Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 38(3): 428-433, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36505212

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Multimodal analgesia is used to treat severe postoperative pain (POP) in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Adjuvants are used with local anesthetics to improve the quality and duration of pain relief. Studies comparing different doses of dexmedetomidine in adductor canal block (ACB) are sparse to date. This study compares postoperative analgesia with two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine in ACB for unilateral TKR. Material and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparative study, sixty patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Postoperatively perineural catheter was inserted and all patients received 0.2% ropivacaine 20 mL bolus followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/Kg in Group A and 1 µg/Kg in Group B) at 8 mL/h. Postoperative pain, motor blockade, rescue analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, sedation, and adverse effects were recorded. Student t, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney tests were used. Results: Most patients were elderly females (M:15, F:45). Postoperatively, from 2nd to 24th hour, pain score was less in Group B (P < 0.05). The requirement of rescue analgesic was also less in Group B (A:B 330 µg:60 µg; 23%:6%). Motor blockade assessed using modified Bromage scale and sedation using Richmond agitation sedation scale did not show any statistical difference. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 µg/Kg is a better adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine than 0.5 µg/Kg in ACB. It provides better analgesia without producing sedation, motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, or any adverse effects.

2.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 37(4): 569-573, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35340959

RESUMO

Background and Aims: To compare the performance characteristics of C-MAC video, McCoy, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in elective cervical spine surgery. The primary objective was to assess the ease of intubation with the three study devices. The secondary objectives were the time to intubation and hemodynamic responses during intubation. Material and Methods: The prospective observational comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Adult ASA 1 and 11 patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery were included in the study. Patients with unstable spine and trauma were excluded. The analysis of variance, Bonferroni test, Chi square test and multiple comparison tests were used to compare the performance characteristics of laryngoscopes. Results: The C-MAC video laryngoscope improved glottis view by improving the modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) score and the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score compared to McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes. The ease of intubation was better with the C-MAC video laryngoscope compared to the McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes. The time to intubation was comparable between the three laryngoscopes. The C-MAC video and McCoy laryngoscopes had 100% successful first attempt intubations while it was 90% for the Macintosh laryngoscope. Hemodynamic variables observed during intubation were comparable between the three groups. Conclusion: The use of C-MAC video laryngoscope resulted in better visualization of the glottis and easier tracheal intubation as compared to the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes in cervical spine surgery. Both C-MAC video and McCoy laryngoscopes had 100% successful first attempt intubation.

3.
Anesth Essays Res ; 12(2): 407-411, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29962607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing corrective surgery for scoliosis may require postoperative ventilation for various reasons. AIM: The aim was to study the correlation of preoperative (pulmonary function test [PFT], etiology, and Cobb's angle) and intraoperative factors (type of surgery, number of spinal segments involved, blood transfusion, and temperature at the end of surgery) on postoperative ventilation following scoliosis surgery. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: patients' medical records of scoliosis surgery at a tertiary care center during 2010-2016 were retrospectively analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied retrospectively 108 scoliosis surgeries done in our institute during this period by the same group of anesthetists using standardized anesthesia technique. We analyzed preoperative (etiology, preoperative PFT, and Cobb's angle) and intraoperative factors (type of surgery, number of spinal segments involved, blood transfusion, and temperature) influencing postoperative ventilation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For all the continuous variables, the results are either given in mean ± standard deviation, and for categorical variables as a percentage. To obtain the association of categorical variables, Chi-square test was applied. RESULTS: Patients with Cobb's angle above 76° and spinal segment involvement of 11 ± 3 required postoperative ventilation. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) <38 and forced vital capacity (FVC%) <38.23 of the predicted could not be extubated. Increased blood transfusion and hypothermia were found to affect postoperative ventilation. CONCLUSION: Preoperative factors such as etiology of scoliosis, Cobb's angle, spirometric values FEV1% and FVC% of predicted and intraoperative factors like number of spinal segments involved, affect postoperative ventilation following scoliosis surgery. Increased blood transfusion and hypothermia are the preventable factors leading to ventilation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA