Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation phase 1 studies evaluating BTH1677, a 1, 3-1,6 beta glucan pathogen associated molecular pattern, in healthy volunteer subjects.

BACKGROUND: BTH1677 is a beta glucan pathogen associated molecular pattern (PAMP) currently being investigated as a novel cancer therapy. Here, the initial safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) results of BTH1677 in healthy subjects are reported. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In the Phase 1a single-dosing study, subjects were randomized (3:1 per cohort) to a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of BTH1677 at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, or 6 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. In the Phase 1b multi-dosing study, subjects were randomized (3:1 per cohort) to 7 daily i.v. infusions of BTH1677 at 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. Safety and PK non-compartmental analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects (N = 24 Phase 1a; N = 12 Phase 1b) were randomized to treatment. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred in either study. Mild or moderate adverse events (AEs) occurred in 67% of BTH1677-treated subjects in both studies. Treatment-related AEs (occurring in ≥10% of subjects) included dyspnea, flushing, headache, nausea, paraesthesia, and rash in Phase 1a and conjunctivitis and headache in Phase 1b. BTH1677 serum concentration was linear with dose. Clearance, serum elimination half-life (t1/2) and volume of distribution (Vss) were BTH1677 dose-independent. In Phase 1b, area under the curve, t1/2, and Vss values were larger at steady state on days 6-30 versus day 0. CONCLUSIONS: BTH1677 was well tolerated after single doses up to 6 mg/kg and after 7 daily doses up to 4 mg/kg.

Efficacy and renal effects of enalapril therapy for hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

The antihypertensive efficacy and renal effects of enalapril maleate therapy were evaluated in 13 hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure. Enalapril was administered as follows: alone; added to furosemide, clonidine hydrochloride, or atenolol; or in combination with any of the aforementioned drugs. Three patients did not complete the study; uncontrolled hypertension was the cause in two of these patients. In the remaining ten patients, short-term (mean +/- SD, 63 +/- 9 days) enalapril maleate therapy decreased the patient's seated blood pressure from 161/98 +/- 19/8 to 130/80 +/- 13/7 mm Hg. Furosemide was administered to eight patients; the dose of concomitant sympatholytic therapy was decreased in five of five patients. Serum potassium concentration increased from 4.1 +/- 0.3 to 4.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/L. Levels of urinary total protein excretion decreased from 2.23 +/- 2.05 to 1.08 +/- 1.45 g/d. Renal function (creatinine clearance, 0.58 +/- 0.21 mL/s) did not change from baseline. During long-term therapy, the rate of progression of renal insufficiency seemed to slacken in three of four patients with diabetic nephropathy. Thus enalapril can reduce blood pressure and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The possibility that enalapril can slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy remains to be confirmed by future studies.

Cholesterol-lowering effects of calcium carbonate in patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, several authors have noted that oral calcium treatment was associated with a reduction in serum cholesterol level. METHODS: Calcium carbonate was examined for its ability to lower serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic patients. Fifty-six patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia were examined in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Patients were treated with a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet targeted at the American Heart Association Step-1 diet for 8 weeks before and while receiving placebo or calcium carbonate (9.98 mmol [400 mg] of elemental calcium) three times daily with meals for 6 weeks. Patients were then crossed over to the alternate treatment for an additional 6-week period. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, calcium carbonate achieved a 4.4% reduction in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and a 4.1% increase in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. The ratio of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly decreased by 6.5% with calcium carbonate treatment. Calcium carbonate treatment did not significantly affect blood pressure or serum levels of triglycerides, lipoprotein Apo B, or calcium. Relative urinary saturation ratios of calcium oxalate levels were unchanged during calcium carbonate therapy. Compliance with diet and treatment was excellent and no significant adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, calcium carbonate was a modestly effective and well-tolerated adjunct to diet in the management of mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia in this clinical study.

Cefotaxime and desacetyl cefotaxime kinetics in renal impairment.

Cefotaxime and desacetyl cefotaxime kinetics after a single, 1 gm intravenous dose were evaluated in five groups of subjects: group I, normal creatinine clearance (CLCR greater than 90 ml/min); group II, mild renal insufficiency (CLCR 30 to 89 ml/min); group III, moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR 16 to 29 ml/min); group IV, severe renal insufficiency (CLCR 4 to 15 ml/min); and group V, end-stage renal disease requiring maintenance hemodialysis (CLCR less than 6 ml/min). The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) ranged from 10% to 55% of body weight but was not related to CLCR. The terminal t1/2 values of cefotaxime and desacetyl cefotaxime were 0.79 and 0.70, 1.09 and 3.95, 1.55 and 5.65, 2.54 and 14.23, and 1.63 and 23.15 hours in groups I to V, respectively. There were no significant changes in Vss or t1/2 after multiple dosing, but there were significant correlations between CLCR and cefotaxime total body clearance, cefotaxime and desacetyl cefotaxime renal clearance, and cefotaxime nonrenal clearance. Dosage regimens for the use of cefotaxime in patients with renal impairment are proposed.

Validity of creatinine clearance estimates in the assessment of renal function.

In clinical practice, estimations of renal function are commonly used to calculate the appropriate dose for drugs that are renally cleared. Continuous-infusion inulin clearance (CLIN), 4-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR,m), and 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR,a) were measured in 109 subjects (86 men and 23 women) with varying degrees of stable renal function (CLIN, 6 to 209 ml/min) and compared with CLCR values as predicted by five equations on the basis of plasma creatinine concentrations, age, weight, and/or height. The CLCR,m was positively correlated with CLIN (r = 0.92; p less than 0.0001) but exceeded CLIN by 15% between the range of 30 and 209 ml/min (CLIN). Similarly, CLCR,a correlated well with both CLCR,m (r = 0.84; p less than 0.0005) and CLIN (r = 0.84; p less than 0.0001). The relative role of tubular secretion in the overall clearance of creatinine increased with declining CLIN and exceeded 40% when CLIN was below 30 ml/min. CLCR estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault and Mawer methods did not significantly differ from either CLCR,m or CLCR,m, whereas the other equations generally underestimated CLCR. Among the numerous mathematical equations, CLCR as estimated by the method proposed either by Mawer or Cockcroft and Gault was the best predictor of CLIN (CLIN = 1.05CLRCR - 18.38 or CLIN = 1.12CLCR - 20.60, respectively; r = 0.81; p less than 0.0001). The present data support the use of estimator equations proposed by Cockcroft and Gault or Mawer for rapid estimation of renal function in the clinical setting.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of codeine in end-stage renal disease.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of codeine and its metabolites codeine glucuronide, morphine, and morphine glucuronide were assessed after the administration of a single 60 mg oral dose of codeine sulfate and a single 60 mg intravenous dose of codeine phosphate in six healthy volunteers and six patients on chronic hemodialysis. Plasma and urine drug and metabolite concentrations were determined by sensitive and specific RIA procedures. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by pupillometry and vital sign determinations. Codeine elimination half-life and mean residence time were increased significantly in the hemodialysis group (18.69 +/- 9.03 hours and 12.77 +/- 7.09 hours, mean +/- SD, respectively) compared with the healthy volunteer group (4.04 +/- 0.60 hours and 3.90 +/- 0.52 hours, respectively). The total body clearance and volume of distribution of codeine were not significantly different between groups. Peak concentrations, times to peak concentrations, and AUCs for the three metabolites were also not significantly different between the groups, in part as a result of significant interpatient variability in the hemodialysis group. Examination of pupillometry and vital sign data did not reveal clinically significant differences in pharmacodynamics between the groups. Adjustment of dosage regimen may be required in some patients with uremia receiving multiple-dose codeine therapy.

The disposition and dynamics of labetalol in patients on dialysis.

The disposition of labetalol was assessed in 16 patients on dialysis after intravenous dosing with 0.7 to 1.0 mg/kg during an interdialytic period and just before hemodialysis (n = 8) and during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (n = 8). The plasma concentration time data exhibited triexponential decay in all patients. The terminal t 1/2 of labetalol was 12.90 +/- 4.68 hours, the total body clearance was 1198.2 +/- 249.4 ml/min, and the AUC was 921.4 +/- 175.2 ng hr/ml during the interdialytic period. No significant changes were observed in these parameters after dosing with labetalol just before dialysis. The hemodialysis clearance of labetalol was 30.67 +/- 5.49 ml/min, and only 0.189 +/- 0.042 mg of labetalol was removed by hemodialysis. The terminal t 1/2 averaged 13.05 +/- 6.32 hours during CAPD. Steady-state volume of distribution, total body clearance (Clp), and CAPD clearance were 10.39 +/- 2.77 L/kg, 1397.2 +/- 372.3 ml/min, and 1.94 +/- 0.65 ml/min, respectively. The fraction of the dose recovered in the CAPD dialysate during the 72-hour study period was 0.14% +/- 0.09%. The decay of the antihypertensive effect of labetalol was gradual and paralleled the decline in the log plasma concentration. There was a significant correlation between labetalol plasma concentration and the fall in supine diastolic and mean blood pressure after the interdialytic dose and during CAPD. Although labetalol is removed by dialysis, dialysis does not significantly enhance Clp.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta.

Different recombinant human erythropoietin products have been developed. Although they appear to have similar pharmacokinetics and function, these have not been directly compared. This randomized, double-blind, four-period crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and subcutaneous epoetin alfa and epoetin beta in 18 normal male volunteers. As a control, three subjects received placebo treatment. After intravenous administration, the steady-state volume of distribution and beta-phase volume of distribution of epoetin beta were 7.7% and 16.9% larger than for epoetin alfa (p less than 0.05). The terminal elimination half-life after intravenous administration of epoetin beta was 20% longer than the terminal elimination half-life of epoetin alfa. After subcutaneous administration there was a delayed drug absorption with epoetin beta compared with epoetin alfa (p less than 0.05). There was a small but significantly greater absolute reticulocyte response after subcutaneous epoetin beta compared with subcutaneous epoetin alfa. The findings support differences in the pharmacokinetics and function of epoetin alfa and beta that are possibly caused by differences in their glycosylation.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in patients with renal disease.

Tazobactam is an irreversible inhibitor of many beta-lactamases. In combination with piperacillin, tazobactam exhibits synergy against many beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam were evaluated in eight normal volunteers and in 52 patients with renal dysfunction. Plasma and urine were obtained for up to 30 hours after an infusion of piperacillin and tazobactam (3 and 0.375 gm, respectively). Dialysate samples were collected from patients undergoing dialysis. Piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental methods were used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Piperacillin and tazobactam total body clearance, area under the curve, and terminal elimination rate correlated with renal function. Hemodialysis removed 31% and 39% of piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. During continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, 5.5% of the piperacillin and 10.7% of the tazobactam was recovered in the dialysate over 28 hours. Peak plasma concentrations of both drugs increased minimally with decreasing creatinine clearance. Dosage alterations for creatinine clearance values less than 40 ml/min are recommended.

Epoetin enhances erythropoiesis in normal men undergoing repeated phlebotomies.

Epoetin may enhance autologous blood donation, but efficacy and dose response have not been established. This multicenter, double-blind trial compared intravenous placebo (n = 23) with epoetin beta, 250 U/kg (n = 23), 500 U/kg (n = 19), and 1000 U/kg (n = 22), administered three times weekly for 26 days. Normal men (age, 28 +/- 7 years; mean +/- SD) received phlebotomies up to three times weekly as long as the hemoglobin remained greater than or equal to 12 gm/dl. Subjects treated with epoetin donated 32% more units of blood (p less than 0.05) compared with placebo. A dose response was not observed. Platelet counts increased with epoetin compared with placebo, but platelet function and bleeding time did not change. Prothrombin times increased and partial thromboplastin times decreased with both epoetin and placebo. The supernatant of packed red blood cells collected after multiple phlebotomies and stored 42 days had slightly lower glucose concentrations and pH after therapy with epoetin. Blood pressure did not change with epoetin or placebo. These findings support the efficacy and safety of epoetin for enhancing the erythropoietic response of normal subjects during intensive phlebotomy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with impaired renal function.

