Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord ; 44(3-4): 182-195, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869959

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in end-stage kidney disease patients on dialysis is increasingly common. This study aimed to review the practice of screening and to evaluate the evidence on cognitive impairment prevalence in this population. METHODS: This scoping review of studies summarises the evidence on cognitive impairment in dialysis populations. The search included the Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases for English-language articles published between 2000 and 2015. A total of 46 articles were reviewed. RESULTS: The studies were of prospective observational design, with the majority conducted in the haemodialysis population. The reported prevalence of cognitive impairment ranged from 6.6 to 51%. Three screening tools were consistently used. CONCLUSION: While cognitive impairment is recognised in the dialysis population, there is paucity of screening data. The design of prospective comparisons ideally includes established screening instruments, particularly the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, to determine the optimal results for this population. Translation of established screening tools to increase the inclusion of people from other cultural and language groups is required. Regular screening can enhance the timing to introduce home-based care support and advance care planning discussions.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Idoso , Disfunção Cognitiva/psicologia , Comparação Transcultural , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Fatores de Risco , Tradução
2.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 21(8): 663-8, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26609786

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare the anti-factor Xa (AXa) level in the blood, after arterial and venous line administration of equivalent doses of enoxaparin for prevention of thrombosis in the extracorporeal blood circuit. DESIGN: The design of the study is a dual centre, prospective, open-labelled randomized crossover, 7 weeks trial. SETTING: The setting of the study is on a patient on long-term haemodialysis (HD) or haemodiafiltration (HDF) using high-flux membrane. PARTICIPANT: There were eight patients on HD and eight on HDF. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin either through the arterial line or venous line of extracorporeal blood circuit for an initial study interval of 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of alternate route administration. During the run-in period of 1 week and the follow-up period of 2 weeks, enoxaparin was administered through the arterial line. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measure was to compare AXa blood level 4 h after enoxaparin administration. The secondary outcome measures were manual compression time to stop bleeding from arteriovenous fistula, extracorporeal circuit clotting and systemic bleeding episodes. RESULTS: The mean AXa blood level, 4 h after venous circuit administration (0.58 ± 0.21 (HD), 0.82 ± 0.29 (HDF)) of enoxaparin, was significantly greater than that after arterial administration of enoxaparin (0.39 ± 0.25 (HD), 0.39 ± 0.14 (HDF) U/mL), (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients on HD or HDF, venous line administration of enoxaparin achieves greater 4 h blood AXa level compared with arterial line administration of equivalent dose. Based on this, we suggest a 25% or 50% reduction in the dose of venous line enoxaparin, compared with the dose administered through arterial line in patients receiving either HD or HDF, respectively.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Enoxaparina/administração & dosagem , Hemodiafiltração/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Estudos Cross-Over , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemodiafiltração/instrumentação , Humanos , Infusões Intra-Arteriais , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Membranas Artificiais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Queensland , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 13(3): 235-41, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18221255

RESUMO

With widespread availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become standard practice for patients with severe renal impairment or previous severe reactions to iodine-containing contrast media to receive gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents instead of traditional radiographic contrast agents, particularly for magnetic resonance angiography. However, there is growing concern about the use of gadolinium contrast agents in the presence of severe renal insufficiency, because of increasing reports of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD)/nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), associated with the exposure to certain gadolinium-containing contrast agents. In this review we explore the causal link between gadolinium exposure and NSF, using an established system of epidemiological criteria proposed by Bradford Hill. Though the current evidence makes gadolinium a strong suspect as an aetiologic agent for NSF in the presence of severe renal failure, the die is not cast yet. At this stage there needs to be cautious approach to the use of gadolinium-containing contrast agents in the presence of severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)).


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Gadolínio/efeitos adversos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Fibrose , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal/patologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Dermatopatias/induzido quimicamente , Dermatopatias/epidemiologia , Dermatopatias/patologia
5.
Transplantation ; 80(7): 937-44, 2005 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16249742

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) may be implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and be contributed to, in part, by free fatty acids (FFAs), produced in excess in centrally obese individuals. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of IR and the relationships between FFAs, central obesity, and atherosclerosis in a cohort of prevalent RTRs. METHODS: Observational data were collected on 85 RTRs (mean age 54 years; 49% male, 87% Caucasian). Fasting serum was analyzed for FFAs, glucose, and insulin; IR was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) score. Vascular structure was assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with IR and atherosclerosis. RESULTS: IR occurred in 75% of RTRs, and FFA levels were independently associated with its occurrence (beta: -0.55, 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.07, P = 0.02). Other variables independently associated with IR were male sex, body mass index, central obesity, diabetes, systolic blood pressure and corticosteroid use. There was a significant correlation between FFA levels and IMT (r = 0.3, P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, IMT correlated with elevated FFA (beta: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.12, P = 0.007), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.05), older age (P < 0.002), and a body mass index >25 kg/m (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: FFAs are associated with the development of IR and may be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in RTRs. Additional studies are required to explore these associations further before considering whether an interventional trial aimed at lowering FFA would be a worthwhile undertaking.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Ácidos Graxos não Esterificados/sangue , Resistência à Insulina , Transplante de Rim , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Túnica Íntima/patologia
7.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 9(6): 418-21, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15663647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the immunosuppressant cyclosporine has significantly improved renal transplant survival. It is an expensive drug and generic alternatives may offer cost advantages. However, generic alternatives must be shown to provide equivalent therapeutic efficacy and safety. This study reports our experience of a switch from the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, Neoral (Novartis), to the generic equivalent, Cysporin (Mayne Pharma). METHOD: A two-period, single-sequence, cross-over study was done to compare cyclosporine blood levels and the area under the curve (AUC) of Neoral with Cysporin 2 weeks after a 1:1 dose switch. cyclosporine blood levels were measured at time points 0, 2, 4 and 8 h (C0, C2, C4, C8) after the switch. The cyclosporine AUC at 0-4 h and 0-12 h were calculated using the trapezoidal method. The two formulations were considered to result in equivalent blood levels if the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the two levels was within 0.8-1.25. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 38 stable renal transplant patients aged 49.79 +/- 11.38 years (mean +/- SD), who were 7.84 +/- 3.97 years postrenal transplantation, were studied. The Neoral dose at the time of the switch was 2.38 +/- 1.21 mg per kg bodyweight. At all measured time points the 95% CI for the cyclosporine drug level ratio was between 0.9 and 1.15. There were no significant adverse events during the period of study. We conclude that the generic formulation of cylosporin, Cysporin, after a 1:1 switch from Neoral results in equivalent blood levels in stable renal transplant recipients. After switchover cyclosporine levels at C0 or C2 can continue to be monitored as per the institution's current monitoring practice.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos Genéricos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim , Estudos Cross-Over , Ciclosporina/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA