RESUMO
AIMS: Examine the presence and various sources of incivility among nursing staff working within an academic medical centre utilizing the Nurse Incivility Scale (NIS). BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests various forms of negative behaviour including incivility exist among nurses. Established consequences of these behaviours include increased employee turnover rates, decreased job satisfaction, decreased productivity and increased absenteeism. METHODS: A descriptive survey design was used which included the NIS instrument to measure the presence of incivility within the nursing workforce and specific sources of these behaviours among 414 nurses in an academic medical centre. RESULTS: Hospital nurses working within the intensive and intermediate care unit experienced significantly greater incivility from patients and families than other participants within the study [F (3, 413) 8.62, p = .001]. No other significant differences existed in sources of incivility between various levels of direct care. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing staff working within high-risk areas for incivility such as the intensive care and intermediate care units may require additional interventions to reduce perceptions of incivility from patients/families. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Findings suggest further research is necessary to develop targeted interventions for nurses practicing within intensive care and intermediate units to alleviate the perceived burden of incivility from patients/families.
Assuntos
Incivilidade/fisiologia , Enfermagem/normas , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Bullying/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicometria/instrumentação , Psicometria/métodos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Since 2000, robotic-assisted surgery has rapidly expanded into almost every surgical sub-specialty. Despite the popularity of robotic surgery across the United States, a national consensus for standardized training and education of robotic surgeons or surgical teams remains absent. In this quality improvement initiative, a novel, stepwise iterative Robotic Assistant Surgical Training (RAST) curriculum was developed to broaden and standardize robotic bedside assistant training. Thirteen voluntary participants, capable of fulfilling the bedside assistant role, were evaluated to determine if RAST enhanced the learner's self-perceived level of confidence and comfort in their role as bedside assistant. A pre- and post-RAST training survey and a between-stages repeated-measures survey were conducted. All learner participants reported statistically significant increases in confidence and comfort after RAST training, (p = < 0.001), and between each stage, F (2, 24 = 60.47, p < .001; [Formula: see text] = 0.834). Participant feedback regarding curriculum improvement was obtained, suggesting the desire for more training and practice, in smaller groups of 2-3 participants. One hundred percent of participants felt RAST was beneficial and that it should be implemented as standardized training during onboarding for all robotic bedside assistants. Thus, a standardized, stepwise iterative robotic bedside assistant curriculum increases learner preparedness, comfort, and confidence, safely away from the patient bedside.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Robótica/educaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 Community Research Partnership is a population-based longitudinal syndromic and sero-surveillance study. The study includes over 17,000 participants from six healthcare systems in North Carolina who submitted over 49,000 serology results. The purpose of this study is to use these serology data to estimate the cumulative proportion of the North Carolina population that has either been infected with SARS-CoV-2 or developed a measurable humoral response to vaccination. METHODS: Adult community residents were invited to participate in the study between April 2020 and February 2021. Demographic information was collected and daily symptom screen was completed using a secure, HIPAA-compliant, online portal. A portion of participants were mailed kits containing a lateral flow assay to be used in-home to test for presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM or IgG antibodies. The cumulative proportion of participants who tested positive at least once during the study was estimated. A standard Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to illustrate the probability of seroconversion over time up to December 20, 2020 (before vaccines available). A separate analysis was performed to describe the influence of vaccines through February 15, 2021. RESULTS: 17,688 participants contributed at least one serology result. 68.7% of the population were female, and 72.2% were between 18 and 59 years of age. The average number of serology results submitted per participant was 3.0 (±1.9). By December 20, 2020, the overall probability of seropositivity in the CCRP population was 32.6%. By February 15, 2021 the probability among healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers was 83% and 49%, respectively. An inflection upward in the probability of seropositivity was demonstrated around the end of December, suggesting an influence of vaccinations, especially for healthcare workers. Among healthcare workers, those in the oldest age category (60+ years) were 38% less likely to have seroconverted by February 15, 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest more North Carolina residents may have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 than the number of documented cases as determined by positive RNA or antigen tests. The influence of vaccinations on seropositivity among North Carolina residents is also demonstrated. Additional research is needed to fully characterize the impact of seropositivity on immunity and the ultimate course of the pandemic.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Participação da Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Soroconversão , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The benefits of breastfeeding for mothers and babies have been well documented in the scientific literature, with new evidence about the benefits continuing to emerge. The Surgeon General's call to action to support breastfeeding recommends mandatory breastfeeding education and training for all healthcare providers that deliver care to mothers and babies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the development of an online computer based breastfeeding training (BT) and the preliminary outcomes of this training. The development of this training included consultation with content and technology experts. The collection of preliminary outcomes related to breastfeeding knowledge data and evaluation of the online BT was pre and posttest study. Eighty six undergraduate nursing students completed the online BT using Blackboard Learn. The online component of the BT consisted of five modules with a combined length of approximately 16 hours. After the completion of the modules, the students increased their levels of knowledge related to breastfeeding and the majority believed that they were fully able to perform skills to support breastfeeding. The results of this study indicate that a successful BT for nursing students can be effectively designed, which can in the future be disseminated to other healthcare providers and students. In addition, this online BT was cost-efficient and effective in improving students' knowledge and skills to support breastfeeding.