Comparative study evaluating antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist as adjuvant therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: Investigating the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (RUP) versus montelukast (MON) as adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: From December 2018 to December 2019, 75 patients with active RA were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three groups (n = 25 in each group); methotrexate (MTX) group which received MTX 15-25 mg/week plus placebo tablet once daily; MTX/RUP group which received MTX plus RUP 10 mg once daily; and MTX/MON group which received MTX plus MON 10 mg once daily. The treatment duration was 3 months. At baseline and 3 months after treatment, blood samples were collected for the biochemical analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukins 8 and 17 (IL-8, IL-17), E-selectin, and clusterin (CLU) levels. Clinical and functional assessments using Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) were performed. RESULTS: Both RUP and MON produced clinical and functional improvements which were translated by significant improvements in DAS28-CRP score and MDHAQ. Rupatadine significantly reduced all measured parameters (P < 0.05) except for IL-17 and CLU. Montelukast significantly decreased all measured variables (P < 0.05) except for E-selectin. Interleukin-8 was positively correlated with IL-17 and CLU, while hs-CRP was positively correlated with E-selectin and body mass index (BMI). Both drugs were well tolerated; somnolence was the common side effect for RUP. No neuropsychiatric events were reported with MON. CONCLUSION: Rupatadine or montelukast may serve as a potential adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis secondary to the preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03770923, December 10, 2018.

A comparative study on the anti-inflammatory effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers & statins on rheumatoid arthritis disease activity.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : Rheumatoid artherits (RA) is a refractory disease and the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in favor of pro-inflammatory cytokines has been implicated in pathogenesis of RA. In this context, the aim of the present study was to compare the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of candesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, and atorvastatin in RA patients. METHODS: : In this single-blinded parallel randomized placebo controlled study, the patients recruited between December 2017 and May 2018 were categorized into three groups: group 1 included 15 RA patients who served as control group and received traditional therapy (+ placebo); group 2 included 15 RA patients who received traditional therapy + candesartan (8 mg/day); and group 3 included 15 patients who received traditional therapy + atorvastatin (20 mg/day) for three months. Clinical status in RA patients was evaluated by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and morning stiffness before and three months after treatment. All groups were subjected to biochemical analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß) and malondialdehyde (MDA) before and three months after treatment. RESULTS: : Both candesartan and atorvastatin treated groups showed significant decrease in serum levels IL-1ß and TNF-α, acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR), number of swollen joint and patient global assessment. This was also associated with improvement in disease activity and quality of life regarding DAS28 and HAQ-DI as compared to baseline data and the control group. Atorvastatin group showed significant decrease in the serum level of oxidative stress marker (MDA). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: : Both candesartan and atorvastatin showed anti-inflammatory effect and immunomodulatory effects leading to improvement in clinical status and disease activity in RA patients. However, atorvastatin was superior to candesartan through its anti-oxidant effect.

Evaluation of the anti-osteoporotic effects of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women.

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic bone disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several studies have documented that metformin is osteogenic in vitro. In contrast, others showed no effect of metformin on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Incretin hormones have received much attention because of their beneficial effects beyond glycemia, including on bone health. The study evaluated the anti-osteoporotic effect of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women. Forty postmenopausal diabetic women were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 received metformin (Glucophage(®) 500 mg) 1 tablet twice daily, and group 2 received sitagliptin (Januvia(®) 100 mg) 1 tablet/day, for 12 weeks. Fasting blood and urine samples were collected for measurement of serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD). Laboratory tests were measured at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks, and at the end of the study. Bone mineral density of the anterior posterior lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 weeks of the intervention. In the metformin-treated group, the mean values for all markers of bone turnover at 12 weeks of treatment were not significantly different from baseline. In group 2, the mean serum total ALP was significantly decreased, serum osteocalcin levels were non-significantly decreased gradually by 10% at 12 weeks, while urinary DPD decreased significantly and was then maintained at 28% decrease at 12 weeks. In conclusion, metformin is neither osteogenic nor has anti-osteoporotic effect, while sitagliptin could positively regulate bone metabolism.

Tadalafil versus pentoxifylline in the management of diabetic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil (TAD) versus pentoxifylline (PTX) in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Some animal studies and clinical trials reported that tadalafil and pentoxifylline have a reducing effect on different blood glucose parameters and lipid profiles which contribute to progress the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to DKD. METHODS: From February 2022 to March 2023, 90 patients with type 2 DM and DKD (micro-albuminuria) were enrolled in this randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three equal groups: control group, TAD group, and PTX group. The three groups received traditional blood glucose lowering therapy + ramipril 10 mg PO. The TAD group also received tadalafil 20 mg PO every other day. The PTX group also received pentoxifylline 400 mg PO twice daily. RESULTS: Both TAD and PTX groups produced statistically significant improvement in the primary outcomes by a significant reduction in Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) which was pronounced by a reduction percentage of-47.47%, -53.73% respectively. In addition to a significant decrease in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (mmol/mol), Fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2-h PPG) (p < 0.001). Only the PTX group showed a significant increase in Cr Cl and a significant decrease in S. Cr (p < 0.001). Only the TAD group showed a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (p < 0.001), while the PTX group showed a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (p-value 0.011), and triglyceride (p-value 0.002). Both TAD and PTX groups showed a decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) which was significant only in the PTX group (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) (p < 0.001), and an increase in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) (p-value 0.850, 0.014 respectively) which was significant only in the PTX group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tadalafil or pentoxifylline may serve as an effective adjuvant therapy for patients with diabetic kidney disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05487755, July 25, 2022.

A Clinical Study Evaluating the Effects of Fluvastatin on Serum Osteoprotegerin Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, has been identified as a critical regulator of bone resorption. Considering the possible role of OPG in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in the osteoclastogenesis suppression effects of statins, the present study aims to investigate the effects of fluvastatin on serum levels OPG and disease activity score (DAS) in patients with RA. Forty patients with RA were randomized in a placebo-controlled trial to receive 40 mg fluvastatin or placebo as an adjunct to existing disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine). Patients were followed up over 12 weeks. OPG and disease activity variables were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. After 12 weeks, the OPG level was significantly increased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group. DAS-28 was significantly decreased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group. C-reactive protein (CRP), morning stiffness, swollen joint count (SJC), and tender joint count (TJC) were significantly decreased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group; however, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ), and visual analogue screen (VAS) were not changed significantly. In conclusion, fluvastatin administration could increase the OPG levels and improve disease activity variables in patients with RA. Therefore, fluvastatin may serve a potential benefit in the treatment of RA patients.