RESUMO
Background Several single-center studies found that high contralateral parenchymal enhancement (CPE) at breast MRI was associated with improved long-term survival in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Due to varying sample sizes, population characteristics, and follow-up times, consensus of the association is currently lacking. Purpose To confirm whether CPE is associated with long-term survival in a large multicenter retrospective cohort, and to investigate if CPE is associated with endocrine therapy effectiveness. Materials and Methods This multicenter observational cohort included women with unilateral ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer (tumor size ≤50 mm and ≤three positive lymph nodes) who underwent MRI from January 2005 to December 2010. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and distant RFS (DRFS) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to investigate differences in absolute risk after 10 years, stratified according to CPE tertile. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to investigate whether CPE was associated with prognosis and endocrine therapy effectiveness. Results Overall, 1432 women (median age, 54 years [IQR, 47-63 years]) were included from 10 centers. Differences in absolute OS after 10 years were stratified according to CPE tertile as follows: 88.5% (95% CI: 88.1, 89.1) in tertile 1, 85.8% (95% CI: 85.2, 86.3) in tertile 2, and 85.9% (95% CI: 85.4, 86.4) in tertile 3. CPE was independently associated with OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.36; P = .047), but was not associated with RFS (HR, 1.11; P = .16) or DRFS (HR, 1.11; P = .19). The effect of endocrine therapy on survival could not be accurately assessed; therefore, the association between endocrine therapy efficacy and CPE could not reliably be estimated. Conclusion High contralateral parenchymal enhancement was associated with a marginally decreased overall survival in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, but was not associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) or distant RFS. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Honda and Iima in this issue.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: In patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), the detection of distant disease determines whether the intention of the treatment is curative or palliative. Therefore, adequate preoperative staging is imperative for optimal treatment planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of conventional imaging techniques, including chest X-ray and/or CT thorax-(abdomen), liver ultrasonography(US), and skeletal scintigraphy, on the distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) in patients with IBTR, and to compare conventional imaging with 18F-FDG PET-CT or no imaging at all. METHODS: This study was exclusively based on the information available at time of diagnoses of IBTR. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the three imaging groups, a propensity score (PS) weighted method was used. RESULTS: Of the 495 patients included in the study, 229 (46.3%) were staged with conventional imaging, 89 patients (19.8%) were staged with 18F-FDG PET-CT, and in 168 of the patients (33.9%) no imaging was used (N = 168). After a follow-up of approximately 5 years, 14.5% of all patients developed a distant recurrence as first event after IBTR. After adjusting for the PS weights, the Cox regression analyses showed that the different staging methods had no significant impact on the DRFI. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a wide variation in the use of imaging modalities for staging IBTR patients in the Netherlands. After using PS weighting, no statistically significant impact of the different imaging modalities on DRFI was shown. Based on these results, it is not possible to recommend staging for distant metastases using 18F-FDG PET-CT over conventional imaging techniques.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Imagem Multimodal , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Metástase Linfática , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos , Cuidados Paliativos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , CintilografiaRESUMO
We determined the characteristics and prognosis of interval breast cancers (IC) at screen-film (SFM) and full-field digital (FFDM) screening mammography. The study population consisted of 417,746 consecutive screening mammograms (302,699 SFM screens and 115,047 FFDM screens), obtained between 2000 and 2011. During 2-year follow-up, we collected breast imaging reports, surgical reports, and pathology results. A total of 800 ICs had been diagnosed in the screened population, of which 288 detected in the first year (early ICs) and 512 in the second year (late ICs) after a negative screen. 31.3 % of early IC's and 19.1 % of late IC's, respectively, were visible in retrospect on the latest previous screens, but had been missed during screening (P < 0.001). Missed invasive ICs were larger (28.5 mm vs. 23.9 mm, P = 0.003) and showed a higher fraction of T3+cancers (16.9 vs. 8.5 %, P = 0.02) than true ICs (i.e., not visible at the latest screen). A higher portion of missed than true ICs underwent mastectomy (44.7 vs. 30.8 %, P = 0.002). We found no differences in mammographic and tumor characteristics for early ICs, detected either after SFM or FFDM. Late ICs following FFDM were more often true ICs than missed ICs (69.0 vs. 57.6 %, P = 0.03) and more often receptor triple negative (P = 0.02), compared to late ICs at SFM. Interval cancer subgroups showed comparable overall survival. Interval cancer subgroups show distinctive mammographic and tumor characteristics but a comparable overall survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Mamografia/métodos , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to determine trends in the incidence of advanced breast cancer at screening mammography and the potential of screening to reduce it. METHODS: We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening mammograms of 85,274 women aged 50-75 years, who underwent biennial screening at a Dutch breast screening region in the period 1997-2008. Two screening radiologists reviewed the screening mammograms of all advanced screen detected and advanced interval cancers and determined whether the advanced cancer (tumor > 20 mm and/or lymph node positive tumor) had been visible at a previous screen. Interval cancers were breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening examination (defined as no recommendation for referral) and before any subsequent screen. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between women with advanced cancer and women with non-advanced cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ. RESULTS: A total of 1,771 screen detected cancers and 669 interval cancers were diagnosed in 2,440 women. Rates of advanced cancer remained stable over the 12-year period; the incidence of advanced screen-detected cancers fluctuated between 1.5 - 1.9 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.6 per 1,000) and of advanced interval cancers between 0.8 - 1.6 per 1,000 screened women (mean 1.2 per 1,000). Of the 570 advanced screen-detected cancers, 106 (18.6%) were detected at initial screening; 265 (46.5%) cancers detected at subsequent screening had been radiologically occult at the previous screening mammogram, 88 (15.4%) had shown a minimal sign, and 111 (19.5%) had been missed. Corresponding figures for advanced interval cancers were 50.9% (216/424), 24.3% (103/424) and 25.1% (105/424), respectively. At multivariate analysis, women with a ≥ 30 months interval between the latest two screens had an increased risk of screen-detected advanced breast cancer (OR 1.63, 95%CI: 1.07-2.48) and hormone replacement therapy increased the risk of advanced disease among interval cancers (OR 3.04, 95%CI: 1.22-7.53). CONCLUSION: We observed no decline in the risk of advanced breast cancer during 12 years of biennial screening mammography. The majority of these cancers could not have been prevented through earlier detection at screening.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Lobular/epidemiologia , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Few data are available on the effect of previous benign breast surgery on screening mammography accuracy. We determined whether sensitivity of screening mammography and tumor characteristics are different for women with and without previous benign breast surgery. We included a consecutive series of 317,398 screening mammograms of women screened between 1997 and 2008. During 2-year follow-up, clinical data, breast imaging, biopsy and surgery reports were collected from women with screen-detected or interval breast cancers. Screening sensitivity, tumor biology and tumor stages were compared between 168 women with breast cancer and prior ipsilateral benign breast surgery and 2,039 women with breast cancer but without previous ipsilateral, benign breast surgery. The sensitivity of screening mammography was significantly lower for women with prior surgery [64.3% (108/168) versus 73.4% (1,496/2,039), p = 0.01]. The concomitant increased interval cancer risk remained significant after logistic regression adjustment for age and breast density (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Comparing screen-detected cancers in women with and without prior breast surgery, no significant differences in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.56), mitotic activity (p = 0.17), proportions of large (T2+) tumors (p = 0.6) or lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.4) were found. Also for interval cancers, no differences were found in estrogen receptor status (p = 0.41), mitotic activity (p = 0.39), proportions of large tumors (p = 0.9) and lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.5) between women with and without prior breast surgery. We conclude that sensitivity of screening mammography is significantly lower in women with previous benign breast surgery than without, but tumor characteristics are comparable both for screen detected cancers and interval cancers.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Mastectomia , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Lobular/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Although malpractice lawsuits are frequently related to a delayed breast cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients, information on claims at European screening mammography programs is lacking. We determined the type and frequency of malpractice claims at a Dutch breast cancer screening region. We included all 85,274 women (351,009 screens) who underwent biennial screening mammography at a southern breast screening region in The Netherlands between 1997 and 2009. Two screening radiologists reviewed the screening mammograms of all screen detected cancers and interval cancers and determined whether the cancer had been missed at the previous screen or at the latest screen, respectively. We analyzed all correspondence between the screening organization, clinicians and screened women, and collected complaints and claims until September 2011. At review, 20.9% (308/1,475) of screen detected cancers and 24.3% (163/670) of interval cancers were considered to be missed at a previous screen. A total of 19 women (of which 2, 6 and 11 women had been screened between 1997 and 2001 (102,439 screens), 2001 and 2005 (114,740 screens) and 2005 and 2009 (133,830 screens), respectively) had contacted the screening organization for additional information about their screen detected cancer or interval cancer, but filed no claim. Three other women directly initiated an insurance claim for financial compensation of their interval cancer without previously having contacted the screening organization. We conclude that screening-related claims were rarely encountered, although many screen detected cancers and interval cancers had been missed at a previous screen. A small but increasing proportion of women sought additional information about their breast cancer from the screening organization.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Imperícia , Mamografia , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography. METHODS: We included 424,703 consecutive screening mammograms and collected imaging, biopsy and surgery reports of women with screen-detected breast cancer. Review of screening mammograms was performed to determine whether or not an initial and second referral comprised the same lesion. RESULTS: The overall positive predictive value of referral for cancer was 38.6% (95% CI 37.3-39.8%). Of 147 (2.6%) women referred twice, 86 had been referred for a different lesion at second referral and 32 of these proved malignant (37.2%, 95% CI 27.0-47.4%). Sixty-one women had been referred twice for the same lesion, of which 22 proved malignant (36.1%, 95% CI 24.1-48.0%). Characteristics of these women were comparable to women with cancer diagnosed after first referral. Compared with women without cancer at second referral for the same lesion, women with cancer more frequently showed suspicious densities at screening mammography (86.4% vs 53.8%, P = 0.02) and work-up at first referral had less frequently included biopsy (22.7% vs 61.5%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer risk in women referred twice for the same lesion is similar to that observed in women referred once, or referred for a second time but for a different lesion. KEY POINTS: Cancer risk was 36% for lesions referred twice at screening mammography. The cancer risk was similar for lesions referred only once at screening. Densities at first referral were associated with increased cancer risk at second referral. No biopsy at first referral was associated with increased cancer risk at second referral. Patient and tumour characteristics were similar for women with and without diagnostic delay.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Idoso , Biópsia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are treated conservatively or in selected cases with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV). The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine predictive factors for a high visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score after conservative, sham or PV and is based on previously published randomized trials. METHODS: The VERTOS II compared conservative versus PV, and VERTOS IV compared sham versus PV treatment. The conservative group received pain medication. The sham and PV group received subcutaneous lidocaine/bupivacaine. In addition, the PV group received cementation, which was simulated in the sham group. Nineteen different predictors of high (≥ 5) versus low (< 5) VAS pain score at 12 months were investigated. RESULTS: 20.7% of patients in the PV group demonstrated a VAS ≥ 5 at the 12-month, compared to 40.1% in the conservative or sham group, with a significant difference (χ2(1) = 15.26, p < 0.0001, OR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.59 to 4.15). In the subgroup analysis, we detected five predictors for the risk of high pain scores (VAS ≥ 5 after 12 months follow-up), namely: female, baseline VAS > 8, long-term baseline pain, mild/severe Genant and new fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant more patients had a high pain score at 12 months in the sham and conservative group when compared with the PV group. Five predictors were identified for sustained high local back pain, regardless of the received treatment. Patients with moderate fracture deformity were less likely to have high pain scores at 12 months if they received PV than if they had sham or conservative therapy.
Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Fraturas por Compressão/terapia , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is increasingly used for treatment of pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of the procedure remain uncertain. We aimed to clarify whether vertebroplasty has additional value compared with optimum pain treatment in patients with acute vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients were recruited to this open-label prospective randomised trial from the radiology departments of six hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were aged 50 years or older, had vertebral compression fractures on spine radiograph (minimum 15% height loss; level of fracture at Th5 or lower; bone oedema on MRI), with back pain for 6 weeks or less, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous vertebroplasty or conservative treatment by computer-generated randomisation codes with a block size of six. Masking was not possible for participants, physicians, and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was pain relief at 1 month and 1 year as measured by VAS score. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00232466. FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2005, and June 30, 2008, we identified 431 patients who were eligible for randomisation. 229 (53%) patients had spontaneous pain relief during assessment, and 202 patients with persistent pain were randomly allocated to treatment (101 vertebroplasty, 101 conservative treatment). Vertebroplasty resulted in greater pain relief than did conservative treatment; difference in mean VAS score between baseline and 1 month was -5·2 (95% CI -5·88 to -4·72) after vertebroplasty and -2·7 (-3·22 to -1·98) after conservative treatment, and between baseline and 1 year was -5·7 (-6·22 to -4·98) after vertebroplasty and -3·7 (-4·35 to -3·05) after conservative treatment. The difference between groups in reduction of mean VAS score from baseline was 2·6 (95% CI 1·74-3·37, p<0·0001) at 1 month and 2·0 (1·13-2·80, p<0·0001) at 1 year. No serious complications or adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: In a subgroup of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and persistent pain, percutaneous vertebroplasty is effective and safe. Pain relief after vertebroplasty is immediate, is sustained for at least a year, and is significantly greater than that achieved with conservative treatment, at an acceptable cost. FUNDING: ZonMw; COOK Medical.
Assuntos
Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas por Compressão/terapia , Osteoporose/complicações , Manejo da Dor , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Vertebroplastia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Cimentos Ósseos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/economia , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/economiaRESUMO
Few data are available on bilateral breast cancer in the screening population. The aim of this study was to determine patient and tumor characteristics of women with bilateral breast cancer at screening mammography. We included all 350,637 screening mammography examinations of women participating in a biennial screening program in a southern screening region of the Netherlands between May 1998 and January 2010. For referred women, all breast imaging reports, biopsy results, and surgery reports during one year after referral were collected. We compared patient and tumor characteristics of referred women with a diagnosis of bilateral breast cancer or unilateral breast cancer at workup. Bilateral or unilateral breast cancer had been diagnosed in respectively 40 (2.2%) and 1766 (97.8%) of 1806 referred women. Women with bilateral or unilateral breast cancer did not differ significantly in mean age, mammographic breast density, family history of breast cancer, or use of hormone replacement therapy. Compared with index cancers, contralateral cancers comprised significantly more lobular cancers (P = 0.02). Tumor size, mitotic activity, and estrogen receptor status were comparable for both groups, but contralateral cancers had a significantly lower risk of lymph node metastases (P = 0.03). Compared to unilateral breast cancer, contralateral malignancies in women with bilateral breast cancer comprised significantly more lobular cancers (P = 0.004) and lymph node negative cancers (P = 0.01). Contralateral breast cancers detected at screening comprise more lobular cancers and show less nodal involvement than index cancers or unilateral cancers. No differences are observed with respect to other patient and tumor characteristics.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography and to assess the sensitivity of screening in the detection of bilateral breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All women gave written informed consent, and the requirement to obtain review board approval was waived. The authors included all 302,196 screening mammograms obtained in 80,466 women aged 50-75 years in a southern breast screening region of the Netherlands between May 1998 and July 2008. During 2-year follow-up, the authors collected clinical data, breast imaging reports, biopsy results, and breast surgery reports from all patients with screening-detected and interval cancers. Two screening radiologists reviewed the screening and clinical mammograms of all bilateral screening-detected and interval cancers for mammographic abnormalities. The radiologists were initially blinded to each other's referral opinion, and discrepant assessments were followed by consensus reading. RESULTS: Of all women with screening-detected cancer (n = 1555) or interval cancer (n = 585), 52 (2.4%) had bilateral breast cancer. The sensitivity of screening mammography in the detection of bilateral breast cancer was 19% (10 of 52 women; 95% confidence interval: 8.5%, 29.9%). At blinded review, 18 of the 53 tumors not detected at screening (34%) were considered to be missed, 11 (21%) showed nonspecific minimal signs, and 24 (45%) had been mammographically occult at screening. Five women referred for further analysis experienced a 6-17-month delay in the diagnosis of the second breast cancer; in four of those women, the delay resulted from an incorrect Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification at clinical mammography. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of screening mammography in the detection of bilateral breast cancer is disappointingly low. Both screening radiologists and clinical radiologists should pay vigorous attention to the contralateral breast to detect bilateral malignancies without diagnostic delay.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance for margin assessment of specimen radiography (SR) in breast conserving surgery (BCS) using radioactive I125-seed localization (RSL). METHODS: The clinical, radiographic and histopathological data of women who underwent BCS after pre-operative RSL with intraoperative SR during nine consecutive years were analyzed. The histological margin and radiographic margin outcomes on SR were compared and results of intraoperative re-excisions were investigated. RESULTS: A consecutive series of 448 women with invasive carcinoma (n = 211), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 79) and a combination of DCIS and invasive carcinoma (n = 158) were included. The median minimal margins for the radiological masses and microcalcifications measured on SR were 14 mm and 11 mm, respectively. Based on a radiological cut-off SR margin value of 1 mm, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 21.0%, 95.0%, 26.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.73. Intraoperative re-excisions based on SR were performed in 31 (6.9%) patients; histopathological examination of the additional excised tissue revealed DCIS or invasive carcinoma in 6 (19.4%) patients. Hence, SR was beneficial for 6/448 patients (1.3%), and unnecessary intraoperative re-excisions were performed in 20/448 patients (4.5%). The number need to treat is 75; this implies that per 75-SR one resection with involved margins is prevented. CONCLUSION: SR has a moderate diagnostic performance for margin involvement using RSL. A more accurate intraoperative margin assessment tool is warranted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo , Mastectomia Segmentar , Radiografia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies addressing the occurrence of negative intraoperative findings (that is the absence of intussusception) after an unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction of an ileocolic intussusception. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of negative intraoperative findings after unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of all children aged 0-18â¯years treated for ileocolic intussusception from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 in 9 Dutch hospitals. Primary outcome measure was the percentage of children without an intussusception during surgical exploration after unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction. RESULTS: In the study period 436 patients were diagnosed with an ileocolic intussusception. Of these, 408 patients underwent hydrostatic reduction of an ileocolic intussusception. 112 patients (27.5%) underwent surgery after an unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction. In 13 (11.6%) patients no intraoperative evidence of intussusception was found. Patients who underwent surgical intervention after unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction were significantly younger than patients who had a successful hydrostatic reduction; there was no gender difference. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of children (11.6%) underwent a laparotomy after unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction in whom no intussusception was found intraoperatively. We suggest initiating laparoscopy instead of laparotomy when surgery is necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Intussuscepção/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/diagnóstico , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Intussuscepção/diagnóstico , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is an alternative option to treat pain after an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Controversy exists as to whether PV increases the risk of new OVCFs or prevents further vertebral height loss in treated levels. We assessed both during 1-year follow-up in patients with acute OVCF randomised to PV or a sham procedure. METHODS: VERTOS IV is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing PV with sham therapy in 180 patients. New OVCFs and further vertebral height loss were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range (IQR) = 12-12) 31 new fractures were reported in 15 patients from the PV group and 28 new fractures in 19 patients from the sham group. The occurrence of new vertebral fractures did not significantly differ between the groups (χ2(1) = 0.83, p = 0.36, OR = .71, 95%CI = 0.33-1.50). There was no higher fracture risk of adjacent versus distant vertebrae. After sham procedure, further height loss of treated vertebrae occurred more frequently (7 patients (8%) in the PV group and 39 (45%) in the sham group (χ2(1) = 28.85, p < 0.001, OR = 9.84, 95%CI = 4.08-23.73)) and was more severe (p < .001) than after PV. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of further vertebral height loss is significantly lower after PV compared to a sham intervention, i.e. PV protects against progressive vertebral height loss. In addition, PV does not increase the risk of new adjacent and distant OVCFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1a, therapeutic study. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01200277.
Assuntos
Estatura , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Idoso , Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas por Compressão/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Dor/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vertebroplastia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether percutaneous vertebroplasty results in more pain relief than a sham procedure in patients with acute osteoporotic compression fractures of the vertebral body. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, sham controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Four community hospitals in the Netherlands, 2011-15. PARTICIPANTS: 180 participants requiring treatment for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were randomised to either vertebroplasty (n=91) or a sham procedure (n=89). INTERVENTIONS: Participants received local subcutaneous lidocaine (lignocaine) and bupivacaine at each pedicle. The vertebroplasty group also received cementation, which was simulated in the sham procedure group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measure was mean reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at one day, one week, and one, three, six, and 12 months. Clinically significant pain relief was defined as a decrease of 1.5 points in VAS scores from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were the differences between groups for changes in the quality of life for osteoporosis and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire scores during 12 months' follow-up. RESULTS: The mean reduction in VAS score was statistically significant in the vertebroplasty and sham procedure groups at all follow-up points after the procedure compared with baseline. The mean difference in VAS scores between groups was 0.20 (95% confidence interval -0.53 to 0.94) at baseline, -0.43 (-1.17 to 0.31) at one day, -0.11 (-0.85 to 0.63) at one week, 0.41 (-0.33 to 1.15) at one month, 0.21 (-0.54 to 0.96) at three months, 0.39 (-0.37 to 1.15) at six months, and 0.45 (-0.37 to 1.24) at 12 months. These changes in VAS scores did not, however, differ statistically significantly between the groups during 12 months' follow-up. The results for secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Use of analgesics (non-opioids, weak opioids, strong opioids) decreased statistically significantly in both groups at all time points, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Two adverse events occurred in the vertebroplasty group: one respiratory insufficiency and one vasovagal reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous vertebroplasty did not result in statistically significantly greater pain relief than a sham procedure during 12 months' follow-up among patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01200277.
Assuntos
Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Cimentos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vertebroplastia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor nas Costas/fisiopatologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus in the newborn is a rare injury that can occur during a traumatic partus. It can be difficult to make the correct diagnosis soon after birth. CASE DESCRIPTION: A neonate, born by a short fundal delivery in an otherwise minimally traumatic partus had reduced movement in the lower left arm on the first day of life. Physical examination and conventional radiography did not reveal any other abnormalities, suggesting a brachial plexus injury. As the arm movement did not improve, two weeks after birth radiographic investigations were repeated and a supracondylar humeral fracture was diagnosed. After a period of immobilisation without a plaster cast, the function of the elbow was completely restored in this otherwise healthy child. CONCLUSION: In neonates with a supracondylar humeral fracture clear clinical or radiological signs may be absent. According to the literature, ultrasonography is effective in revealing these fractures at an early stage. Generally, these fractures heal well without a plaster cast.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Moldes Cirúrgicos , Humanos , Imobilização/fisiologia , Recém-Nascido , MasculinoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In most breast screening programmes screen-film mammography (SFM) has been replaced by full-field digital mammography (FFDM). We compared interval cancer characteristics at SFM and FFDM screening mammography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included all 297 screen-detected and 104 interval cancers in 60,770 SFM examinations and 427 screen-detected and 124 interval cancers in 63,182 FFDM examinations, in women screened in the period 2008-2010. Breast imaging reports, biopsy results and surgical reports of all cancers were collected. Two radiologists reviewed prior and diagnostic mammograms of all interval cancers. They determined breast density, described mammographic abnormalities and classified interval cancers as missed, showing a minimal sign abnormality or true negative. RESULTS: The referral rate and cancer detection at SFM were 1.5% and 4.9 respectively, compared to 3.0% (p<0.001) and 6.6 (p<0.001) at FFDM. Screening sensitivity was 74.1% at SFM (297/401, 95% confidence interval (CI)=69.8-78.4%) and 77.5% at FFDM (427/551, 95% CI=74.0-81.0%). Significantly more interval cancers were true negative at prior FFDM than at prior SFM screening mammography (65.3% (81/124) versus 47.1% (49/104), p=0.02). For interval cancers following SFM or FFDM screening mammography, no significant differences were observed in breast density or mammographic abnormalities at the prior screen, tumour size, lymph node status, receptor status, Nottingham tumour grade or surgical treatment (mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy). CONCLUSION: FFDM resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate, but sensitivity was similar for SFM and FFDM. Interval cancers are more likely to be true negative at prior FFDM than at prior SFM screening mammography, whereas their tumour characteristics and type of surgical treatment are comparable.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/instrumentação , Mamografia/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/instrumentação , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países BaixosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetic mastopathy is a rare condition, which is clinically not easily to differentiate from breast cancer. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 32-year-old woman, with a long-standing history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus presented at the breast outpatient clinic with a firm palpable, painless mass in her right breast. Mammography and ultrasound examination showed, respectively, slight asymmetry with dense glandular tissue and a hypoechoic area with posterior shadowing. MR mammography showed no suspicious abnormalities. Histopathological examination revealed fibrous tissue with lymphocytic inflammation. The combination of clinical presentation, history of diabetes mellitus, and histological findings led to a diagnosis of diabetic mastopathy. CONCLUSION: A palpable breast abnormality in a woman with diabetes mellitus can be caused by diabetic mastopathy. Knowledge of this condition by the disciplines involved can prevent over-diagnosis and unnecessary interventions.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/diagnóstico , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/etiologia , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Doença da Mama Fibrocística/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Mamografia , Ultrassonografia MamáriaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of women with screen detected cancers (SDC) or interval cancers (IC), diagnosed after previous benign breast surgery, were reviewed by two screening radiologists. They determined the presence and degree of post surgical changes, classified breast density and determined whether mammographic interpretation was hampered by tissue characteristics. They also assessed whether the cancer had already been visible at a previous screen. RESULTS: Screening sensitivity was lower in women with prior benign breast surgery than without (63.5% (115/181) versus 73.5% (1643/2236), p=0.004). A total of 115 SDCs and 66 ICs were diagnosed in breasts after previous benign breast surgery. Post surgical mammographic alterations in the breast segment where cancer was diagnosed were more distinct in ICs than in SDCs (p=0.001). Women with post surgical mammographic changes at the location of the breast cancer had an increased interval cancer risk (OR=2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.05-4.26). Limited mammographic interpretation due to tissue characteristics was mentioned, only in three SDCs and one IC. The proportions of SDCs and ICS that were already visible at a previous screen were comparable for women with and without prior surgery (SDC: 47.5% versus 43.8%, p=0.3, IC: 50.0% versus 48.4%, p=0.8). CONCLUSION: Previous benign breast surgery decreases screening sensitivity and this is likely due to postoperative mammographic changes.
Assuntos
Doenças Mamárias/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/cirurgia , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Mama/patologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Análise de Regressão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although primarily a disease of the lungs, is associated with extrapulmonary effects such as muscle weakness and osteoporosis. Fractures owing to osteoporosis cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with COPD. To prevent osteoporotic fractures, it is important to diagnose osteoporosis in an early stage and to start anti-osteoporotic therapy in at-risk patients. Because routine chest computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to assess the extent of emphysema and airways disease in patients with COPD, we investigated whether simple attenuation measurement of the thoracic spine on routine chest CT may provide useful information on bone health in patients with COPD. Fifty-eight patients with moderate to very severe COPD were included in our study. The average attenuation of thoracic vertebrae 4, 7, and 10 on chest CT was correlated with the lowest bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and lumbar spine (L(1) to L(4)) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in patients with COPD. The inter- and intra-observer variabilities of the attenuation measurements were low as shown by Bland-Altman plots. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the average attenuation of the three thoracic vertebrae and the lowest BMD of the hip and lumbar spine was high (r = 0.827, p < 0.001). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the area under the curve for osteoporosis was 0.969 (p < 0.001), corresponding to an attenuation threshold of 147 Hounsfield Units (HU). In conclusion, our data demonstrated that bone attenuation measured on routine chest CT correlated strongly with BMD assessed on DXA in patients with COPD. Routine chest CT may provide useful information on bone health in patients with COPD.