Comparison of Two Weight-Based Desmopressin Dosing Strategies for Spontaneous Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desmopressin are appropriate for adjusted body weight-based dosing, particularly in obese patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe desmopressin dosing strategies, with emphasis on hemostatic outcomes among patients without preexisting bleeding disorders. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who received intravenous weight-based desmopressin for a hemostatic indication. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment setting, indication, site of bleeding, and outcomes were collected from the medical record. Primary outcomes included need for procedural intervention to achieve hemostasis, transfusion requirement, and death. Association between desmopressin dose and outcome was evaluated using χ2 or Fischer's exact tests and logistic and linear regression models. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify other predictors of outcome in the data set. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included (n = 26, dose adjustment; n = 83, no dose adjustment). Baseline characteristics were well-matched between groups: mean (SD) age of 57.0 (13.5) years; mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Score of 6.5 (2.8); 37% were obese; 76% were critically ill; 81% were actively bleeding without differences in site of bleeding; and crude mortality was 39%. No differences in death, mean units of packed red blood cells transfused, or need for procedural hemostasis were observed between adjusted weight- and actual weight-based desmopressin dosing. CONCLUSIONS: When used adjunctively to blood product transfusion in actively bleeding patients, use of adjusted body weight-based desmopressin did not negatively affect clinical outcomes. More data are needed to confirm this dosing strategy.

Comparison of Plasma-Lyte A and Sodium Chloride 0.9% for Fluid Resuscitation of Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare Plasma-Lyte A (PL) and sodium chloride 0.9% (NS) in regard to time to resolution of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) when one fluid was used predominantly over the other for resuscitation. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the records of patients treated for DKA at a large, academic medical center between July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2015. Patients were placed into the PL or NS group based on the predominant fluid they received during fluid resuscitation. Serum biochemistry variables were categorized as follows: initial, 2 to 4 hours, 4 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, and 12 to 24 hours. The primary outcome was mean time to resolution of DKA. Results: Eighty-four patients were included in the study. The primary outcome of mean time to resolution of DKA was similar between the PL (19.74 hours) and NS (18.05 hours) groups (P = .5080). Patients treated with PL had a significantly greater rise in pH within the 4- to 6-hour and 6- to 12-hour periods. The chloride level was significantly higher and the anion gap was significantly lower for the NS group in the 6- to 12-hour period. Conclusion: These data suggest that the use of PL for fluid resuscitation in DKA may confer certain advantages over NS.

Resistance Patterns of Escherichia coli in Women with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Do Not Correlate with Emergency Department Antibiogram.

BACKGROUND: Urine cultures are not always performed for female Emergency Department (ED) patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI). Accordingly, hospital, and even ED-specific, antibiograms might be skewed toward elderly patients with many comorbidities and relatively high rates of antimicrobial resistance, and thus do not accurately reflect otherwise healthy women. Our ED antibiogram indicates Escherichia coli resistance rates for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) of 42%, 26%, and 33%, respectively. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare resistance rates of urinary E. coli from otherwise healthy women with uncomplicated UTI and pyelonephritis in the ED to rates in our ED antibiogram. METHODS: Females > 18 years old with acute onset of urinary frequency, urgency, or dysuria with pyuria identified on urinalysis (white blood cell count > 10/high-power field) were prospectively enrolled in the ED of an urban, academic medical center. Exclusion criteria indicating a complicated UTI were consistent with Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Susceptibility patterns of E. coli to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and TMP-SMX in the study group were compared to our ED antibiogram. RESULTS: Forty-five patients grew E. coli. Pyelonephritis was suspected in nine (20%) subjects. Compared with the ED antibiogram, significantly lower rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin (2% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), levofloxacin (2% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), and TMP-SMX (16% vs. 33%, p = 0.016) were observed. Six patients grew non-E. coli uropathogens. All were susceptible to both levofloxacin and TMP-SMX. CONCLUSIONS: ED antibiograms may overestimate resistance rates for uropathogens causing uncomplicated UTIs. In cases where nitrofurantoin cannot be used, fluoroquinolones and possibly TMP-SMX may remain viable options for treatment of uncomplicated UTI and pyelonephritis in women.

Diltiazem versus metoprolol for rate control in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: The impact of patient-specific factors on the choice of ß-blocker versus calcium channel blocker therapy for rate control in emergency department (ED) patients treated for atrial fibrillation (AF) was investigated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the influence of demographics, prior medication use, hemodynamic and clinical characteristics, and other variables on selection of first-line therapy for AF among patients admitted to the ED of an academic medical center over a 22-month period (October 2012-July 2014) who received i.v. treatment with either the ß-blocker metoprolol (n = 45) or the calcium channel blocker diltiazem (n = 55) for rate control. RESULTS: Significant predictors of the selection of metoprolol versus diltiazem included a past history of AF (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.396-72.713; p = 0.032) or diabetes mellitus (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.208-58.490; p = 0.042) and being prescribed a ß-blocker prior to presentation (OR, 27.8; 95% CI, 4.704-272.894; p = 0.001); a history of calcium channel blocker use prior to ED presentation was a negative predictor of ß-blocker use for initial rate control (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.005-0.265; p = 0.002). No differences in the effectiveness or safety of diltiazem and metoprolol were identified. Indicators of hemodynamic and clinical response to ED management were not predictive of discharge medication selection. CONCLUSION: The drug class used for rate control prior to ED admission was the most significant predictor of medication selection for rate control in the ED setting.