RESUMO
To benchmark the dose from paediatric head and chest examinations on computed tomography (CT) scanners throughout Scotland, to identify scanners that may require optimisation and to provide optimisation advice based on the protocols from better performing scanners. Anthropomorphic phantoms corresponding to 1, 5 and 10 year olds were sent to 50 CT scanners around Scotland. Head and chest examinations were undertaken by local staff using local techniques on each scanner with each phantom, and details of the protocols used were recorded. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI)voland dose length product (DLP) were recorded post-scan. There is a significant variation in performance throughout Scotland. For head examinations, the highest DLP is 13 times the lowest for an equivalent sized phantom. For chest examinations, the highest is 128 times the lowest for an equivalent sized phantom. The wide range of CT dose measurements indicates the potential for variation in image quality across Scotland. Feedback has been provided to all participating sites on their individual results compared to the national data set. Specific feedback was provided where relevant on potential considerations for optimisation. Scanners that may be undertaking paediatric CT head and chest examinations in a sub-optimal manner throughout Scotland have been identified along with those aspects of a scan protocol that are most likely to lead to sub-optimal performance.
Assuntos
Benchmarking , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Criança , Humanos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Doses de Radiação , Tomógrafos ComputadorizadosRESUMO
AIM: Transradial coronary procedures are associated with decreased vascular access site complications and other benefits compared to the femoral approach. There is some concern however about high-recorded radiation doses for interventional cardiologists using the transradial route. We therefore designed and investigated the effect of a transradial radiation protection board (TRPB) on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were randomly assigned by time period to undergo radial coronary procedures either with or without a TRPB. This is a grooved arm board with a detachable 0.5-mm lead equivalent shield designed to rest between the patient's arm and side. Individual case-specific radiation exposures were measured using electronic personal dosimeter worn on the left outer pocket of the lead apron at chest level. The TRPB was used in addition to standard lead apron and thyroid shielding, below-table leaded flaps, and leaded glass. Operator radiation exposure was significantly decreased in the TRPB group overall: 28 [18-65] microSV versus 19.5 [10.5-35] microSV, P = 0.003. There were no significant differences in procedure duration, total fluoroscopy dose, or contrast load between the two groups. conclusion: Identification of methods to reduce operator radiation dose is important. The use of the TRPB can significantly reduce radiation exposure to radial operators.