Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Int ; 96(3): 330-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699625

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the trends of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in 2 European tertiary referral centers with regards to guideline changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,573 patients who underwent RN or PN for localized (≤T2) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were included. Logistic regression analyses assessed the predictors of PN and laparoscopy over time. RESULTS: Out of the total, 1,013 patients (65.6%) were treated with RN and 560 patients (34.4%) with PN. Also, 1,233 patients (80%) had open surgery whereas 340 patients (22%) were treated with a laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic RN and PN were performed in 216 (13.7%) and 124 (7.8%) patients, respectively. T1b tumors were 73% less likely (p < 0.001) to be treated with PN compared to T1a tumors. The odds of undergoing PN or laparoscopy in 2008-2010 relative to 2000-2001 were 6.5-fold (p < 0.001) and 36-fold higher (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size and year of surgery are independent predictors of PN in our cohort. Our data exemplify the adoption of PN for RCC in tertiary care centers in Austria and Germany in line with implemented guideline changes. The utilization of PN has increased over time regardless of surgical approach. Further studies need to address the use of robot-assisted surgery and care in community hospitals.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Néfrons/cirurgia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Análise de Regressão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
2.
Cent European J Urol ; 72(1): 23-31, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011436

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We compared the potential prognostic impact of B7-H1 and B7-H3 glycoprotein expressions with the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) score in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) during a long term follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 44 mccRCC patients, who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2006 at a single tertiary academic center and received interferon therapy (IFNT) for at least three months. The SSIGN score was applied as a validated prediction outcome model. Representative tumor sections were immunostained with anti-B7-H3 and anti-B7-H1 antibodies. Hereafter, positive antigen-antibody reactions were measured using the Positive-Pixel-Count Algorithm of the Aperio-Technology Image Scope software. RESULTS: In total, 48% of patients were treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy and postoperative IFNT due to synchronous mccRCC, whereas 52% received IFNT after developing metachronous mccRCC. The SSIGN score was independently associated with a higher mortality risk. Patients with a SSIGN score ≤9 showed an extended 'nephrectomy to start of INFT'-interval (p = 0.02), less synchronous clinical metastases (p = 0.0002), as well as an increased median overall - (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, B7-H3 expression levels of ≤16% were associated with an improved OS or CSS and correlated with a more frequent pathologic grade 1-2, as well as a longer 'nephrectomy to start of IFNT'-interval, respectively. B7-H1 expression patterns did not correlate with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SSIGN score demonstrated the best prognostic performance. In contrast, B7-H3 expression patterns showed a low association with histopathological parameters, but predicted the cut-off-dependent impaired survival and in the future may define a cut-off to indicate checkpoint-inhibitor treatment.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA