State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century.

BACKGROUND: An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE: To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS: The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS: Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.

Recurrence Rates and Risk Factors in the Altemeier Procedure for Rectal Prolapse: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Perineal proctosigmoidectomy (Altemeier) is a surgical procedure that is commonly used for the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, there is a diverse range of recurrence rates after Altemeier procedure repair that has been reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To identify primary and subsequent recurrence rates after perineal proctosigmoidectomy and to define potential risk factors for recurrence. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTINGS: Conducted at 6 hospitals affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic. PATIENTS: The study included patients who were older than 18 years and were treated with the Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse between 2007 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were rates of primary and subsequent recurrences. Secondary outcomes included potential risk factors for recurrence previously mentioned in the literature. RESULTS: We identified 182 patients, of whom 95.1% were women, with a mean age of 79 years (SD 11.4). Overall, procedures were elective in 92.1% of patients, and 14.3% had previously undergone prolapse repairs (Delorme, Thiersch, abdominal suture rectopexy, and abdominal mesh rectopexy). At a mean follow-up period of 27.5 months (SD 45.7), 37.9% of patients experienced recurrence, with 16.5% of patients having multiple recurrences. A subsequent Altemeier procedure was performed in 72.5% of instances. Other treatments included Delorme, abdominal suture rectopexy, abdominal mesh rectopexy, or conservative management. This study identified connective tissue disorders and time since surgery as significant risk factors for recurrence. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and varying follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal proctosigmoidectomy is associated with a significant risk of recurrence. The risk of recurrence increased with the presence of a connective tissue disorder and in proportion to the elapsed time since surgery. These discoveries assist health care professionals in counseling and managing patients who undergo perineal proctosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse. See Video Abstract . TASAS DE RECURRENCIA Y FACTORES DE RIESGO EN EL PROCEDIMIENTO DE ALTEMEIER PARA EL PROLAPSO RECTAL UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO: ANTECEDENTES:La proctosigmoidectomía perineal (Altemeier) es un procedimiento quirúrgico que se utiliza comúnmente para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal. Sin embargo, existe una amplia gama de tasas de recurrencia después de la reparación con el procedimiento de Altemeier que se han informado en la literatura.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue identificar las tasas de recurrencia primaria y posterior después de la proctosigmoidectomía perineal, así como definir los posibles factores de riesgo de recurrencia.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte.AJUSTES:Realizado en 6 hospitales afiliados a la Clínica Cleveland.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años que fueron tratados con procedimiento de Altemeier por prolapso rectal entre 2007 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Los resultados primarios fueron las tasas de recurrencias primarias y posteriores. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron factores de riesgo potenciales de recurrencia mencionados anteriormente en la literatura.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron 182 pacientes, de los cuales el 95,1% eran mujeres con una edad media de 79 años (DE 11,4). En general, el 92,1% fueron electivos y el 14,3% se habían sometido previamente a reparaciones de prolapso (Delorme, Thiersch, rectopexia con sutura abdominal y rectopexia con malla abdominal). En un período de seguimiento medio de 27,5 meses (DE 45,7), el 37,9% de los pacientes experimentó recurrencia, y el 16,5% de los pacientes tuvo recurrencias múltiples. En el 72,5% de los casos se realizó un procedimiento de Altemeier posterior. Otros tratamientos incluyeron Delorme, rectopexia con sutura abdominal, rectopexia con malla abdominal o manejo conservador. Este estudio identificó los trastornos del tejido conectivo y el tiempo transcurrido desde la cirugía como factores de riesgo importantes de recurrencia.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo y períodos de seguimiento variables.CONCLUSIÓN:La proctosigmoidectomía perineal se asocia con un riesgo significativo de recurrencia. El riesgo de recurrencia aumentó con la presencia de un trastorno del tejido conectivo y en proporción al tiempo transcurrido desde la cirugía. Estos descubrimientos ayudan a los profesionales de la salud a asesorar y tratar a los pacientes que se someten a proctosigmoidectomía perineal por prolapso rectal. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Third Time's the Charm? Indications and Outcomes for Redo-Redo IPAA.

