Utility of urodynamics in the management of asymptomatic tethered cord in children.

BACKGROUND: We have noted a recent increase in neurosurgical requests at our institution for urodynamics (UDS) prior to release of asymptomatic tethered cord. Our aim was to determine how preoperative UDS results are used in the clinical management of asymptomatic tethered cord. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 120 patients diagnosed with primary tethered cord from 2007 to 2010. Inclusion criteria included MRI diagnosis of tethered cord and UDS performed by three pediatric urologists. Excluded were any neurologic or urologic dysfunction or associated syndromes, as well as other significant comorbidities. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (female 26; male 12), mean age of 3 years (0.2-16.3) were diagnosed with an asymptomatic tethered cord. The majority of the patients had normal preoperative renal ultrasounds. Thirty-one (82 %) of the children had normal baseline UDS, yet twenty-one (68 %) of these patients still underwent neurosurgical intervention. Of the 27 patients untethered, 15 patients (55 %) had follow-up UDS performed. Three patients had improved UDS parameters and one had worsening UDS parameters, including high PVR and DSD. Of the seven patients with abnormal baseline UDS, all had normal renal ultrasound findings and had no other significant differences in presentation from the patients with normal UDS. CONCLUSION: In children with asymptomatic tethered cord, abnormal preoperative UDS may prompt intervention, while normal UDS do not appear to prevent intervention. There is no significant correlation between abnormal preoperative UDS and abnormal preoperative imaging. Further study is needed to evaluate the utility of this procedure in the preoperative setting in this asymptomatic patient population.

Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline.

PURPOSE: Cryptorchidism is one of the most common pediatric disorders of the male endocrine glands and the most common genital disorder identified at birth. This guideline is intended to provide physicians and non-physician providers (primary care and specialists) with a consensus of principles and treatment plans for the management of cryptorchidism (typically isolated non-syndromic). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature was conducted using controlled vocabulary supplemented with key words relating to the relevant concepts of cryptorchidism. The search strategy was developed and executed by reference librarians and methodologists to create an evidence report limited to English-language, published peer-reviewed literature. This review yielded 704 articles published from 1980 through 2013 that were used to form a majority of the guideline statements. Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions were used for guideline statements lacking sufficient evidence-based data. RESULTS: Guideline statements were created to inform clinicians on the proper methods of history-taking, physical exam, and evaluation of the boy with cryptorchidism, as well as the various hormonal and surgical treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging for cryptorchidism is not recommended prior to referral, which should occur by 6 months of age. Orchidopexy (orchiopexy is the preferred term) is the most successful therapy to relocate the testis into the scrotum, while hormonal therapy is not recommended. Successful scrotal repositioning of the testis may reduce but does not prevent the potential long-term issues of infertility and testis cancer. Appropriate counseling and follow-up of the patient is essential.

Inter-disciplinary provider development of an online, interactive adolescent varicocele decision aid prototype.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making regarding varicocele management can be a complex process for patients and families. However, to date, no studies have presented ways to mitigate the decisional conflict surrounding varicoceles. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate a discussion among physicians in order to develop a framework of the decision-making process regarding adolescent varicocele management, which will inform the development of the first online, interactive decision aid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with pediatric urologists and interventional radiologists were conducted to discuss their rationale for varicocele decision-making. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded. Key themes were identified, grouped, and then qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis. Utilizing the common themes identified and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, a decision aid prototype was developed and transformed into a user-friendly website: varicoceledecisionaid.com. RESULTS: Pediatric urologists (n = 10) and interventional radiologists (n = 2) were interviewed. Key themes identified included: (1) definition/epidemiology; (2) observation as an appropriate management choice; (3) reasons to recommend repair; (4) types of repair; (5) reasons to recommend one repair over another; (6) shared decision-making; and (7) appropriate counseling. With this insight, a varicocele decision aid prototype was developed that engages patients and parents in the decision-making process. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This is the first interactive and easily accessible varicocele decision aid prototype developed by inter-disciplinary physicians for patients. This tool aids in decision-making surrounding varicocele surgery. It can be used before or after consultation to help families understand more about varicoceles and their repair, and why intervention may or may not be offered. It also considers a patient and family's personal values. Future studies will incorporate the patient and family perspective into the decision-making aid as well as implement and test the usability of this decision aid prototype in practice and in the wider urologic community.

