Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Methods ; 201: 34-40, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33722693

RESUMO

Viral load monitoring in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is often performed using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to observe response to treatment and identify the development of resistance. Traceability is achieved using a calibration hierarchy traceable to the International Unit (IU). IU values are determined using consensus agreement derived from estimations by different laboratories. Such a consensus approach is necessary due to the fact that there are currently no reference measurement procedures available that can independently assign a reference value to viral reference materials for molecular in vitro diagnostic tests. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a technique that has the potential to be used for this purpose. In this paper, we investigate the ability of reverse transcriptase dPCR (RT-dPCR) to quantify HIV-1 genomic RNA without calibration. Criteria investigated included the performance of HIV-1 RNA extraction steps, choice of reverse transcription approach and selection of target gene with assays performed in both single and duplex format. We developed a protocol which was subsequently applied by two independent laboratories as part of an external quality assurance (EQA) scheme for HIV-1 genome detection. Our findings suggest that RT-dPCR could be used as reference measurement procedure to aid the value assignment of HIV-1 reference materials to support routine calibration of HIV-1 viral load testing by RT-qPCR.


Assuntos
HIV-1 , Transcrição Reversa , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , RNA , RNA Viral/análise , RNA Viral/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
2.
Methods ; 201: 65-73, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33812016

RESUMO

A candidate digital PCR (dPCR)-based reference measurement procedure for quantification of human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) was evaluated in 10 viral load comparison schemes (seven external quality assessment (EQA) and three additional training schemes) organized by INSTAND e.V. over four years (between September 2014 and March 2018). Four metrology institutes participated in these schemes using the same extraction method and dPCR measurement procedure for the hCMV specific target sequence of UL54 gene. The calibration independent reference measurement procedure results from the metrology institutes were compared to the results of the clinical diagnostic laboratories applying hCMV qPCR measurement procedures calibrated to reference materials. While the criteria for the acceptable deviation from the target value interval for INSTAND's EQA schemes is from -0.8 log10 to +0.8 log10, the majority of dPCR results were between -0.2 log10 to +0.2 log10. Only 4 out of 45 results exceeded this interval with the maximum deviation of -0.542 log10. In the training schemes containing samples with lower hCMV concentrations, more than half of the results deviated less than ±0.2 log10 from the target value, while more than 95% deviated less than ±0.4 log10 from the target value. Evaluation of intra- and inter-laboratory variation of dPCR results confirmed high reproducibility and trueness of the method. This work demonstrates that dPCR has the potential to act as a calibration independent reference measurement procedure for the value assignment of hCMV calibration and reference materials to support qPCR calibration as well as ultimately for routine hCMV load testing.


Assuntos
Citomegalovirus , Calibragem , Citomegalovirus/genética , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
Methods ; 201: 5-14, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34454016

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious, acute respiratory disease caused mainly by person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Its emergence has caused a world-wide acute health crisis, intensified by the challenge of reliably identifying individuals likely to transmit the disease. Diagnosis is hampered by the many unknowns surrounding this disease, including those relating to infectious viral burden. This uncertainty is exacerbated by disagreement surrounding the clinical relevance of molecular testing using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the presence of viral RNA, most often based on the reporting of quantification cycles (Cq), which is also termed the cycle threshold (Ct) or crossing point (Cp). Despite it being common knowledge that Cqs are relative values varying according to a wide range of different parameters, there have been efforts to use them as though they were absolute units, with Cqs below an arbitrarily determined value, deemed to signify a positive result and those above, a negative one. Our results investigated the effects of a range of common variables on Cq values. These data include a detailed analysis of the effect of different carrier molecules on RNA extraction. The impact of sample matrix of buccal swabs and saliva on RNA extraction efficiency was demonstrated in RT-qPCR and the impact of potentially inhibiting compounds in urine along with bile salts were investigated in RT-digital PCR (RT-dPCR). The latter studies were performed such that the impact on the RT step could be separated from the PCR step. In this way, the RT was shown to be more susceptible to inhibitors than the PCR. Together, these studies demonstrate that the consequent variability of test results makes subjective Cq cut-off values unsuitable for the identification of infectious individuals. We also discuss the importance of using reliable control materials for accurate quantification and highlight the substantial role played by dPCR as a method for their development.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , RNA Viral/análise , RNA Viral/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Transcrição Reversa , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
Anal Chem ; 94(14): 5566-5574, 2022 04 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35357151

RESUMO

The use of standardized components and processes in engineering underpins the design-build-test model, and the engineering of biological systems is no different. Substantial efforts to standardize both the components and the methods to validate the engineered biological systems is ongoing. This study has developed a panel of control materials encoding the commonly used reporter genes GFP and RFP as DNA or RNA molecules. Each panel contained up to six samples with increasingly small copy number differences between the two reporter genes that ranged from 1- to 2-fold differences. These copy number differences represent the magnitude of changes that may need to be measured to validate an engineered system. Using digital PCR (dPCR), we demonstrated that it is possible to quantify changes in both gene and gene transcript numbers both within and between samples down to 1.05-fold. We corroborated these findings using a simple gene circuit within a bacterial model to demonstrate that dPCR was able to precisely identify small changes in gene expression of two transcripts in response to promoter stimulation. Finally, we used our findings to highlight sources of error that can contributed to the measurement uncertainty in the measurement of small ratios in biological systems. Together, the development of a panel of control materials and validation of a high accuracy method for the measurement of small changes in gene expression, this study can contribute to the engineering biology "toolkit" of methods and materials to support the current standardization efforts.


Assuntos
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Genes Reporter , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas
5.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 414(2): 791-806, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34738220

RESUMO

Nucleic acid analysis is used in many areas of life sciences such as medicine, food safety, and environmental monitoring. Accurate, reliable measurements of nucleic acids are crucial for maximum impact, yet users are often unaware of the global metrological infrastructure that exists to support these measurements. In this work, we describe international efforts to improve nucleic acid analysis, with a focus on the Nucleic Acid Analysis Working Group (NAWG) of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance: Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM). The NAWG is an international group dedicated to improving the global comparability of nucleic acid measurements; its primary focus is to support the development and maintenance of measurement capabilities and the dissemination of measurement services from its members: the National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs). These NMIs and DIs provide DNA and RNA measurement services developed in response to the needs of their stakeholders. The NAWG members have conducted cutting edge work over the last 20 years, demonstrating the ability to support the reliability, comparability, and traceability of nucleic acid measurement results in a variety of sectors.


Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos/análise , Ácidos Nucleicos/normas , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Euro Surveill ; 27(32)2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959687

RESUMO

Monkeypox was declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 23 July 2022. Between 1 January and 23 July 2022, 16,016 laboratory confirmed cases of monkeypox and five deaths were reported to WHO from 75 countries on all continents. Public health authorities are proactively identifying cases and tracing their contacts to contain its spread. As with COVID-19, PCR is the only method capable of being deployed at sufficient speed to provide timely feedback on any public health interventions. However, at this point, there is little information on how those PCR assays are being standardised between laboratories. A likely reason is that testing is still limited on a global scale and that detection, not quantification, of monkeypox virus DNA is the main clinical requirement. Yet we should not be complacent about PCR performance. As testing requirements increase rapidly and specimens become more diverse, it would be prudent to ensure PCR accuracy from the outset to support harmonisation and ease regulatory conformance. Lessons from COVID-19 should aid implementation with appropriate material, documentary and methodological standards offering dynamic mechanisms to ensure testing that most accurately guides public health decisions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mpox , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiologia , Monkeypox virus/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
7.
Clin Chem ; 68(1): 153-162, 2021 12 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34633030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA quantities, measured by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), have been proposed to stratify clinical risk or determine analytical performance targets. We investigated reproducibility and how setting diagnostic cutoffs altered the clinical sensitivity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing. METHODS: Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA distributions [quantification cycle (Cq) and copies/mL] from more than 6000 patients from 3 clinical laboratories in United Kingdom, Belgium, and the Republic of Korea were analyzed. Impact of Cq cutoffs on clinical sensitivity was assessed. The June/July 2020 INSTAND external quality assessment scheme SARS-CoV-2 materials were used to estimate laboratory reported copies/mL and to estimate the variation in copies/mL for a given Cq. RESULTS: When the WHO-suggested Cq cutoff of 25 was applied, the clinical sensitivity dropped to about 16%. Clinical sensitivity also dropped to about 27% when a simulated limit of detection of 106 copies/mL was applied. The interlaboratory variation for a given Cq value was >1000 fold in copies/mL (99% CI). CONCLUSION: While RT-qPCR has been instrumental in the response to COVID-19, we recommend Cq (cycle threshold or crossing point) values not be used to set clinical cutoffs or diagnostic performance targets due to poor interlaboratory reproducibility; calibrated copy-based units (used elsewhere in virology) offer more reproducible alternatives. We also report a phenomenon where diagnostic performance may change relative to the effective reproduction number. Our findings indicate that the disparities between patient populations across time are an important consideration when evaluating or deploying diagnostic tests. This is especially relevant to the emergency situation of an evolving pandemic.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/normas , COVID-19 , Ácidos Nucleicos , Bélgica , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , Ácidos Nucleicos/análise , RNA Viral/análise , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , República da Coreia , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reino Unido
8.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 27(3): 155-162, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33654014

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 has put the in-vitro-diagnostic community under an unprecedented spotlight, with a global requirement for accurate SARS-CoV-2 tests. This review will outline technological responses to this need and the analytical considerations required for their translation to routine use. RECENT FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic solutions directly detect the virus or measure host-derived surrogate markers of infection. With pressure upon supply chains for the 'traditional' molecular approaches, a wide variety of analytical tools spanning the molecular, serology, imaging and chemistry space are being developed, including high throughput solutions and simplified near-patient formats. SUMMARY: The unique genetic nature of SARS-CoV-2 means high analytical specificity is achievable by most diagnostic formats. However, clinical sensitivity assessment is complicated by wide discrepancies in analytical range and challenges associated with standardising these differences. When coupled with the acute nature of SARS-CoV-2 infection, reported precise metrics of test performance must be questioned. The response to SARS-CoV-2 has delivered considerable diagnostic innovation, but for a technology to be maximised, it must be demonstrably reproducible and fit for purpose. If novel diagnostic solutions for SARS-CoV-2 are to succeed, equally innovative mechanisms are needed to ensure widespread clinical and surveillance application, enabling agreed standards and metrics to ensure comparability.


Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Invenções , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/virologia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica
9.
Mar Drugs ; 19(2)2021 Feb 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33540777

RESUMO

A potent and heat-stable tetrodotoxin (TTX) has been found to accumulate in various marine bivalve species, including Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas), raising a food safety concern. While several studies on geographical occurrence of TTX have been conducted, there is a lack of knowledge about the distribution of the toxin within and between bivalves. We, therefore, measured TTX in the whole flesh, mantle, gills, labial palps, digestive gland, adductor muscle and intravalvular fluid of C. gigas using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Weekly monitoring during summer months revealed the highest TTX concentrations in the digestive gland (up to 242 µg/kg), significantly higher than in other oyster tissues. Intra-population variability of TTX, measured in the whole flesh of each of twenty animals, reached 46% and 32% in the two separate batches, respectively. In addition, an inter-population study was conducted to compare TTX levels at four locations within the oyster production area. TTX concentrations in the whole flesh varied significantly between some of these locations, which was unexplained by the differences in weight of flesh. This is the first study examining TTX distribution in C. gigas and the first confirmation of the preferential accumulation of TTX in oyster digestive gland.


Assuntos
Crassostrea/química , Venenos/análise , Tetrodotoxina/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Animais , Trato Gastrointestinal/química , Brânquias/química , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Distribuição Tecidual/fisiologia
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(16)2021 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34445406

RESUMO

The reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is an established tool for the diagnosis of RNA pathogens. Its potential for automation has caused it to be used as a presence/absence diagnostic tool even when RNA quantification is not required. This technology has been pushed to the forefront of public awareness by the COVID-19 pandemic, as its global application has enabled rapid and analytically sensitive mass testing, with the first assays targeting three viral genes published within days of the publication of the SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence. One of those, targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene, has been heavily criticised for supposed scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level, and this criticism has been extrapolated to doubts about the validity of RT-qPCR for COVID-19 testing in general. We have analysed this assay in detail, and our findings reveal some limitations but also highlight the robustness of the RT-qPCR methodology for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Nevertheless, whilst our data show that some errors can be tolerated, it is always prudent to confirm that the primer and probe sequences complement their intended target, since, when errors do occur, they may result in a reduction in the analytical sensitivity. However, in this case, it is unlikely that a mismatch will result in poor specificity or a significant number of false-positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses, especially as this is routinely checked by diagnostic laboratories as part of their quality assurance.


Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Humanos , Pandemias , RNA Viral/genética , RNA Polimerase Dependente de RNA , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Temperatura
11.
Clin Chem ; 66(8): 1012-1029, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32746458

RESUMO

Digital PCR (dPCR) has developed considerably since the publication of the Minimum Information for Publication of Digital PCR Experiments (dMIQE) guidelines in 2013, with advances in instrumentation, software, applications, and our understanding of its technological potential. Yet these developments also have associated challenges; data analysis steps, including threshold setting, can be difficult and preanalytical steps required to purify, concentrate, and modify nucleic acids can lead to measurement error. To assist independent corroboration of conclusions, comprehensive disclosure of all relevant experimental details is required. To support the community and reflect the growing use of dPCR, we present an update to dMIQE, dMIQE2020, including a simplified dMIQE table format to assist researchers in providing key experimental information and understanding of the associated experimental process. Adoption of dMIQE2020 by the scientific community will assist in standardizing experimental protocols, maximize efficient utilization of resources, and further enhance the impact of this powerful technology.


Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações/normas , Humanos , Ácidos Nucleicos/análise
12.
Clin Chem ; 64(9): 1296-1307, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29903874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing of tumor tissue and circulating cell-free DNA for somatic variants guides patient treatment of many cancers. Such measurements will be fundamental in the future support of precision medicine. However, there are currently no primary reference measurement procedures available for nucleic acid quantification that would support translation of tests for circulating tumor DNA into routine use. METHODS: We assessed the accuracy of digital PCR (dPCR) for copy number quantification of a frequently occurring single-nucleotide variant in colorectal cancer (KRAS c.35G>A, p.Gly12Asp, from hereon termed G12D) by evaluating potential sources of uncertainty that influence dPCR measurement. RESULTS: Concentration values for samples of KRAS G12D and wild-type plasmid templates varied by <1.2-fold when measured using 5 different assays with varying detection chemistry (hydrolysis, scorpion probes, and intercalating dyes) and <1.3-fold with 4 commercial dPCR platforms. Measurement trueness of a selected dPCR assay and platform was validated by comparison with an orthogonal method (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry). The candidate dPCR reference measurement procedure showed linear quantification over a wide range of copies per reaction and high repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility (CV, 2%-8% and 5%-10%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This work validates dPCR as an SI-traceable reference measurement procedure based on enumeration and demonstrates how it can be applied for assignment of copy number concentration and fractional abundance values to DNA reference materials in an aqueous solution. High-accuracy measurements using dPCR will support the implementation and traceable standardization of molecular diagnostic procedures needed for advancements in precision medicine.


Assuntos
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Medicina de Precisão , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Humanos , Espectrometria de Massas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
13.
Anal Chem ; 89(3): 1724-1733, 2017 02 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27935690

RESUMO

This study tested the claim that digital PCR (dPCR) can offer highly reproducible quantitative measurements in disparate laboratories. Twenty-one laboratories measured four blinded samples containing different quantities of a KRAS fragment encoding G12D, an important genetic marker for guiding therapy of certain cancers. This marker is challenging to quantify reproducibly using quantitative PCR (qPCR) or next generation sequencing (NGS) due to the presence of competing wild type sequences and the need for calibration. Using dPCR, 18 laboratories were able to quantify the G12D marker within 12% of each other in all samples. Three laboratories appeared to measure consistently outlying results; however, proper application of a follow-up analysis recommendation rectified their data. Our findings show that dPCR has demonstrable reproducibility across a large number of laboratories without calibration. This could enable the reproducible application of molecular stratification to guide therapy and, potentially, for molecular diagnostics.


Assuntos
Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , DNA/química , DNA/metabolismo , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Sequência de DNA
14.
Clin Chem ; 63(2): 525-531, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27979961

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the cornerstone of successful clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Quantitative monitoring of the percentage of the fusion transcript BCR-ABL1 (breakpoint cluster region-c-abl oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase) BCR-ABL1IS (%BCR-ABL1IS) by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard strategy for evaluating patient response to TKIs and classification into prognostic subgroups. However, this approach can be challenging to perform in a reproducible manner. Reverse-transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) is an adaptation of this method that could provide the robust and standardized workflow needed for truly standardized patient stratification. METHODS: BCR-ABL1 and ABL1 transcript copy numbers were quantified in a total of 102 samples; 70 CML patients undergoing TKI therapy and 32 non-CML individuals. 3 commercially available digital PCR platforms (QS3D, QX200 and Raindrop) were compared with the platform routinely used in the clinic for RT-qPCR using the EAC (Europe Against Cancer) assay. RESULTS: Measurements on all instruments correlated well when the %BCR-ABL1IS was ≥0.1%. In patients with residual disease below this level, greater variations were measured both within and between instruments limiting comparable performance to a 4 log dynamic range. CONCLUSIONS: RT-dPCR was able to quantify low-level BCR-ABL1 transcript copies but was unable to improve sensitivity below the level of detection achieved by RT-qPCR. However, RT-dPCR was able to perform these sensitive measurements without use of a calibration curve. Adaptions to the protocol to increase the amount of RNA measured are likely to be necessary to improve the analytical sensitivity of BCR-ABL testing on a dPCR platform.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Fusão bcr-abl/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Neoplasia Residual/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-abl/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Humanos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico
15.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 409(10): 2601-2614, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124757

RESUMO

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is an important tool in pathogen detection. However, the use of different qPCR components, calibration materials and DNA extraction methods reduces comparability between laboratories, which can result in false diagnosis and discrepancies in patient care. The wider establishment of a metrological framework for nucleic acid tests could improve the degree of standardisation of pathogen detection and the quantification methods applied in the clinical context. To achieve this, accurate methods need to be developed and implemented as reference measurement procedures, and to facilitate characterisation of suitable certified reference materials. Digital PCR (dPCR) has already been used for pathogen quantification by analysing nucleic acids. Although dPCR has the potential to provide robust and accurate quantification of nucleic acids, further assessment of its actual performance characteristics is needed before it can be implemented in a metrological framework, and to allow adequate estimation of measurement uncertainties. Here, four laboratories demonstrated reproducibility (expanded measurement uncertainties below 15%) of dPCR for quantification of DNA from human cytomegalovirus, with no calibration to a common reference material. Using whole-virus material and extracted DNA, an intermediate precision (coefficients of variation below 25%) between three consecutive experiments was noted. Furthermore, discrepancies in estimated mean DNA copy number concentrations between laboratories were less than twofold, with DNA extraction as the main source of variability. These data demonstrate that dPCR offers a repeatable and reproducible method for quantification of viral DNA, and due to its satisfactory performance should be considered as candidate for reference methods for implementation in a metrological framework.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Citomegalovirus/genética , DNA Viral/análise , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/normas , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , DNA Viral/genética , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
16.
Anal Chem ; 88(24): 12169-12176, 2016 12 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28193036

RESUMO

Enumeration-based determination of DNA copy-concentration was assessed through an international comparison among national metrology institutes (NMIs) and designated institutes (DIs). Enumeration-based quantification does not require a calibration standard thereby providing a route to "absolute quantification", which offers the potential for reliable value assignments of DNA reference materials, and International System of Units (SI) traceability to copy number 1 through accurate counting. In this study, 2 enumeration-based methods, flow cytometric (FCM) counting and the digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), were compared to quantify a solution of the pBR322 plasmid at a concentration of several thousand copies per microliter. In addition, 2 orthogonal chemical-analysis methods based on nucleotide quantification, isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) were applied to quantify a more concentrated solution of the plasmid. Although 9 dPCR results from 8 laboratories showed some dispersion (relative standard deviation [RSD] = 11.8%), their means were closely aligned with those of the FCM-based counting method and the orthogonal chemical-analysis methods, corrected for gravimetric dilution factors. Using the means of dPCR results, the RSD of all 4 methods was 1.8%, which strongly supported the validity of the recent enumeration approaches. Despite a good overall agreement, the individual dPCR results were not sufficiently covered by the reported measurement uncertainties. These findings suggest that some laboratories may not have considered all factors contributing to the measurement uncertainty of dPCR, and further investigation of this possibility is warranted.


Assuntos
DNA/análise , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Plasmídeos/análise , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Eletroforese Capilar , Espectrometria de Massas , Nucleotídeos/análise
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(2): 392-400, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26659206

RESUMO

Digital PCR (dPCR) is being increasingly used for the quantification of sequence variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), due to its high accuracy and precision in comparison with techniques such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) and melt curve analysis. To develop and evaluate dPCR for SNP detection using DNA, RNA, and clinical samples, an influenza virus model of resistance to oseltamivir (Tamiflu) was used. First, this study was able to recognize and reduce off-target amplification in dPCR quantification, thereby enabling technical sensitivities down to 0.1% SNP abundance at a range of template concentrations, a 50-fold improvement on the qPCR assay used routinely in the clinic. Second, a method was developed for determining the false-positive rate (background) signal. Finally, comparison of dPCR with qPCR results on clinical samples demonstrated the potential impact dPCR could have on clinical research and patient management by earlier (trace) detection of rare drug-resistant sequence variants. Ultimately this could reduce the quantity of ineffective drugs taken and facilitate early switching to alternative medication when available. In the short term such methods could advance our understanding of microbial dynamics and therapeutic responses in a range of infectious diseases such as HIV, viral hepatitis, and tuberculosis. Furthermore, the findings presented here are directly relevant to other diagnostic areas, such as the detection of rare SNPs in malignancy, monitoring of graft rejection, and fetal screening.


Assuntos
Antivirais/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Viral , Vírus da Influenza A/efeitos dos fármacos , Vírus da Influenza A/genética , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Influenza Humana/virologia , Mutação , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Genes Virais , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/efeitos dos fármacos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/genética , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Tipagem Molecular , Oseltamivir/farmacologia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 366, 2016 08 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27487852

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Real-time PCR (qPCR) based methods, such as the Xpert MTB/RIF, are increasingly being used to diagnose tuberculosis (TB). While qualitative methods are adequate for diagnosis, the therapeutic monitoring of TB patients requires quantitative methods currently performed using smear microscopy. The potential use of quantitative molecular measurements for therapeutic monitoring has been investigated but findings have been variable and inconclusive. The lack of an adequate reference method and reference materials is a barrier to understanding the source of such disagreement. Digital PCR (dPCR) offers the potential for an accurate method for quantification of specific DNA sequences in reference materials which can be used to evaluate quantitative molecular methods for TB treatment monitoring. METHODS: To assess a novel approach for the development of quality assurance materials we used dPCR to quantify specific DNA sequences in a range of prototype reference materials and evaluated accuracy between different laboratories and instruments. The materials were then also used to evaluate the quantitative performance of qPCR and Xpert MTB/RIF in eight clinical testing laboratories. RESULTS: dPCR was found to provide results in good agreement with the other methods tested and to be highly reproducible between laboratories without calibration even when using different instruments. When the reference materials were analysed with qPCR and Xpert MTB/RIF by clinical laboratories, all laboratories were able to correctly rank the reference materials according to concentration, however there was a marked difference in the measured magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: TB is a disease where the quantification of the pathogen could lead to better patient management and qPCR methods offer the potential to rapidly perform such analysis. However, our findings suggest that when precisely characterised materials are used to evaluate qPCR methods, the measurement result variation is too high to determine whether molecular quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis would provide a clinically useful readout. The methods described in this study provide a means by which the technical performance of quantitative molecular methods can be evaluated independently of clinical variability to improve accuracy of measurement results. These will assist in ultimately increasing the likelihood that such approaches could be used to improve patient management of TB.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Patologia Molecular , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
20.
Anal Chem ; 87(7): 3706-13, 2015 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25646934

RESUMO

Digital PCR (dPCR) offers absolute quantification through the limiting dilution of template nucleic acid molecules and has the potential to offer high reproducibility. However, the robustness of dPCR has yet to be evaluated using complex genomes to compare different dPCR methods and platforms. We used DNA templates from the pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis to evaluate the impact of template type, master mixes, primer pairs and, crucially, extraction methods on dPCR performance. Performance was compared between the chip (BioMark) and droplet (QX100) formats. In the absence of any external calibration, dPCR measurements were generally consistent within ∼2-fold between different master mixes and primers. Template DNA integrity could influence dPCR performance: high molecular weight gDNA resulted in underperformance of one master mix, while restriction digestion of a low molecular weight sample also caused underestimation. Good concordance (≤1.5-fold difference) was observed between chip and droplet formats. Platform precision was in agreement with predicted Poisson error based on partition number, but this was a minor component (<10%) of the total variance when extraction was included. dPCR offers a robust reproducible method for DNA measurement; however, as a predominant source of error, the process of DNA extraction will need to be controlled with suitable calibrators to maximize agreement between laboratories.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/análise , Infecções por Mycobacterium/microbiologia , Mycobacterium bovis/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Animais , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Plasmídeos/genética , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA