A comparison of salvage infusional chemotherapy regimens for recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the impact of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, infusional chemotherapy regimens continue to be used for patients with multiple myeloma. To the authors' knowledge, contemporary data regarding salvage chemotherapy regimens are sparse, with no direct comparisons. METHODS: The authors performed a single-institution study comparing 3 salvage chemotherapy regimens in 107 patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma: dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP) in 52 patients; bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VTD-PACE) in 22 patients; and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVAD) in 33 patients. RESULTS: Differences between treatment groups existed, including higher baseline creatinine for patients treated with CVAD (P<.001) and greater prior use of infusional chemotherapy for those receiving VTD-PACE (P<.001). There was no significant difference in response noted among the 3 regimens: 55% overall (P = .18). For the intent-to-transplant population, a similar percentage were successfully bridged to transplant without further therapy (62%; P = .9). There was no difference in survival observed across the 3 regimens, with an overall median progression-free survival of 4.5 months (95% confidence interval, 3.6-5.5 months [P = .8]) and a median overall survival of 8.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-11 months [P = .8]). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference noted among clinically relevant adverse events, although there was a suggestion of fewer adverse events with DCEP. Patients treated with the intent to transplant had superior outcomes for response (odds ratio, 3.40; P = .01), progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.28; P<.001), and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.19; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 3 salvage regimens demonstrated similar responses, survival, and adverse events. Given the short response durations observed in the recurrent/refractory disease setting, infusional chemotherapy is best suited for cytoreduction before more definitive therapy is administered.

Sequence of novel agents in multiple myeloma: an instrumental variable analysis.

Lenalidomide and bortezomib have not been compared prospectively and are currently used in sequence for patients with multiple myeloma; however, it is unknown whether a sequence of administration could result in improved outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed electronic records of patients with multiple myeloma who had used both agents in sequence at our institution: 97 patients had lenalidomide first and 111 had bortezomib first. On multivariable analysis, the sequence of therapy was not associated with outcome. These findings were confirmed with instrumental variable analyses. Finally, use of bortezomib first was associated with improved survival for patients with baseline renal insufficiency.

Salvage chemotherapy regimens for acute myeloid leukemia: Is one better? Efficacy comparison between CLAG and MEC regimens.

There is no standard salvage regimen for AML. We retrospectively compared two commonly used regimens at our institution: CLAG and MEC. The complete response rate (CR) was 37.9% for CLAG (n=97) and 23.8% for MEC (n=65) (P=0.048), with median overall survival (OS) of 7.3 and 4.5 months, respectively (P=0.05). In primary refractory disease, CR was 45.5% for CLAG and 22.2% for MEC (P=0.09), with median OS of 11 and 4.5 months, respectively (P=0.07). In first relapse, CR was 36.8% and 25.9% (P=0.35) and median OS was 6.7 and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.87). Our data support use of CLAG for RR-AML.

Abbreviated rasburicase dosing for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia in adults at risk for tumor lysis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report the experience of using abbreviated rasburicase dosing for adult patients at risk for developing hyperuricemia secondary to tumor lysis syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who received rasburicase from January 2003 through March 2004 were identified, and a retrospective chart review was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen patients received >/= 1 dose of rasburicase for the prevention or treatment of hyperuricemia. Of these patients, 8 patients received 1 dose, 3 patients received 2 doses, and 2 patients received 3 doses of rasburicase. All 13 patients experienced normalization of plasma uric acid levels within 24 hours (mean uric acid decreased from 9.1 mg/dL to 0.68 mg/dL). Mean serum creatinine decreased from 2.3 mg/dL to 1.6 mg/dL. No patients required hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Our experience supports that abbreviated courses of rasburicase are effective in managing hyperuricemia in patients at risk for tumor lysis syndrome.