Pituitary adenomas that show a faint GH-immunoreactivity but lack fibrous body: Pit-1 adenoma with endocrinologically low activity.

Growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenomas have been classified into densely and sparsely granulated adenomas. The latter are chromophobic with weak GH-positivity and characteristically possess fibrous body (FB), aggregation of cytokeratin filaments. We report eight cases of unusual chromophobic adenomas. GH-immunoreactivity was detected in most adenoma cells in five cases and scattered in three cases. However, it appeared much weaker than that seen in ordinary GH-producing adenomas because of spotty immunoreactivity. Although intracytoplasmic organelles were well-developed, secretory granules were small and sparse. FB was not identified in any cases. Thyroid-stimulating hormone was positive in four cases. Pit-1 protein was positive in all eight cases. A weak labeling with GH probe was detected in two of two cases examined by in situ hybridization. Acromegalic features were evident in four cases, while mild or absent in four cases. GH levels were below 5 microg/l in four cases and 5-10 microg/l in the remaining cases. Macroadenomas and invasive adenomas were seen in seven and six cases, respectively.Pituitary adenomas that show a faint GH-immunoreactivity but lack FB do not fit the established classification. These adenomas may be a distinct pituitary adenoma type of Pit-1 lineage with endocrinologically low activity.

Clinicopathological characterization of TSH-producing adenomas: special reference to TSH-immunoreactive but clinically non-functioning adenomas.

Thyrotropin (thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH))-producing pituitary adenomas have been known to be quite variable in clinical features covering from typical functioning TSH-producing adenomas (FTSHomas) associated with hyperthyroidism to clinically silent TSH cell adenomas (STAs) that are apparently unassociated with hyperthyroidism. It is important to distinguish STAs from other types of clinically non-functioning adenomas for adequate postoperative managements. However, because of rareness of TSH-producing adenomas, their histopathological features linking to the clinical manifestations have not been well characterized. Herein, we investigated clinical and histopathological findings to characterize 29 TSH-producing adenomas including 20 FTSHomas and nine STAs. Clinical symptoms of the patients with STAs included headache, visual defect, vertigo, and nausea. All STAs and 19 FTSHomas were macroadenoma. The average tumor size of STAs was significantly larger than that of FTSHomas (P < 0.05). The invasiveness was detected in 33% STAs and in 20% FTSHomas. Both STAs and FTSHomas showed a variety of morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles. Chromophobic polygonal or short-spindled tumor cells usually proliferated in a diffuse pattern, while they exhibited globoid or whorl-like appearance with intertwined cytoplasmic processes in both subgroups. Stromal fibrosis and calcification were often noted. Their nuclei were somehow pleomorphic. Ultrastructural features of all four STAs examined were similar to those of normal thyrotrophs. Thus, STAs and FTSHomas were indistinguishable by histology alone. Immunohistochemically, the number of TSH-positive cells in individual FTSHomas was highly various. Six tumors showed only a few TSH-positive cells (1-5%), and three were negative for TSH by conventional method without antigen retrieval. After proteinase K treatment, these tumors turned out TSH positive. As defined, STAs were TSH positive in more than 20% of tumor cells and three of them in more than 50%. Growth hormone- and/or prolactin-positive cells were detected in 55% STAs and 63% FTSHomas. Both pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 and GATA-binding protein 2 were expressed in all STAs and 20 FTSHomas. Membranous somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-2A immunoreactivity was found in 89% STAs and 94% FTSHomas, whereas SSTR5 was positive in 78% of both STAs and FTSHomas. MIB-1 labeling index was related to tumor invasiveness and tumor size (P < 0.05, P = 0.09, respectively). Thus, although both STAs and FTSHomas showed unique histopathological features distinct from other type adenomas, these two subgroups were indistinguishable by histopathology. Immunohistochemistry for TSH by use of antigen retrieval, transcription factors, and SSTRs may be useful to confirm STAs and to determine the postoperative therapy among various kinds of clinically non-functioning adenomas.