and specific techniques of postoperative ventilation. It is of vital importance to identify, at the earliest possible timepoint, complications that might emerge after the operation. The occurrence of postoperative tachyarrhythmia has proven to be a frequent and early indicator of such complications. The treatment of complications after oesophageal resections includes adequate conservative, interventional, e. g., endoscopic placement of a stent in cases of covered insufficiency of the suture line, and operative procedures like reoperation in cases of uncovered leakage with pleural connection. All the other surgical complications like haemorrhage, tracheobronchial leak-ages or chylothorax are rarely seen and demand specific therapeutic procedures. CONCLUSION: It is not only the surgery that determines a high or low complication rate in oesophageal resectional procedures. It has clearly been proved that interdisciplinary management of complications after oesophagectomy is much more effective in high-volume centres, leading to a lower mortality, than in surgical departments with a lower case rate and thus with less experience in such complex operations.

[Oesophageal cancer: current status of multimodality therapy]. / Ösophaguskarzinom: Aktueller Stand der multimodalen Therapie.

Multimodality treatment options have been widely promoted in the therapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (cT3/4Nx). Generally neoadjuvant chemotherapy and combined radiochemotherapy are frequently used in this setting. The recent meta-analyses evaluating randomised trials of different neoadjuvant therapy protocols prior to surgery for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer showed only a modest improvement in survivial of 5-10% survival at 5 years. In contrast, the meta-analyses reveal that patients with excellent histopathological responses seem to highly benefit from neoadjuvant regimens. Patients with poor histopathological responses have no benefit but rather disadvantegeous prognoses. Therefore, predictive markers to allow individualisation of multimodality treatment in locally advanced esophageal cancer are urgently needed.

[Value of distal gastrectomy as a remedial operation for failed fundoplication]. / Stellenwert der distalen Magenresektion mit Rekonstruktion nach Roux-Y zur Behandlung des Refluxrezidivs nach Fundoplikatio.

BACKGROUND: Failure of conventional antireflux surgery is a challenging problem. This study aims at defining the role of distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y diversion in the treatment of failed fundoplication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This report reviews the indications and results of 26 patients who underwent revisional antireflux surgery in our department. Distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction were performed in 6 patients (group a), refundoplication in 15 (group b), and re-hiatoplasty in 5 patients (group c). RESULTS: Group a patients had the longest history (p = 0.001) and the highest number of previous operative procedures (p = 0.001). In contrast, hospital stay was longer and postoperative morbidity was higher after distal gastrectomy (p = n. s.). At follow-up, symptom improvement was achieved most reliably after distal gastrectomy (groups a-c: 100%, 78.6%, and 60% of patients; p = n. s.). CONCLUSION: Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y diversion is a safe and reliable surgical option for selected patients after failed fundoplication. Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y diversion is a reliable surgical option for selected patients after failed fundoplication. Despite a higher morbidity, this procedure represents an important addition to the surgical armamentarium, particularly in patients with a history of multiple previous interventions.