The conundrum of high-grade hydronephrosis with non-obstructive drainage on diuretic renography.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high grade hydronephrosis (HN) and non-obstructive drainage on mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) diuretic renography (renal scans) can pose a dilemma for clinicians. Some patients may progress and require pyeloplasty; however, more clarity is needed on outcomes among these patients. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to predict which patients with high-grade HN and non-obstructive renal scan, (defined as T ½ time <20 min) would experience resolution of HN. Our secondary objective was to determine predictors for surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with prenatally detected HN were prospectively enrolled from 7 centers from 2007 to 2022. Included patients had a renal scan with T ½<20 min and Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grade 3 or 4 at last ultrasound (RBUS) prior to renal scan. Primary outcome was resolution of HN defined as SFU grade 1 and anterior posterior diameter of the renal pelvis (APD) < 10 mm on follow-up RBUS. Secondary outcome was pyeloplasty, comparing patients undergoing pyeloplasty with patients followed with serial imaging without resolution. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the total 2228 patients, 1311 had isolated HN, 338 patients had a renal scan and 129 met inclusion criteria. Median age at renal scan was 3.1 months, 77% were male and median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 20-49). We found that 22% (29/129) resolved, 42% of patients had pyeloplasty (54/129) and 36% had persistent HN that required follow-up (46/129). Univariate predictors of resolution were age≥3 months at time of renal scan (p = 0.05), T ½ time≤5 min (p = 0.09), SFU grade 3 (p = 0.0009), and APD<20 mm (p = 0.005). Upon multivariable analysis, SFU grade 3 (OR = 4.14, 95% CI: 1.30-13.4, p = 0.02) and APD<20 mm (OR = 6.62, 95% CI: 1.41-31.0, p = 0.02) were significant predictors of resolution. In the analysis of decision for pyeloplasty, SFU grade 4 (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.01-5.71, p = 0.04) and T ½ time on subsequent renal scan of ≥20 min (OR = 5.14, 95% CI: 1.54-17.1, p = 0.008) were the significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high grade HN and reassuring renal scan can pose a significant challenge to clinical management. Our results help identify a specific candidate for observation with little risk for progression: the patient with SFU grade 3, APD under 20 mm, T ½ of 5 min or less who was 3 months or older at the time of renal scan. However, many patients may progress to surgery or do not fully resolve and require continued follow-up.

Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation in Pediatric Urology: Pilot-phase outcomes of a prospective, multi-center study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a fundamental shift in perioperative care that has consistently demonstrated an improved outcome for a wide variety of surgeries in adults but has only limited evidence in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the success with and barriers to implementation of ERAS in a prospective, multi-center study on patients undergoing complex lower urinary tract reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Centers were directed to implement an ERAS protocol using a multidisciplinary team and quality improvement methodologies. Providers completed pre- and post-pilot surveys. An audit committee met after enrolling the first 5 patients at each center. Pilot-phase outcomes included enrollment of ≥2 patients in the first 6 months of enrollment, completion of 90 days of follow-up, identification of barriers to implementation, and protocol adherence. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled across 8 centers. The median age at surgery was 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-12.5). Sixty five percent had a diagnosis of myelomeningocele, and 33 % had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A bladder augmentation was performed in 70 %, Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in 52 %, Monti ileovesicostomy in 15 %, and antegrade continence enema channel in 38 %. The most commonly perceived barriers to implementation on the pre-pilot survey were "difficulty initiating and maintaining compliance with care pathway" in 51 % followed by a "lack of time, money, or clinical resources" in 36 %. The pre-pilot study experience, implementation, and pilot-phase outcomes are provided in the Table. All primary and secondary outcomes were achieved. DISCUSSION: The findings of the present study were similar to several small comparative studies with regard to the importance of a multidisciplinary team, strong leadership, and continuous audit for successful implementation of ERAS. Similar barriers were also encountered to other studies, which primarily related to a lack of administrative support, leadership, and buy-in from other services. The limitations of the present study included a relatively small heterogeneous cohort and absence of a comparative group, which will be addressed in the larger exploratory phase of the trial. The findings may also not be generaziable due to the need for sustainable processes that were unique to each center as well as an absence of adequate volume or resources at smaller centers. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS was successfully implemented for complex lower urinary tract reconstruction across 8 centers through a multidisciplinary team, structured approach based on the local context, and focus on a continuous audit.

Pediatric urologists' confidence and accuracy in estimating penile curvature.

BACKGROUND: Assessment and management of congenital penile curvature (PC) can be variable. Methods for correction of PC usually are dependent on degree of PC which is reliant on how degree is assessed. We sought to assess the confidence and accuracy of measuring PC and hence management using case-based examples. METHODS: A survey was emailed to members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology. Demographic information, management strategies for PC, and self-reported confidence in measuring PC were assessed. A Likert scale measured self-confidence. Case scenarios were used to assess ability to measure PC and methods of correction. The cases consisted of three computer-generated penis model images with arc-type ventral curvature and one image of lateral curvature in an infant. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% (108/355). The mean confidence score was 3.6 ± 0.8 (3-fairly confident; 4-very confident). In clinic, 89% of urologists used eyeball estimates to assess PC; 5% used both eyeball and goniometer. In the operating room, 71% used eyeball estimates, 8% used goniometer, and 16% used both. If sole decision-maker, urologists recommend surgical correction of PC over observation at median 30° (IQR 21-30°). At a median of 45°, there was a shift in corrective surgical preference from dorsal plication (DP) (IQR 30-54°) to ventral lengthening (IQR 34-60°). Urologists underestimated PC degree for all cases (summary table). For all cases, there was no association between years in practice or confidence level on estimated PC degree. In case 1, only 24% of urologists would correct a mean estimate of 23° PC; those who would correct had a higher mean PC estimate vs those who would not (28° vs 21°, p < 0.001). Case 2 and 4 had similar estimations and correction methods. In case 2, those who chose VL had a higher mean PC estimate vs those who did not (43° vs 37°, p < 0.01), but no estimate difference was seen for DP (p = 0.52). In case 4 with lateral PC, those who chose DP had a higher mean PC estimate vs those who did not (41° vs 33°, p = 0.049). Yet in case 3, there was no difference in PC estimate in urologists who chose VL vs not (57° vs 53°, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: A uniform underestimation of PC existed despite self-reported confidence in the ability to measure PC. An increasing willingness to perform surgical correction was demonstrated with a shift towards VL for ventral curvature and less so for lateral curvature as PC worsens.

Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline.

PURPOSE: The authors of this guideline reviewed the literature regarding use of urodynamic testing in common lower urinary tract symptoms. The findings are intended to assist clinicians in the appropriate selection of urodynamic tests, following an evaluation and symptom characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and EMBASE databases (searched from 1/1/90 to 3/10/11) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to using urodynamic tests for diagnosis, determining prognosis, guiding clinical management decisions and improving patient outcomes in patients with various urologic conditions. The review yielded an evidence base of 393 studies after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the evidence basis for characterizing the statements presented in the guideline as Standards, Recommendations or Options. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence for a particular treatment was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate) or C (low). In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinion. RESULTS: The evidence-based guideline statements are provided for diagnosis and overall management of common LUTS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The Panel recognizes that each patient presenting with LUTS is unique. This Guideline is intended to serve as a tool facilitating the most effective utilization of urodynamic testing as part of a comprehensive evaluation of patients presenting with LUTS.

Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists.

PURPOSE: There are no current guidelines for diagnosing and managing mild prenatal hydronephrosis. Variations in physician approach make it difficult to analyze outcomes and establish optimal management. We determined the variability of diagnostic approach and management regarding prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online surveys were sent to mailing lists for national societies for each specialty. Participants were surveyed regarding criteria for diagnosing mild prenatal hydronephrosis and recommendations for postnatal management, including use of antibiotic prophylaxis, followup scheduling and type of followup imaging. RESULTS: A total of 308 maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, 126 pediatric urologists and 112 pediatric radiologists responded. Pediatric urologists and radiologists were divided between Society for Fetal Urology criteria and use of anteroposterior pelvic diameter for diagnosis, while maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians preferred using the latter. For postnatal evaluation radiologists preferred using personal criteria, while urologists preferred using anteroposterior pelvic diameter or Society for Fetal Urology grading system. There was wide variation in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis among pediatric urologists. Regarding the use of voiding cystourethrography/radionuclide cystography in patients with prenatal hydronephrosis, neither urologists nor radiologists were consistent in their recommendations. Finally, there was no agreement on length of followup for mild prenatal hydronephrosis. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a lack of uniformity regarding grading criteria in diagnosing hydronephrosis prenatally and postnatally among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists. There was also a lack of agreement on the management of mild intermittent prenatal hydronephrosis, resulting in these cases being managed inconsistently. A unified set of guidelines for diagnosis, evaluation and management of mild intermittent prenatal hydronephrosis would allow more effective evaluation of outcomes.

Upper pole pathologies in duplex kidneys: an analysis of predictive factors for surgery and urinary tract infections from the Mid-Atlantic Pediatric Academic Consortium.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: While there is significant data on the natural history and outcomes for prenatal hydronephrosis in simplex kidneys, duplex kidneys tend to be less studied. Management can be quite variable based on provider preference. We aimed to describe practice patterns from several tertiary academic institutions, identify clinical predictors for surgical intervention and urinary tract infection (UTI) for upper pole pathology, and demonstrate the natural history of lower pole vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients from 4 Mid-Atlantic institutions between 2015 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients with a duplex kidney with upper pole pathology and/or lower pole VUR. The primary outcome was predictive factors for surgical intervention and UTI. The secondary outcome was to assess the natural history of lower pole VUR including resolution rates by grade. Linear regression identified clinical predictors for UTI events. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of surgical intervention, UTI, and lower pole VUR resolution. Descriptive statistics and regression modeling analyses were performed using SAS. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two patients were included with a total of 271 duplex renal units. Hydronephrosis grade (both SFU and UTD grading) and number of prior UTI events were statistically significant predictors for surgical intervention (p = 0.03/0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Ectopic ureter (p = 0.004), ureterocele (p = 0.02), and obstruction (p = 0.04) were the only pathologies predictive for surgery. Male gender and circumcision were significantly associated with decreased UTI risk (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01). On linear regression modeling, antibiotic prophylaxis after the first year of life was associated with decreased risk of further UTI events (p = 0.03); however, antibiotic prophylaxis within the first year of life did not decrease UTI risk (p = 0.14). For VUR outcomes, 65.0% of grades 1-3 VUR and 52.2% of grades 4-5 had resolution/improvement at mean time of 2.1 years. There were no predictive factors for resolution/improvement of VUR. CONCLUSIONS: Hydronephrosis grade and UTI events were significant predictors for surgical intervention for upper pole pathology. Pathologies that were predictive for surgery included ectopic ureter, ureterocele and obstruction. Male gender, circumcision and antibiotic prophylaxis after the first year of life were associated with a decreased UTI risk. Roughly 58% of lower pole VUR spontaneously improved/resolved. Identification of these risk factors aids in standardization of care practices to reduce long-term UTI risk and inform counseling with families about possible need for surgical intervention and expectations for long term outcomes.

Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in isolated prenatal hydronephrosis.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal hydronephrosis (PNH) is one of the most common congenital anomalies and can increase the risk of developing a urinary tract infection (UTI) in the first two years of life. Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) has been recommended empirically to prevent UTI in children with PNH, but its use has been controversial. OBJECTIVE: We describe the incidence of UTI in children with isolated PNH of the renal pelvis without ureteral dilation. Our objective was to compare patients receiving and not receiving CAP and determine whether CAP is beneficial at preventing UTI in children with isolated PNH. STUDY DESIGN: Children with confirmed PNH were enrolled between 2008 and 2020 into the Society for Fetal Urology Hydronephrosis Registry. Children with isolated dilation of the renal pelvis without ureteral or bladder abnormality were included. The primary outcome was development of a UTI, comparing patients who were prescribed and not prescribed CAP. RESULTS: In this cohort of 801 children, 76% were male, and 35% had high grade hydronephrosis (SFU grades 3-4). CAP was prescribed in 34% of children. The UTI rate among all children with isolated PNH was 4.2%. Independent predictors of UTI were female sex (HR = 13, 95% CI: 3.8-40, p = 0.0001), intact prepuce (HR = 5.1, 95% CI: 1.4-18, p = 0.01) and high grade hydronephrosis (HR = 2.0, 95% CI: 0.99-4.0, p = 0.05; Table) on multivariable analysis. For patients on CAP, the UTI rate was 4.0% compared to 4.3% without CAP (p = 0.76). The risk of UTI during follow-up was not significantly different between patients who received CAP and patients who were not exposed to CAP; adjusting for sex, circumcision status and hydronephrosis grade (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.34-1.5, p = 0.38). In sub-group analysis of patients at higher risk of UTI (uncircumcised males, females and high grade hydronephrosis), CAP use was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in UTI. CONCLUSIONS: The overall UTI rate in children with isolated PNH is very low at 4.2%. In the overall population of patients with isolated PNH, CAP was not associated with reduction in UTI risk, although the limitations in our study make characterizing CAP effectiveness difficult. Clinicians should consider risk factors prior to placing all patients with isolated PNH on CAP.

Risk of urinary tract infection in patients with hydroureter: An analysis from the Society of Fetal Urology Prenatal Hydronephrosis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal hydronephrosis is one of the most common anomalies detected on prenatal ultrasonography. Patients with prenatal hydronephrosis and ureteral dilation are at increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) is recommended. However, current guidelines do not define the minimum ureteral diameter that would be considered a dilated ureter in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the definition of clinically relevant hydroureter, its association with UTI, and the impact of CAP. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with prenatal hydronephrosis from seven centers were enrolled into the Society for Fetal Urology Prenatal Hydronephrosis Registry from 2008 to 2020. Patients with ureteral measurement on ultrasound were included. Patients with ureterocele, ectopic ureter, neurogenic bladder, posterior urethral valves, horseshoe or solitary kidney, known ureteropelvic junction obstruction, or follow-up less than one month were excluded. Primary outcome was UTI. Analyses were performed using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 1406 patients enrolled in the registry, 237 were included. Seventy-six percent were male, ureteral diameter ranged from 1 to 34 mm, and median follow-up was 2.2 years. Patients with ureters 7 mm or greater had nearly three times the risk of UTI adjusting for sex, circumcision status, antibiotic prophylaxis and hydronephrosis grade (HR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, p = 0.03; Figure). In patients who underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG; 200/237), ureteral dilation of 7 mm or more identified patients at increased UTI risk controlling for sex, circumcision status, vesicoureteral reflux and hydronephrosis grade (HR = 2.3, 95% CI: 0.97-5.6, p = 0.06). CAP was significantly protective against UTI (HR = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87), p = 0.01). Among patients who underwent VCUG and did not have vesicoureteral reflux, ureteral dilation 7 mm or greater corresponded with higher UTI risk compared to ureteral diameter less than 7 mm on multivariable analysis (HR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1-19.5, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospectively collected, multicenter study to demonstrate that hydroureter 7 mm or greater identifies a high-risk group for UTI who benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis. In contrast, patients with prenatal hydronephrosis and non-refluxing hydroureter less than 7 mm may be managed more conservatively.

Identifying and addressing training deficiencies in the examination of cryptorchidism-a quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate and timely diagnosis of cryptorchidism by primary care providers (PCPs) is critical to oncologic and fertility outcomes. Physical exam is the mainstay of diagnosis, but little is known about PCPs' skills in examining cryptorchid patients. Patients referred to surgeons for cryptorchidism often have normal or retractile testes on exam, and delayed or missed diagnosis of cryptorchidism may contribute to advanced age at surgical intervention. Previous studies on cryptorchidism have not investigated the baseline training, confidence, and/or exam skills of providers. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to define baseline training and provider confidence in the exam of cryptorchid patients and to improve examiner confidence using bedside teaching with a pediatric urologist. Secondarily, baseline training and confidence were correlated to skill. STUDY DESIGN: Medical students, family medicine, pediatrics, and urology residents, and pediatric attendings completed surveys on baseline training and self-reported confidence in the examination of cryptorchid patients at an academic institution from 2017 to 2018. N.G.K. (pediatric urologist) proctored examinations of cryptorchid patients and provided standardized grades and individualized feedback. Surveys were readministered after 3 months. Non-parametric comparison tests were performed to determine intervention effect and compare subgroups. RESULTS: Ninety-two respondents participated. 62% reported little to no formal training on the scrotal exam, 50% were self-taught, and 20% defined undescended testis incorrectly. Confidence increased with level of training, comparing attendings to residents to students (P < 0.001). Those who learned from a mentor had higher baseline confidence than those who did not (P < 0.01). Baseline confidence and amount of formal training positively correlated with exam skill as graded during proctored sessions (n = 59, P < 0.01). Provider confidence was higher after proctored exams (Fig. 2, n = 32, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Significant training deficiencies exist in the examination of cryptorchid patients. A single proctored exam with a pediatric urologist can improve provider confidence and may improve exam skills. A rotation with pediatric urology, including proctored exams of cryptorchid patients, has become standard practice for pediatric trainees at the authors institution as a result of this study. CONCLUSIONS: While further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of bedside teaching and its impact on accurate and timely diagnosis of cryptorchidism, implementation of the authors quality improvement recommendations at other teaching institutions would help address training deficiencies in the examination of cryptorchid patients.

Assessment of urinary tract dilation grading amongst pediatric urologists.

INTRODUCTION: The Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) system was created to address variability in hydronephrosis grading. It is unknown if or how pediatric urologists are integrating this newer system into practice. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the current use of hydronephrosis grading systems, inter-rater reliability (IRR) for individual systems, and management preferences based on degree of hydronephrosis. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was emailed to the Societies for Pediatric Urology listserv. Questions addressed familiarity/preference for various grading systems and respondent confidence in interpretation of hydronephrosis. Three clinical vignettes asked respondents to grade hydronephrosis using their system of choice and report further imaging they would obtain. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and IRR was calculated using a linear-weighted modified Fleiss' kappa test. RESULTS: Response rate was 43% (n = 138). The majority of respondents used Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) (70%) or UTD (19%) systems. Most favored SFU (58%) or UTD (34%) systems for a unified system. Confidence in own interpretation was higher than confidence in radiologists' reads (median 4.4 vs 3.6, p < 0.001). IRR was substantial for UTD (κ0.68 [0.64-0.71]) and moderate for SFU (κ0.60 [0.52-0.76]). There was notable heterogeneity regarding follow-up imaging for cases. There was no difference in requested follow-up studies between SFU and UTD systems, except for fewer voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) requests for Case 3 with UTD (28% vs 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Most pediatric urologists still use SFU rather than the UTD system. There was slightly higher IRR with the UTD system. There was substantial variability in follow-up imaging not related to grading system, except with low grade hydronephrosis.

Antenatal hydronephrosis.

The diagnosis, workup, and management of prenatal hydronephrosis have undergone a swing from preemptive surgical treatment to a more conservative approach as the natural history of the differential diagnoses becomes more appreciated. We examine different radiologic tests for determining the diagnoses associated with antenatal hydronephrosis. A review of the more common differential diagnoses of prenatal hydronephrosis and current treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux, ureteroceles, ectopic ureters, and megaureters is undertaken.

Prenatal intervention for lower urinary tract obstruction.

Hydronephrosis is one of the most common abnormalities detected on routine prenatal ultrasounds, being noted in up to 1% of fetuses. Rarely, severe hydronephrosis coexists with oligohydramnios, which portends a poor prognosis. We review the most recent literature on the results of prenatal intervention in this setting. Presently, the first randomized controlled trial to address whether prenatal vesicoamniotic shunting improves survival and renal function is underway, and should address the value of prenatal intervention.

Postnatal imaging of antenatal hydronephrosis.

Radiologic imaging of the newborn detected prenatally with hydronephrosis should follow a systematic approach. Upper and lower urinary tract imaging should be performed in most cases in order to determine the etiology and gauge the use of future imaging. An overview of renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography, renal scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance urography in the setting of antenatal hydronephrosis are discussed.

The management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction presenting with prenatal hydronephrosis.

The treatment of the newborn diagnosed with a ureteropelvic obstruction prenatally should follow a systematic approach. Although a majority of patients can be followed without surgical intervention, controversy exists concerning appropriate follow-up. Furthermore, a significant number of patients will manifest mild disease and thus deserve abbreviated follow-up. Herein, an appropriate algorithm and a review of the literature are discussed.