Regional variability in liver waiting list removals causes false ascertainment of waiting list deaths.

Inconsistent identification of reasons for removal from the liver transplant waiting list by Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions may contribute to regional variability in wait-list death rates. We analyzed OPTN and Social Security Administration (SSA) reported deaths of 103 364 liver transplant candidates listed May 8, 2003-April 17, 2011, and determined regional variability in risk of death attributable to differences in use of OPTN removal codes. Only 26% of candidates removed as "too sick" died within 90 days of delisting; 6335 deaths after delisting were not reported to OPTN. The ratio of number of candidates removed as "too sick" to number who died on the waiting list varied by region from 0.23 to 0.94, indicating substantial variability in use of removal codes. Including SSA-reported deaths within 90 days of delisting reduced regional variability in risk of death by 48% compared with deaths on the list alone, and by 35% compared with deaths plus the "too sick" designation. Codes for delisting liver transplant candidates are inconsistently applied among OPTN regions, spuriously elevating estimated regional variability in risk of wait-list death. This variability is ameliorated by including SSA- reported deaths within 90 days of delisting.

Kidney function and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in kidney transplant recipients: the FAVORIT trial.

In kidney transplant recipients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death. The relationship of kidney function with CVD outcomes in transplant recipients remains uncertain. We performed a post hoc analysis of the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) Trial to assess risk factors for CVD and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Following adjustment for demographic, clinical and transplant characteristics, and traditional CVD risk factors, proportional hazards models were used to explore the association of estimated GFR with incident CVD and all-cause mortality. In 4016 participants, mean age was 52 years and 20% had prior CVD. Mean eGFR was 49 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . In 3676 participants with complete data, there were 527 CVD events over a median of 3.8 years. Following adjustment, each 5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher eGFR at levels below 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was associated with a 15% lower risk of both CVD [HR = 0.85 (0.80, 0.90)] and death [HR = 0.85 (0.79, 0.90)], while there was no association between eGFR and outcomes at levels above 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . In conclusion, in stable kidney transplant recipients, lower eGFR is independently associated with adverse events, suggesting that reduced kidney function itself rather than preexisting comorbidity may lead to CVD.

The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial.

Prior small studies have shown multiple benefits of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis compared to conventional three times per week treatments. To study this further, we randomized 87 patients to three times per week conventional hemodialysis or to nocturnal hemodialysis six times per week, all with single-use high-flux dialyzers. The 45 patients in the frequent nocturnal arm had a 1.82-fold higher mean weekly stdKt/V(urea), a 1.74-fold higher average number of treatments per week, and a 2.45-fold higher average weekly treatment time than the 42 patients in the conventional arm. We did not find a significant effect of nocturnal hemodialysis for either of the two coprimary outcomes (death or left ventricular mass (measured by MRI) with a hazard ratio of 0.68, or of death or RAND Physical Health Composite with a hazard ratio of 0.91). Possible explanations for the left ventricular mass result include limited sample size and patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance, self-reported depression, laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism and anemia, blood pressure and rates of hospitalization, and vascular access interventions. Patients in the nocturnal arm had improved control of hyperphosphatemia and hypertension, but no significant benefit among the other main secondary outcomes. There was a trend for increased vascular access events in the nocturnal arm. Thus, we were unable to demonstrate a definitive benefit of more frequent nocturnal hemodialysis for either coprimary outcome.

The role of monocytes in serum sickness nephritis.

We have investigated the pathogenesis of glomerular hypercellularity seen in acute serum sickness nephritis induced in rabbits with bovine serum albumin (BSA). The increase in cellularity began with the first stages of immune clearance of BSA, with a peak cellularity occuring at the time of onset of proteinuria. Although there was a significant increase in the fraction of glomerular cells incorporating [3H]thymidine, first seen at the onset of proteinuria, this increase occurred too late and was too small to explain the observed rate of increase in glomerular cellularity. On the other hand, a striking monocytic infiltration of the glomeruli was documented by electron microscopy and by staining for nonspecific esterase. This monocytic infiltration paralleled the observed course of glomerular hypercellularity and was quantitatively sufficient to explain the total increase seen. It appears, therefore, that glomerular hypercellularity seen in this model is principally a result of monocyte infiltration.

Histopathologic clusters differentiate subgroups within the nonspecific diagnoses of CAN or CR: preliminary data from the DeKAF study.

The nonspecific diagnoses 'chronic rejection''CAN', or 'IF/TA' suggest neither identifiable pathophysiologic mechanisms nor possible treatments. As a first step to developing a more useful taxonomy for causes of new-onset late kidney allograft dysfunction, we used cluster analysis of individual Banff score components to define subgroups. In this multicenter study, eligibility included being transplanted prior to October 1, 2005, having a 'baseline' serum creatinine < or =2.0 mg/dL before January 1, 2006, and subsequently developing deterioration of graft function leading to a biopsy. Mean time from transplant to biopsy was 7.5 +/- 6.1 years. Of the 265 biopsies (all with blinded central pathology interpretation), 240 grouped into six large (n > 13) clusters. There were no major differences between clusters in recipient demographics. The actuarial postbiopsy graft survival varied by cluster (p = 0.002). CAN and CNI toxicity were common diagnoses in each cluster (and did not differentiate clusters). Similarly, C4d and presence of donor specific antibody were frequently observed across clusters. We conclude that for recipients with new-onset late graft dysfunction, cluster analysis of Banff scores distinguishes meaningful subgroups with differing outcomes.

Pathological and clinical characterization of the 'troubled transplant': data from the DeKAF study.

We are studying two cohorts of kidney transplant recipients, with the goal of defining specific clinicopathologic entities that cause late graft dysfunction: (1) prevalent patients with new onset late graft dysfunction (cross-sectional cohort); and (2) newly transplanted patients (prospective cohort). For the cross-sectional cohort (n = 440), mean time from transplant to biopsy was 7.5 +/- 6.1 years. Local pathology diagnoses included CAN (48%), CNI toxicity (30%), and perhaps surprisingly, acute rejection (cellular- or Ab-mediated) (23%). Actuarial rate of death-censored graft loss at 1 year postbiopsy was 17.7%; at 2 years, 29.8%. There was no difference in postbiopsy graft survival for recipients with versus without CAN (p = 0.9). Prospective cohort patients (n = 2427) developing graft dysfunction >3 months posttransplant undergo 'index' biopsy. The rate of index biopsy was 8.8% between 3 and 12 months, and 18.2% by 2 years. Mean time from transplant to index biopsy was 1.0 +/- 0.6 years. Local pathology diagnoses included CAN (27%), and acute rejection (39%). Intervention to halt late graft deterioration cannot be developed in the absence of meaningful diagnostic entities. We found CAN in late posttransplant biopsies to be of no prognostic value. The DeKAF study will provide broadly applicable diagnostic information to serve as the basis for future trials.

Inflammation in areas of tubular atrophy in kidney allograft biopsies: a potent predictor of allograft failure.

The Banff scoring schema provides a common ground to analyze kidney transplant biopsies. Interstitial inflammation (i) and tubulitis (t) in areas of viable tissue are features in scoring acute rejection, but are excluded in areas of tubular atrophy (TA). We studied inflammation and tubulitis in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients undergoing allograft biopsy for new-onset late graft dysfunction (N = 337). We found inflammation ('iatr') and tubulitis ('tatr') in regions of fibrosis and atrophy to be strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001). Moreover, iatr was strongly associated with death-censored graft failure when compared to recipients whose biopsies had no inflammation, even after adjusting for the presence of interstitial fibrosis (Hazard Ratio = 2.31, [1.10-4.83]; p = 0.0262) or TA (hazard ratio = 2.42, [1.16-5.08]; p = 0.191), serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, time to biopsy and i score. Further, these results did not qualitatively change after additional adjustments for C4d staining or donor specific antibody. Stepwise regression identified the most significant markers of graft failure which include iatr score. We propose that a more global assessment of inflammation in kidney allograft biopsies to include inflammation in atrophic areas may provide better prognostic information. Phenotypic characterization of these inflammatory cells and appropriate treatment may ameliorate late allograft failure.

Use of cardioprotective medications in kidney transplant recipients.

Death with function causes half of late kidney transplant failures, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in these patients. We examined the use of potentially cardioprotective medications in a prospective observational study at seven transplant centers in the United States and Canada. Among 935 patients, 87% received antihypertensive medications at both 1 and 6 months after transplantation. Similar antihypertensive regimens were used for patients with and without diabetes and CVD, but with wide variability among centers. In contrast, while 44% of patients were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) at the time of transplantation, the proportion taking these agents dropped to 12% at month 1, then increased to 24% at 6 months. Fewer than 30% with CVD or diabetes received ACEI/ARB therapy 6 months posttransplant. Aspirin use was uncommon (<40% of patients). Even among those with diabetes and/or CVD, fewer than 60% received aspirin and only half received a statin at 1 and 6 months. This study demonstrates marked variability in the use of cardioprotective medications in kidney transplant recipients, a finding that may reflect, among several possible explanations, clinical uncertainty due the lack of randomized trials for these medications in this population.