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% to 40% cases of redo IPAA procedures will result in pouch failure. Whether to offer a second redo procedure to maintain intestinal continuity remains a controversial decision. OBJECTIVE: To report our institutional experience of second redo IPAA procedures. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. Patient-reported outcomes were compared between patients undergoing second redo procedures and those undergoing first redo procedures using propensity score matching to balance the 2 cohorts. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent second redo IPAA procedures between 2004 and 2021 were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Second redo IPAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pouch survival and patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life survey. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included (65% women), 20 (87%) with an index diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and 3 (13%) with indeterminate colitis. The final diagnosis was changed to Crohn's disease in 8 (35%) cases. The indication for pouch salvage was the same for the first and second redo procedures in 21 (91%) cases: 20 (87%) patients had both redo IPAAs for septic complications. After a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range, 18.5-95.5 months), pouch failure occurred in 8 (30%) cases (7 cases due to sepsis, of whom 3 never had their stoma closed, and 1 case due to poor function); all patients who experienced pouch failure underwent the second redo procedure due to septic complications. Overall pouch survival at 3 years was 76%: 62.5% in patients with a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease versus 82.5% in patients with ulcerative/indeterminate colitis ( p = 0.09). Overall quality-of-life score (0-1) was 0.6 (0.5-0.8). Quality of life and functional outcomes were comparable between first and second redo procedures, except incontinence, which was higher in second redo procedures. LIMITATIONS: Single-center retrospective review. CONCLUSIONS: A second pouch salvage procedure may be offered with acceptable outcomes to selected patients with high motivation to keep intestinal continuity. See Video Abstract . LA TERCERA ES LA VENCIDA INDICACIONES Y RESULTADOS DE LA RERECONFECCION DE LA ANASTOMOSIS ANAL CON BOLSA ILEAL: ANTECEDENTES:Hasta un 20-40% de los casos de rehacer anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal (IPAA) resultarán en falla de la bolsa. La posibilidad de ofrecer un segundo procedimiento para mantener la continuidad intestinal sigue siendo una decisión controvertida.OBJETIVO:Reportar nuestra experiencia institucional de una segunda re-confección de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva; los resultados informados por los pacientes se compararon entre los pacientes que se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion con los de los pacientes que se sometieron a una la primera re-confeccion utilizando el puntaje de propensión para equilibrar las dos cohortes.AJUSTES ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion de de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal entre 2004 y 2021.INTERVENCIONES:Segunda re-confeccion de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Supervivencia de la bolsa, resultados informados por los pacientes medidos mediante la encuesta Cleveland Global Quality of Life.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron veintitrés pacientes (65% mujeres), 20 (87%) con diagnóstico inicial de colitis ulcerosa y 3 (13%) con colitis indeterminada. El diagnóstico final se cambió a enfermedad de Crohn en ocho (35%) casos. La indicación para el rescate de la bolsa fue la misma para la primera y segunda re-confeccion en 21 (91%) casos: 20 (87%) pacientes tuvieron ambas re-confecciones de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal por complicaciones sépticas. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses (RIC 18,5 - 95,5), se produjo falla de la bolsa en 8 (30%) casos (7 casos debido a sepsis, de los cuales 3 nunca cerraron el estoma y 1 caso debido a una mala función); todos los pacientes que experimentaron falla de la bolsa se sometieron a una segunda re-confeccion debido a complicaciones sépticas. La supervivencia global de la bolsa a los 3 años fue del 76%: 62,5% en pacientes con diagnóstico final de enfermedad de Crohn, versus 82,5% en colitis ulcerativa/indeterminada ( p = 0,09). La puntuación general de calidad de vida (0 -1) fue 0,6 (0,5 - 0,8). La calidad de vida y los resultados funcionales fueron comparables entre la primera y la segunda re-confeccion, excepto la incontinencia, que fue mayor en la segunda re-confeccion.LIMITACIONES:Revisión retrospectiva de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Se puede ofrecer un segundo procedimiento de rescate de la bolsa con resultados aceptables a pacientes seleccionados con alta motivación para mantener la continuidad intestinal. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Salvage Surgery: An Effective Therapy in the Management of Ileoanal Pouch Prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is the surgical treatment of choice for patients requiring surgery for IBD and, less frequently, for other pathologies. Pouch prolapse is a rare complication that compromises pouch function and negatively affects patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe our experience from a single high-volume center in this infrequent condition. DESIGN: Restrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained, Institutional Review Board-approved database. SETTINGS: All consecutive eligible patients with IPAA and pouch prolapse were identified from 1990 to 2021. PATIENTS: Patients with full-thickness prolapse treated by pouch pexy were included. INTERVENTIONS: Pouch pexy (with/without mesh). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rate of pouch pexy, defined as no recurrence of prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 4791 patients underwent IPAA; 7 (0.1%) were diagnosed with full-thickness prolapse. An additional 18 patients who underwent IPAA and had full-thickness prolapse were referred from outside institutions. Among 25 included patients, 16 (64.0%) were women, and the overall mean age was 35.6 ± 13.4 years. The time interval from initial pouch formation to prolapse was 4.2 (interquartile range, 1.1-8.5) years. Nine patients (36.0%) underwent previous treatment for prolapse. All patients presented with symptoms and physical examination compatible with full-thickness prolapse. Twenty patients (80.0%) underwent surgical pouch pexy without mesh and 5 (20.0%) had pouch pexy with mesh placement. A diverting ileostomy was performed in 1 patient (4.0%) before pouch pexy and in 8 patients (32.0%) at the time of surgical prolapse correction. After surgery, recurrent prolapse was noted in 3 patients (12.0%) at a median of 6.9 (interquartile range, 5.2-8.3) months. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, small sample size thus prone to selection, and referral biases, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. CONCLUSION: Pouch prolapse can be effectively treated with salvage surgery. Surgical intervention is safe and provides acceptable outcomes. See Video Abstract. CIRUGA DE RESCATE UNA TERAPIA EFICAZ EN EL MANEJO DEL PROLAPSO DE LA BOLSA ILEOANAL: ANTECEDENTES:La proctocolectomía restauradora con anastomosis reservorio ileoanal es el tratamiento quirúrgico de elección para aquellos pacientes que requieren cirugía por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y, con menor frecuencia, por otras patologías. El prolapso de la bolsa es una complicación rara que compromete la función de la bolsa y afecta de manera negativa la calidad de vida de los pacientes.OBJETIVO:Describir nuestra experiencia de un solo centro de alto volumen en esta condición poco frecuente.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente aprobada por el IRB.AJUSTES/PACIENTES:Fueron identificados y elegibles de manera consecutiva todos los pacientes con anastomosis de bolsa ileoanal y prolapso de bolsa entre 1990 y 2021. Se incluyeron pacientes con prolapso de bolsa de espesor total tratados con pexia.INTERVENCIONES:Pexia de la bolsa (con/sin malla).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de éxito de la pexia de la bolsa, definida como ausencia de recurrencia del prolapso.RESULTADOS:Un total de 4.791 pacientes fueron sometidos a anastomosis de bolsa ileoanal; siete (0,1%) fueron diagnosticados con prolapso de espesor total. Otros 18 pacientes con anastomosis de reservorio ileoanal fueron derivados de instituciones externas. De entre los 25 pacientes incluidos, 16 (64,0 %) eran mujeres y la edad media promedio fue de 35,6+/-13,4 años. El intervalo de tiempo desde la creación inicial de la bolsa hasta el prolapso fue de 4,2 (IQR 1,1-8,5) años. Nueve (36,0 %) pacientes fueron sometidos a tratamiento previo para el prolapso (fisioterapia n = 4, pexia de la bolsa n = 2, pexia de la bolsa con malla n = 2, resección de la mucosa n = 1). Todos los pacientes presentaron síntomas y exploración física compatibles con prolapso de espesor total. Veinte (80,0%) pacientes se sometieron a pexia de bolsa quirúrgica sin malla y cinco (20,0%) se sometieron a pexia de bolsa con colocación de malla. Se realizó una ileostomía de derivación en un (4,0%) paciente antes de la pexia de la bolsa y en ocho (32,0%) pacientes en el momento de la corrección quirúrgica del prolapso. Posterior a la cirugía, se observó prolapso recurrente en tres pacientes (12,0 %) con una mediana de 6,9 (IQR 5,2-8,3) meses.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, pequeño tamaño de muestra, por lo tanto, propenso a sesgos de selección y referencia que pueden limitar la generalización de nuestros hallazgos.CONCLUSIÓN:El prolapso de la bolsa ileoanal puede tratarse de manera efectiva mediante la cirugía de rescate. La intervención quirúrgica es segura y proporciona resultados aceptables. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Segmental Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is performed in select patients who may be at increased risk for postoperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent segmental colectomy and assess their postoperative and long-term outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: A tertiary care IBD center. PATIENTS: Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surgery between 1995 and 2022. INTERVENTION: Segmental colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complications, early and late colitis, metachronous cancer development, completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates, and stoma at follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (20 [36.4%] women; age 67.8 (57.4-77.1) years at surgery; BMI 27.7 (24.2-31.1) kg/m 2 ; median follow-up 37.3 months). Thirty-two patients (58.2%) had ASA score of 3, 48 (87.3%) had at least 1 comorbidity, and 48 (87.3%) had Mayo endoscopic subscores of 0 to 1. Patients underwent right hemicolectomy (n = 28; 50.9%), sigmoidectomy (n = 17; 30.9%), left hemicolectomy (6; 10.9%), low anterior resection (n = 2; 3.6%), or a nonanatomic resection (n = 2; 3.6%) for endoscopically unresectable polyps (n = 21; 38.2%), colorectal cancer (n = 15; 27.3%), symptomatic diverticular disease (n = 13; 23.6%), and stricture (n = 6; 10.9%). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (29.1%; n = 7 [12.7%] Clavien-Dindo class III-V). Early and late postoperative colitis rates were 9.1% and 14.5%, respectively. Metachronous cancer developed in 1 patient. Four patients (7.3%) underwent subsequent completion proctocolectomy with ileostomy. Six patients (10.9%) had a stoma at follow-up. Two- and 5-year completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates were 91% and 88%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is associated with low postoperative complication rates, symptomatic early colitis and late colitis rates, metachronous cancer development, and the need for subsequent completion proctocolectomy. Therefore, it can be safe to consider select patients, such as the elderly with quiescent colitis and other indications, for colectomy. See Video Abstract . COLECTOMA SEGMENTARIA EN LA COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se realiza en pacientes seleccionados que pueden tener un mayor riesgo de morbilidad posoperatoria.OBJETIVO:Identificar pacientes con colitis ulcerosa sometidos a colectomía segmentaria y evaluar sus resultados postoperatorios y a largo plazo.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.AMBIENTE:Un centro de atención terciaria para enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales.PACIENTES:Pacientes con colitis ulcerosa intervenidos quirúrgicamente entre 1995 y 2022.INTERVENCIÓN(S):Colectomía segmentaria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Complicaciones postoperatorias, colitis temprana y tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico, tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa y estoma en el seguimiento.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron cincuenta y cinco pacientes [20 (36,4%) mujeres; 67,8 (57,4-77,1) años de edad al momento de la cirugía; índice de masa corporal 27,7 (24,2-31,1) kg/m2; mediana de seguimiento 37,3 meses]. La puntuación ASA fue III en 32 (58,2%) pacientes, 48 (87,3%) tenían al menos una comorbilidad y 48 (87,3%) tenían una subpuntuación endoscópica de Mayo de 0-1. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a hemicolectomía derecha (28, 50,9%), sigmoidectomía (17, 30,9%), hemicolectomía izquierda (6, 10,9%), resección anterior baja (2, 3,6%) o resección no anatómica (2, 3,6%) para; pólipos irresecables endoscópicamente (21, 38,2%), cáncer colorrectal (15, 27,3%), enfermedad diverticular sintomática (13, 23,6%) y estenosis (6, 10,9%). Se produjeron complicaciones postoperatorias en 16 (29,1%) pacientes [7 (12,7%) Clavien-Dindo Clase III-V]. Las tasas de colitis posoperatoria temprana y tardía fueron del 9,1% y el 14,5%, respectivamente. Un paciente desarrolló cáncer metacrónico. A 4 (7,3%) pacientes se les realizó posteriormente proctocolectomía completa con ileostomía. Seis (10,9%) pacientes tenían estoma en el seguimiento. Las tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa a dos y cinco años fueron del 91% y 88%, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se asocia con bajas tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias, tasas de colitis sintomática temprana y tasas de colitis tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico y la necesidad de una posterior proctocolectomía completa. Por lo tanto, puede ser seguro considerar pacientes seleccionados, como los ancianos con colitis inactiva y otras indicaciones de colectomía. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Single-Port Vs Multiport Laparoscopic Total Abdominal Colectomy With End Ileostomy for Medically Refractory Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Medically refractory ulcerative colitis necessitates surgical intervention, with total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy being a definitive treatment. The comparison between single-port and multiport laparoscopic surgery outcomes remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes of single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis comparing single-port to multiport surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis from 2010 to 2020. Patients were propensity score-matched 3:1 (multiport to single-port) on baseline characteristics. SETTINGS: Single-center academic hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 756 patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis who underwent multiport vs single-port total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy from 2010 to 2020 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Binary outcomes were compared using a multivariable logistic regression model, and a subset analysis was conducted for postoperative stump leak based on stump implantation during surgery. These metrics were compared between the single-port and multiport groups to assess the differences in surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The multiport and single-port groups included 642 and 114 patients, respectively. The matched cohort included 342 multiports and 114 single ports. We observed a statistically significant difference in mean operation time, with the single-port procedure taking 43 minutes less than the multiport laparoscopy. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative stump leaks, postoperative ileus, stoma site complications, postoperative readmission within 30 days, postoperative reoperation within 30 days, and subsequent IPAA surgery. In the subset analysis, stump implantation was associated with a higher risk of stump leak in the multiport group. The single-port group had a shorter hospital stay. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature and being conducted at a single center. CONCLUSION: Single-incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy in the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis is a safe, effective, and efficient approach. In our cohort, single-incision laparoscopy has had shorter operation times and better overall length of stay compared with the multiport approach. Taking into account a less invasive approach, decreased abdominal trauma, and faster recovery, single-port surgery is a viable alternative to multiport surgery. See Video Abstract . UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN DE LA COLECTOMA ABDOMINAL TOTAL LAPAROSCPICA CON PUERTO NICO VERSUS PUERTO MLTIPLE CON ILEOSTOMA TERMINAL PARA LA COLITIS ULCEROSA MDICAMENTE REFRACTARIA: ANTECEDENTES:La colitis ulcerosa (CU) médicamente refractaria requiere una intervención quirúrgica, siendo la colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía terminal un tratamiento definitivo. La comparación entre los resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica con puerto único y con puerto múltiple aún no se ha explorado lo suficiente.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados quirúrgicos de la cirugía laparoscópica con puerto único versus con puerto múltiple en pacientes sometidos a colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía terminal para CU médicamente refractaria.DISEÑO:Un análisis retrospectivo que comparó la cirugía de puerto único con la de puerto múltiple en pacientes con CU de 2010 a 2020. Los pacientes fueron emparejados por puntuación de propensión 3:1 (puerto múltiple a puerto único) según las características iniciales.AJUSTES:Hospital académico unicentrico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados binarios se compararon utilizando un modelo de regresión logística multivariable y se realizó un análisis de subconjunto para la fuga postoperatoria del muñón basado en la implantación del muñón durante la cirugía. Estas métricas se compararon entre los grupos de puerto único y de puerto múltiple para evaluar las diferencias en los resultados quirúrgicos.RESULTADOS:Los grupos de puerto único y multipuerto incluyeron 642 y 114 pacientes, respectivamente. La cohorte emparejada incluyó 342 puertos múltiples y 114 puertos únicos. Observamos una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el tiempo medio de operación, ya que el procedimiento de puerto único duró 43 minutos menos que la laparoscopia de puerto múltiple. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos en las fugas del muñón posoperatorio, el íleo posoperatorio, las complicaciones del sitio del estoma, el reingreso posoperatorio dentro de los 30 días, la reoperación posoperatoria dentro de los 30 días y la cirugía IPAA posterior. En el análisis de subconjunto, la implantación del muñón se asoció con un mayor riesgo de fuga del muñón en el grupo multipuerto. El grupo de puerto único tuvo una estancia hospitalaria más corta.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo, realizándose en un único centro.CONCLUSIÓN:La colectomía abdominal total laparoscópica de incisión única en el tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa mucosa es un enfoque seguro, eficaz y eficiente. En nuestra cohorte, en comparación con el abordaje multipuerto, la laparoscopia de incisión única ha mostrado tiempos de operación más cortos y una mejor duración total de la estancia hospitalaria. Teniendo en cuenta un enfoque menos invasivo, un menor traumatismo abdominal y una recuperación más rápida, la cirugía con puerto único es una alternativa viable a la cirugía con puertos múltiples. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Resection Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse Repair.

