Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Within 4 Weeks of Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Infection Rates.

PURPOSE: To refine the understanding of the effect of timing of corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and shoulder arthroscopy on postoperative infection. METHODS: An insurance database was used to determine all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for a 5-year period with an associated preoperative ipsilateral corticosteroid injection. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on timing of preoperative CSI: (1) 0-<2 weeks, (2) 2-<4 weeks, (3) 4-<6 weeks, and (4) 6-<8 weeks. Patients were pooled to include all patients who had a CSI less than 4 weeks and those longer than 4 weeks. A cohort of patients who never had a corticosteroid injection before undergoing arthroscopy were used as a control. All patients had a follow-up of 2 years. Multivariable regression analyses were performed using R Studio with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression showed a greater odds ratio (OR) for postoperative infection in patients who received CSI 0-<2 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy at 90 days (3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.57, P < .001), 1 year (2.51, 95% CI 1.46-4.12, P < .001), and 2 years (2.08, 95% CI 1.27-3.28, P = .002) compared with the control group. Patients who received CSI 2-<4 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy had greater OR for infection at 90 days (2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.83, P = .03), 1 year (1.82, 95% CI 1.13-2,82, P = .01), and 2 years (1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.47, P = .012). Patients who received CSI after 4 weeks had similar ORs of infection at 90 days (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.78-1.69, P = .48) 1 year (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85-1.63 P = .33), and 2 years (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.42, P = .54), compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the postoperative infection risk is greatest when CSIs are given within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy, whereas CSIs given within 2-<4 weeks also portend increased risk, albeit to a lesser degree. The risk of postoperative infection is not significantly increased when CSIs are given more than 1 month before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative, prognosis study.

Curtailing infection risks in hepatitis C patients: the effect of antiviral treatment in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) is a complex procedure that can result in various postoperative complications. However, the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) on postoperative complications after RevSA remains unclear because of limited and inconsistent evidence. This study aims (1) to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with HCV undergoing RevSA and (2) to evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on complication rates at different time points after the revision procedure, specifically at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database to investigate recent trends in the use of RevSA among HCV patients to assess postoperative complication rates, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), wound complication, transfusion, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Statistical analyses involved propensity score matching to create balanced cohorts and logistic regression to determine the relative risk of postoperative complications. Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 24.0 for Windows). The study included patients who underwent partial or total RevSA procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Patients were identified based on medical claims that included procedural codes for RevSA and associated diagnosis codes for PJI or insertion/removal of an antibiotic spacer. A Bonferroni correction was used because many tests were performed and statistical significance was set at P = .0125. RESULTS: The HCV cohort demonstrated higher PJI rates at 1-year (5.5% vs. 3.9%, P = .006) and 2-year follow-ups (6.7% vs. 4.6%, P = .006). However, no significant differences emerged in VTE and wound complication rates between the HCV and non-HCV cohorts. Comparing untreated and treated HCV patients, the former showed significantly higher PJI rates at 2 years (P = .010), whereas the treated group had significantly lower odds ratios for PJI. When comparing treated HCV patients with the non-HCV cohort, minimal differences were found in postoperative outcomes, indicating no significant difference in the risk of complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our study observed an association between HCV patients who received antiviral treatment prior to RevSA and a reduced incidence of PJI compared to untreated HCV patients. When comparing this group to the non-HCV controls, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI, suggesting a potential association between antiviral treatment and the observed risk patterns in HCV patients. Proper management of HCV-positive patients during RevSA is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications.

Open versus arthroscopic treatment of the rheumatoid elbow arthritis: a comparison of complications at two years utilizing a nationally representative database.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be addressed surgically with open procedures or elbow arthroscopy. Previous studies comparing outcomes of open to arthroscopic arthrolysis for the management of RA did not utilize a large database study. The aim was to compare demographics and two-year complications, in RA patients undergoing open or arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was performed utilizing a private, nationwide, all-payer database. We queried the database to identify patients undergoing open (n = 578) or arthroscopic (n = 379) arthrolysis for elbow RA. The primary goal of the study was to compare complications at two-years. Categorical variables were assessed utilizing the chi-squared test; while, continuous variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for infection following open or arthroscopic arthrolysis. RESULTS: RA patients undergoing open elbow arthrolysis were older (55 vs. 49 years, p < 0.001), predominately female (61.6% vs 60.9%, p = 0.895), and likely to have chronic kidney disease (20.4 vs. 12.9%), and DM (45.2 vs. 32.2%) (both p < 0.005). Open elbow arthrolysis was also associated with higher rates of infection (31.7 vs. 4.7%) and wound complications (26.8 vs. 3.4%) (both p = 0.001). Nerve injury rates were found to be similar (8.3 vs. 9.0%, p = 0.81). On multivariable logistic regression, open elbow procedures were associated with the highest risk for infection (OR: 8.43). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open arthrolysis for RA were at a higher risk of infection and wound complications compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis utilizing a nationally representative database. While there appears to be a difference in outcomes following these two procedures, higher level evidence is needed to draw more definitive conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, Level III.

Higher preoperative expectations predict better outcomes in shoulder surgery patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative expectations (PE) are an independent predictor of greater 2-year outcomes and greater improvement from baseline in shoulder surgery patients. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixteen patients who underwent shoulder surgery at one institution were studied. Patients completed both preoperative and 2-year follow-up questionnaires including PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) computer-adaptive testing in six domains, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, shoulder numeric pain scale (NPS), and the Marx Shoulder Activity Rating Scale (MARS). PE were measured using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes and Data Evaluation Management System (MODEMS) expectations domain, and satisfaction was measured via the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8). RESULTS: The mean PE score was 86.2 ± 17.8. Greater PE were associated with significantly better 2-year scores for ASES, NPS, MARS, SSQ8, and PROMIS domains of Physical Function, Fatigue, Pain Interference Fatigue and Social Satisfaction. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that greater PE were an independent predictor of both better 2-year scores and greater improvement for PROMIS SS (p < 0.001), ASES (p = 0.007), and shoulder NPS (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Greater PE are positively associated with numerous patient-based outcomes 2 years after surgery. With regards to pain relief, shoulder function, and social satisfaction, higher PE are also predictive of better outcome scores and more improvement. This study suggests that preoperative assessment of shoulder surgery PE is important, and that counseling patients to optimize realistic expectations may lead to superior outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does needle penetration of the shoulder joint prior to arthroscopy increase infection risk? The effect of preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram or corticosteroid injection.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has associated preoperative corticosteroid shoulder injection (CSI) with infection following shoulder surgery. A recent study found an equally elevated risk of total knee arthroplasty infection with preoperative injection of either CSI or hyaluronic acid. The implication is that violation of a joint prior to surgery, even in the absence of corticosteroid, may pose an elevated risk of infection following orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether violation of the shoulder joint for magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) poses an elevated risk of infection following shoulder arthroscopy, and to compare this risk to that introduced by preoperative CSI. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) no CSI or MRA within 6 months of surgery (n = 5000), (2) CSI within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 1055), (3) CSI between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 2575), (4) MRA within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 414), and (5) MRA between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 1138). Postoperative infection (septic shoulder or surgical site infection) was analyzed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years, postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for differences among groups. RESULTS: MRA within 2 weeks prior to shoulder surgery was associated with an increased risk of infection at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P = .007), while MRA 2-4 weeks preceding surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at any time point. By comparison, CSI within 2 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.72; P = .022), 1 year (OR, 1.65; P = .005), and 2 years (OR, 1.63; P = .002) following surgery. Similarly, CSI 2-4 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.83; P < .001), 1 year (OR, 1.62; P < .001), and 2 years (OR, 1.79; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CSI within 4 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy elevates the risk of postoperative infection. Needle arthrotomy for shoulder MRA elevates the risk of infection in a more limited fashion. Avoidance of MRA within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy may mitigate postoperative infection risk. Additionally, the association between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection may be more attributed to medication profile than to needle arthrotomy.

Increased actual sling wear is associated with better early patient-reported and image-based outcomes after shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have failed to show differences in functional outcomes for patient-reported sling use after rotator cuff repair. Temperature-sensing devices are used to more accurately measure brace adherence. The purposes of this study were to quantify actual sling adherence and its predictors and to establish whether increased sling adherence is associated with improved functional and image-based outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 65 patients undergoing shoulder surgery requiring ≥4 weeks of postoperative sling use. Temperature-sensing devices were implanted in the slings to monitor sling adherence. Patient-reported sling adherence was determined from a questionnaire. Patients were considered 80% adherent if they wore the sling 16 h/d (112 h/week) when 20 h/d was prescribed. The primary outcomes were patient-reported and actual sling adherence, patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale pain score) within 12 months postoperatively, and image-based failure based on ultrasound or radiography at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Patient-reported sling adherence was highly sensitive (82.8%), was poorly specific (28.6%), had low accuracy (53.1%), and was weakly correlated with actual sling adherence (r = 0.32, P = .009). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, male patients were 91% less likely than female patients to be adherent with sling use (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.42; P = .002). Additionally, obese and morbidly obese patients were 88% (95% CI, 0.02-0.84; P = .033) and 98% (95% CI, 0.002-0.27; P = .003), respectively, less likely than non-obese patients to adhere to sling wear postoperatively. After we controlled for surgical procedure, visual analog scale pain scores were significantly better at 6 weeks (ß = -1.47; 95% CI, -2.88 to -0.05; P = .04) and 3 months (ß = -1.68; 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.08; P = .04) if patients adhered to sling wear. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that 13.6 hours and 15.4 hours of daily sling wear optimized image-based outcomes at 6 weeks (failure rate, 0% vs. 16%; P = .01) and 1 year (failure rate, 3% vs. 28%; P = .008) postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that patient-reported sling adherence is unreliable, adherence can be predicted by female sex and lower body mass index, and increased sling adherence is associated with improved early pain scores and image-based outcomes. These data can help inform future studies using postoperative sling protocols as patient-reported sling adherence is not an accurate method to assess sling use.

Does timing matter? The effect of preoperative smoking cessation on the risk of infection or revision following rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Nicotine in tobacco products is known to impair bone and tendon healing, and smoking has been associated with an increased rate of retear and reoperation following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Although smoking is known to increase the risk of failure following RCR, former smoking status and the timing of preoperative smoking cessation have not previously been investigated. METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried for patients undergoing RCR between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive groups according to smoking history: (1) never smokers (n = 50,000), (2) current smokers (n = 28,291), (3) former smokers with smoking cessation 3-6 months preoperatively (n = 34,513), (4) former smokers with smoking cessation 6-12 months preoperatively (n = 786), and (5) former smokers with smoking cessation >12 months preoperatively (n = 1399). The risks of postoperative infection and revision surgery were assessed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years following surgery. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to isolate and evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS: The 90-day rate of infection following RCR was 0.28% in never smokers compared with 0.51% in current smokers and 0.52% in former smokers who quit smoking 3-6 months prior to surgery (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression identified smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; P < .001) and smoking cessation 3-6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.56; P < .001) as risk factors for 90-day infection. The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. However, smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a significant elevation in infection risk. In addition, smoking was associated with an elevated 90-day revision risk (OR, 1.22; P = .038), as was smoking cessation between 3 and 6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.19; P = .048). The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a statistically significant elevation in revision risk. CONCLUSION: Current smokers and former smokers who quit smoking within 6 months of RCR are at an elevated risk of postoperative infection and revision surgery at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively compared with never smokers. Former smokers who quit >6 months prior to RCR are not at a detectably elevated risk of infection or revision surgery compared with those who have never smoked.

Acromion morphology is associated with glenoid bone loss in posterior glenohumeral instability.

BACKGROUND: The acromion morphology in a shoulder with posterior instability differs from that of a shoulder without glenohumeral instability. Specifically, the acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt, greater posterior acromial height, and less posterior coverage is associated with posterior instability. However, the association between acromion morphology and glenoid bone loss (GBL) in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability has not previously been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether acromial morphology influences the extent or pattern of posterior GBL in a cohort of patients with posterior glenohumeral instability. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study identified 89 shoulders with unidirectional posterior glenohumeral instability. Total area GBL was measured using the best-fit circle method on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Shoulders were divided into 3 groups: (1) no GBL (n = 30), (2) GBL 0%-13.5% (n = 45), or (3) GBL ≥13.5% (n = 14). Acromion measurements were performed on MRI and included acromial tilt, posterior acromial height, anterior acromial coverage, and posterior acromial coverage. RESULTS: Patients without GBL had a steeper acromial tilt (58.5° ± 1.4°) compared with those with 0%-13.5% GBL (64.3° ± 1.5°) or GBL ≥13.5% (67.7° ± 1.8°) (P = .004). Patients without GBL also had greater posterior coverage (65.4° ± 1.7°) compared with those with GBL (60.3° ± 1.4°) (P = .015). Posterior acromion height was not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that an acromion with a flatter sagittal tilt and less posterior coverage is associated with GBL in the setting of posterior glenohumeral instability. This is important to consider as posterior GBL has been identified as a risk factor for failure of posterior soft tissue-stabilizing procedures.

An accurate method of measuring shoulder sling compliance: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of postoperative shoulder sling compliance on surgical outcomes is unknown. The goal was to determine an accurate method to measure sling compliance. We compared volunteer recorded sling wear time with temperature-based sensors to monitor sling compliance. METHODS: Data loggers sutured at three locations measured heat generated in 15-minute intervals. Slings wearers logged sling wear to accurately cross-reference with temperature sensors. Secondary experiments analyzed whether surrounding ambient temperature can be discerned from actual sling wear. We created an algorithm to describe actual sling wear time as a function of heat recorded and calculated percent wear accuracy. RESULTS: The modified sling was worn for 172 h. The algorithm modeled sling on/off times by analyzing cutoff temperatures. Diagnostic accuracy was >99 % for the three locations, with no statistically significant differences among them. Compared with sling wear, ambient temperature took longer to reach critical temperature values determined by the algorithm, helping distinguish compliance from false positives. CONCLUSIONS: The described algorithm can effectively quantify shoulder sling wear time based on heat-generated sensor readings. False positives from ambient temperature are minimal. This measurement method could be used to study the relationship between postoperative sling use and functional outcomes after shoulder surgery.

Reliability of supraspinatus intramuscular fatty infiltration estimates on T1-weighted MRI in potential candidates for rotator cuff repair surgery: full-thickness tear versus high-grade partial-thickness tear.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with supraspinatus high-grade partial-thickness tear or full-thickness tear are potential candidates for rotator cuff repair surgery. We sought (1) to compare supraspinatus intramuscular fatty infiltration between these groups by Goutallier grade, fuzzy C-means and an orthopaedic surgeon visible percentage estimate, (2) and to determine the reliability of each method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of supraspinatus intramuscular fatty infiltration on T1-weighted MR images for 93 shoulders with either supraspinatus partial-thickness tear > 50% tendon thickness or full-thickness tear by Goutallier grade, fuzzy C-means and an orthopaedic surgeon visible percentage estimate, by two observers for each method. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare groups. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was determined. Correlative analysis among the three methods was performed. RESULTS: Significant differences of mean supraspinatus intramuscular fatty infiltration were present when comparing supraspinatus high-grade partial-thickness tear versus full-thickness tears by Goutallier grade (p = 0.004), fuzzy C-means (p = 0.002) and orthopaedic surgeon visible percentage estimate (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference for age (55.0 ± 11.1 years versus 56.1 ± 9.6 years) or sex (35.4% male versus 47.8% male) for supraspinatus high-grade partial-thickness tear and full-thickness tear, respectively. A significant difference existed among the subgroup of full-thickness tears stratified by tear size by all three methods (p < 0.020). Inter- and intra-observer reliability was Goutallier grade 0.590 and 0.624, fuzzy C-means 0.768 and 0.925 and orthopaedic surgeon visible percentage estimate 0.858 and 0.686, respectively. For shoulders with mean Goutallier grade ≥ 2.0, inter-observer reliability was 0.878 and 0.802 for fuzzy C-means and orthopaedic surgeon visible percentage estimate, respectively. A strong correlation was present among the three methods of supraspinatus FI analysis (rho ≥ 0.72). CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus full-thickness tears have higher amounts of intramuscular fatty infiltration compared to high-grade partial-thickness tear. Quantitative fuzzy C-means shows excellent inter-observer reliability for estimating supraspinatus intramuscular fat. Experienced orthopaedic surgeons' semi-quantitative estimation of supraspinatus visible intramuscular fat may offer improved reliability as compared to semi-quantitative Goutallier grade.

Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.

Shoulder arthroplasty is performed with increasing frequency, and osteoarthritis is the most common indication for this procedure. However, the glenoid side of the joint is widely recognized as a limiting factor in the long-term durability of shoulder replacement, and osteoarthritis leads to characteristic bony changes at the glenoid which can exacerbate this challenge by reducing the already limited glenoid bone stock, by altering biomechanics, and by interfering with operative exposure. This article reviews the Walch classification system for glenoid morphology. Several typical findings of osteoarthritis at the glenoid are discussed including central bone loss, posterior bone loss, retroversion, biconcavity, inclination, osteophyte formation, subchondral bone quality, and bone density. The three primary types of shoulder arthroplasty are reviewed, along with several techniques for addressing glenoid deformity, including eccentric reaming, bone grafting, and the use of augmented glenoid components. Ultimately, a primary objective at shoulder arthroplasty is to correct glenoid deformity while preserving bone stock, which depends critically on characterizing the glenoid at pre-operative imaging. Understanding the surgical techniques and the implications of glenoid morphology on surgical decision-making enables the radiologist to provide the morphologic information needed by the surgeon.

Patients undergoing shoulder surgery have high preoperative expectations.

PURPOSE: The primary aims of this study were to (1) assess the preoperative expectations of patients undergoing shoulder surgery, and (2) determine the relationship between preoperative patient demographics, PROs, and preoperative patient expectations. It was hypothesized that younger patients with worse function and worse health status had higher expectations of shoulder surgery. METHODS: Data from a total of 319 patients (319 shoulders) from 2015-2018 were analyzed. Patients completed a series of questionnaires covering demographics and patient-reported outcome measures. Expectations of treatment were evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine the significance of identified associations. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 186 males and 133 females. The mean age was 46.9 (± 17.2), and the mean BMI was 30.1 (± 6.8). Overall, patients had high expectations of shoulder surgery, with a mean score of 84.7 (± 19.3). The most commonly performed procedure in the study population was arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. There was a significant association between pre-treatment expectations and ethnicity, previous shoulder surgery, employment status, income level, tobacco use, preoperative opioid use, depression, and ASA score. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that patients undergoing shoulder surgery have high overall preoperative expectations, which were significantly associated with ethnicity, surgical history, opioid use, and employment status, and with multiple patient-reported outcome measures including physical function, pain interference, fatigue, and depression. Nevertheless, by discussing expectations preoperatively, orthopaedic surgeons can help patients develop high but realistic expectations to improve outcomes and satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Benzoyl peroxide use transiently decreases Cutibacterium acnes load on the shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium acnes is the most common pathogen in shoulder prosthetic joint infections. Short-contact benzoyl peroxide (BPO) solutions effectively reduce C acnes loads on the shoulder preoperatively. It is unknown how long the effect of BPO lasts. We evaluated C acnes counts 1 week after BPO application. We hypothesized that BPO would decrease C acnes burden with a rebound after 1 week. METHODS: Screening of 102 healthy volunteers with no history of shoulder surgery or C acnes infection was performed to establish bacterial counts. Thirty-four participants were selected based on an established threshold. Each was given BPO 5% for 3 consecutive days of application on either the left or right shoulder as indicated by a random number generator. Deep sebaceous gland cultures were obtained with a detergent scrub technique before BPO application, after 3 days of use, and 1 week after BPO treatment commenced. RESULTS: The differences between the logarithmic reduction and the logarithmic rebound at the anterior, lateral, and posterior sites were statistically significant. Anteriorly, the average log reduction was -0.44 and the average log rebound was 0.69 (P = .003). Laterally, reduction was -0.64 and rebound was 0.74 (P = .003). Posteriorly, reduction was -0.63 and rebound was 0.78 (P = .008). At the axilla, reduction was -0.40 and rebound was 0.31 (P = .10). The differences in C acnes burden between pretreatment and 1-week counts at all sites were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in C acnes burden occurred after BPO application but was not permanent. Significant rebound occurred just 1 week later.

Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome scores, (2) define failure and reoperation rates, and (3) quantify the magnitude of patient response across treatment strategies. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Scopus databases were searched for studies including physical therapy and operative treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. The criteria of the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies were used to assess study quality. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported outcome scores as well as failure, complication, and reoperation rates. To quantify patient response to treatment, we compared changes in the Constant-Murley score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with previously reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. RESULTS: No level I or II studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were found. Physical therapy was associated with a 30% failure rate among the included patients, and another 30% went on to undergo surgery. Partial repair was associated with a 45% retear rate and 10% reoperation rate. Only graft interposition was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for both the Constant-Murley score and ASES score. Latissimus tendon transfer techniques using humeral bone tunnel fixation were associated with a 77% failure rate. Superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata autograft was associated with a weighted average change that exceeded the MCID for the ASES score. Reverse arthroplasty was associated with a 10% prosthesis failure rate and 8% reoperation rate. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality comparative studies to guide treatment recommendations. Compared with surgery, physical therapy is associated with less improvement in perceived functional outcomes and a higher clinical failure rate.

Association of Patient Self-Reported Shoulder Scores to Quantitative and Semiquantitative MRI Measures of Rotator Cuff Intramuscular Fatty Infiltration: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of supraspinatus fat fraction and Goutallier grade to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in cohorts of older adults with painful full-thickness supraspinatus tendon (SST) tear and control subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Seventeen control subjects and 15 study participants with painful full-thickness SST tear were prospectively recruited (mean age ± SD, 63.0 ± 10.1 years and 62.6 ± 9.0 years, respectively). Study participants received shoulder MRI and completed ASES questionnaires at one time. Goutallier grade was assessed on T1-weighted MRI. Fat fraction was measured on 6-point Dixon MRI. Body mass index (BMI) was determined. Descriptive, correlation, reliability, and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS. The control and painful full-thickness SST tear cohorts differed in mean supraspinatus fat fraction (3.3% ± 1.4% and 7.3 ± 5.9%, respectively; p = 0.024) and Goutallier grade (0.4 ± 0.5 and 0.9 ± 0.7, respectively; p = 0.022). Fat fraction (p = 0.014) and Goutallier grade (p = 0.017) showed a significant inverse association with ASES score only in the SST tear cohort. The association of BMI to ASES score was significant only in the control group (p = 0.036). The correlation between BMI and fat fraction were different for the two groups (control cohort, r = 0.676 and p = 0.003; SST tear cohort, r = 0.124 and p = 0.687). Fat fraction showed strong interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.903); Goutallier grade showed poor interobserver reliability (κ = 0.178). CONCLUSION. The association of ASES score and supraspinatus fat fraction or Goutallier grade differs between patients with painful full-thickness SST tear and control subjects without symptoms. Although fat fraction shows strong reliability, Goutallier grade should be regarded cautiously because of suboptimal reproducibility. Our results also suggest that painful full-thickness SST tear alters the correlation between supraspinatus fat fraction and BMI as compared with control subjects.

CT-Based 3D Printing of the Glenoid Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: Bony Morphology and Model Evaluation.

To demonstrate the 3D printed appearance of glenoid morphologies relevant to shoulder replacement surgery and to evaluate the benefits of printed models of the glenoid with regard to surgical planning. A retrospective review of patients referred for shoulder CT was performed, leading to a cohort of nine patients without arthroplasty hardware and exhibiting glenoid changes relevant to shoulder arthroplasty planning. Thin slice CT images were used to create both humerus-subtracted volume renderings of the glenoid, as well as 3D surface models of the glenoid, and 11 printed models were created. Volume renderings, surface models, and printed models were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist for accuracy. Four fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons specializing in shoulder surgery reviewed each case individually as follows: First, the source CT images were reviewed, and a score for the clarity of the bony morphologies relevant to shoulder arthroplasty surgery was given. The volume rendering was reviewed, and the clarity was again scored. Finally, the printed model was reviewed, and the clarity again scored. Each printed model was also scored for morphologic complexity, expected usefulness of the printed model, and physical properties of the model. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon signed rank tests of the clarity scores were calculated, and the Spearman's ρ correlation coefficient between complexity and usefulness scores was computed. Printed models demonstrated a range of glenoid bony changes including osteophytes, glenoid bone loss, retroversion, and biconcavity. Surgeons rated the glenoid morphology as more clear after review of humerus-subtracted volume rendering, compared with review of the source CT images (p = 0.00903). Clarity was also better with 3D printed models compared to CT (p = 0.00903) and better with 3D printed models compared to humerus-subtracted volume rendering (p = 0. 00879). The expected usefulness of printed models demonstrated a positive correlation with morphologic complexity, with Spearman's ρ 0.73 (p = 0.0108). 3D printing of the glenoid based on pre-operative CT provides a physical representation of patient anatomy. Printed models enabled shoulder surgeons to appreciate glenoid bony morphology more clearly compared to review of CT images or humerus-subtracted volume renderings. These models were more useful as glenoid complexity increased.

Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Shoulder Surgery: How Do Medical Institution Web Sites Rate?

This study evaluated the readability of online patient education materials on shoulder surgery. Medical and nonmedical institution web sites were compared and it was hypothesized that medical institution materials are written at lower grade levels than nonmedical institution materials, because medical institutions understand physician-patient interactions. Eighty-six articles were scored according to 10 readability tests: cumulative combined average grade level was 12.5 ± 2.8 and average Flesch reading score was 43.5 ± 12.6 (college level). The average composite grade level readability for medical institution web sites was 13 ± 2, significantly higher than for nonmedical institution web sites (11.9 ± 2.1; p = .017). Patient education materials available online are written at a higher level than American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health guidelines. Medical institution articles are written at a statistically significant higher grade level than nonmedical institution articles, but the difference is small and both rate poorly compared with current standards. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(3):209-214, 2019).

Comparison of Curved and Straight Anchor Insertion for SLAP Repair: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To compare a curved drill guide with a straight guide for suture anchor placement into the posterosuperior glenoid from an anterolateral portal with respect to glenoid perforation, drill contact with the suprascapular nerve, and maximum load. METHODS: Ten bilateral pairs of fresh human cadaveric shoulders were randomized to the curved technique on 1 side and the straight technique on the contralateral side. An anterolateral trans-rotator cuff portal was used for placement of anchors at the posterior (11 o'clock right shoulder) and far posterior (10 o'clock right shoulder) positions on the glenoid with a 24-mm drill stop, and the drill tip was marked with ink. Specimens were dissected for glenoid perforation and drill contact with the suprascapular nerve. The maximum load of each anchor was measured using a material testing system. RESULTS: Glenoid perforation occurred in 30% in the curved group and 60% in the straight group overall (P = .01). Ink markings demonstrated a direct hit on the suprascapular nerve in most of the penetrations (13 of 18) but was not significantly different between the curved and straight guides (P = .25). Maximum load of the posterior anchor was greater in the curved group than that in the straight group (199.5 vs 146.7 N, respectively; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The curved technique has a lower rate of glenoid perforation and greater maximum load than the straight technique. However, the curved technique can result in glenoid perforation and injury to the suprascapular nerve, and we do not recommend it. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Placing suture anchors through an anterolateral portal with a curved guide provides a more optimal trajectory with decreased risk of glenoid perforation and superior biomechanical strength than that with the straight guide, but it is not safe.

Neer Award 2018: Benzoyl peroxide effectively decreases preoperative Cutibacterium acnes shoulder burden: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) solutions effectively reduce Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) on the face, neck, and back in nonoperative settings. This study compared preoperative application of BPO vs. chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in decreasing shoulder C acnes skin burden in surgical patients. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing shoulder surgery were prospectively enrolled in a randomized double-blind trial at 1 institution from August 2015 to April 2017. Participants were randomized to 5% BPO or 4% CHG for 3 consecutive days. The nonoperative shoulder had no intervention and served as the negative control. Skin cultures of both shoulders were obtained via a detergent scrub technique the day of surgery at anterior, lateral, and posterior sites and the axilla. RESULTS: Fewer positive cultures were obtained from the BPO-treated side compared with the contralateral side (P = .0003), and no change was shown for the CHG group (P = .80). Shoulders treated with BPO showed a statistically significant reduction in C acnes counts compared with CHG at anterior (P = .03) and posterior (P = .005) portal sites. No significant difference was found at the axilla (P = .99) or lateral portal site (P = .08). No postoperative infections or wound complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: BPO is more effective than CHG at reducing C acnes on the shoulder. Decreasing the skin burden of C acnes may reduce intraoperative wound contamination and postoperative infection. BPO should be considered as an adjunctive preoperative skin preparation considering its potential benefit, low risk, and low cost.

Os acromiale fixation: a biomechanical comparison of polyethylene suture versus stainless steel wire tension band.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic hardware is a commonly reported complication after surgical fixation of an unstable meso-type os acromiale. This study compared the biomechanical properties of a cannulated screw tension band construct using a metal wire tension band vs. a suture tension band, considering that the suture construct could allow for decreased hardware burden in the clinical setting. METHODS: A meso-type os acromiale was created in 16 cadaveric shoulders. Two cannulated 4-mm screws were placed in each specimen. Tension band augmentation was accomplished with a 1-mm stainless steel wire (wire group) or a #5 braided polyethylene suture (suture group), with 8 specimens in each group. An inferiorly directed force was applied to the anterior acromion at 1 mm/s on a materials testing machine. Stiffness and ultimate failure load were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference (P = .22) was observed in the ultimate failure load between the wire (228 ± 85 N; range, 114-397 N) and the suture (275 ± 139 N; range, 112-530 N). No significant difference (P = .17) was observed in the stiffness between the wire (28 ± 12 N/mm; range, 18-53 N/mm) and the suture (38 ± 25 N/mm; range, 10-83 N/mm). CONCLUSIONS: Stainless steel wire and polyethylene suture have similar biomechanical strength in the cannulated screw tension band fixation of meso-type os acromiale at time zero.