RESUMO
The present study examines how different chronic illnesses and mental illness comorbidity (chronic illness with complexity [CIC]) associate with components of advance care planning (ACP). We also explore the role self-perceived burden plays in the relationship between illness and ACP. Data were gathered from a cross-sectional survey of 305 elderly participants from the New Jersey End-of-Life study. Participants with diabetes and those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are less likely, while participants with CIC are more likely, to plan for the end-of-life. Participants with diabetes are less likely to make formal plans, whereas those with CVD are less likely to hold informal discussions. CIC is associated with increased odds of having an advance directive, but no other form of ACP. Self-perceived burden did not appear to be the gateway by which illness groups differentially engaged in ACP. Future research should investigate what aspects of illnesses drive ACP.
Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , New Jersey , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The objectives of this investigation were to (1) identify elements that comprise an acceptable quality of life (Q-L) post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the perspectives of patients and families, and (2) explore patient and family satisfaction with treatment decisions relevant to QoL. The authors created, tested, and administered two forms (patient; family) of a 35-question interview to 33 participants in a longitudinal TBI study (14 women, 19 men) and 33 associated family members. Men associated ratings of QoL with numerous variables, while women's responses revealed no significant relationships shared by QoL and other variables. Women reported a poorer QoL than did men. Older patients reported a better QoL than did younger patients. Families emphasized the family relationship, emotional control, and ability to concentrate when considering overall QoL. Patients did not. The majority of patients and families expressed satisfaction with decisions made about acute treatment. QoL research is essential to illuminate best practice models.