BACKGROUND: Resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy are widely accepted surgical options for the treatment of rectal prolapse, however reports on long-term recurrence rates and functional outcomes are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We compared quality of life, long-term functional outcomes and prolapse recurrence after resection rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected rectal prolapse surgery database. SETTINGS: Patients who underwent resection rectopexy or ventral mesh rectopexy at our center between 2009 and 2016 were included. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty patients were included, of which 208 (94%) female; 85 (39%) underwent resection rectopexy, 135 (61%) ventral mesh rectopexy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Prolapse recurrence. RESULTS: The resection rectopexy group was younger (median 52 vs 60 years old, p = 0.02) and had more open procedures (20% vs 9%, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 110 (IQR 94 - 146) months for resection rectopexy and 113 (87 - 137) for ventral mesh rectopexy, recurrences occurred in 21 (26%) in the resection rectopexy and 50 (39%) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.041). Median time to recurrence was 44 (18 - 80) months in the resection rectopexy group and 28.5 (11 - 52.5) in the ventral mesh rectopexy group (p = 0.14). There were no differences in the recurrence rate for primary prolapses in resection rectopexy vs ventral mesh rectopexy. Recurrence rate for re-do prolapses was higher in the ventral mesh rectopexy group 63% at 10 years, versus 25% in resection rectopexy group (p = 0.006). Functional outcomes were similar between the two groups. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective review, recall bias. CONCLUSION: Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes after resection rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy were comparable. Ventral mesh rectopexy was associated with a higher prolapse recurrence rate after recurrent rectal prolapse repair. See Video Abstract.

Tofacitinib Is Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning for increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to tofacitinib. There are limited data regarding postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to tofacitinib. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether preoperative exposure to tofacitinib is associated with increased odds of postoperative venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTINGS: Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients exposed to tofacitinib within 4 weeks before total abdominal colectomy or total proctocolectomy, with or without ileostomy, from 2014 to 2021, matched 1:2 for tofacitinib exposure or no exposure. INTERVENTION: Tofacitinib exposure versus no exposure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ninety-day postoperative venous thromboembolism rate. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with tofacitinib exposure and 84 case-matched patients without tofacitinib exposure underwent surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Nine (22.0%) tofacitinib-exposed patients and 7 (8.5%) unexposed patients were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism within 90 days of surgery. In univariate logistic regression, patients exposed to tofacitinib had 3.01 times increased odds of developing venous thromboembolism within 90 days after surgery compared to unexposed patients ( p = 0.04; 95% CI, 1.03-8.79). Other venous thromboembolism risk factors were not significantly associated with venous thromboembolisms. Venous thromboembolisms in both groups were most commonly portomesenteric vein thromboses (66.7% in the tofacitinib-exposed group and 42.9% in the unexposed group) and were diagnosed at a mean of 23.2 days (range, 3-90 days) postoperatively in the tofacitinib-exposed group and 7.9 days (1-19 days) in the unexposed group. There were no statistically significant differences in location or timing between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the study and associated biases. Reliance on clinically diagnosed venous thromboembolisms may underreport the true incidence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib exposure before surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis is associated with 3 times increased odds of venous thromboembolism compared with patients without tofacitinib exposure. See Video Abstract . TOFACITINIB SE ASOCIA CON UN MAYOR RIESGO DE TROMBOEMBOLISMO VENOSO POSTOPERATORIO EN PACIENTES CON COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:En 2019, la FDA emitió una advertencia de recuadro negro sobre un mayor riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con artritis reumatoide expuestos a tofacitinib. Hay datos limitados sobre el riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa expuestos a tofacitinib.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si la exposición preoperatoria a tofacitinib se asocia con mayores probabilidades de tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva.LUGARES:Centro médico académico terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos expuestos a tofacitinib dentro de las 4 semanas previas a la colectomía abdominal total o proctocolectomía total, con o sin ileostomía, entre 2014 y 2021, emparejados 1:2 para exposición a tofacitinib o ninguna exposición.INTERVENCIÓN(S):Exposición a tofacitinib versus ninguna exposición.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de tromboembolismo venoso posoperatorio a los 90 días.RESULTADOS:Cuarenta y dos pacientes con exposición a tofacitinib y 84 pacientes de casos similares sin exposición a tofacitinib se sometieron a cirugía por colitis ulcerosa médicamente refractaria. Nueve (22,0%) pacientes expuestos a tofacitinib y 7 (8,5%) pacientes no expuestos fueron diagnosticados con tromboembolismo venoso dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía. En la regresión logística univariada, los pacientes expuestos a tofacitinib tuvieron 3,01 veces más probabilidades de desarrollar un tromboembolismo venoso dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía en comparación con los no expuestos ( p = 0,04, IC del 95 %: 1,03-8,79). Otros factores de riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso no se asociaron significativamente con el tromboembolismo venoso. Los tromboembolismos venosos en ambos grupos fueron más comúnmente trombosis de la vena portomesentérica (66,7% en los expuestos a tofacitinib y 42,9% en los no expuestos) y se diagnosticaron en una media de 23,2 días (rango, 3-90 días) después de la operación en los expuestos a tofacitinib y 7,9 días. (1-19 días) en los grupos no expuestos, respectivamente. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la ubicación o el momento entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo del estudio y sesgos asociados. La dependencia de tromboembolismos venosos diagnosticados clínicamente puede subestimar la tasa de incidencia real.CONCLUSIONES:La exposición a tofacitinib antes de la cirugía para la colitis ulcerosa médicamente refractaria se asocia con probabilidades 3 veces mayores de tromboembolismo venoso en comparación con los pacientes sin exposición a tofacitinib. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

The mode of delivery does not influence the occurrence of post-partum perianal disease flares in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Perianal disease occurs in up to 34% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. An estimated 25% of women will become pregnant after the initial diagnosis, thus introducing the dilemma of whether mode of delivery affects perianal disease. The aim of our study was to analyze whether a cesarean section (C-section) or vaginal delivery influence perianal involvement. We hypothesized the delivery route would not alter post-partum perianal manifestations in the setting of previously healed perianal disease. METHODS: All consecutive eligible IBD female patients between 1997 and 2022 who delivered were included. Prior perianal involvement, perianal flare after delivery and delivery method were noted. RESULTS: We identified 190 patients with IBD who had a total of 322 deliveries; 169 (52%) were vaginal and 153 (48%) were by C-section. Nineteen women (10%) experienced 21/322 (6%) post-partum perianal flares. Independent predictors were previous abdominal surgery for IBD (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1-7.2; p = 0.042), ileocolonic involvement (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.4; p = 0.030), previous perianal disease (OR, 22; 95% CI, 7-69; p < 0.001), active perianal disease (OR, 96; 95% CI, 21-446; p < 0.001) and biologic (OR, 4.4; 95% CI,1.4-13.6; p < 0.011) or antibiotic (OR, 19.6; 95% CI, 7-54; p < 0.001) treatment. Negative association was found for vaginal delivery (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.61; p < 0.005). Number of post-partum flares was higher in the C-section group [17 (11%) vs. 4 (2%), p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery by C-section section was not protective of ongoing perianal disease activity post-delivery, but should be recommended for women with active perianal involvement.

Perioperative outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis - an analysis of 823 patients.

AIM: Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) following total abdominal colectomy (TAC) allows for resortation of bowel continuity but prior studies have reported rates of anastomotic leak (AL) to be as high as 23%. We aimed to report rates of AL and complications in a large cohort of patients undergoing IRA. We hypothesized that AL rates were lower than previously reported and that selective use of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is associated with decreased AL rates. METHOD: Patients undergoing TAC or end-ileostomy reversal with IRA, with or without DLI, between 1980 and 2021 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively analysed. Redo IRA cases were excluded. Short-term (30-day) surgical outcomes were collected using our database. AL was defined using a combination of imaging and, in the case of return to the operating room, intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Of 823 patients in the study cohort, DLI was performed in 27% and performed more frequently for constipation and inflammatory bowel disease. The overall AL rate was 3% (1% and 4% in those with and without DLI, respectively) and diversion was found to be protective against leak (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.94, p = 0.04). However, patients undergoing diversion had a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (51% vs. 36%, p < 0.001) including superficial wound infection, urinary tract infection, dehydration, blood transfusion and portomesenteric venous thrombosis (all p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study represents the largest series of patients undergoing IRA reported to date and demonstrates an AL rate of 3%. While IRA appears to be a viable surgical option for diverse indications, our study underscores the importance of careful patient selection and thoughtful consideration of staging the anastomosis and temporary faecal diversion when necessary.

Outcome of incidental versus preoperatively diagnosed colorectal cancer during total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease.

AIM: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer (CRC) in inflammatory bowel disease. CRC may also be discovered incidentally at IPAA for other indications. We sought to determine whether incidentally found CRC at IPAA was associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: Our institutional pouch registry (1983-2021) was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CRC at pathology after IPAA were divided into two groups: a preoperative diagnosis (PreD) group and an incidental diagnosis (InD) group. Their long-term outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival and pouch survival) were compared. RESULTS: We included 164 patients: 53 (32%) InD and 111 (68%) PreD. There were no differences in cancer staging, differentiation and location. After a median follow-up of 11 (IQR 3-25) years for InD and 9 (IQR 3-20) years for the PreD group, deaths were 14 (26%) in the InD group and 18 (16%) in the PreD group. Pouch failures were five (9%) in the InD group and nine (8%) in the PreD group, of which two (5%) and four (4%) were cancer related. Ten-year overall survival was 94% for InD and 89% for PreD (P = 0.41), disease-free survival was 95% for InD and 90% for PreD (P = 0.685) and pouch survival was 89% for InD and 97% for PreD (P = 0.80). Pouch survival at 10 years was lower in rectal versus colon cancer (87% vs. 97%, P = 0.01). No difference was found in outcomes in handsewn versus stapled anastomoses. CONCLUSION: Inflammatory bowel disease patients with incidentally found CRC during IPAA appear to have similarly excellent oncological and pouch outcomes to patients with a preoperative cancer diagnosis.

Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy with transabdominal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (abd-IPAA) has become the standard surgical treatment for medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it requires a technically difficult distal anorectal dissection and anastomosis due to the bony confines of the deep pelvis. To address these challenges, the transanal IPAA approach (ta-IPAA) was developed. This novel approach may offer increased visibility and range of motion compared with abd-IPAA, although its postoperative benefits remain unclear. The aim of this work was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare and inform the frequency of postoperative outcomes between ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA for patients with UC. METHOD: Several databases were searched from inception until May 2022 for studies reporting postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing ta-IPAA. Reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, evaluated studies for inclusion and graded the risk of bias. Odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD) and prevalence ratio (PR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ten retrospective studies comprising 284 patients with ta-IPAA were included. Total mesorectal excision was performed in 61.8% of cases and close rectal dissection in 27.9%. There was no difference in the odds of Clavien-Dindo (CD) I-II complications, CD III-IV and anastomotic leak (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.27-3.40; OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.65-2.16; OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58-3.23; respectively) between ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA. The ta-IPAA pooled CD I-II complication rate was 18% (95% CI 5%-35%) and for CD III-IV 10% (95% CI 5%-17%), and the anastomotic leak rate was 6% (95% CI 2%-10%). There were no deaths reported. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis compared the novel ta-IPAA procedure with abd-IPAA and found no difference in postoperative outcomes. While the need for randomized controlled trails and comparison of functional outcomes between both approaches remains, this evidence should assist colorectal surgeons to decide if ta-IPAA is a viable alternative.

Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Recurrence of rectal prolapse following the Altemeier procedure is reported with rates up to 40%. The optimal surgical management of recurrences has limited data available. Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a favored procedure for primary rectal prolapse, but its role in managing recurrences after Altemeier is unclear. VMR for recurrent prolapse involves implanting the mesh on the colon, which has a thinner wall, more active peristalsis, no mesorectum, less peritoneum available for covering the mesh, and potential diverticula. These factors can affect mesh-related complications such as erosion, migration, or infection. This study assessed the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of VMR for recurrent rectal prolapse after the Altemeier procedure. METHODS: We queried our prospectively maintained database between 01/01/2008 and 06/30/2022 for patients who had experienced a recurrence of full-thickness rectal prolapse following Altemeier's perineal proctosigmoidectomy and subsequently underwent ventral mesh rectopexy. RESULTS: Ten women with a median age of 67 years (range 61) and a median BMI of 27.8 kg/m2 (range 9) were included. Five (50%) had only one Altemeier, and five (50%) had multiple rectal prolapse surgeries, including Altemeier before VMR. No mesh-related complications occurred during a 65-month (range 165) median follow-up period. Three patients (30%) experienced minor postoperative complications unrelated to the mesh. Long-term complications were chronic abdominal pain and incisional hernia in one patient, respectively. One out of five (20%) patients with only one previous prolapse repair had a recurrence, while all patients (100%) with multiple prior repairs recurred. CONCLUSION: Mesh implantation on the colon is possible without adverse reactions. However, high recurrence rates in patients with multiple previous surgeries raise doubts about using VMR for secondary or tertiary recurrences.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: a retrospective review of the surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding the surgical outcomes of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), commonly referred to as Ogilvie syndrome, in modern clinical practice. The prevailing belief is that surgery should be avoided due to previously reported high mortality rates. We aimed to describe the surgical results of ACPO treated within our institution. METHODS: Our prospectively maintained colorectal surgery registry was queried for patients diagnosed with ACPO, who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2022. Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients who underwent surgery for ACPO were identified. Overall, nonoperative therapy was initially administered to 21 patients (65.6%). The surgeries performed included total abdominal colectomy (15, 43.1%), ascending colectomy with end ileostomy (8, 25%), transverse colostomy (5, 15.6%), ileostomy and transverse colostomy (3, 9.4%), and Hartmann's operation (1, 3.1%). Severe postoperative complications (CD grade 3 or 4) occurred in five patients (15.6%). No recurrence of ACPO was observed and no patient required reoperation. The average postoperative length of stay was 14.5 days, 30-day mortality was 6.3% (n = 2), and 90-day mortality was 15.6% (n = 5) due to complications of underlying comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was effective for patients with ACPO refractory to medical therapy or presenting with acute complications. Although postoperative complications were frequent, both the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were lower than previously documented in the literature. Further investigations are warranted to determine the optimal surgical strategy, which may involve total or segmental colectomy, or diversion alone without resection.

Redo IPAA for long rectal cuff syndrome after ileoanal pouch for inflammatory bowel disease.

ABTRACT: BACKGROUND: When constructing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the rectal cuff should ideally be 1-2 cm long to avoid subsequent complications. METHODS: We identified patients from our IBD center who underwent redo IPAA for a long rectal cuff. Long rectal cuff syndrome (LRCS) was defined as a symptomatic rectal cuff ≥ 4 cm. RESULTS: Forty patients met the inclusion criteria: 42.5% female, median age at redo surgery 42.5 years. The presentation was ulcerative proctitis in 77.5% of the cases and outlet obstruction in 22.5%. The index pouch was laparoscopically performed in 18 patients (45%). The median rectal cuff length was 6 cm. The pouch was repaired in 16 (40%) cases, whereas 24 (60%) required the creation of a neo-pouch. At the final pathology, the rectal cuff showed chronic active colitis in 38 (90%) cases. After a median follow-up of 34.5 (IQR 12-109) months, pouch failure occurred in 9 (22.5%) cases. The pouch survival rate was 78% at 3 years. Data on the quality of life were available for 11 (27.5%) patients at a median of 75 months after redo surgery. The median QoL score (0-1) was 0.7 (0.4-0.9). CONCLUSION: LRCS, a potentially avoidable complication, presents uniformly with symptoms of ulcerative proctitis or stricture. Redo IPAA was restorative for the majority.

Gender Related Differences in Surgeon Compensation: Survey Results from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the effect of sex on compensation among colorectal surgeons and to determine which factors contribute to gender-based differences in compensation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sex-based wage gap in the medical profession is among the most pronounced wage gaps in the U.S. Data regarding the wage gap among colorectal surgeons and the underlying reasons for this disparity remain unclear. METHODS: The Healthcare Economics Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons conducted a survey to evaluate surgeon demographics, compensation, and practice characteristics. To evaluate the effect of sex on compensation, we performed multivariable linear regression with backward selection. We used a two-sided P -value with a significance threshold <0.05. RESULTS: The mean difference in normalized total compensation between men and women was $46,250, and when salary was adjusted for FTEs, the difference was $57,000. Women were more likely to perform anorectal surgery, less likely to perform general surgery and less likely to hold positions in leadership. After adjustments, women reported significantly lower compensation (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97). Time spent doing abdominal surgery (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.23), professor status (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32) and instructor status (aOR, 1.49; 95% 1.28-1.73) were independently associated with compensation. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 12% adjusted sex wage gap among colorectal surgeons. Gender-based differences in leadership positions and allocation of effort may contribute. Further research will be necessary to clarify sources of wage inequalities. Still, our results should prompt expedient actions to support closing the gap.

Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-inflammatory Bowel Disease (PSC-IBD): Long-term Pouch and Liver Transplant Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of liver transplantation (LT) on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) outcomes in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD). BACKGROUND: Patients with PSC-IBD may require both IPAA for colitis and LT for PSC. METHODS: Patients with PSC-IBD from out institutional pouch registry (1985-2022) were divided according to LT status and timing of LT (before and after IPAA) and their outcomes analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included: 112 (70%) nontransplanted at last follow-up; 48 (30%) transplanted, of which 23 (14%) before IPAA and 25 (16%) after. Nontransplanted patients at IPAA had more laparoscopic procedures [37 (46%) vs 8 (18%), P =0.002] and less blood loss (median 250 vs 400 mL, P =0.006). Morbidity and mortality at 90 days were similar. Chronic pouchitis was higher in transplanted compared with nontransplanted patients [32 (67%) vs 51 (45.5%), P =0.03], but nontransplanted patients had a higher rate of chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. Overall survival was similar, but nontransplanted patients had more PSC-related deaths (12.5% vs 2%, P =0.002). Pouch survival at 10 years was 90% for nontransplanted patients and 100% for transplanted patients (log-rank P =0.052). Timing of LT had no impact on chronic pouchitis, pouch failure, or overall survival. PSC recurrence was 6% at 10 years. For transplanted patients, graft survival was similar regardless of IPAA timing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PSC-IBD and IPAA, LT is linked to an increased pouchitis rate but does not affect overall and pouch survival. Timing of LT does not influence short-term and long-term pouch outcomes.

Gracilis Flap Repair for Reoperative Rectovaginal Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas is notoriously difficult. Placement of the gracilis muscle between the vagina and anus is an advanced technique used to close persistent fistulas. We have utilized this procedure for recalcitrant fistulas and hypothesized that a gracilis interposition would offer a good treatment option for patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas, regardless of underlying etiology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate healing rates of gracilis interposition in patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas. DESIGN: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all adult female patients with a diagnosis of rectovaginal fistula between January 2009 and August 2020 was performed; those who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive fistula closure were included for analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States. PATIENTS: All patients were adult females with a diagnosis of a rectovaginal fistula who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, etiology of rectovaginal fistula, previous surgical intervention, presence of intestinal diversion, operative details, 30-day morbidity, recurrence of fistula, and time to recurrence. Fistula closure was defined as lack of clinical symptoms following stoma closure, negative fistula detection on gastrograffin enema' and absence of an internal opening at examination under anesthesia. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included who had a median age of 43 years (range, 19-64 years) and median body mass index of 31 kg/m 2 (range, 22-51). Median time between prior attempted surgical repair and gracilis surgery was 7 months (range, 3-17). The number of previously attempted repairs were 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), and > 4 (n = 5). The most recent attempted surgical repair was rectal advancement flap (n = 7), transperineal +/- Martius flap (n = 4), episioproctotomy (n = 3), transvaginal repair (n = 2), and other (n = 6). All patients had fecal diversion at the time of gracilis surgery. Thirty-day postoperative surgical site infection at the graft/donor site was 32% (n = 7). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 2-62), fistula closure was 59% (n = 13). Gracilis interposition was successful in all inflammatory bowel disease patients. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Gracilis interposition is an effective operative technique for reoperative rectovaginal fistula closure. Patients should be counseled regarding the possibility of graft/donor site infection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 . REPARACIN CON COLGAJO DE GRACILIS PARA LA FSTULA RECTOVAGINAL REOPERATORIA: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico de las fístulas rectovaginales recurrentes es muy difícil. La colocación del músculo gracilis entre la vagina y el ano es una técnica avanzada que se utiliza para cerrar las fístulas persistentes. Hemos utilizado este procedimiento para las fístulas recalcitrantes y planteamos la hipótesis de que una interposición del gracilis ofrecería una buena opción de tratamiento para pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias, independientemente de la etiología subyacente.OBJETIVO:Investigar las tasas de curación de la interposición del gracilis en pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias.DISEÑO:Tras la aprobación de la junta de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de todas las pacientes adultas con un diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal entre enero de 2009 y agosto de 2020; los que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para el cierre definitivo de la fístula se incluyeron para el análisis.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal de un centro terciario en Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Todas las pacientes adultas con diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para cierre definitivo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:datos demográficos del paciente, etiología de la fístula rectovaginal, intervención quirúrgica previa, presencia de derivación intestinal, detalles quirúrgicos, morbilidad a los 30 días, recurrencia de la fístula y tiempo hasta la recurrencia. El cierre de la fístula se definió como la ausencia de síntomas clínicos después del cierre del estoma, la detección negativa de la fístula en el enema de gastrograffin y la ausencia de una abertura interna en el examen bajo anestesia.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 22 pacientes que tenían una mediana de edad de 43 años (rango 19-64 años) y una mediana de índice de masa corporal de 31 kg / m2 (rango 22-51). La mediana de tiempo entre el intento previo de reparación quirúrgica y la cirugía del gracilis fue de 7 meses (rango 3-17). El número de reparaciones previamente intentadas fue: 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), y >4 (n = 5). El intento de reparación quirúrgica más reciente fue el colgajo de avance rectal (n = 7), el colgajo transperineal +/- Martius (n = 4), la episioproctotomía (n = 3), la reparación transvaginal (n = 2) y otros (n = 6). Todos los pacientes tenían derivación fecal en el momento de la cirugía gracilis. La infección del sitio quirúrgico posoperatorio a los 30 días en el sitio del injerto / donante fue del 32% (n = 7). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 22 meses (rango 2-62), el cierre de la fístula fue del 59% (n = 13). La interposición de Gracilis fue exitosa en todos los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo de los datos.CONCLUSIONES:La interposición de Gracilis es una técnica quirúrgica eficaz para el cierre reoperatorio de la fístula rectovaginal. Se debe asesorar a los pacientes sobre la posibilidad de infección del sitio del injerto / donante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Gracilis Muscle Interposition for the Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A rectovaginal fistula is a debilitating condition that often severely impacts quality of life. Despite many treatment options available, the best surgical treatment is far from being established, and many patients will undergo several procedures before fistula closure is achieved. Gracilis muscle interposition, which is the transposition of the gracilis muscle into the rectovaginal septum, is an option for complex and persistent fistulas, but literature on the subject is scarce, mainly consisting of small case series. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the success rate of gracilis muscle interposition for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Studies comprising at least 5 patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for rectovaginal fistula were included. No date or language restrictions was applied. INTERVENTION: Gracilis muscle interposition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the fistula closure rate (%). Other domains analyzed are stoma closure rate, postoperative complications, quality of life, fecal continence, and sexual function. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included for a total of 384 patients. The pooled fistula closure rate for gracilis muscle interposition was 64% (95% CI, 53%-74%; range, 33%-100%). Risk factors for failure were smoking, underlying Crohn's disease, and more than 2 previous repairs, whereas stoma formation was associated with improved outcomes. Postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 37%, mostly related to surgical site occurrences at the harvest site and perineal area. No deaths occurred. Gracilis muscle interposition improved quality of life and fecal continence, but impairment of sexual function was common. LIMITATIONS: Most of the included studies were small case series. CONCLUSIONS: Gracilis muscle interposition is a safe and moderately effective treatment that could be taken into consideration as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent rectovaginal fistula. REGISTRATION NO: CRD42022319621.

Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Procedure Is an Alternative to Permanent Ostomy in Patients With Complex Pelvic Fistulas.

BACKGROUND: A permanent stoma is frequently recommended in the setting of complex or recurrent rectovaginal fistulas because of the high failure rate of reconstructive procedures. The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure is a salvage operation for motivated patients desiring to avoid permanent fecal diversion. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cure rates of complex rectovaginal fistulas after the Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure based on cause. DESIGN: After the institutional review approval board, a retrospective review of women who underwent the procedure (1993-2018) for a rectovaginal fistula was conducted. Patients' demographics, cause, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. SETTING: Colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult women with a rectovaginal fistula who underwent a colonic pull-through procedure were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recurrence after the colonic pull-through procedure. RESULTS: There were 81 patients who underwent colonic pull-through; of those, 26 patients had a rectovaginal fistula, had a median age of 51 (43-57) years, and had a mean BMI of 28 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 . A total of 4 patients (15%) had a recurrence and 85% of the patients healed. Ninety-three percent of the patients healed after the prior anastomotic leak. Patients with a Crohn's disease-related fistula had a 75% cure rate. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of recurrence of 8% (95% CI, 0%-8%) within 6 months after surgery and 12% at 12 months. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure may be the last option to preserve intestinal continuity and successfully treat rectovaginal fistulas in 85% of cases. EL PROCEDIMIENTO PULLTHROUGH DE TURNBULLCUTAIT ES UNA ALTERNATIVA A LA OSTOMA PERMANENTE EN PACIENTES CON FSTULAS PLVICAS COMPLEJAS: ANTECEDENTES:Con frecuencia se recomienda un estoma permanente en el contexto de una fístula rectovaginal compleja o recurrente debido a la alta tasa de fracaso de los procedimientos reconstructivos. El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait es una operación de rescate para pacientes motivados que desean evitar la desviación fecal permanente.OBJETIVO:Analizar las tasas de curación de la fístula rectovaginal compleja después del procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait según la etiología.DISEÑO:Después de la junta de aprobación de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de mujeres que se sometieron a un procedimiento (1993-2018) por fístula rectovaginal. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, la etiología y los resultados posoperatorios de los pacientes.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal en un centro terciario en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Mujeres adultas con fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a extracción del colon.RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:recurrencia después de la extracción del colon.RESULTADOS:Hubo 81 pacientes que tenían extracción colónica, de esas 26 fístulas rectovaginales con una mediana de edad de 51 (43 - 57) años, y un índice de masa corporal promedio de 28 ± 3,2 kg/m2. Un total de 4 (15%) pacientes tuvieron una recurrencia y el 85% de los pacientes se curaron. El noventa y tres por ciento de los pacientes se curaron después de la fuga anastomótica previa. Los pacientes con fístula relacionada con EC tuvieron una tasa de curación del 75%. El análisis de Kaplan Meier mostró una incidencia acumulada de recurrencia del 8% [95% intervalo de confianza 0%-18%] dentro de los 6 meses posteriores a la cirugía y del 12% a los 12 meses.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait puede ser la última opción que se puede ofrecer para preservar la continuidad intestinal y tratar la fístula rectovaginal con éxito en el 85% de los casos. (Traducción-Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil).