Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies.

The benefits of newborn screening (NBS) programs have been widely demonstrated after more than 50 years since first established. NBS enables the detection of the disease before the child shows clinical symptoms, allowing clinicians to act early and facilitating appropriate interventions to prevent or improve adverse outcomes. Delay or lack of medical intervention in these infants may lead to developmental delay, severe disability, or premature death. NBS programs have grown exponentially both in the number of diseases screened and in complexity, creating controversy. New technological advances, as well as the emergence of new therapies that require early disease detection, have allowed for the inclusion of new diseases in NBS screening programs. However, different countries and even different regions have in turn adopted very diverse strategies and diagnostic algorithms when it comes to NBS. There are many factors responsible for these differences, such as the health care system, available funds, local politics, professional groups, and others that depend on the position taken by policymakers. These differences in NBS have led to discrepancies in detection opportunities between countries or regions, which has led to many varied attempts to harmonize NBS programs but not all have been equally satisfactory. Some countries have achieved good results, but always within their borders. Therefore, there are still many differences between NBS programs at the international level that must be overcome. These advances have also brought considerable uncertainty regarding ethical aspects and balance between benefits and harms. For this reason, and so that the situation of disparity in the global NBS programs can be minimized, health authorities must work to develop uniform criteria for decision-making and to take a further step toward harmonization. To do so, it is necessary to identify the crucial factors that lead to the adoption of different NBS programs worldwide, in order to analyze their influence and find ways to overcome them.

Why is the novel Hb Miguel Servet visualised by CE-HPLC newborn and not by the CE-HPLC ß-thalassaemia programme?

Screening of haemoglobinopathies is indicated for the detection of sickle cell anaemia; thus, neonates can benefit from early and adequate treatment that prevents neurological damage, reduces morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. These types of programmes sometimes lead to unexpected findings. We present a new haemoglobin (Hb) variant (Hb Miguel Servet) detected by newborn screening. During neonatal screening of haemoglobinopathies by cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC) newborn, an Hb variant was detected. An analysis at 8 months of age using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) confirmed the presence of this new Hb. The molecular characterisation was performed by automatic sequencing of the α and ß globin genes in an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer. Hb analysis by CE-HPLC ß-thalassaemia short programmedid not indicate the presence of abnormal Hbs. By CZE showed a peak in the zone 12 zone comprising 3.3% of the total Hb. A new analysis by CE-HPLC on a Tosoh G8-2 (Horiba) shown a peak, in the region of HbA1b, did not interfere with the quantification of HbA1c. Sequencing of the ß gene revealed the substitution of a guanine for a thymine (GGT >TGT) in codon 69 of the second exon, resulting in substitution of cysteine for the amino acid glutamine (HBB:c.208G>T). Hb Miguel Servet is a ß-chain globin variant detected by CE-HPLC newborn (BioRad), by CZE and by CE-HPLC-CE Tosoh G8-2 (Horiba), but no by CE-HPLC-CE ß-thalassaemia short programme (BioRad). In fact, for all the techniques that are visualised, what would be detected would be the glutathione variant of Hb (Miguel Servet).

[Beginnings, evolution and current situation of the Newborn Screening Programs in Spain.] / Inicio, evolución y situación actual de los Programas de Cribado Neonatal en España.

Newborn Screening Programs (NSP) in Spain were born in the city of Granada in 1968. Till the 1980s, they were developed around the so-called "National Plan for Preventing Subnormality", covering up to 30% of the Spanish newborns. From 1982, when the health system management was transferred to the different autonomous regions, the NSP began to expand, and the bases to transform them into an organized and multidisciplinary activity, integrated and coordinated from the National Health System were settled. Despite this expansion, it is not until the 1990s when their coverage reaches almost 100% newborns in Spain. NSP grew up asymmetrically across the different autonomous regions. In 2005 and 2006 the scientific societies SEQC (Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry) and AECNE (Spanish Society of Newborn Screening), coordinated by the Health Promotion Area of the General Directorate of Public Health, gathered together the necessary information to elaborate a report on the NSP in Spain addressed to the Interterritorial Council of the National Health System. In July 2013, that Council approved the seven diseases that should be part of each region newborn screening panel, being the first step towards the NSP harmonization in Spain. Currently, the NSP include between 8 and 29 diseases in their panels, thus more still more efforts are needed in order to achieve a higher uniformity.

Los Programas de Cribado Neonatal (PCN) nacen en España en Granada en el año 1968. Posteriormente, y hasta los años 80, se fueron desarrollando en torno al llamado "Plan Nacional de Prevención de la Subnormalidad" con una cobertura cercana al 30% de los recién nacidos españoles. A partir de 1982, con el inicio de la gestión de la sanidad a las comunidades autónomas (CCAA), los PCN se expandieron y se comenzaron a sentar las bases para que éstos se convirtieran en una actividad organizada y multidisciplinar, integrados y coordinados desde el Sistema de Salud. A pesar de dicha expansión no es hasta el inicio de la década de los 90 cuando se consigue una cobertura próxima al 100% de los RN en España. Los PCN fueron creciendo de forma muy asimétrica en las diferentes CCAA y en los años 2005 y 2006 las Sociedades Científicas SEQC (Sociedad Española de Química Clínica) y AECNE (Asociación Española de Cribado Neonatal), con la coordinación del Área de Promoción de la Salud de la Dirección General de Salud Pública, recopilaron la información y elaboraron un informe, sobre los PCN en España para el Consejo Interterritorial del sistema Nacional de Salud (CISNS). En julio de 2013 este Consejo aprobó las siete enfermedades que debían formar parte del panel de detección de los PCN territoriales, primer paso hacia la armonización de estos programas. Actualmente, los PCN incluyen entre 8 y 29 enfermedades por lo que es necesario seguir trabajando para conseguir una mayor uniformidad.