Discriminating factors in access to video-EEG for epilepsy surgery in a French tertiary epilepsy center.

Equitable access to care and management is a priority for patients with epilepsy and may vary depending on each country's healthcare system. As this issue has not been specifically addressed in France, we conducted a retrospective study to identify discriminating factors in access to surgery at a French tertiary epilepsy center. Initially, we examined factors previously identified in other countries as influential in surgery access, including age at diagnosis, affected side, gender, years of education, socio-professional categories, and density of general practitioners in the residential area, in 293 consecutive French-native patients with refractory medial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS). Subsequently, we conducted a case-control study comparing patients born in France with 22 patients born abroad to specifically explore migratory status. The analysis revealed that the only three factors statistically influencing the delay between the onset of epilepsy and entry into video-EEG were early age at onset (associated with a longer delay), pensioner status (associated with a longer delay), and student status (associated with a shorter delay). Migratory status, gender, and socio-economic level (indirectly reflected by the level of education and socio-professional category) were not found to be discriminatory factors in access to video-EEG. Discrepancies between our study and foreign studies may be attributed to differences in healthcare systems and medical coverage among countries. Efforts in France to improve access to surgery should focus on enhancing communication among practitioners to promptly refer any MTLE-HS patient to an epilepsy surgery center, regardless of their age.

Revisiting emotion recognition in different types of temporal lobe epilepsy: The influence of facial expression intensity.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) can induce various difficulties in recognizing emotional facial expressions (EFE), particularly for negative valence emotions. However, these difficulties have not been systematically examined according to the localization of the epileptic focus. For this purpose, we used a forced-choice recognition task in which faces expressing fear, sadness, anger, disgust, surprise, or happiness were presented in different intensity levels from moderate to high intensity. The first objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of emotional intensity on the recognition of different categories of EFE in TLE patients compared to control participants. The second objective was to assess the effect of localizationof epileptic focus on the recognition of EFE in patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) associated or not with hippocampal sclerosis (HS), or lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE). The results showed that the 272 TLE patients and the 68 control participants were not differently affected by the intensity of EFE. However, we obtained group differences within the clinical population when we took into account the localization of the temporal lobe epileptic focus. As predicted, TLE patients were impaired in recognizing fear and disgust relative to controls. Moreover, the scores of these patients varied according to the localization of the epileptic focus, but not according to the cerebral lateralization of TLE. The facial expression of fear was less well recognized by MTLE patients, with or without HS, and the expression of disgust was less well recognized by LTLE as well as MTLE without HS patients. Moreover, emotional intensity modulated differently the recognition of disgust and surprise of the three patient groups underlying the relevance of using moderate emotional intensity to distinguish the effect of epileptic focus localization. These findings should be taken into account for interpreting the emotional behaviors and deserve to befurther investigated before considering TLE surgical treatment or social cognition interventions in TLE patients.

[Quetiapine and anticholinergic drugs induced ischaemic colitis: A case study]. / Colite ischémique sous quétiapine associée à d'autres molécules anticholinergiques : à propos d'un cas.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper is to underline the need for systematic monitoring of patients treated with anticholinergic antipsychotic drugs. We present the clinical history of a 34-year-old adult, treated with quetiapine in combination with other drugs with anticholinergic effects. CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old male adult had been suffering from bipolar disorder since 2001. He was treated with risperidone, but he was not compliant due to adverse effects, including decreased libido and erectile dysfunction. On June 5th 2012, it was decided to administrate 600mg per day of quetiapine in combination with tropatepine consequent to an episode of agitation and aggressiveness. On June 14th 2012, while the patient was receiving diazepam and valproic acid, loxapine oral solution was introduced. On June 23th, the patient started mentioning digestive disorders, such as diffuse abdominal pain with constipation but continued to pass gaz. On June 25th, at 6:30 am, he declared abdominal pain, which worsened at 8:15 am despite administration of analgesics, followed by malaise and onset of vomiting. His laboratory tests showed leukocytosis 11.2G/L with neutrophils 7.7G/L. The abdomen's radiograph without preparation showed small bowel and colonic air-fluid levels. The result of the CT scan confirmed an occlusive syndrome affecting the whole small gut and colon. At 1 pm, the patient's condition worsened. He received an intramuscular injection of 100mg of loxapine and an opioid treatment, including tramadol and morphine. At 2:30 pm, the clinical condition further deteriorated with an onset of generalized abdominal contracture, the absence of abdominal breathing, sweating, tachycardia at 104 beats per minute, and hypothermia of 34.5°C. He was transferred to an intensive care unit. Laboratory tests showed metabolic acidosis, elevated liver enzymes and acute renal failure. He received volume expansion and was treated by renal replacement therapy and antibiotics. He was intubated and transferred to the operating room. At laparotomy, both colonic necrosis with perforation and necrosis of the small bowel were seen. The patient underwent total colectomy with small bowel resection, distal ileostomy and closure of the rectal stump. The onset of septic and hemorrhagic state required further surgery on June 26th. The evolution was characterized by multi-organ failure with acute anuric renal failure, multiple cardiac arrests, and systemic bacterial and fungal infection. On July 24th, this unfavorable outcome lead to death. In summary, the patient had an occlusive syndrome due to neuroleptics and complications, including mesenteric ischemia with necrotizing colitis. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Quetiapine, like all antipsychotics, has anticholinergic effects, including cardiac, psychiatric and digestive disorders. The combination of anticholinergic drugs decreases intestinal peristalsis. Without any prompt management, this decrease can result in a colonic ischemia or necrosis. In patients treated with neuroleptics, the onset of constipation must alert medical staff. Systematic monitoring of bowel movements should be performed in any patient receiving anticholinergic drugs.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: direct comparisons of biomarkers for the diagnosis of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C and B.

BACKGROUND: Blood tests and transient elastography (TE), proposed as alternatives to biopsy for identifying advanced fibrosis (METAVIR-stage-F2 or greater) or cirrhosis, have never been compared using an intention to diagnose approach, with direct comparisons only, and Bayesian approach. AIM: To permit more appropriate comparisons. METHODS: From an overview of articles (2002-2014), we selected studies that directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of FibroTest, aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB4 or TE, with biopsy as a reference, in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) or B (CHB). Investigators abstracted and checked study details and quality by using pre-defined criteria. Bayesian method in intention to diagnose was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of 1321 articles identified, 71 studies including 77 groups according to aetiology (All-CB) were eligible: 37 Only-C, 28 Only-B and 12 Mixed-C-B. There were 185 direct comparisons between the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs), 99 for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and 86 for cirrhosis. In All-CB, Bayesian analyses revealed significant AUROCs differences in identifying advanced fibrosis in favour of FibroTest vs. TE [credibility interval: 0.06(0.02-0.09)], FibroTest vs. APRI [0.05 (0.03-0.07)] and for identifying cirrhosis TE vs. APRI [0.07 (0.02-0.13)] and FIB4 vs. APRI [0.04(0.02-0.05)]. No differences were observed between TE and FibroTest, for identifying cirrhosis in All-CB, and in sub-groups (Only-C, Only-B, Mixed-CB) for both cirrhosis and fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In CHC and CHB, APRI had lower performances than FIB-4, TE and FibroTest. TE had lower performance than FibroTest for identifying advanced fibrosis in All-CB, without significant difference for identifying cirrhosis in all groups.

Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations.

The joint development of polymorphic molecular markers and paternity analysis methods provides new approaches to investigate ongoing patterns of pollen flow in natural plant populations. However, paternity studies are hindered by false paternity assignment and the nondetection of true fathers. To gauge the risk of these two types of errors, we performed a simulation study to investigate the impact on paternity analysis of: (i) the assumed values for the size of the breeding male population (NBMP), and (ii) the rate of scoring error in genotype assessment. Our simulations were based on microsatellite data obtained from a natural population of the entomophilous wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. We show that an accurate estimate of NBMP is required to minimize both types of errors, and we assess the reliability of a technique used to estimate NBMP based on parent-offspring genetic data. We then show that scoring errors in genotype assessment only slightly affect the assessment of paternity relationships, and conclude that it is generally better to neglect the scoring error rate in paternity analyses within a nonisolated population.