Long-term Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Rectal Endometriosis: Seven-year Follow-up of Patients Enrolled in a Randomized Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate, and pregnancy likelihood in patients undergoing conservative or radical surgery for deep rectal endometriosis followed up for 7 years. DESIGN: Prospective study in a cohort of patients enrolled in a 2-arm randomized trial from March 2011 to August 2013. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifty-five patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent either segmental resection or nodule excision via shaving or disk excision, depending on randomization that was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was the number of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation, frequent bowel movements, anal incontinence, or bladder dysfunction 24 months after surgery. The secondary end points were values of gastrointestinal and overall quality of life scores. The 7-year recurrence rates (new deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the rectum) in the excision vs segmental resection arms were 7.4 % vs 0% (p = .24). One of the symptoms included in the definition of the primary outcomes was recorded in 55.6% vs 60.7% of patients (p = .79). However, 51.9% vs 53.6% of patients considered their bowel movements as normal (p = .99). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall quality of life scores did not find a difference between the 2 groups 7 years after surgery. At the end of the 7-year study period, 31 of 37 patients who tried to conceive were successful (83.8%), including 27 pregnancies (57.4%) resulting from natural conception and 20 pregnancies (42.6%) resulting from assisted reproductive technology procedures. The pregnancy rate was 82.4% vs 85% in the 2 arms (p = .99). A 75.7% live birth rate was recorded. At the end of the follow-up, there were 15 women with 1 child (40.5%) and 13 women with 2 children (35.1%). During the 7-year follow-up, the reoperation rates were 37% and 35.7%, respectively, in each arm (p = .84). Among the 27 reoperation procedures during the follow-up period, 11 (40.7%) were for postoperative complications, 7 (25.9%) were necessary before assisted reproductive technology management, 8 (29.6%) were for recurrent abdominal or pelvic pain, and 1 (3.7%) was for midline ventral hernia after pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Our study did not reveal a considerable difference in terms of digestive functional outcomes, recurrence rate, reoperation risk, and pregnancy likelihood when conservative and radical rectal surgeries for deep endometriosis were compared 7 years after surgery. The postoperative pregnancy rate observed in our series was high.

La douche préopératoire chez les patients obèses : ce qu'en disent les patients et les soignants.

Introduction : At least one preoperative shower is recommended to avoid surgical site infection. Caregivers must explain the showering technique, help the patient if necessary, and assess skin cleanliness after showering.Context : Showering may be more difficult for obese patients because of inadequate equipment and difficulties moving, as well as insufficient explanation regarding the showering technique and an insufficient skin cleanliness assessment from caregivers.Objective : to assess whether patients and/or caregivers report difficulties in the preoperative shower process that could be linked to patient obesity. Methods : pilot qualitative survey with semi-structured interviews conducted with 9 obese surgery patients and 11 surgery caregivers.Results : Patients did not report feelings of discrimination. They described no problem with equipment, but declared having received little explanation on the showering technique and no visual skin cleanliness assessment. Caregivers reported equipment as inadequate, they stated having delivered detailed information, but found the skin cleanliness assessment difficult.Discussion : The lack of skin cleanliness assessment by caregivers after preoperative showering is new information. Limits : preliminary study with a small number of interviews and no non-obese patients.Conclusion : the subject warrants additional work with both quantitative and qualitative surveys to better understand the difficulties with preoperative showering.

Excision versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: 5-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in functional outcomes and recurrence rate between conservative versus radical rectal surgery in patients with large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum 5 years postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: No evidence was found that long-term outcomes differed when nodule excision was compared to rectal resection for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Functional outcomes of nodule excision and rectal resection for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel are comparable 2 years after surgery. Despite numerous previously reported case series enrolling patients managed for colorectal endometriosis, long-term data remain scarce in the literature. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring >20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Among them, 55 women were enrolled at one tertial referral centre in endometriosis, using a randomization list drawn up separately for this centre. Institute review board approval was obtained to continue follow-up to 10 years postoperatively. One patient requested to stop the follow-up 2 years after surgery. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients underwent either nodule excision by shaving or disc excision, or segmental resection. Randomization was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, and patients were informed of randomization results. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation (1 stool/>5 consecutive days), frequent bowel movements (≥3 stools/day), anal incontinence, dysuria or bladder atony requiring self-catheterization 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were values taken from the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-symptom questionnaire (KESS), the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI), the Wexner scale, the urinary symptom profile (USP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. Among the 27 patients in the excision arm, two were converted to segmental resection (7.4%). One patient managed by segmental resection withdrew from the study 2 years postoperatively, presuming that associated pain of other aetiologies may have jeopardized the outcomes. The 5 year-recurrence rate for excision and resection was 3.7% versus 0% (P = 1), respectively. For excision and resection, the primary endpoint was present in 44.4% versus 60.7% of patients (P = 0.29), respectively, while 55.6% versus 53.6% of patients subjectively reported normal bowel movements (P = 1). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall KESS, GIQLI, Wexner, USP and SF36 scores did not reveal significant differences between the two arms 5 years postoperatively. Statistically significant improvement was observed shortly after surgery with no further improvement or impairment recorded 1-5 years postoperatively. During the 5-year follow-up, additional surgical procedures were performed in 25.9% versus 28.6% of patients who had undergone excision or resection (P = 0.80), respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The presumption of a 40% difference concerning postoperative functional outcomes in favour of nodule excision resulted in a lack of power for demonstration of the primary endpoint difference. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Five-year follow-up data do not show statistically significant differences between conservative and radical rectal surgery for long-term functional digestive and urinary outcomes in this specific population of women with large involvement of the rectum. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was received. Patient enrolment and follow-up until 2 years postoperatively was supported by a grant from the clinical research programme for hospitals in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This randomized study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01291576. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 January 2011. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 7 March 2011.

Effectiveness of Fibrin Sealant Application on the Development of Staple Line Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of fibrin sealant (FS) for preventing the development of staple line complications (SLCs) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the best means of preventing SLCs after SG. METHODS: This was a prospective, intention-to-treat, randomized, 2 center study of a group of 586 patients undergoing primary SG (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01613664) between March 2014 and June 2017. The 1:1 randomization was stratified by center, age, sex, gender, and body mass index, giving 293 patients in the FS group and 293 in the control group (without FS). The primary endpoint (composite criteria) was the incidence of SLCs in each of the 2 groups. The secondary criteria were the mortality rate, morbidity rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and risk factors for SLC. RESULTS: There were no intergroup differences in demographic variables. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of SLCs was similar in the FS and control groups (1.3% vs 2%, respectively; P = 0.52). All secondary endpoints were similar: complication rate (5.4% vs 5.1%, respectively; P = 0.85), mortality rate (0.3% vs 0%, respectively; P = 0.99), GL rate (0.3% vs 1.3%, respectively; P = 0.18), postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma rate (1% vs 0.7%, respectively; P = 0.68), reoperation rate (1% vs 0.3%, respectively; P = 0.32). Length of stay was 1 day in both groups (P = 0.89), and the readmission rate was similar (5.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.32). No risk factors for SLCs were found. CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative SLCs did not appear to depend on the presence or absence of FS.

Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in functional outcome between conservative versus radical rectal surgery in patients with large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum 2 years postoperatively? SUMMARY ANSWER: No evidence was found that functional outcomes differed when conservative surgery was compared to radical rectal surgery for deeply invasive endometriosis involving the bowel. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adopting a conservative approach to the surgical management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum, by employing shaving or disc excision, appears to yield improved digestive functional outcomes. However, previous comparative studies were not randomized, introducing a possible bias regarding the presumed superiority of conservative techniques due to the inclusion of patients with more severe deep endometriosis who underwent colorectal resection. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a 2-arm randomized trial, enroling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth and up to 50% of rectal circumference. No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients were enroled in three French university hospitals and had either conservative surgery, by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery, by segmental resection. Randomization was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, and patients were informed of the results of randomization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation (1 stool/>5 consecutive days), frequent bowel movements (≥3 stools/day), defecation pain, anal incontinence, dysuria or bladder atony requiring self-catheterization 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were the values of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS), the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Wexner scale, the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 60 patients were enroled. Among the 27 patients in the conservative surgery arm, two were converted to segmental resection (7.4%). In each group, 13 presented with at least one functional problem at 24 months after surgery (48.1 versus 39.4%, OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.22-2.21). The intention-to-treat comparison of the overall scores on KESS, GIQLI, Wexner, USP and SF36 did not reveal significant differences between the two arms. Segmental resection was associated with a significant risk of bowel stenosis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <20 mm in length. The presumption of a 40% difference favourable to conservative surgery in terms of postoperative functional outcomes resulted in a lack of power to demonstrate a difference for the primary endpoint. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Conservative surgery is feasible in patients managed for large deep rectal endometriosis. The trial does not show a statistically significant superiority of conservative surgery for mid-term functional digestive and urinary outcomes in this specific population of women with large involvement of the rectum. There is a higher risk of rectal stenosis after segmental resection, requiring additional endoscopic or surgical procedures. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research programme for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 01291576. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31 January 2011. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 7 March 2011.

Long-term functional outcomes following colorectal resection versus shaving for rectal endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Two surgical approaches usually are used in the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: the radical approach that mainly is based on colorectal resection and the conservative or symptom-guided approach that prioritizes conservation of the rectum. There are no data available that compare long-term functional digestive outcomes of 1 approach to the other. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term digestive outcomes in women who were treated by either rectal shaving or colorectal resection for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study was performed. All women who were treated with surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum by either shaving or colorectal resection at the University Hospital of Rouen from January 2005 to January 2010 were enrolled. Follow-up evaluation was carried out for a minimum of 5 years. Postoperative evaluation of digestive symptoms was performed by 4 standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom score for constipation, the Wexner score for anal continence, and the Bristol Stool Score. Symptoms that were related to endometriosis, fertility, and disease recurrence were obtained from a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 77 women were included. Three women were lost to follow up (3.9%), and 3 were treated by disc excision (3.9%). The mean follow-up time was 80±19 months. Forty-six women underwent conservative rectal shaving, and 25 women underwent colorectal resection. Patient characteristics and the severity of the disease were comparable in both groups. Patients who were treated by rectal shaving had significantly better Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index values, lower Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom scores for postoperative constipation, and better anal continence. No statistically significant differences were revealed for postoperative pelvic pain. Rectal recurrence occurred in 8.7% of patients who were treated by conservative surgery: 4.3% underwent secondary colorectal resection and 4.3% were treated secondarily by rectal shaving. Consequently, avoiding a recurrence for merely 1 patient would have required 11 patients to undergo colorectal resection instead of shaving. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that, in patients who are treated for rectal endometriosis, colorectal resection does not improve long-term postoperative functional outcomes when compared with rectal shaving.

Morbidity-mortality conference for adverse events associated with totally implanted venous access for cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Although considered safer than central venous catheters for administration of cancer chemotherapy, totally implanted venous access (TIVA) is associated with adverse events that may impair prognosis and quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy. Our aim was to assess the feasibility and interest of surveillance of cancer chemotherapy TIVA-adverse events (AE), associated with morbidity-mortality conferences (MMCs) on TIVA-AE. METHODS: We performed a prospective interventional study in two hospitals (a university hospital and a comprehensive care center). For each cancer chemotherapy care pathway within each hospital, we set up surveillance of TIVA-AE and MMC on these events. Patients included in surveillance were those with a TIVA either placed or used for chemotherapy cycles in one of the participating wards. Feasibility of MMC was assessed by the number of MMC meetings that actually took place and the number of participants at each meeting. The interest of MMC was assessed by the number of TIVA-AE identified and analyzed, and the number and type of improvement actions selected and actually implemented. RESULTS: We recorded 0.41 adverse events per 1000 TIVA-day. MMCs were implemented in all care pathways, with sustained pluriprofessional attendance throughout the survey; 39 improvement actions were identified during meetings, and 18 were actually implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of TIVA-AE associated with MMC is feasible and helps change practices. It could be useful for improving care of patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy.

Deep shaving and transanal disc excision in large endometriosis of mid and lower rectum: the Rouen technique.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal resection is performed in a majority of patients presenting with large endometriosis of mid and lower rectum; however, it may negatively and irreversibly impact postoperative rectal function. To avoid such unfavourable outcomes, we propose an original technique combining laparoscopic deep rectal shaving and transanal disc excision using a semi-circular stapler. METHODS: The video presents the procedure performed in a 29-year-old nullipara referred with a large endometriotic nodule infiltrating the lower rectum on more than 30 mm length. The first step is laparoscopic and involves deep rectal shaving performed using exclusively the plasma energy. Then, transanal excision of shaved area is performed, by placing traction parachute sutures in the middle and outside the shaved area. Their traction induces the prolapse of shaved area that is resected using a semicircular stapler. Insufflating the rectum with air checks the integrity of the staple line. RESULTS: Operative time was 210 min. Immediate postoperative outcomes were uneventful, and bowel movements were normal beginning with day 6. Our technique is suitable in large rectal nodules located up to 10 cm above the anus, infiltrating the rectum on up to 6 cm length, and these parameters are preoperatively assessed using MRI and computed tomography. To date, it was successfully carried out in 29 women with large deep endometriosis of the mid and lower rectum. Rectovaginal fistula was recorded in one patient (3.6 %) and transitory bladder dysfunction in seven patients (25 %). Digestive function assessment using standardized questionnaires revealed an overall improvement, without de novo anal continence troubles. Postoperative pregnancy rate was 78 % with a majority of patients having conceived spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, we believe that our conservative technique is feasible and reproducible in large mid and lower rectal endometriosis and might avoid the risk of unfavourable outcomes related to low colorectal resection.

Adjuvant I-131 Lipiodol After Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High rates of recurrence have been observed after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The main aim of this study was to establish the influence of adjuvant transarterial radioembolization-based I-131 lipiodol on survival and recurrence. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, 38 patients were treated with adjuvant I-131 lipiodol therapy, at a dosage of 2220 MBq, within 4 months after surgery. This treated cohort was compared to a control cohort consisting of 42 consecutive patients operated prior to the time the I-131 lipiodol treatment became available. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival in the control and in the I-131 lipiodol cohort was 12.6 and 18.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.871, p = 0.025). At 2 and 5 years, the cumulative incidence of a first recurrence or death was, respectively, 50 % and 61 % in the treated cohort versus 69 % and 74 % in the control cohort. Median overall survival was 55 and 29 months, respectively (p = 0.051). Among patients with a recurrence at 2 years, more patients had already experienced such recurrence at 1 year in the control cohort (70 % vs 33 %, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant I-131 lipiodol improves disease-free survival in patients with HCC.

Does Intraoperative Systematic Bacterial Sampling During Complete Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraoperative Peritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Influence Postoperative Treatment? A New Predictive Factor for Postoperative Abdominal Infectious Complications.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an emerging curative treatment option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. It has a long-term survival benefit but is associated with high rates of morbidity, ranging from 12 % to 65 %, mainly due to infectious complications. We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of routine intraoperative bacteriological sampling following CRS/HIPEC. STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2010 and December 2014, every patients receiving CRS/HIPEC were included. Three samples were routinely collected from standardized locations for intraperitoneal rinsing liquid bacteriological analysis (RLBA) after completion of HIPEC. The clinical and surgical features, bacteriological results, and short-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The overall mortality and morbidity rates were 5 and 45 %, respectively. Among the 75 included patients, 40 % (n = 30) had at least one positive bacterial culture. Risk factors for a positive culture were colorectal resection (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.072, 95 % CI 1.843-8.004; p = 0.009) and blood loss >1000 mL (HR = 4.272, 95 % CI 1.080-18.141; p = 0.031). Among 26 (35 %) patients with abdominal infectious complications, 13 (17 %) experienced isolated complications. A positive RLBA result was independently associated with abdominal infectious complications (HR = 5.108, 95 % CI 1.220-16.336; p = 0.024) and isolated abdominal infectious complications (HR = 4.199, 95 % CI 1.064-15.961; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of the RLBA samples obtained following CRS/HIPEC tested positive for bacteria. Bacterial sampling of rinsing liquid should be systematically performed. An aggressive and immediate antibiotic strategy needs to be evaluated.

Continuous Amenorrhea May Be Insufficient to Stop the Progression of Colorectal Endometriosis.

We present the case of a patient in whom consecutive imaging assessment and surgery demonstrated the obvious progression of colorectal endometriosis under continuous medical therapy. A 26-year-old nullipara presented with secondary dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, diarrhea, and constipation during menstruation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment revealed 2 right ovarian endometriomas, but no deep endometriosis lesion. Intraoperatively, we found a 2-cm length of thickened and congestive area of sigmoid colon, along with small superficial lesions arising in the small bowel and appendix. We performed ablation of ovarian endometriomas and appendectomy, and decided to not resect the bowel. Postoperative computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy (CTC) revealed a slight abnormality of the sigmoid colon. Endorectal ultrasound identified a normal rectum and sigmoid colon. Despite long-term continuous medical treatment, the patient presented 4 years later with impaired digestion consisting in constipation alternating with diarrhea, bloating, dyschesia, and pelvic pain. MRI and CTC revealed an abnormal sigmoid colon from 42 to 50 cm above the anus, with digestive tract diameter reduced from 10 mm down to the virtual lumen, along with an overall rigid appearance. Laparoscopy revealed the extent of endometriosis lesions in the sigmoid colon and multiple implantations in the small bowel. We performed sigmoid and small bowel resection. This case demonstrates the obvious progression of deep rectal endometriosis despite 4 years of continuous hormonal therapy.

[About 2 cases of ectopic sebaceous glands in esophagus: Endoscopic and histological correlations from biopsies and resected specimens]. / À propos de 2 cas de glandes sébacées ectopiques œsophagiennes : corrélations endoscopiques, et anatomopathologiques sur biopsies et pièces opératoires.

Sebaceous glands are cutaneous annexes located in the dermis. Focal spots of ectopy of these glands are frequently identified in ectodermal tissues: they represent Fordyce's disease. However, only a few cases of ectopic sebaceous glands have been mentioned in non-ectodermic tissue. Fordyce spots of esophageal location are unusual, and most of them have been diagnosed from biopsy specimens. We report two cases of ectopic sebaceous glands in esophagus, the first diagnosed from a resected specimen, the second from biopsies. A literature review is carried out.

Recurrences and fertility after endometrioma ablation in women with and without colorectal endometriosis: a prospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the recurrence and pregnancy rates in women managed for ovarian endometrioma by ablation using plasma energy with and without associated surgery for colorectal endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Concomitant management of colorectal endometriosis does not impact either risk of recurrences or probability of pregnancy in women managed for endometrioma ablation using plasma energy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: No consensus exists on how best to manage patients presenting with ovarian endometriomas and colorectal endometriosis, in terms of impact on fertility preservation and recurrence rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective series of consecutive patients managed for ovarian endometriomas by ablation using plasma energy, over a period of 48 consecutive months. The study included patients with associated colorectal endometriosis (n = 52) and those who were free of colorectal localizations of the disease (n = 72). No women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The 124 women included in this study were managed for either unilateral or bilateral ovarian endometriomas using plasma energy at a university tertiary care center. Recurrences and pregnancy rate were compared in patients with and without colorectal endometriosis. The minimum length of follow-up was 1 year. Cyst recurrences were assessed using pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Kaplan-Meier and actuarial life-table analysis were used to estimate the recurrence-free survival curve and the probability of pregnancy. The Cox model was used to assess independent predictive factors for recurrences. Pregnancy likelihood and independent predictors were estimated using a regression logistic model. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mean follow-up was 32 ± 18 months. Forty-eight patients (40.3%) were presumed infertile and attended an assisted reproductive techniques (ART) center. Eighteen patients presented with a recurrence (14.5%). Bilateral localization of endometriomas was the only factor independently related to an increased risk of recurrences [hazard ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-9.4]. Of the 83 women wishing to conceive (66.9%), 51 became pregnant (61.4%) and 33 of these pregnancies were spontaneous (64.7%). The rates of pregnancy were 65.8% for the group of patients with associated colorectal endometriosis and 57.8% for controls (P = 0.50). Age over 35 years was the only independent factor for which association with pregnancy rates approached the significance threshold (adjusted odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1, P = 0.06). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study sample size may be insufficient to reveal statistically significant differences related to risk factors which have low impact on the probability of recurrence and pregnancy. Data on ovarian reserve before and after the procedure was not available in all patients, which would have added to our results and the discussion about treatment of endometrioma in general. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Concomitant management of colorectal endometriosis does not impact either risk of recurrences or the probability of pregnancy in women having benefited from ovarian endometrioma ablation using plasma energy. Moreover, surgical management of colorectal and ovarian endometriosis may allow spontaneous conception in one out of three patients, thus reducing expenses related to ART management. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No financial support was received for this study. Horace Roman reports personal fees for participating in a symposium and masterclass presenting his experience in the use of PlasmaJet.

Full-Thickness Disc Excision in Deep Endometriotic Nodules of the Rectum: A Prospective Cohort.

BACKGROUND: To date, a majority of patients presenting with large endometriosis of the rectum are managed worldwide by colorectal resection. However, postoperative rectal function may be impacted by radical rectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes of patients with rectal endometriosis who are managed by full-thickness disc excision and to compare outcomes of the 2 procedures using a transanal approach. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with colorectal endometriosis that was managed by disc excision between June 2009 and November 2014 were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: The procedure included laparoscopic deep shaving, followed by full-thickness disc excision to remove the shaved rectal area. Disc excision was performed using a semicircular transanal stapler (the Rouen technique) in 20 patients, an end-to-end anastomosis circular transanal stapler in 28 patients, and transvaginal excision in 2 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative assessments of pelvic symptoms and digestive function using standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires were the main measures. RESULTS: The largest diameter of specimens achieved was significantly higher using the Rouen technique (58 ± 9 mm) than the end-to-end anastomosis stapler (34 ± 6 mm). Two rectovaginal fistulas were recorded (4%), and 8 patients presented with transitory bladder voiding (16%). Median postoperative values for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire improved progressively 1 and 3 years after surgery. For patients intending to get pregnant, the cumulative pregnancy rate was 80%, and 63% of pregnancies were spontaneous. LIMITATIONS: The study sample size is small and the design is not comparative; however, direct comparison of patients managed by disc excision and colorectal resection would be inappropriate, because of differences regarding nodule localization and size. CONCLUSIONS: Disc excision is a valuable alternative to colorectal resection in selected patients presenting with rectal endometriosis, achieving better preservation of rectal function. The Rouen technique allows for successful removal of large nodules of the low and midrectum, with favorable postoperative outcomes. (See video abstract, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A208.).

Colorectal Endometriosis Responsible for Bowel Occlusion or Subocclusion in Women With Pregnancy Intention: Is the Policy of Primary in Vitro Fertilization Always Safe?

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the risk of bowel occlusion or subocclusion in patients with pregnancy wish and deep colorectal endometriosis, when surgery is postponed until after conception. DESIGN: A prospective series of consecutive patients managed for occlusion or subocclusion between January 2012 and January 2015 (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Deep endometriosis had previously been diagnosed in all patients; however, they were advised to postpone surgery until after conception. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twelve women with bowel occlusion or subocclusion due to deep endometriosis and desiring pregnancy. INTERVENTION: Surgical management including colorectal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Digestive symptoms, including standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires and preoperative imaging assessment of deep endometriosis. RESULTS: The patients enrolled in the series represent 5% of 241 patients with colorectal endometriosis managed over 37 consecutive months. Major digestive complaints were bloating, defecation pain, constipation, liquid stools, and a feeling of incomplete stool evacuation. The median length of digestive tract stenosis was 50 mm (range, 20-100 mm). In 8 patients (67%), computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy revealed a virtual digestive lumen. The median length of colorectal specimen removed was 120 mm (range, 60-200 mm). Three patients (25%) had Clavien-Dindo IIIb and IVa postoperative complications with favorable outcomes within up to 20 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Given the risk of bowel occlusion or subocclusion in young patients with colorectal endometriosis, an exhaustive assessment of deep disease and advice at a tertiary referral center appears to be mandatory before prioritizing primary in vitro fertilization instead of primary surgery.