Long-term outcomes in nondiabetic chronic kidney disease.

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study examined the effects of strict blood pressure control and dietary protein restriction on the progression of kidney disease. Here, we retrospectively evaluated outcomes of nondiabetic participants with stages 2-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) from randomized and nonrandomized cohorts of the MDRD Study. Kidney failure and survival status through December of 2000, were obtained from the US Renal Data System and the National Death Index. Event rates were calculated for kidney failure, death, and a composite outcome of death and kidney failure. In the 1666 patients, rates for kidney failure were four times higher than that for death. Kidney failure was a more likely event than death in subgroups based on baseline glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, kidney disease etiology, gender, and race. It was only among those older than 65 that the rate for death approximated that for kidney failure. In contrast to other populations with CKD, our study of relatively young subjects with nondiabetic disease has found that the majority of the participants advanced to kidney failure with a low competing risk of death. In such patients, the primary emphasis should be on delaying progression of kidney disease.

OPTN policy regarding prioritization of patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome: does it provide equitable organ allocation?

United Network for Organ Transplantation (UNOS) policy 3.6.4.5.1 provides exception points to patients diagnosed with hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) to compensate for their reported increased mortality risk. We compared pre- and posttransplant and overall outcomes in 255 patients receiving exception points under this policy (HPS policy patients) with 32 358 nonexception control patients listed in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) era to determine whether the intent of the policy is being met. Overall, 92.5% of HPS policy patients versus 45.5% of controls had been transplanted, 5.1% versus 31.2% remained on waiting list and 1.5% versus 14.1% had died while awaiting transplant (p < 0.0001 for each comparison). Relative risk (RR) of death for HPS policy patients compared to controls was 0.158 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.059-0.420, p = 0.0002) pretransplant, and 0.827 (CI: 0.587-1.170, p = 0.28) posttransplant. Overall (combined waitlist and posttransplant) RR of death was 0.514 (CI: 0.374-0.707, p = 0.00004) compared with controls. After adjustment for laboratory MELD, overall RR was 0.807 (CI: 0.587-1.110, p = 0.19), indicating that HPS policy patients' mortality risk would be similar to that of controls had they been listed with their laboratory MELD score. HPS policy patients have a significant pretransplant survival advantage over standard liver transplant candidates because of the exception points awarded, and have similar posttransplant survival. Better criteria for diagnosing and grading of HPS are required.

Application of magnetic resonance imaging in pancreas transplant.

Various imaging methods have been used in the differential diagnosis of pancreas-transplant dysfunction. As early as 1977, angiography and radionuclide studies ([75Se]seleno-DL-methionine) were used to evaluate pancreas allografts. More recently, the use of 99mTc-labeled DTPA, computed tomography, and ultrasonography has been described, and abnormal findings associated with rejection have been reported with these imaging methods. However, no attempt has been made to determine the ability of each method to detect rejection and to differentiate graft dysfunction caused by rejection from dysfunction by other causes. We summarize our experience with the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pancreas transplantation and a comparative study of radionuclide 99mTc-DTPA scans, ultrasonography, and MRI in the detection and differentiation of pancreas-graft dysfunction.

Effect of timing of administration and quantity of blood transfusion on cadaver renal transplant survival.

Graft and patient survival rates were analyzed in 239 consecutive first cadaver renal transplants as a function of time of administration of blood transfusion and the number of units given. There was no statistically significant difference in patient survival in comparing patients who were never transfused, patients not previously transfused who received blood peroperatively, those who received blood before transplantation only, and those who were transfused before transplantation and peroperatively. In fact, the best survival rates were achieved in patients who were not transfused previously. Graft survival rates were significantly better in the prior transfused groups compared to either the never transfused group or the larger no prior transfused group which included the peroperatively transfused patients. Graft survival of the peroperatively transfused patients was intermediate between the never transfused and the prior transfused patients. There was no statistically significant difference between graft survival rates of patients who received more than 6 units of blood with those receiving less than 6 units. Also, the time interval from the last transfusion to transplantation appeared to have no effect on graft survival. Since an intentional transfusion protocol carries the real risk of sensitization and delay or elimination of the transplantation option, a prospective study comparing peroperative with preoperative transfusions is suggested. Such a study would answer the questions of the risk of sensitization with prior transfusion and the value of peroperative transfusions.

Effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant patients.

This study investigated the effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine A (CsA) bioavailability in 10 renal transplant patients. Under CsA steady state conditions, patients were randomly administered their usual dose of CsA with either 8 ounces of grapefruit juice or 8 ounces of water. Using a crossover design, a 12-hr pharmacokinetic study was then conducted. Grapefruit juice increased the area under the concentration versus time curve (4218+/-1497 ng x hr/ml [grapefruit juice] vs. 3415+/-1288 ng x hr/ml [water], P=0.029) and 12-hr trough (244+/-214 ng x ml [grapefruit juice] vs. 132+/-56 ng x ml [water], P=0.09), but it did not change peak concentration (734+/-290 ng x ml [grapefruit juice] vs. 708+/-305 ng x ml [water], P=0.76). In addition, grapefruit juice delayed the time to peak concentration compared with water (5.4+/-3.0 hr [grapefruit juice] vs. 2.8+/-0.8 hr [water], P=0.025). These data suggest that concurrent administration of grapefruit juice with CsA will delay the absorption of CsA and increase the drug exposure of CsA without changing peak concentration.

Appearance of type II diabetes mellitus in type I diabetic recipients of pancreas allografts.

To determine the cause of hyperglycemia appearing after pancreas transplantation in type I diabetic recipients, we performed 65 oral glucose tolerance tests with serum insulin and C-peptide determinations in 32 patients with pancreas grafts functioning two or more months following transplantation. We correlated these results with estimates of graft size obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and values of urinary amylase as a measure of pancreatic exocrine function. A total of 33 studies were obtained in 20 patients at times of normal glucose tolerance, and normal ranges for serum insulin and C-peptide levels were established; 32 studies in 17 patients during periods of glucose intolerance revealed values of serum insulin and C-peptide that were within the normal range, though the time to peak values was delayed to 2 hr, characteristic of type II diabetes. Only 3 of 17 patients examined by MRI had significant pancreatic allograft atrophy. These patients also had low urinary amylase excretion, and the only values for serum C-peptide that were below the normal range. The other 14 hyperglycemic patients had normalized pancreas grafts, normal urinary amylase excretion, and normal values for serum insulin and C-peptide. In our experience, then, in 76% of patients with hyperglycemia more than 2 months following pancreas transplantation, the cause was appearance of type II diabetes rather than destruction of the allograft with recurrence of type I diabetes. This observation has important implications for the definition of pancreas allograft failure and for the management of pancreas allograft recipients with hyperglycemia.

Increased frequency of posttransplant lymphomas in patients treated with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone.

We have documented seven B cell lymphomas over a six-month period in 132 (5.3%) kidney and heart allograft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone (triple therapy). This is a significant increase (P less than 0.0001) over the number of such tumors seen by us previously. Only 2 lymphomas had occurred in 669 cadaver and 29 living-related kidney allografts treated with azathioprine and prednisone alone (0.3%). In 160 cadaver kidney recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone there have been no lymphomas. Similarly in 14 living-related kidney recipients who were transplanted since the introduction of triple therapy for cadaver grafts, but continued to receive only azathioprine and prednisone, no lymphomas occurred. There seemed to be a clear relationship between this increase and the use of triple therapy. This led us to examine other possible contributing factors. A case control study has not shown any other factor that differs in patients in whom lymphomas developed. We have only been able to demonstrate Epstein Barr virus nuclear antigen in the cells of one tumor. Four of these 7 tumors were monoclonal, one polyclonal, and two indeterminate. All patients had their immunosuppression withdrawn and six received intravenous acyclovir. Three patients have shown some response but four patients died. Triple therapy is being used by many centers to reduce the level of cyclosporine toxicity. We wish to sound a note of caution that this may result in an increased incidence of posttransplant lymphomas.

Evaluation of pre- and posttransplant donor-specific transfusion/cyclosporine A in non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients. Cooperative Clinical Trials in Transplantation Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of donor specific transfusion (DST) have become controversial in the cyclosporine era. This study was performed to evaluate the potential benefits of a new protocol for administering DSTs in the perioperative period. METHODS: Non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized prospectively to control or to receive a DST 24 hr before transplant and 7-10 days posttransplant. All patients received similar immunosuppression according to protocol. RESULTS: The protocol had 212 evaluable patients (115 transfused and 97 control). There were no differences in 1- and 2-year graft and patient survival, causes of graft failure, incidence and types of infection, repeat hospitalization, or the ability to withdraw steroids. Immunological hyporesponsiveness (by mixed lymphocyte culture) occurred more frequently in transfused patients (18%) than controls (3%) (P = 0.04). Blood stored for > or =3 days was associated with fewer early rejections than blood stored < or =2 days. Overall, class II antigen mismatches were associated with more rejection episodes than class I antigen mismatches. However, transfused patients, but not control patients, with more class I antigen mismatches were more likely to have rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of DSTs by the method described had no practical influence on patient or graft survival for up to 2 years. However, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was more common in transfused patients (18 vs. 3%). Longer follow-up will be needed to determine whether DST will be associated with long-term benefit.

A rapid method for embedding tissues for electron microscopy using 1,4-dioxane and Polybed 812.

A rapid method for embedding tissues for electron microscopy is described. This method, which can be completed within 5 hr, uses 1,4-dioxane as the final dehydrating agent and Polybed 812 as the embedding medium. Satisfactory preservation of cellular structures is consistently achieved with a variety of normal and diseased tissues. This method may be of particular value to diagnostic electron microscopy laboratories where time and simplicity are critical.

A clinical trial in type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

A prospective, randomized, three-armed, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial has been completed in 210 sites worldwide to determine whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan or the calcium channel blocker amlodipine has a renoprotective effect in patients with overt type 2 diabetic nephropathy. A total of 1,715 subjects randomized during a 3-year period were followed a minimum of 2 years. The goal for all treatment groups was to achieve equivalent blood pressure control, with the blinded study drug (irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo) as primary therapy with additional antihypertensive drugs, excluding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and angiotensin II receptor antagonists, to achieve seated systolic blood pressure less than 135 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure less than 85 mm Hg. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of time to doubling of entry serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary outcomes included fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. A Clinical Management Committee monitored the conduct of the study. An Outcome Confirmation Committee classified all study outcome events in blinded fashion. An external Data Safety Monitoring Committee monitored unblinded data for interim safety and efficacy analyses of the study. Eligibility criteria included informed consent, age 30 to 70 years, adult-onset diabetes, hypertension, urine protein excretion greater than 900 mg/24 hours, and serum creatinine values of 90 to 265 micromol/L in women and 110 to 265 micromol/L in men. Baseline characteristics were age, 59 +/- 8 years; body mass index, 31 +/- 7 kg/m(2); 67% male; 73% white, 14% black, and 13% other; duration of diabetes, 15 +/- 9 years; retinopathy, 66%; neuropathy, 48%; congestive heart failure, 7.5%; screening seated systolic blood pressure, 156 +/- 18 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure, 85 +/- 11 mm Hg; urine protein excretion, 4.0 +/- 3.5 g/24 hours; serum creatinine, 150 +/- 53 micromol/L; serum potassium, 4.6 +/- 0.5 mEq/L; total cholesterol, 229 +/- 58 mg/dL; and hemoglobin A(1c), 8.1 +/- 1.7%. This large-scale international trial should help define the clinical course and standards of care for hypertensive adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. Results available on May 19, 2001, will help in defining the current controversy of the risks and benefits of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system versus calcium channel blockade versus standard antihypertensive therapy in this large patient population.

Design of trials of methods to reduce late renal allograft loss: the price of success.

The excellent present outcomes of renal transplantation pose major challenges for the construction of future studies of interventions to reduce late renal allograft loss. Using current data on expected renal allograft outcomes, we performed power calculations to estimate the required size of trials of primary and secondary interventions in chronic renal allograft rejection. A primary prevention trial would require recruitment of 1500 patients over three years and is probably not feasible. A secondary intervention trial would require entry of only 126 patients and is still feasible. The difficulty of performing trials using graft failure as the primary study outcome has encouraged interest in use of surrogate endpoints such as acute rejection. Using the UNOS renal transplant data base, we examined changes over time in the frequency of acute rejection within the first year and the risk of subsequent graft loss. Changes in acute rejection rates were neither parallel to nor predictive of changes in the rate of late graft loss, providing no support for the use of acute rejection as a surrogate for late graft loss. Future continued improvement in renal transplant outcomes may require changes in traditional scientific and administrative methods for evaluating the impacts of proposed interventions.