RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lipidapheresis techniques are increasingly used to treat drug-resistant hyperlipidemia but few efficacy studies under routine application are available. In this multicenter observational study we investigated direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipoprotein filtration (MONET) for the short and the long-term effects on lipid-lowering effects. METHODS: Data of 122 apheresis patients from 11 centers (DALI: n = 78, MONET: n = 44) were prospectively collected for a period of 2 years. Routine lipid measurements were evaluated (2154 DALI and 1297 MONET sessions). It was investigated whether the relative reduction of LDL-C during apheresis session achieves at least 60%. Also relative reduction of total cholesterol, HDL, triglyceride, and Lp(a) were analyzed. RESULTS: The relative reduction of LDL-C was at least 60%: DALI: 70.62%, 95% CI = [69.34; 71.90] and MONET: 64.12%, 95% CI = [60.79; 67.46]. Also triglycerides were reduced with both systems: DALI 38.63%, 95% CI = [33.95; 43.30] vs. MONET 57.68%, 95% CI = [51.91; 63.45]. Relative reductions of total cholesterol were in the range of 50% (DALI 95% CI = [46.49; 49.65] MONET 95% CI = [48.93; 55.26]) and of Lp(a) in the range of 65% (DALI 95% CI = [61.92; 65.83] MONET 95% CI = [63.71; 70.30]. HDL reduction was: DALI 15.01%, 95% CI = [13.22; 16.79] and MONET 22.59%, 95% CI = [19.33; 25.84]. For both devices treated patient plasma/blood volume and in case of DALI the use of the larger adsorber configurations (DALI 1000 and DALI 1250) were independent positive predictors of the relative reduction of LDL-C and of Lp(a). CONCLUSIONS: Both systems effectively improved lipid profile and reduced atherogenic lipids. The results point to the importance of the individualized application of these valuable therapies to achieve clinical targets.
Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Hiperlipidemias/terapia , Lipídeos/sangue , Adsorção , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/efeitos adversos , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Regulação para Baixo , Feminino , Filtração , Alemanha , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/sangue , Hiperlipidemias/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Triglicerídeos/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lipidapheresis was introduced for intractable hyperlipidemia as a more selective therapy than plasma exchange aiming to enhance efficacy and limit side-effects. Although this therapy is regarded safe, multicenter data from routine application are limited. We investigated direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipofiltration (MONET) regarding the short and the long-term safety aspects. METHODS: This multicenter observational study prospectively evaluated 2154 DALI and 1297 MONET sessions of 122 patients during a period of 2 years. Safety parameters included clinical side-effects (adverse device effects, ADEs), technical complications, blood pressure and pulse rate. Also routinely performed laboratory parameters were documented. Analysis of laboratory parameters was not corrected for blood dilution. RESULTS: Overall 0.4% DALI and 0.5% MONET treatments were affected by ADE. Technical complications occurred in 2.1% and in 0.8% DALI and MONET sessions, respectively. The most frequent ADE was hypotension, and the majority of technical problems were related to vascular access. Both types of treatments led to a drop of thrombocytes in the range of 7-8%. Hematocrit and erythrocytes decreased only during the DALI treatments by about 6%. Leucocytes decreased during the DALI therapy (â¼15%), whereas they increased during the MONET application (â¼11%). MONET treatment was associated with a higher reduction of proteins (fibrinogen: 58% vs. 23%, albumin: 12% vs. 7%, CRP: 33% vs. 19% for MONET and DALI, respectively). Apart from severe thrombocytopenia in two DALI patients, changes of other parameters were typically transient. CONCLUSIONS: Under routine use the frequency of side-effects was low. Still, monitoring of blood count and proteins in chronic apheresis patients is recommended.
Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Hiperlipidemias/terapia , Lipídeos/sangue , Adsorção , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/efeitos adversos , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Regulação para Baixo , Feminino , Filtração , Alemanha , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/sangue , Hiperlipidemias/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Triglicerídeos/sangueRESUMO
Lipoprotein apheresis is an effective treatment for severe disorders of lipid metabolism. It is the only life prolonging therapy for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Changes of lipid metabolism during pregnancy related to changes of hormone concentrations do not cause clinical complications in the majority of cases. However, in particular clinical situations there is the need to offer a therapeutic option. Increasing morbidity and mortality of mother and child due to severe disorders of lipid metabolism have to be prevented. In general, lipid lowering drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. Therefore, lipoprotein apheresis offers an alternative, which could be used in select cases to treat acute or chronic hyperlipoproteinemia associated with pregnancy. This article summarizes experiences with patients, who became pregnant during chronic lipoprotein apheresis, or who were treated by lipoprotein apheresis because of acute disorders of lipid metabolism during pregnancy. In conclusion, after individual risk benefit analysis for mother and child lipoprotein apheresis can be safely performed during pregnancy.
Assuntos
LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/terapia , Lipoproteínas LDL/sangue , Plasmaferese/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , LDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Lipoproteínas LDL/metabolismo , Plasmaferese/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez de Alto Risco , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Rheopheresis is a specific application of membrane differential filtration, synonymous with double filtration plasmapheresis, for extracorporeal hemorheotherapy. Safety and efficacy of Rheopheresis for wound healing and skin oxygenation were investigated in patients with ischemic diabetic foot syndrome. Eight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-healing foot ulcers caused by severe ischemic diabetic foot syndrome were treated by a series of seven Rheopheresis sessions in a time span of 11 weeks. Wound healing had not been detectable under conditions of standardized wound care during at least 2 months. Wound status was classified by its morphology, severity and location, according to the criteria of Wagner. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcPO2), laser Doppler flowmetry and vital capillary microscopy were repeatedly performed to monitor the effects of the Rheopheresis treatment series on microcirculation and skin blood flow. Laboratory parameters of blood rheology, endothelial function and inflammatory state were measured in addition to safety parameters. In four patients (baseline Wagner stage 2), Rheopheresis accelerated wound healing of foot ulcers and was associated with an improvement of Wagner stage and a pronounced increase in tcPO2. In two patients (baseline Wagner stage 2), wound healing was unchanged but mean tcPO2 increased, allowing successful minor amputation. Values of tcPO2 remained stable and enhanced for the 3 months follow-up period. In two patients (baseline Wagner stage 4 or 5), no improvements in foot lesions were observed within the treatment period. As an adjunct therapeutic option, Rheopheresis may preserve a functional lower extremity, delay amputation or reduce the extent of amputation.
Assuntos
Pé Diabético/terapia , Pé/irrigação sanguínea , Isquemia/terapia , Plasmaferese/métodos , Idoso , Pé Diabético/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemofiltração/métodos , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiologia , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Cicatrização/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities of renal replacement therapy differ in their diffusive and convective mass transfer characteristics. It was the goal of this study to clarify whether an increase in convective mass transfer as performed with haemofiltration (HF) and haemodiafiltration (HDF) in comparison with high-flux haemodialysis (HD) is associated with an alteration in procoagulatory activity or with complement activation. METHODS: Ten stable chronic HD patients were monitored during 120 treatments in a randomized cross over design. A high-flux polysulfone dialyser (APS 900) was used for high-flux HD, pre-dilution HF and pre-dilution HDF. Constant flow of on-line substitution fluid for HF and HDF was 200 ml/min. The low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin was used for anticoagulation (i) as single bolus (50 IU/kg body weight, median 3700 IU) and (ii) as bolus of 1200 IU followed by a median continuous dose of 400 IU/h. Blood samples were collected before the LMWH bolus, after 10 min, 60 min, 120 min and at the end of treatment in venous and arterial blood lines to determine antiXa activity, thrombin-antithrombin-III complex (TAT), D-dimer and C5a generation. RESULTS: Net ultrafiltration did not significantly differ between HD, HF and HDF but total ultrafiltration in HF and HDF far exceeded total ultrafiltration in HD. With conditions of single bolus, or bolus and continuous anticoagulation with enoxaparin, after comparable treatment times (median duration 4.25 h), TAT and D-dimer generation at identical anti-Xa levels revealed significantly higher coagulation activity during HF and HDF, compared with high-flux HD as assessed by comparative area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Plasma concentration of C5a in venous bloodlines did not significantly differ during HD, HF and HDF. CONCLUSION: A higher convective mass transfer during HF and HDF, in comparison with high-flux HD caused by a greater total ultrafiltration volume was associated with increased procoagulatory activity in the extracorporeal circuit. Molecular markers assessing the activation of coagulation are appropriate to adjust the anticoagulation regime to high UF volumes in order to minimize bleeding risk and optimize patency of the extracorporeal circuit.