Combined cystoscopic and laparoscopic approach in deep endometriosis of the bladder.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To report the combined cystoscopic and laparoscopic approach in deep endometriosis with full-thickness infiltration of the bladder. DESIGN: Video (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT: A 34-year-old nulliparous woman with a large (35-mm) endometriosis nodule infiltrating the bladder and deep endometriosis of the rectum and sigmoid colon. INTERVENTION: The urologic surgeon performed cystoscopy, identified the limits of mucosal involvement, and incised the muscular layer up to fat tissues surrounding the bladder. The gynecologic surgeon identified and followed the circular incision, and completed full-thickness resection of the bladder wall. Surgical technique reports in anonymous patients are exempt from ethical approval by the institutional review board. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patient's functional outcome was uneventful. Laparoscopic resection of large endometriotic nodules of the bladder per se may lead to inadvertent removal of healthy bladder muscle. Thus it increases the risk of postoperative complications and symptoms due to small bladder volume. Conversely, if resection of the nodule is performed only cystoscopically, it probably would not be completely removed. We routinely combine the 2 approaches because this enables complete resection of the endometriotic nodule. It not only averts the risk of excessive removal of healthy bladder muscle but also leaves no disease behind. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our experience, we propose the combined cystoscopic and laparoscopic approach in managing large endometriotic nodules with full-thickness infiltration of the bladder.

When Gastroplasty Is Not Feasible in Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Single-Center Study of Intrathoracic Esophagojejunostomy.

Objective: The surgical management of tumors of the esophagogastric junction is increasingly performed by minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. However, gastroplasty is not always feasible. The creation of a long loop is an alternative for esophageal reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of using a minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach in esophagojejunostomy and to describe the contraindications for gastroplasty. Methods: All patients who had intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy in our center were identified in our database. Since 2016, the preferred approach for intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy is minimally invasive laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, using a long Roux-en-Y jejunal loop with a semimechanical triangular anastomosis technique. Results: Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2022, 12 patients who had esophagojejunostomy in our center were included in the study. Among them, 6 had thoracotomy and 6 had total minimally invasive thoracoscopy, representing 3.5% of surgical procedures for esophagogastric junction tumors since 2016. The mean operative time was 416.9 ± 107.47 minutes. No anastomotic leakage was observed in the minimally invasive group versus 2 leakages in the thoracotomy group. The main complication was pneumonia in 3 patients (27.3%). Finally, the main indication for intrathoracic esophagojejunostomy was tumor size with a mean of 4.72 ± 2.35 cm and the patient's surgical history. Conclusion: A total minimally invasive approach using a long jejunal loop with triangular anastomosis could be a feasible and reproducible alternative to gastroplasty to restore continuity in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy when the stomach cannot be used.

Evolution of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Biomarkers in Response to Weight Loss 1 Year After Bariatric Surgery-a Post Hoc Analysis of the FibroTest Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is among the therapeutic options for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), affecting 90% of patients with obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of NAFLD lesions 1 year after surgery using noninvasive markers. METHODS: From November 2011 to November 2012, 253 patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery in three French University Hospitals were included. Histological data regarding intraoperative liver biopsy were collected at baseline, clinical, and biological data, including FibroTest®, SteatoTest®, and NASHTest®, before and after surgery. RESULTS: Fibrosis' prevalence was 74.2% with a positive predictive value (PPV) for FibroTest® of 78.6% and 43.4% for significant fibrosis (Kleiner ≥ F2) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 56.1%. NAFLD's prevalence was 84% with a PPV for SteatoTest® of 85.9% and 7.7% for NASH with an NPV for NASHTest® of 93.8%. One year after bariatric surgery, mean BMI had significantly decreased from 46.5 to 31.7 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). Fibrosis assessed by the FibroTest® showed that 82.5% of patients were F0 after surgery compared to 90.9% before. Using SteatoTest®, the percent of patient without steatosis (S0) increased from 1.6 to 49.6% after surgery, and rate of severe steatosis (S3) improved from 43.3 to 3.9%. NASHTest® revealed that the percent of patients without NASH increased from 12.8 to 73.6% and rates of NASH improved from 12 to 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Validated noninvasive biomarkers SteatoTest® and NASHTest® suggested NAFLD and steatohepatitis improvement after bariatric surgery and might be useful tools for patient follow-up. Regarding fibrosis, FibroTest® was not accurate in patients with extreme obesity.