Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: More relevant than ever? Results of a survey among breast surgeons.

PURPOSE: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery has been part of clinical routine for several years without an internationally accepted nomenclature, standardization or a systematic evaluation of single surgical procedures. METHODS: We carried out a structured survey of breast surgeons (n = 50) during the annual meeting of the German Society for Senology in Berlin 2017. In the run-up to the event, 10 questions were determined and released for an anonymous survey during the consensus meeting. RESULTS: Most surgeons participating in the consensus meeting had an expertise of more than 200 oncologic breast surgeries in the last 3 years and approved the need of a higher rate of standardization in oncoplastic techniques. From the oncological standpoint, oncoplastic surgery is considered safe with a comparable rate of compilations as seen in conventional breast-conserving procedures. Most surgeons approve that using oncoplastic surgery, higher rates of breast conservation and improved aesthetic results can be accomplished. The majority of the participants would endorse a more systematic review of subjective aesthetic results in clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: A higher degree in standardization of oncoplastic breast surgery is required for surgical-technical, educational, and scientific reasons as well as for a more differentiated monetary compensation of the surgical procedures. This process has already been started.

First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: To obtain consensus recommendations for the standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS) from an international panel of experts in breast surgery including delegates from the German, Austrian and Swiss societies of senology. METHODS: A total of 52 questions were addressed by electronic voting. The panel's recommendations were put into context with current evidence and the report was circled in an iterative open email process until consensus was obtained. RESULTS: The panelists considered OPS safe and effective for improving aesthetic outcomes and broadening the indication for breast conserving surgery (BCS) towards larger tumors. A slim majority believed that OPS reduces the rate of positive margins; however, there was consensus that OPS is associated with an increased risk of complications compared to conventional BCS. The panel strongly endorsed patient-reported outcomes measurement, and recommended selected scales of the Breast-Q™-Breast Conserving Therapy Module for that purpose. The Clough bi-level classification was recommended for standard use in clinical practice for indicating, planning and performing OPS, and the Hoffmann classification for surgical reports and billing purposes. Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty were the only two recognized OPS procedure categories supported by a majority of the panel. Finally, the experts unanimously supported the statement that every OPS procedure should be tailored to each individual patient. CONCLUSIONS: When implemented into clinical practice, the panel recommendations may improve safety and effectiveness of OPS. The attendees agreed that there is a need for prospective multicenter studies to optimize patient selection and for standardized criteria to qualify and accredit OPS training centers.

Single-Site Experience with an Automated Artificial Intelligence Application for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Measurement in Echocardiography.

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key parameter in evaluating left ventricular (LV) function using echocardiography (Echo), but its manual measurement by the modified biplane Simpson (MBS) method is time consuming and operator dependent. We investigated the feasibility of a server-based, commercially available and ready-to use-artificial intelligence (AI) application based on convolutional neural network methods that integrate fully automatic view selection and measurement of LVEF from an entire Echo exam into a single workflow. We prospectively enrolled 1083 consecutive patients who had been referred to Echo for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. LVEF was measured independently using MBS and AI. Test-retest variability was assessed in 40 patients. The reliability, repeatability, and time efficiency of LVEF measurements were compared between the two methods. Overall, 889 Echos were analyzed by cardiologists with the MBS method and by the AI. Over the study period of 10 weeks, the feasibility of both automatic view classification and seamlessly measured LVEF rose to 81% without user involvement. LVEF, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes correlated strongly between MBS and AI (R = 0.87, 0.89 and 0.93, p < 0.001 for all) with a mean bias of +4.5% EF, -12 mL and -11 mL, respectively, due to impaired image quality and the extent of LV function. Repeatability and reliability of LVEF measurement (n = 40, test-retest) by AI was excellent compared to MBS (coefficient of variation: 3.2% vs. 5.9%), although the median analysis time of the AI was longer than that of the operator-dependent MBS method (258 s vs. 171 s). This AI has succeeded in identifying apical LV views and measuring EF in one workflow with comparable results to the MBS method and shows excellent reproducibility. It offers realistic perspectives for fully automated AI-based measurement of LVEF in routine clinical settings.

Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions.

While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both p < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.

[Quality assurance in breast reconstruction - Establishment of a prospective national online registry for microsurgical breast reconstructions]. / Qualitätssicherung in der Brustrekonstruktion ­ Etablierung eines prospektiven nationalen Onlineregisters für mikrochirurgische Brustrekonstruktionen.

BACKGROUND: The loss of a breast, and thus of the female body shape, is often extremely traumatising for women affected. Although free flap grafts have become the gold standard in reconstructive breast surgery, it has not been possible to date to unequivocally document their superiority over conventional alternative techniques. To date, there are no data on the care situation in Germany. Neither the number of reconstructions nor the proportion of the individual techniques is known. A prospective online registry has been set up in order to systematically collect and transparently present the structure and quality of care. The long-term goals are to record the existing quality of care, improve deficits and to certify centres with the appropriate expertise to establish a high level of care nationwide. METHODS: For this purpose, the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) has set up an internet-based database in which treatment data are recorded anonymously. As part of a certification process, auditors checked structure quality, compliance with specifications, and the stringency of the data entered in comparison with the hospital's internal documentation. If the evaluation is positive, the DGPRÄC quality seal is awarded. RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2012, the database has provided validated information. Initially, only a few departments were prepared to present their results transparently. However, the number has grown steadily in recent years. As a result, the quality recording assumed a pioneering function nationwide and can now be used as a reliable source of information by patients and doctors. The DGPRÄC website features a map of the centres, which are colour-coded according to their respective qualifications. It is thus possible to find a qualified plastic surgeon with comprehensive expertise in acceptable proximity to every oncological breast centre. CONCLUSION: The database provides an overview of the quality of the various surgical techniques and thus the possibility of serious self monitoring and scientific analysis. The systematic collection of data has contributed to strengthening the position of plastic surgery in the field of reconstructive breast surgery. However, the financial and personnel resources required to establish the database were clearly underestimated.

[Consensus of the German-Speaking Society for Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM) on minimum standards for microsurgical training courses and accreditation - Minimum Standards for Microsurgical Training Courses and Accreditation]. / Konsensus der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße (DAM) für Mindeststandards mikrochirurgischer Trainings- und Übungskurse zur Vergabe eines Qualitätssiegels.

Microsurgical training courses are an integral part of surgical education and training. Due to the changes in the surgical everyday routine, the competence and skills training outside the operating room has an increasingly important status. Multi-day, hands-on exercises with different models of increasing difficulty use artificial, avital and vital microsurgical models. The skills are evaluated with regard to fine motor skills as well as orientation in space and low-tremor motion sequences as well as bimanual manipulation exercises by means of "lobal rating scales". However, with numerous course offerings in German-speaking countries, there are no uniform and transparent contents and evaluation standards to reflect the quality of the courses. At a consensus meeting, minimum requirements for the contents of microsurgical training courses in the context of continuing medical education were defined and drafted as a German-language consensus in order to award a DAM quality seal. The parameters include the definition of targets, the existence of a scripts, the number of hours used, models used, practical exercise time on the microscope, trainer to participant ratio, types of anastomosis or coaptation (artery, vein, nerve, lymph vessel), application of a global rating scale , examination (grade/passed - failed), participant certificate and course evaluation. With the aim to meet the available courses/course concepts to maintain or improve the quality of education and training, the assignment of a "Basic" and an "Advanced" quality seal has been defined. The further stepwise development of the courses is necessary to sustain all skills and competencies for future microsurgeons. Integration of validated microsurgical simulators may reduce animal use and thus contribute to the ethical responsibility. The introduction of quality seals for microsurgical training courses should strengthen the transparency and commitment of participants and provide support to course providers with appropriately substantiated content through DAM.

[Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap ­ What is the current standard? Consensus Statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels]. / Brustrekonstruktion mit freien TRAM oder DIEP Lappen ­ Was ist zeitgemäßer Standard?

The most common donor-site for autologous breast reconstruction is the abdomen. Over the past several decades technical advances have resulted in the development of flaps that have been associated with a progressive decrease in abdominal wall morbidity. However, controversy exists related to the differences between muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Hence, the question which approach should be considered standard of care remains unanswered. To address this question the current literature and published evidence was critically reviewed and discussed by an expert panel at the 39th Annual Meeting of the German-speaking Society for Micro surgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM). Based on this discussion a consensus statement was developed that incorporates contemporary data regarding postoperative complication rate, donor site morbidity, as well as expert opinion regarding technical details in autologous breast reconstruction with free TRAM and DIEP flaps.

Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Recommendations for the Screening, Diagnosis and Therapy of Breast Cancer.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Methods The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines which were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and the results of a systematic search of literature databases and the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point to develop recommendations and statements which were modified and graded in a structured consensus procedure. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and follow-up care of breast cancer. The importance of mammography for screening is confirmed in this updated version of the guideline and forms the basis for all screening. In addition to the conventional methods used to diagnose breast cancer, computed tomography (CT) is recommended for staging in women with a higher risk of recurrence. The follow-up concept includes suggested intervals between physical, ultrasound and mammography examinations, additional high-tech diagnostic procedures, and the determination of tumor markers for the evaluation of metastatic disease.

Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.

Gluteal artery perforator flaps.

Perforator flaps have allowed the transfer of a patient's own skin and fat in a reliable manner with minimal donor site morbidity for more than a decade. They represent the latest in the evolution of soft tissue flaps and provide the reconstructive microsurgeon with more freedom to select a donor site that matches the skin color, thickness, texture, and subcutaneous fat quality of the recipient site. More attention can be paid to the aesthetic quality of the reconstruction. This article focuses on buttock flaps for breast reconstruction and covers aspects such as patient evaluation, selection, preparation, surgical technique, and complications of superior gluteal artery perforator and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps.

An Appraisal of Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction-An Analysis of 515 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: The usage of internal mammary artery perforators (IMAPs) has been described in autologous breast reconstruction although IMAPS are not yet considered standard recipient vessels. It remains unclear if these vessels can be safely used in large flaps after radiation therapy or in delayed breast reconstruction. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 515 free flaps for autologous breast reconstruction were performed on 419 patients by 2 surgeons (S1 and S2). In a retrospective analysis, time of reconstruction, ischemia time, flap weight, diameter of couplers, and complications were analyzed. All 515 flaps were compared in a subset with regard to the 2 surgeons: S1 who always used the IMA as a recipient vessel and S2 who attempted IMAP use if possible. RESULTS: Of all 515 flaps, 424 were abdominal flaps and 91 flaps were from the upper thigh. Three hundred six cases were immediate reconstructions, and 112 were delayed reconstructions. In 97 cases, implants were converted to autologous tissue. In 112 cases, the IMAPs were used; of these, 82 were immediate and 17 were delayed reconstructions, and in 13 cases, implants were removed. Thirty-five percent of all anastomoses to IMAPs had previous radiation therapy. The flap failure rate was 1.9%. In none of these cases, the IMAPs were used. S1 never used the IMAP, and S2 used the IMAP in 37% of all of his flaps. CONCLUSIONS: IMAPs were safely used in all kinds of reconstructions and after radiation therapy, with no flap failure or negative effects on mastectomy skin flap perfusion. Using the IMAPs as recipient vessels is a further step toward simplifying microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Alternatives to thumb replantation.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should: 1. Have a variety of options for thumb reconstruction. 2. Know the advantages and disadvantages of the nonmicrosurgical and microsurgical techniques for thumb reconstruction. 3. Understand the decision making from the variety of thumb reconstruction techniques based on patient needs. 4. Have a basic understanding of the various thumb reconstruction techniques discussed. The traumatic amputation of the thumb is an absolute indication for attempted replantation. The profound disability of the hand resulting from absence of the thumb, with loss of pinch and grasp, obliges the surgeon to make every attempt to replant the amputated thumb and preserve hand function. However, not all attempts at replantation result in survival of the amputated portion, and unreconstructable damage to or complete loss of the amputated part may preclude attempted replantation. In such situations, the surgeon must have alternative methods of dealing with the sequelae of thumb loss. This article will discuss nonmicrosurgical and microsurgical techniques for thumb reconstruction.

Musculoskeletal sepsis: principles of treatment.

Musculoskeletal sepsis is infection of bone, joints, muscles, and skin and often occurs after open fractures. Thus, the main objective in the treatment of open fractures in restoration of function and prevention of infection. It is important to consider all open fracture wounds as contaminated. The principles of open fracture treatment include taking appropriate cultures, instituting immediate systemic antibiotic therapy, surgical débridement and wound management, stabilizing the fracture, and early bone grafting when indicated. The open tibial fracture, classified according to Gustilo and Anderson, serves as an exemplary model for musculoskeletal sepsis because this type of injury is described extensively in the literature. Early diagnosis and effective surgical and antibiotic management can control musculoskeletal sepsis, and the suppression of infection may last a lifetime.

Tissue expansion.

Tissue expansion in the upper extremity is a valuable technique with expanding indications and expected outcomes. The primary indications are coverage problems after trauma, but the technique is also applicable to defects caused by treatment of hemangioma, nevi, tattoos, or hypertrophic scars as well as correction of unstable tissue or as an alternative to free tissue transfer. The advantage of expansion-specifically, match in tissue texture and retention of sensibility-may be more important in the hand and upper extremity than in other areas. The inevitable capsule that forms around the expander does provide a smooth gliding surface for tendons in the forearm and wrist. In conclusion, tissue expansion of the upper extremity offers the surgeon the ability to improve cosmesis in one location without having to sacrifice cosmesis at a second site.

Applications of the vascularized fibula for upper extremity reconstruction.

There are limited reconstructive options for segmental bone defects of the upper extremity larger than 6 cm in length, especially when associated with soft-tissue loss. Among the limited treatment options the osteoseptocutaneous fibular transplant is well established. The anatomy is reliable, the blood supply is constant, and the operative technique can be standardized. The advantage of including skin with the vascularized fibular transplant is twofold. First, the skin paddle can be used to augment the soft-tissue envelope. Second, the skin paddle serves as a monitor, providing an immediate, ongoing, and reliable method to monitor the blood flow to the graft. The osteoseptocutaneous fibular transplant proved to be an effective treatment of combined segmental bony and soft-tissue defects of the forearm and humerus.

High-dose vitamin C treatment reduces capillary leakage after burn plasma transfer in rats.

Oxidative stress after burn injuries leads to systemic capillary leakage and leukocyte activation. This study evaluates whether antioxidative treatment with high-dose vitamin C leads to burn edema reduction and prevention of leukocyte activation after burn plasma transfer. Donor rats underwent a burn (n = 7; 100 degrees C water, 12 seconds, 30% body surface area) or sham burn (37 degrees C water; n = 2) procedure and were killed after 4 hours for plasma harvest. This plasma was administered to study rats (continuous infusion). Rats were randomized to four groups (n = 8 each; burn plasma alone [BP]; burn plasma/vitamin C-bolus 66 mg/kg and maintenance dose 33 mg/kg/hr [VC66]; burn plasma/vitamin C-bolus 33 mg/kg and maintenance dose 17.5 mg/kg/hr [VC33]; and sham burn plasma [SB]). Intravital fluorescence microscopy in the mesentery was performed at 0, 60, and 120 minutes for microhemodynamic parameters, leukocyte adherence, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin extravasation. No differences were observed in microhemodynamics at any time. Burn plasma induced capillary leakage, which was significantly higher compared with sham burn controls (P < .001). VC66 treatment reduced microvascular barrier dysfunction to sham burn levels, whereas VC33 had no significant effect. Leukocyte sticking increased after burn plasma infusion, which was not found for sham burn. Vitamin C treatment did not influence leukocyte activation (P > .05). Burn plasma transfer leads to systemic capillary leakage. High-dose vitamin C treatment (bolus 66 mg/kg and maintenance dose 33 mg/kg/hr) reduces endothelial damage to sham burn levels, whereas half the dose is inefficient. Leukocyte activation is not influenced by antioxidative treatment. Therefore, capillary leakage seems to be independent from leukocyte-endothelial interactions after burn plasma transfer. High-dose vitamin C should be considered for parenteral treatment in every burn patient.