Many antibiotics are eliminated renally and dosage adjustments are commonly made in patients with renal insufficiency. This is a critical review of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Detailed information regarding pharmacokinetic alterations with specific antibiotics or antibiotic classes has been compiled and tabulated. From pharmacokinetic evidence, recommendations for dosage adjustments of antibiotics are supplied. The criteria used for assigning rating levels to specific pharmacokinetic articles as well as the grading system for dosage adjustments are outlined. In addition, a basic review of pharmacokinetic alterations in renal failure and factors affecting the removal of drugs by haemodialysis is included.

Pharmacokinetics and blood pressure response of losartan in end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Losartan is a selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist currently employed in the management of essential hypertension. This compound is in common use in populations with renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in patients with ESRD in order to establish administration guidelines. METHODS: Patients were administered losartan 100 mg/day for 7 days, and after the seventh and final dose pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both losartan and its active metabolite E-3174. During the study, the haemodialytic clearances of losartan and E-3174 were measured during a standard 4-hour dialysis session. Neurohumoral and biochemical changes were assessed during losartan administration. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in haemodialysis patients did not alter to a clinically significant level. Losartan administration was accompanied by a decline in plasma aldosterone level as well as by an increase in plasma renin activity. Losartan administration resulted in a decline in plasma uric acid level, despite the fact that the study participants had no residual renal function. Losartan and E-3174 were not dialysable. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 are minimally altered in ESRD; thus, dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of advanced dialysis-dependent renal failure. In addition, postdialysis supplementation is not required for losartan because of the negligible dialysability of losartan and E-3174.

Antihypertensive and humoral effects of nifedipine in essential hypertension uncontrolled by hydrochlorothiazide alone.

This double-blind placebo controlled study investigated the antihypertensive and humoral effects of nifedipine capsules in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled (seated diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg) by hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) alone. Nifedipine acutely (first dose) lowered supine blood pressure but did not change supine plasma renin activity (PRA) or aldosterone concentration. In contrast to placebo, short-term treatment (10 weeks) with nifedipine (n = 9, mean dose 43 +/- 16 mg daily) added to HCTZ (50 mg daily) significantly decreased seated blood pressure by 8.6 +/- 10.8/11.5 +/- 6.9 mm Hg. Neither nifedipine or placebo therapy altered PRA, plasma aldosterone concentration or 24 hour urinary aldosterone excretion. Nifedipine frequently caused mild vasodilator symptoms but these did not limit therapy in most patients. There was no correlation between PRA, plasma aldosterone concentration or 24 hour urinary aldosterone excretion and the acute or short-term blood pressure response to nifedipine in these diuretic treated patients. The acute blood pressure response to nifedipine did not predict short-term efficacy. Thus, nifedipine added to a diuretic is generally well-tolerated, effectively lowers blood pressure, and does not stimulate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) axis. Additionally, in diuretic treated patients, the activity of the RAA axis and initial blood pressure response to nifedipine are not predictive of short-term efficacy.

Correlation of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements with urinary albumin and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase excretions in essential hypertension.

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) correlates better than office blood pressure with hypertensive changes in the heart and vasculature. Using the 24-hour urinary excretions of albumin and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) as markers, we examined the relationship between office and ABP and target-organ changes in the kidney in 42 untreated patients with essential hypertension. Mean urinary albumin excretion was 23.2 +/- 34.3 mg/day and mean urinary NAG excretion was 45.1 +/- 22.9 nmol/hr/mg creatinine. Urinary albumin excretion was positively correlated with both office and mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (r = 0.31, P less than 0.05; and r = 0.44, P less than 0.01, respectively). Urinary NAG excretion was positively correlated with 24-hour ambulatory systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (r = 0.32, P less than 0.05; r = 0.32, P less than 0.05; and r = 0.39, P less than 0.05, respectively), but not with office blood pressure. Thus, urinary albumin and NAG excretions are positively correlated with blood pressure and may be useful markers of renal involvement in patients with essential hypertension. Additionally, ABP may be more reliable than office blood pressure in identifying those patients at risk for hypertensive target-organ changes in the kidney.

Gentamicin disposition in young and elderly patients with various degrees of renal function.

The effect of aging on the total body clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life of gentamicin was examined in 99 febrile patients with various degrees of renal function. In the 50 patients who were 18 to 64 years old, clearance of gentamicin was 79.0 +/- 27.0 mL/min (mean +/- standard deviation), creatinine clearance was 98.6 +/- 33.3 mL/min, volume of distribution was 0.242 +/- 0.077 L/kg, and half-life was 2.63 +/- 0.90 hours. In the 49 patients who were 65 to 90 years old, these values were 36.9 +/- 16.3 mL/min, 51.2 +/- 21.2 mL/min, 0.244 +/- 0.102 L/kg, and 5.80 +/- 4.13 hours. Significant differences were observed between the two groups for all parameters except volume of distribution. Linear regression revealed good correlations between the disposition characteristics (clearance and elimination-rate constant) of gentamicin and age as well as creatinine clearance. However, there was no apparent relationship between the ratio of gentamicin clearance to creatinine clearance and age (r = .0731). These findings suggest that the disposition of gentamicin is independent of age but dependent on renal function.

Disposition of cefpodoxime proxetil in hemodialysis patients.

The disposition of cefpodoxime after single, oral 200-mg doses of cefpodoxime proxetil (cefpodoxime equivalents) was investigated in an open-label study of six patients with end-stage renal disease currently maintained on hemodialysis. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, which differed in the sequence of the interdialytic and intradialytic periods. Doses were separated by at least 2 weeks. Blood samples were serially collected for 48 hours after each treatment; if obtainable, urine was also collected over this same period. During the intradialytic period, hemodialysis was scheduled to begin approximately 3 hours after dosing, and dialysate was collected before and until the end of dialysis. Average cefpodoxime elimination half-life for the interdialytic period was 18.0 +/- 6.5 hours; apparent total body clearance was 28.6 +/- 13 mL/minute. The half-life during hemodialysis, 2.66 +/- 0.74 hours, was considerably shorter than that after hemodialysis, 19.2 +/- 3.5 hours, in the intradialytic period of the study. Hemodialysis clearance of cefpodoxime was 120 +/- 31 mL/minute, which was 57.1 +/- 13% and 71.7 +/- 25% of the hemodialysis clearance for urea nitrogen and creatinine, respectively. The 2.86 +/- 0.25 hour hemodialysis session removed 22.4 +/- 2.9% of the administered dose, as assessed by cefpodoxime recovery in dialysate. A maximum rebound in cefpodoxime plasma concentration of 0.41 +/- 0.33 mcg/mL was observed, at about one-half hour after the end of hemodialysis. Based on these results, dosage adjustment is not required, but extension of the dosing interval is warranted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Disposition of misoprostol and its active metabolite in patients with normal and impaired renal function.

The disposition of misoprostol acid, the active metabolite of misoprostol, was studied in 48 subjects with various degrees of renal function after administration of a single 400 microgram oral dose of misoprostol. Subjects were assigned to one of four treatment groups: group 1, normal renal function with creatinine clearance (CLCR) 80-140 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 2, mild renal impairment with CLCR 50-79 mL/min/1.73 m2; group 3, moderate renal impairment with CLCR 20-49 mL/min/1.73 m2 or group 4, end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients maintained on hemodialysis. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach Cmax (tmax) for misoprostol acid tended to be larger in group 4 subjects; however, it failed to reach statistical significance. Although not statistically significant, in group 4 subjects the terminal half-life (t1/2) of misoprostol acid was almost twice as large (1.27 +/- 0.77 h) as in groups 1, 2, and 3 (0.70 +/- 0.72, 0.72 +/- 0.67, and 0.73 +/- 0.45 h, respectively). Misoprostol acid's total area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC0 infinity) was larger in group 4 subjects (1173.5 +/- 487.4 pg.h/mL) as compared with groups 1, 2, and 3 (421.4 +/- 263.1, 418.9 +/- 114.5, and 377.0 +/- 145.2 pg.h/mL, respectively; P < .05). The apparent total body clearance (CL) of misoprostol acid was statistically significantly smaller in group 4 subjects (0.094 +/- 0.044 L/kg/min) as compared only with group 3 subjects (0.284 +/- 0.102 L/kg/min). The dose of misoprostol may need to be reduced in ESRD patients on prolonged hemodialysis to prevent unnecessary high plasma levels of misoprostol acid and to avoid possible dose-related adverse effects.

A dose-ranging pharmacokinetics study of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate in normal healthy volunteers.

Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) is an investigational modulator of the toxicity produced by cisplatin. The pharmacokinetics of DDTC were evaluated after administration of 200 mg/m2/hr (n = 8) and 400 mg/m2/hr (n = 7) DDTC as 4-hour intravenous infusions to normal male healthy volunteers. Diethyldithiocarbamate concentration at steady-state (Cpss) increased disproportionally from 27.0 +/- 7.6 microM for the low dose to 74.8 +/- 19.3 microM for the high dose, whereas total body clearance decreased from 23.83 +/- 8.23 mL/min/kg for the low dose to 15.48 +/- 2.72 mL/min/kg for the high dose (P < 0.05). However, the volume of distribution in the terminal phase remained unchanged. Diethyldithiocarbamate terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) increased from 3.74 +/- 1.10 minutes for the low dose to 6.08 +/- 1.07 minutes for the high dose (P < 0.005). The data were then fitted using a one-compartment open model with zero-order infusion and Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics. The Km for DDTC was estimated to be 124.3 +/- 19.9 microM, whereas the Vm was estimated to be 3.67 +/- 1.15 mumol/min/kg. However, DDTC t1/2 beta was independent of DDTC concentrations, suggesting that the nonlinearity in DDTC kinetics does not exactly follow Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics. Thus, DDTC pharmacokinetics are dose dependent and may not be concentration dependent. Clinically, DDTC Cpss will increase nonlinearly with an increase in dose.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of pravastatin and metabolites in patients with renal impairment.

The disposition of a single 20-mg oral dose of pravastatin was assessed in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Sixteen subjects (13 males, 3 females) with creatinine clearance values ranging from 15 to 112 mL/min/1.73 m2 completed the study. Area under the serum concentration-time curve, maximum serum concentration, time to maximum serum concentration, terminal serum elimination half-life, apparent clearance, and apparent volume of distribution for pravastatin were not affected by renal impairment, whereas the renal clearance of pravastatin decreased as creatinine clearance decreased (r2 = 0.697, P less than .001). The area under the serum concentration-time curve and time to maximum serum concentration of SQ 31,945 (a hepatic metabolite) increased in patients with renal impairment, whereas the terminal elimination rate constant and renal clearance of SQ 31,945 significantly decreased as a function of creatinine clearance. The renal clearance of another metabolite (SQ 31,906) also significantly declined with decreasing renal function. This single-dose study demonstrates that pravastatin pharmacokinetics were not affected in patients with renal impairment, probably because of its dual route of elimination.

Effects of hemodialysis on plasma protein binding of bepridil.

The effects of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and hemodialysis on the in vitro plasma protein binding of bepridil hydrochloride were investigated. The possible influence of bepridil metabolites on bepridil-protein binding in ESRD patients was also examined. Plasma samples were obtained from six patients with ESRD. Bepridil-plasma protein binding was measured by microequilibrium dialysis after addition of freshly prepared bepridil-14C (239 microCi/mg) at a final concentration of 2 micrograms/mL. The percentage of free bepridil in peripheral venous samples drawn on a nondialysis day was lower (i.e., binding was greater) in the patients with ESRD relative to previous observations in healthy subjects (0.15% +/- 0.04% versus 0.31% +/- 0.05% (mean +/- SD). The plasma concentrations of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), the principal bepridil binding protein, were also higher in ESRD patients (110 +/- 32 mg/dL) than previously reported in healthy subjects. Although hemodialysis resulted in significant increases in AAG, total protein, and albumin concentrations, no significant difference in bepridil-plasma protein binding was detected between predialysis and postdialysis peripheral venous samples in the presence (0.16 versus 0.18) or absence (0.20 versus 0.17) of bepridil metabolites. The percentage of free bepridil in plasma from both the arterial and venous limbs of the dialyzer during hemodialysis (means of free bepridil ranged from 0.24-0.28%) was higher than in samples drawn from a peripheral vein. This displacement of bepridil from its binding sites as blood passes through the dialyzer may have been owing to the presence of high local concentrations of plasticizers. Confirmation of this hypothesis will require further investigation.