Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent ; 15(2): 77-80, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17645069

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to confirm that Smartprep burs do not cut non-carious, healthy dentine. Twenty non-carious extracted molars were trimmed with a diamond bur to remove enamel and to create a flat dentine surface. A new Smartprep bur (RA # 4) was applied to each tooth for 30 seconds. As a control, a new number three round stainless steel bur was applied to each tooth. The mean dentine loss was 4.25 mg (range 1.4 - 9 mg) for Smartprep burs and 12.21 mg (range 7.6 - 16.5 mg) for stainless steel burs. The Smartprep burs remove significantly less dentine than stainless steel burs.


Assuntos
Preparo da Cavidade Dentária/instrumentação , Equipamentos Odontológicos de Alta Rotação , Dentina/cirurgia , Humanos , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Polímeros/uso terapêutico , Rotação
2.
J Endod ; 38(10): 1387-90, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980184

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess Enterococcus faecalis penetration into the dentin of the apical 3 mm and bacterial death after the application of either chlorhexidine or laser to root-end cavities. METHODS: Root canals of 60 single-rooted teeth were prepared. In part 1, cementum was removed semicircumferentially from 21 roots, and the smear layer was removed from 15 roots using 17% EDTA/cetrimide. Teeth were inoculated and incubated with E. faecalis for 10 days, rinsed, and live/dead stained. The effect of cementum and smear on bacterial penetration was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In part 2, 39 teeth had root ends resected and cavities ultrasonically prepared. Inoculated roots were assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: (1) root-end cavities irrigated with 0.2 % chlorhexidine, (2) root-end cavities irradiated with a laser for 20 seconds at 1.5 W, or (3) root-end cavities that received no treatment. Roots were live/dead stained, sectioned, and examined by CLSM. The depth of the bacterial penetration and bacterial survival were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The presence of a smear layer and/or cementum did not significantly affect bacterial penetration. In root-end cavities, chlorhexidine was more effective than laser (P < .001), reducing bacterial viability by 93% versus 70% with a laser. CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis invaded the entire width of dentin in the apical 3 mm irrespective of the smear layer and/or cementum. Chlorhexidine was more effective than laser in disinfecting root-end cavities.


Assuntos
Cemento Dentário/fisiologia , Dentina/microbiologia , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Ápice Dentário/microbiologia , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Líquido Dentinal/microbiologia , Desinfecção/métodos , Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Enterococcus faecalis/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterococcus faecalis/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Lasers Semicondutores/uso terapêutico , Microscopia Confocal , Camada de Esfregaço , Terapia por Ultrassom
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA