A multivalent RSV vaccine based on the modified vaccinia Ankara vector shows moderate protection against disease caused by RSV in older adults in a phase 3 clinical study.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes a significant disease burden in older adults. The live recombinant vaccine based on a nonreplicating modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA-BN) poxvirus, MVA-BN-RSV, encoding for multiple proteins of RSV subtypes A and B, was assessed for efficacy against respiratory disease caused by RSV. Adults aged ≥60 years, with or without underlying chronic conditions, were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of vaccine or placebo and were followed for disease caused by RSV infection during the 2022-2023 season. The 2 primary endpoints were RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) with ≥3 and ≥ 2 symptoms; acute respiratory disease (ARD) was a key secondary endpoint. The humoral RSV-specific immune response was assessed at baseline and 14 days post-vaccination. Safety was evaluated by collection of solicited adverse events (AEs) and unsolicited AEs for 7 and 28 days post-vaccination respectively, and SAEs for the entire study period. In total, 18,348 participants were included in the final efficacy and safety analyses. Vaccine efficacy was 42.9 % (95 % CI: -16.1; 71.9) against RSV-associated LRTD with ≥3 symptoms, 59.0 % (95 % CI: 34.7; 74.3) against LRTD with ≥2 symptoms, and 48.8 % (95 % CI: 25.8; 64.7) against ARD. The primary objective was not met for LRTD with ≥3 symptoms since the lower bound of the 95 % CI was below 20 %, the prespecified success criterion. The vaccine-elicited immune response showed mean fold-increases of 1.7 for RSV A and B neutralizing antibodies and 2.9 and 4.3 for RSV-specific IgG and IgA, respectively. The vaccine displayed mild to moderate reactogenicity, and no safety concerns were identified. MVA-BN-RSV induced suboptimal protection against RSV-associated LRTD, likely due to suboptimal neutralizing antibody response. The vaccine had an acceptable safety profile and confirmed immunogenicity, overall showing promise for MVA-BN-vectored constructs targeting other diseases. Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05238025 (Registered February 14, 2022).

Safety and immunogenicity of 3 formulations of a Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine produced on the PER.C6® cell line: A phase 2, double-blind, randomized, controlled study in infants vaccinated at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age.

An inactivated poliovirus vaccine candidate using Sabin strains (sIPV) grown on the PER.C6® cell line was assessed in infants after demonstrated immunogenicity and safety in adults. The study recruited 300 infants who were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of 3 dose levels of sIPV or a conventional IPV based on Salk strains (cIPV). Poliovirus-neutralizing antibodies were measured before the first dose and 28 days after the third dose. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for 28 days after each vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Solicited AEs were mostly mild to moderate. None of the SAEs reported in the study were judged vaccine related, including one fatal SAE due to aspiration of vomitus that occurred 26 days after the third dose of low-dose sIPV. After 3 sIPV vaccinations and across all dose levels, seroconversion (SC) rates were at least 92% against Sabin poliovirus types and at least 80% against Salk types, with a dose-response in neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) observed across the 3 sIPV groups. Compared to cIPV, the 3 sIPV groups displayed similar or higher SC rates and GMTs against the 3 Sabin types but showed a lower response against Salk types 1 and 2; this was most visible for Salk type 1. While the PER.C6® cell line-based sIPV showed an acceptable safety profile and immunogenicity in infants, lower seroprotection against type 1 warrants optimization of dose level and additional clinical evaluation.

Antibody persistence and immune memory in healthy adults following vaccination with a two-dose inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: long-term follow-up at 15 years.

Long-term persistence of vaccine-induced immune response in adults was assessed annually for 15 years following primary immunization with a two-dose inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. In 1992, 119 and 194 subjects aged 17-40 years and naïve for hepatitis A virus (HAV) were enrolled in two studies to receive 1,440 ELISA units (El.U) of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix™, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Belgium) according to a standard 0, 6 or an extended 0, 12 months schedule, respectively. Serum samples were taken 1 month after the second vaccine dose and every consecutive year up to 15 years after primary vaccination for measurement of anti-HAV antibody concentrations (NCT00291876 and NCT00289757). At year 15, 100% (48/48) and 97.3% (108/111) of subjects vaccinated at 0, 6 or 0, 12 months remained seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies, with geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of 289.2 and 367.4 mIU/ml, respectively. An additional dose of HAV vaccine (1,440 El.U) was administered to the six subjects who had become seronegative for anti-HAV antibodies since year 11. All subjects mounted a humoral immune response to the additional HAV challenge dose, although post-challenge anti-HAV antibody levels remained low in one subject. These studies represent the longest annual follow-up of hepatitis A vaccine in healthy adults. The immune response induced by two doses of this inactivated HAV vaccine was shown to persist for at least 15 years. No difference in long-term antibody persistence was observed between the two primary vaccination schedules, reinforcing the potential for flexibility in the timing of the second primary vaccine dose.

Meeting report: CEPI consultation on accelerating access to novel vaccines against emerging infectious diseases for pregnant and lactating women, London, 12-13 February 2020.

Infectious diseases may cause serious morbidity and mortality in pregnant women, their foetuses, and infants; the risk associated with any newly emerging infectious disease (EID) is likely unknown at the time of its emergence. While the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic shows that the development of vaccines against new pathogens can be considerably accelerated, the immunization of pregnant women generally lags behind the general population. Guided by the priority pathogen list for WHO's R&D Blueprint for Action to Prevent Epidemics, this workshop sought to define the evidence needed for use of vaccines against EIDs in pregnant and lactating women, using Lassa fever as a model. Close to 60 maternal immunization (MI) and vaccine safety experts, regulators, vaccine developers, Lassa fever experts, and investigators from Lassa-affected countries examined the critical steps for vaccine development and immunization decisions for pregnant and lactating women. This paper reports on key themes and recommendations from the workshop. Current practice still assumes the exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials. A shift in paradigm is needed to progress towards initial inclusion of pregnant women in Phase 2 and 3 trials. Several practical avenues were delineated. Participants agreed that vaccine platforms should be assessed early for their suitability for maternal immunization. It was noted that, in some cases, nonclinical data derived from assessing a given platform using other antigens may be adequate evidence to proceed to a first clinical evaluation and that concurrence from regulators may be sought with supporting rationale. For clinical trials, essential prerequisites such as documenting the disease burden in pregnant women, study site infrastructure, capabilities, and staff experience were noted. Early and sustained communication with the local community was considered paramount in any program for the conduct of MI trials and planned vaccine introduction.

Safety and immunogenicity of a new Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine candidate produced on the PER.C6® cell-line: a phase 1 randomized controlled trial in adults.

This first-in-human study (NCT03032588), conducted in Belgium, evaluated a new inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) candidate based on Sabin poliovirus strains grown on the high-yield PER.C6® cell line. Healthy adults (N = 32) were randomized (1:1) to receive a single dose of PER.C6-based Sabin-IPV (sIPV, 15:35:112.5 DU/dose) or conventional Salk-IPV (cIPV, 40:8:32 DU/dose). Reactogenicity was assessed up to 7 days after vaccination, immunogenicity 28 days after vaccination, and safety up to 6 months after vaccination.Solicited adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate, no changes of concern in vital signs or safety laboratory values were observed, and no severe AEs (SAEs) or vaccine-related unsolicited AEs were reported after vaccination. A trend to more frequent solicited AEs after sIPV than after cIPV administration was observed. Most participants had preexisting neutralizing antibodies against poliovirus types (titer ≥8), which were strongly boosted by sIPV. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers were high (≥12,000) and similar across the two vaccination groups. Only participants with very high preexisting antibody levels did not show a vaccine-induced response, defined in seropositive participants as a 4-fold titer increase. The 10 initially seronegative (titer <8) participants (n = 5 in each study group) seroconverted and all participants had seroprotective antibody levels post-vaccination. The antibodies elicited by sIPV neutralized both Sabin and Salk poliovirus strains.In conclusion, the PER.C6®-based sIPV was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in adults with preexisting antibodies to poliovirus.

Decennial administration of a reduced antigen content diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine in young adults.

BACKGROUND: Booster vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria at 10-year intervals is commonly recommended. Reduced antigen content diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccines developed for booster vaccination of preschool children, adolescents, and adults are licensed for once-in-a-lifetime use in most countries. Objective. To evaluate decennial administration of a dTpa vaccine. Methods. Young adults vaccinated with dTpa or diphtheria and tetanus toxoids followed by acellular pertussis (DT+ap) 1 month later in a clinical trial 10 years previously received 1 dTpa dose. Blood samples were taken before and 1 month after vaccination. Antibody concentrations against vaccine antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Solicited and unsolicited symptoms and serious adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-two individuals were enrolled in the study. In the 75 individuals who had received the dTpa vaccine 10 years previously, prevaccination seroprotection or seropositivity rates were 98.8% (diphtheria), 97.5% (tetanus), 64.6% (pertussis toxoid), 100% (filamentous hemagglutinin), and 96.3% (pertactin). One month after the second booster, all study participants were seroprotected or seropositive against all vaccine antigens. Antibody concentrations increased by a similar magnitude as 10 years previously. During the 4-day follow-up, 9.9% of participants recorded grade 3 pain; 17.3% and 18.5% recorded redness and swelling of 50 mm or larger, respectively; and 8.6% recorded fever (temperature, 37.5 degrees C). No serious adverse events were considered causally related to the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: A second dTpa booster was highly immunogenic and well tolerated in this population of young adults. This study supports the use of this vaccine as a decennial booster. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00610168 .

Booster vaccination after neonatal priming with acellular pertussis vaccine.

After a birth dose of acellular pertussis (aP) and diphtheria (DT)aP-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-inactivated polio vaccine (IPV)/Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) at 2, 4, and 6 months, a booster dose of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib at 12 to 23 months induced strong anti-pertussis booster responses. Thus, neonatal aP priming did not lead to immune tolerance to pertussis antigens. However, it elicited bystander interference on HBV, Hib, and diphtheria responses.

Primary and booster vaccination in Latin American children with a DTPw-HBV/Hib combination: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis (DTPw)-based combination vaccines are an attractive option to rapidly achieve high coverage and protection against other important pathogens, such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib). To ensure adequate antigen supply, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals has introduced a new DTPw antigen source and developed a new DTPw-HBV/Hib combination vaccine containing a reduced amount of Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP). This study was undertaken to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of this new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine with a licensed DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine (Tritanrix™-HBV/Hib). METHODS: This was a randomized, partially-blind, multicenter study in three countries in Latin America (Argentina, Chile and Nicaragua). Healthy children received either the new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine (1 of 3 lots; n = 439; double-blind) or Tritanrix™-HBV/Hib (n = 146; single-blind) co-administered with oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) at 2, 4 and 6 months, with a booster dose at 18-24 months. RESULTS: One month after the end of the 3-dose primary vaccination course, the new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine was non-inferior to Tritanrix™-HBV/Hib in terms of seroprotection/vaccine response rates for all component antigens; ≥97.3% and ≥93.9% of subjects in the two groups, respectively, had seroprotective levels of antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B and Hib and a vaccine response to the pertussis component. Persistence of antibodies against all vaccine antigens was comparable between groups, with marked increases in all antibody concentrations after booster administration in both groups. Both vaccines were generally well-tolerated as primary and booster doses. CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm the suitability of this new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine comprising antigens from a new source and a reduced PRP content for inclusion into routine childhood vaccination programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00332566.

The immunogenicity and safety of a reduced PRP-content DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine when administered according to the accelerated EPI schedule.

BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines improve coverage, compliance and effectively introduce new antigens to mass vaccination programmes. This was a phase III, observer-blind, randomized study of GSK Biologicals diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine combined with hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines, containing a reduced amount of polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate (PRP) and a DTPw component manufactured at a different site (DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft]). The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate that DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft] was not inferior to the licensed DTPw-HBV/Hib (Tritanrix(tm)-HepB/Hiberix(tm)) vaccine or the DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 vaccine, also containing a reduced amount of PRP, with respect to the immune response to the PRP antigen, when administered to healthy infants, according to the Expanded Programme for Immunization (EPI) schedule at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age. METHODS: 299 healthy infants were randomised to receive either DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft] DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 or DTPw-HBV/Hib according to the 6-10-14 week EPI schedule. Blood samples were analysed prior to the first dose of study vaccine and one month after the third vaccine dose for the analysis of immune responses. Solicited local and general symptoms such as pain, redness and swelling at the injection site and drowsiness and fever, unsolicited symptoms (defined as any additional adverse event) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded up to 20 weeks of age. RESULTS: One month after the third vaccine dose, 100% of subjects receiving DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft] or DTPw-HBV/Hib and 98.8% of subjects receiving DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 vaccine had seroprotective levels of anti-PRP antibodies (defined as anti-PRP antibody concentration ≥0.15 µg/ml). Seroprotective antibody concentrations were attained in over 98.9% of subjects for diphtheria, tetanus and hepatitis B. The vaccine response rate to pertussis antigen was at least 97.8% in each group. Overall, the DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft] vaccine was well tolerated in healthy infants; no SAEs were reported in any group. CONCLUSIONS: The DTPw-HBV/Hib2.5 [Kft] vaccine was immunogenic and well-tolerated when administered according to the EPI schedule to Indian infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00473668.

Lasting immune memory against hepatitis B in children after primary immunization with 4 doses of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib in the first and 2nd year of life.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed long term persisting immunity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in children vaccinated during infancy with combined vaccines containing recombinant HBV surface antigen (HBs). We assessed antibody persistence and immune memory in children 4-5 years of age, previously vaccinated with four doses of combined hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (Infanrix hexa). METHODS: Immune memory was assessed in 301 children through administration of a challenge dose of monovalent HBV vaccine. RESULTS: At 4-5 years of age, 85.3% of subjects had persisting anti-HBs antibody concentrations >or= 10 mIU/mL, rising to 98.6% after the HBV challenge dose. All but 12 subjects (95.8%) achieved post-challenge anti-HBs concentrations >or= 100 mIU/mL. The post-challenge anti-HBs GMC rose by 100-fold compared to pre-challenge concentrations. An anamnestic response to the HBV vaccine challenge was observed in 96.8% of subjects, including 17/21 (81.0%) of children with initially undetectable antibodies (<3.3 mIU/mL). All but 4 of 42 subjects (90.5%) with anti-HBs antibodies <10 mIU/mL prior to the challenge dose, achieved seroprotective levels afterwards. A 4-fold rise in antibody concentration after the challenge dose was observed in 259/264 (98.1%) of initially seropositive subjects. The magnitude of the post-challenge responses was proportional to pre-challenge anti-HBs levels. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. CONCLUSION: The combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine induced lasting immune memory against hepatitis B. Long term protection afforded by DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib is likely to be similar to that observed following priming with monovalent HBV vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov 106789 NCT00411697.

Five years follow-up following two or three doses of a hepatitis B vaccine in adolescents aged 11-15 years: a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The standard three-dose schedule of hepatitis B vaccines is frequently not completed, especially in adolescents. A primary study has confirmed the equivalence of a two-dose schedule of an Adult formulation of hepatitis B vaccine [Group HBV_2D] to a three-dose schedule of a Paediatric formulation in adolescents (11-15 years) [Group HBV_3D]. This follow-up study evaluated the five year persistence of antibody response and immune memory against the hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) antigens five years after completion of primary vaccination. METHODS: A total of 234 subjects returned at the Year 5 time point, of which 144 subjects received a challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Blood samples were collected yearly and pre- and post-challenge dose to assess anti-HBs antibody concentrations. RESULTS: At the end of five years, 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.7 - 86.1) and 91.4% (95% CI: 82.3 - 96.8) of subjects who received the two-dose and three-dose schedules, respectively had anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥ 10 mIU/mL. Post-challenge dose, all subjects had anti-HBs antibody concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL and >94% subjects had anti-HBs antibody concentration ≥ 100 mIU/mL. All subjects mounted a rapid anamnestic response to the challenge dose. Overall, the challenge dose was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The two-dose schedule of hepatitis B vaccine confers long-term immunogenicity and shows evidence of immune memory for at least five years following vaccination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00343915, NCT00524576.

Immunological persistence in 4-6 and 7-9 year olds previously vaccinated in infancy with hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib.

BACKGROUND: The combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenzae conjugate vaccine (DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib, Infanrix Hexa() GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) is the only hexavalent vaccine currently licensed for primary and booster vaccination of infants and provides simultaneous protection against six major diseases of childhood. The persistence of the immune response in children aged 4-6 and 7-9 years of age previously vaccinated with four doses of DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was assessed (www.clinicaltrials.gov.au 106744 NCT00356564 and 106745 NCT00335881). METHODS: A blood sample was collected from 403 children, all of whom had received 3-dose primary vaccination and a booster dose in the second year of life with DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib, in previous clinical vaccine trials in Germany. RESULTS: Mean time from the fourth DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib dose until serological follow-up ranged between 3.6 and 6.4 years. After the 4th DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib dose, in subjects who had not received additional booster doses, seroprotective antibody levels persisted up to 9 years of age in >/=90% of subjects for diphtheria, Hib and poliomyelitis, in 77.2% subjects for Hepatitis B and in 64.7% of subjects for tetanus. Anti-pertussis toxin antibodies remained detectable in no more than 38.2% of subjects. CONCLUSION: With the exception of PT , the combined DTP a-HBV-IPV/Hib induces long lasting immune response against all vaccine antigens. Falling seropositivity against PT over time supports the recommended administration of a pertussis booster dose in 5-6 year old children in Germany.

Immune memory to hepatitis B virus in 4-9-year old children vaccinated in infancy with four doses of hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine.

The combined hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine produces similar hepatitis B responses as the HBV monovalent vaccine. Booster vaccination of immunocompetent individuals primed against hepatitis B in infancy is currently not recommended. We investigated persisting immunity to hepatitis B in 4-6 (Study A; 106745) and 7-9 (Study B; 106744) year-old children primed in infancy and boosted in the second year of life with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib. Immunity was assessed by measuring persisting anti-HBs antibodies and evaluating the response to a challenge dose of HBV vaccine. At 4-6 years of age 86.0% of 186 subjects had persisting anti-HBs > or =10 mIU/ml increasing to 98.4% after the challenge. At 7-9 years of age, 78.0% of 186 subjects continued to have anti-HBs antibody concentrations > or =10 mIU/ml, increasing to 98.9% after the challenge. In both studies anti-HBs antibody GMC rose >80-fold. An anamnestic response to the HBV challenge was observed in 95.7% and 98.9% of subjects in Studies A and B, respectively. In both studies, 87% of 38 subjects with initially undetectable circulating anti-HBs antibodies (>3.3 IU/ml) achieved the 10 mIU/ml threshold after challenge; > or =97.0% of subjects with detectable antibodies before the challenge at least quadrupled their concentration. Post-vaccination anti-HBs concentrations were directly related to persisting antibody concentrations and the concentrations achieved after the booster dose in the second year of life. The HBV vaccine challenge dose was well tolerated. These studies show that primary and booster vaccination with combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix hexa) induces sustained immune memory against hepatitis B up to age 9 years.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio virus-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines administered at 3, 5 and 11-12 months of age.

The use of combination vaccines in the routine childhood program reduces distress to the recipients and is likely to improve uptake rates and timeliness of vaccination but requires careful evaluation and surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two commercial diphtheria-tetanus- acellular pertussis-hepatitis b-inactivated polio virus-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib) combination vaccines when administered to infants at 3, 5 and 11-12 months of age. A total of 494 infants were randomized to receive three doses of either Infanrix hexa (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; N = 246) or Hexavac (Sanofi Pasteur MSD; N = 248) in 10 centers in Italy, Finland and Sweden. After the third dose, antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus, polio and Hib were at the protective level in nearly all infants in both groups whereas the proportion of subjects who had achieved the protective concentration of >or=10 mIU/ml to hepatitis B surface antigen was 99.1% (95% CI 96.7-99.9) in the Infanrix hexa group as compared to 94.4% (95% CI 90.4.97.1) in the Hexavac group. Antibody titers to all three polio antigens were highest in Italy and lowest in Finland. Clinically relevant general reactions (such as fever of >39.5 degrees C) were mostly reported in less than 5% of the vaccinees. Three doses of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib combination vaccines produced sufficient immune responses in nearly all vaccinees.

Neonatal vaccination with an acellular pertussis vaccine accelerates the acquisition of pertussis antibodies in infants.

OBJECTIVES: Because young infants are at highest risk of pertussis complications, this study assessed whether neonatal acellular pertussis (aP) vaccination could provide earlier immunity. STUDY DESIGN: Neonates (n = 121) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either aP or hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) (controls) vaccine at birth, followed by vaccination with DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib at 2, 4 and 6 months. Immune responses were measured. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after each dose. RESULTS: The aP birth dose was followed by few adverse events. Reactogenicity of subsequent vaccine doses did not differ between groups. Seven serious adverse events were reported from each group; none were related to the study vaccines. At 3 months of age, vaccination with aP at birth had induced significantly higher antibody responses to the 3 pertussis antigens compared with controls. At 7 months, geometric mean/concentrations of antibodies against pertussis antigens were similar in both groups, and all subjects had reached "seroprotective" antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3. Geometric mean/concentrations of antibodies to haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and HBV were significantly lower in the aP group. CONCLUSIONS: Early neonatal immunization with aP was safe, well tolerated, and resulted in earlier antibody responses, seen after the first dose of a DTaP combination vaccine. Birth dose of aP did not induce immunologic tolerance to pertussis antigens but appear to dampen responses to Hib and HBV vaccines.

Immunologic response to Hib tetanus toxoid conjugated vaccine coadministered with DTPa either mixed or in two separate injections in toddlers not primed with Hib vaccine.

This open randomized study compared the immunogenicity and safety of a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTPa) and H. influenzae polyribosylribitol phosphate conjugated to the tetanus toxoid (Hib-PRP-T) vaccine (mixed prior to administration) with separate injections of DTPa and Hib vaccines in toddlers aged two years. A total of 119 children (60 mixed; 59 separate administration), primed with DTPw, but not with Hib vaccine were enrolled. Prior to immunization only 10.3% of toddlers had anti-PRP antibody titres > or =1.0 microg/ml, compared with all children on Days 7 and 30. The anti-PRP and anti-tetanus antibody geometric mean concentrations were lower after the combined DTPa/Hib vaccine compared to separately administered vaccines (47.16 microg/ml vs 78.36 microg/ml and 24.95 IU/ml vs 40.63 IU/ml, respectively). One month after vaccination all children had anti-tetanus and anti-diphtheria antibody titres above the protective level of > or =0.1 IU/ml. The rates of recorded adverse events were similar and mostly mild or moderate in intensity whether the vaccines were combined as a single injection or given separately. We conclude that in 2-year old children, previously not immunized against Hib, a single dose of DTPa and Hib was safe and highly immunogenic irrespective of whether it was given as a combined vaccine or separate injections. Although the increase in anti-T and early (7-10 days after) anti-PRP concentrations was greater when the vaccine components were given separately than after combined administration, the DTPa/Hib combined vaccine would provide an effective method of delivering primary Hib vaccination in unprimed toddlers.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary immunization with a novel combined Haemophilus influenzae Type b and Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup C-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine coadministered with a Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular Pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary vaccination with a novel Hib-MenC conjugate vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] Biologicals) coadministered with DTPa-HBV-IPV (GSK Biologicals) at 2, 4 and 6 months. METHODS: Healthy infants were randomized to receive Hib-MenC coadministered with DTPa-HBV-IPV (N = 117) or MenC-CRM (Wyeth) coadministered with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (GSK Biologicals; N = 120) at 2, 4 and 6 months. Antibody concentrations were measured before vaccination and after doses 2 and 3. Solicited local and general symptoms, unsolicited symptoms and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: All subjects in the Hib-MenC group had seroprotective titers of anti-PRP antibodies (>or=0.15 microg/mL) and SBA-MenC titers (>or=1:8) 1 month after the third dose. These responses were noninferior to those seen in the control group, in which a 99.1% seroprotection rate was observed for both Hib and MenC. At that time, anti-PRP and SBA-MenC GMTs were significantly higher in the Hib-MenC group (12.8 microg/mL and 2467.1 microg/mL, respectively) than in the control group (3.8 microg/mL and 1833.7 microg/mL). High seroprotection rates were already observed after the second dose of Hib-MenC; 96.4% and 100% of subjects were seroprotected to Hib and MenC, respectively. Immune responses to coadministered antigens were unimpaired; seroprotection/vaccine response rates >or=96.5% were recorded postdose 3 in the Hib-MenC group. No differences in reactogenicity were seen between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of a Hib-MenC conjugate vaccine with DTPa-HBV-IPV is well tolerated and immunogenic, and does not impair the immune response to any of the coadministered antigens.

Primary vaccination of infants against hepatitis B can be completed using a combined hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine.

INTRODUCTION: Children in Singapore receive vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) at 0, 1 and 5 or 6 months of age, and vaccination against pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, and polio at 3, 4 and 5 months of age. Parents often choose to vaccinate with the combined acellular-pertussis-inactivated polio-Hib vaccine (DTPa-IPV/Hib). We investigated whether a combined hexavalent vaccine, DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, could replace the separate administration of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV for the final vaccination at 5 months of age (Trial DTPa-HBV-IPV-075). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an open study, 150 children were randomised to complete their vaccination schedule with DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV or DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib. RESULTS: One month after the final vaccination, there was no difference between groups in seroprotection rates or antibody concentrations against HBV. Seroprotection rates against diphtheria, tetanus, Hib and polio, as well as vaccine response rates to pertussis antigens were also similar between groups. Local and general symptoms occurred at a similar rate after the third dose of either vaccine. CONCLUSION: The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the hexavalent vaccine DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix hexa, GSK) group is comparable to that of separately administered DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines. Combined hexavalent vaccine, DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, could replace the separate administration of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV for vaccination at 5 months of age, thereby reducing the number of injections required.

Antibody persistence after primary vaccination with a hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/HiB vaccine coadministered with a meningococcal C-CRM197 vaccine and response to a DTPa-IPV/HiB booster at 18 months of age.

Children 17-20 months of age (N = 344) received a diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis (DTPa)-inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)/Haemophilus influenzae (Hib) booster after a 3-dose primary vaccination course with DTPa-hepatitis B vaccine-IPV/Hib plus conjugate meningococcal C vaccine-CRM. Seroprotection rates were >80% (diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, polio and polyribosylribitol phosphate) before and > or =96.6% (diphtheria, tetanus, polio and polyribosylribitol phosphate) after booster vaccination. The booster was well-tolerated (fever >39.5 degrees C after <2% of doses; large swelling reactions after 6.3% of doses).

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary immunization with a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio-Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine coadministered with two doses of a meningococcal C-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the concurrent use of meningococcal C tetanus conjugate (MenC-TT) vaccine (NeisVac-C) with DTaP-based combinations, according to 2 vaccination schedules, one of which included hepatitis B vaccination at birth (Trial DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib-097). METHODS: Healthy infants were randomized to receive either DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (Infanrix hexa) at 2, 4, and 6 months (N = 115) or HBV at birth followed by DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib at 2 and 6 months and DTaP-IPV/Hib (Infanrix-IPV Hib) at 4 months (N = 115). In both groups 2 doses of MenC-TT conjugate were coadministered at 2 and 4 months, and compared with 3 doses of MenC-CRM197 conjugate (Meningitec) coadministered at 2, 4, and 6 months with DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (N = 120). Antibody concentrations were measured at 2, 6 and 7 months. Solicited local and general symptoms, unsolicited symptoms, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: All MenC-TT recipients had seroprotective concentrations of anti-PRP antibodies (> or = 0.15 microg/mL) 1 month after the third vaccine dose and all had SBA-MenC titers > or = 1:8 after the second dose of MenC-TT. These responses were noninferior to those seen after 3 doses of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib and MenC-CRM. Anti-PRP antibody GMCs were significantly higher in MenC-TT than MenC-CRM vaccinees (7.9, 7.3, 3.8 microg/mL, respectively). Immune responses to all other coadministered antigens were unimpaired, with seroprotection/seropositivity rates > or = 98.1% in MenC-TT vaccinees. All schedules studied were well tolerated, with no differences in reactogenicity between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib or DTaP-IPV/Hib with 2 doses of MenC-TT conjugate vaccine is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic, with no impairment of the response to the coadministered antigens.