Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rhinology ; 62(2): 202-207, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999634

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increased blood eosinophil count (BEC) is common in patients under dupilumab treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study investigated the prevalence and consequences of hypereosinophilia and to help define patients at risk. METHODS: Real-life, prospective observational cohort study of patients treated with dupilumab for severe CRSwNP. Eligible patients were adult and biological-naive (N=334). All BEC values at baseline and during treatment were reported. Patients with a follow-up of >= 1 year were included to define patients at risk for hypereosinophilia by comparing baseline BEC values (N=218). Furthermore, clinical characteristics and therapeutic consequences for patients with BEC >= 3.0 were noted. RESULTS: Hypereosinophilia developed in a minority of patients, with a peak at week 12 (16.2% with BEC >= 1.5, and 1.7% >= 3.0) in cross-sectional analysis. BEC >= 1.5 developed in 28.9% and BEC >=3.0 in 4.6% of cases with a minimal 1-year follow-up. Baseline BEC was significantly higher for patients developing BEC >= 1.5 and BEC >=3.0, with an optimal cut-off point of 0.96 to predict developing BEC >= 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: Blood eosinophil count (BEC) >= 1.5 is transient and usually abates with no therapeutic interventions and BEC >= 3.0 is rare. Hypereosinophilic syndrome did not occur and switching to a different biological was rarely employed. A baseline BEC of >=1.0 can be a reason for extra caution.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Eosinofilia , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Rinossinusite , Sinusite , Adulto , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasais/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica
2.
Rhinology ; 62(3): 383-384, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478151

RESUMO

The latest European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS2020) defines markers for type2 inflammation in the context of indicating biological therapy in severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) as either a total serum immunoglobulin E (total-IgE) <100 kU/L, a blood eosinophil count (BEC, expressed as -109 cells / L) >=0.25, or a tissue eosinophil count >=10 per high power field (HPF) (1). Recently, an EPOS/EUFOREA expert panel advised to lower the threshold for BEC from >=0.25 (EPOS2020) to >=0.15 (EUFOREA2023) to align with thresholds used for biological indication in asthma patients (2). As far as we know, there is no literature supporting the cut-off value for total-IgE.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Eosinófilos , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/terapia , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/sangue , Sinusite/terapia , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/sangue , Doença Crônica , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/análise , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Contagem de Leucócitos , Rinossinusite
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA