HLA-DPB1 and HLA class I confer risk of and protection from narcolepsy.

Type 1 narcolepsy, a disorder caused by a lack of hypocretin (orexin), is so strongly associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II HLA-DQA1(∗)01:02-DQB1(∗)06:02 (DQ0602) that very few non-DQ0602 cases have been reported. A known triggering factor for narcolepsy is pandemic 2009 influenza H1N1, suggesting autoimmunity triggered by upper-airway infections. Additional effects of other HLA-DQ alleles have been reported consistently across multiple ethnic groups. Using over 3,000 case and 10,000 control individuals of European and Chinese background, we examined the effects of other HLA loci. After careful matching of HLA-DR and HLA-DQ in case and control individuals, we found strong protective effects of HLA-DPA1(∗)01:03-DPB1(∗)04:02 (DP0402; odds ratio [OR] = 0.51 [0.38-0.67], p = 1.01 × 10(-6)) and HLA-DPA1(∗)01:03-DPB1(∗)04:01 (DP0401; OR = 0.61 [0.47-0.80], p = 2.07 × 10(-4)) and predisposing effects of HLA-DPB1(∗)05:01 in Asians (OR = 1.76 [1.34-2.31], p = 4.71 × 10(-05)). Similar effects were found by conditional analysis controlling for HLA-DR and HLA-DQ with DP0402 (OR = 0.45 [0.38-0.55] p = 8.99 × 10(-17)) and DP0501 (OR = 1.38 [1.18-1.61], p = 7.11 × 10(-5)). HLA-class-II-independent associations with HLA-A(∗)11:01 (OR = 1.32 [1.13-1.54], p = 4.92 × 10(-4)), HLA-B(∗)35:03 (OR = 1.96 [1.41-2.70], p = 5.14 × 10(-5)), and HLA-B(∗)51:01 (OR = 1.49 [1.25-1.78], p = 1.09 × 10(-5)) were also seen across ethnic groups in the HLA class I region. These effects might reflect modulation of autoimmunity or indirect effects of HLA class I and HLA-DP alleles on response to viral infections such as that of influenza.

Comparative effectiveness of warfarin management strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: The management of warfarin therapy presents clinical challenges due to its narrow therapeutic index. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different management strategies in patients using warfarin. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and EBSCO Open Dissertation were searched from inception to 8 May 2024. Randomized controlled trials that compared the following interventions: patient self-management (PSM), patient self-testing (PST), anticoagulation management services (AMS), and usual care in patients prescribed warfarin for any indication were included. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank different interventions. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online platform. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023491978). Findings: Twenty-eight trials involving 8100 participants were included, with follow-up periods of 1-24 months. Mean warfarin dosages were 4.9-7.2 mg/day. Only PSM showed a significant reduction of major TE risk compared with usual care (RR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.71; I2 = 0.0%) with moderate certainty of evidence. The 97.6% SUCRA also supported the beneficial effects of PSM over other interventions. The combined direct and indirect evidence showed significantly higher TTR in PSM compared with usual care (MD = 7.39; 95% CI: 2.39, 12.39), with very low certainty. However, direct evidence showed non-significant TTR improvement (MD = 6.49; 95% CI: -3.09, 16.07, I2 = 96.1%). No differences across various strategies were observed in all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and hospitalization. Interpretation: PSM reduces the risk of major TE events compared with usual care, tends to improve anticoagulation control, and should be considered where appropriate. Funding: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant ID 5R18HS027960).