Self-sampling versus health care professional-guided swab collection for SARS-CoV-2 testing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic reliability and practicability of self-collected oropharyngeal swab samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection as self-sampling could enable broader testing availability and reduce both personal protective equipment and potential exposure. METHODS: Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were asked to collect two oropharyngeal swabs (SC-OPS1/2), and an additional oropharyngeal swab was collected by a health care professional (HCP-OPS). SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing for samples from 58 participants was performed, with a 48-h delay in half of the self-collected samples (SC-OPS2). The sensitivity, probability of concordance, and interrater reliability were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess predictive factors. Practicability was evaluated through a questionnaire. RESULTS: The test sensitivity for HCP-OPS, SC-OPS1, and SC-OPS2 was 88%, 78%, and 77%, respectively. Combining both SC-OPS results increased the estimated sensitivity to 88%. The concordance probability between HCP-OPS and SC-OPS1 was 77.6% and 82.5% between SC-OPS1 and SC-OPS2, respectively. Of the participants, 69% affirmed performing future self-sampling at home, and 34% preferred self-sampling over HCP-guided testing. Participants with both positive HCP-OPS1 and SC-OPS1 indicating no challenges during self-sampling had more differences in viral load levels between HCP-OPS1 and SC-OPS1 than those who indicated challenges. Increasing disease duration and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG correlated with negative test results in self-collected samples of previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals. CONCLUSION: Oropharyngeal self-sampling is an applicable testing approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. Self-sampling tends to be more effective in early versus late infection and symptom onset, and the collection of two distinct samples is recommended to maintain high test sensitivity.

MRI-based ventilation and perfusion imaging to predict radiation-induced pneumonitis in lung tumor patients at a 0.35T MR-Linac.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP), diagnosed 6-12 weeks after treatment, is a complication of lung tumor radiotherapy. So far, clinical and dosimetric parameters have not been reliable in predicting RP. We propose using non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based functional parameters acquired over the treatment course for patient stratification for improved follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 lung tumor patients received MR-guided hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy at a 0.35T MR-Linac. Ventilation- and perfusion-maps were generated from 2D-cine MRI-scans acquired after the first and last treatment fraction (Fx) using non-uniform Fourier decomposition. The relative differences in ventilation and perfusion between last and first Fx in three regions (planning target volume (PTV), lung volume receiving more than 20Gy (V20) excluding PTV, whole tumor-bearing lung excluding PTV) and three dosimetric parameters (mean lung dose, V20, mean dose to the gross tumor volume) were investigated. Univariate receiver operating characteristic curve - area under the curve (ROC-AUC) analysis was performed (endpoint RP grade≥1) using 5000 bootstrapping samples. Differences between RP and non-RP patients were tested for statistical significance with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test (α=0.05). RESULTS: 14/23 patients developed RP of grade≥1 within 3 months. The dosimetric parameters showed no significant differences between RP and non-RP patients. In contrast, the functional parameters, especially the relative ventilation difference in the PTV, achieved a p-value<0.05 and an AUC value of 0.84. CONCLUSION: MRI-based functional parameters extracted from 2D-cine MRI-scans were found to be predictive of RP development in lung tumor patients.

The role of online MR-guided multi-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in lung tumours.

Background: The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the dosimetry benefits, changes in pulmonary function, and clinical outcome of online adaptive MR-guided SBRT. Methods: From 11/2020-07/2022, 45 consecutive patients with 59 lesions underwent multi-fraction SBRT (3-8 fractions) at our institution. Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-proven NSCLC or lung cancer/metastases diagnosed via clinical imaging. Endpoints were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). We evaluated PTV/GTV dose coverage, organs at risk exposure, and changes in pulmonary function (PF). Acute toxicity was classified per the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: The median PTV was 14.4 cm3 (range: 3.4 - 96.5 cm3). In total 195/215 (91%) plans were reoptimised. In the reoptimised vs. predicted plans, PTV coverage by the prescribed dose increased in 94.6% of all fractions with a median increase in PTV VPD of 5.6% (range: -1.8 - 44.6%, p < 0.001), increasing the number of fractions with PTV VPD ≥ 95% from 33% to 98%. The PTV D95% and D98% (BED10) increased in 93% and 95% of all fractions with a median increase of 7.7% (p < 0.001) and 10.6% (p < 0.001). The PTV D95% (BED10) increased by a mean of 9.6 Gy (SD: 10.3 Gy, p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 21.4 months (95% CI: 12.3-27.0 months), 1- and 2-year LC rates were 94.8% (95% CI: 87.6 - 100.0%) and 91.1% (95% CI: 81.3 - 100%); 1- and 2-year OS rates were 85.6% (95% CI: 75.0 - 96.3%) and 67.1 % (95% CI: 50.3 - 83.8%). One grade ≥ 3 toxicity and no significant reduction in short-term PF parameters were recorded. Conclusions: Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT is an effective, safe and generally well tolerated treatment option for lung tumours achieving encouraging local control rates with significantly improved target volume coverage.

A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based SARS-CoV-2 testing is expensive, resource intensive, and time consuming. A self-collection approach is a probable alternative; however, its feasibility, cost, and ability to prevent infections need to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare an innovative self-collection approach with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy in a large European industrial manufacturing site. METHODS: The feasibility of a telemedicine-guided PCR-based self-collection approach was assessed for 150 employees (intervention group) and compared with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing approach used for 143 employees (control group). Acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy were evaluated using a software application. A simulation model was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness. An interactive R shiny app was created to enable customized simulations. RESULTS: The test results were successfully communicated to and interpreted without uncertainty by 76% (114/150) and 76.9% (110/143) of the participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P=.96). The ratings for acceptability, ergonomics, and efficacy among intervention group participants were noninferior when compared to those among control group participants (acceptability: 71.6% vs 37.6%; ergonomics: 88.1% vs 74.5%; efficacy: 86.4% vs 77.5%). The self-collection approach was found to be less time consuming (23 min vs 38 min; P<.001). The simulation model indicated that both testing approaches reduce the risk of infection, and the self-collection approach tends to be slightly less effective owing to its lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The self-collection approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was found to be technically feasible and well rated in terms of acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy. The simulation model facilitates the evaluation of test effectiveness; nonetheless, considering context specificity, appropriate adaptation by companies is required.