Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Mov Disord ; 36(10): 2408-2412, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34191352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Solriamfetol is approved (US and EU) for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate solriamfetol safety/efficacy for EDS in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Phase 2, double-blind, 4-week, crossover trial: adults with PD and EDS were randomized to sequence A (placebo, solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d), B (solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d, placebo), or C (placebo). Outcomes (safety/tolerability [primary]; Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]; Maintenance of Wakefulness Test [MWT]) were assessed weekly. P values are nominal. RESULTS: Common adverse events (n = 66): nausea (10.7%), dizziness (7.1%), dry mouth (7.1%), headache (7.1%), anxiety (5.4%), constipation (5.4%), dyspepsia (5.4%). ESS decreased both placebo (-4.78) and solriamfetol (-4.82 to -5.72; P > 0.05). MWT improved dose-dependently with solriamfetol, increasing by 5.05 minutes with 300 mg relative to placebo (P = 0.0098). CONCLUSIONS: Safety/tolerability was consistent with solriamfetol's known profile. There were no significant improvements on ESS; MWT results suggest possible benefit with solriamfetol in PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Assuntos
Carbamatos/uso terapêutico , Distúrbios do Sono por Sonolência Excessiva , Doença de Parkinson , Fenilalanina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Distúrbios do Sono por Sonolência Excessiva/tratamento farmacológico , Distúrbios do Sono por Sonolência Excessiva/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados
2.
Sleep ; 33(11): 1553-61, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21102997

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin 1 mg and 3 mg in elderly subjects with chronic primary insomnia. DESIGN AND METHODS: the study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomized to 12 weeks of nightly treatment with doxepin (DXP) 1 mg (n = 77) or 3 mg (n = 82), or placebo (PBO; n = 81). Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG), patient reports, and clinician ratings. Objective efficacy data are reported for Nights (N) 1, 29, and 85; subjective efficacy data during Weeks 1, 4, and 12; and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and Patient Global Impression (PGI) scale data after Weeks 2, 4, and 12 of treatment. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS: DXP 3 mg led to significant improvement versus PBO on N1 in wake time after sleep onset (WASO; P < 0.0001; primary endpoint), total sleep time (TST; P < 0.0001), overall sleep efficiency (SE; P < 0.0001), SE in the last quarter of the night (P < 0.0001), and SE in Hour 8 (P < 0.0001). These improvements were sustained at N85 for all variables, with significance maintained for WASO, TST, overall SE, and SE in the last quarter of the night. DXP 3 mg significantly improved patient-reported latency to sleep onset (Weeks 1, 4, and 12), subjective TST (Weeks 1, 4, and 12), and sleep quality (Weeks 1, 4, and 12). Several global outcome-related variables were significantly improved, including the severity and improvement items of the CGI (Weeks 2, 4, and 12), and all 5 items of the PGI (Week 12; 4 items after Weeks 2 and 4). Significant improvements were observed for DXP 1 mg for several measures including WASO, TST, overall SE, and SE in the last quarter of the night at several time points. Rates of discontinuation were low, and the safety profiles were comparable across the 3 treatment groups. There were no significant next-day residual effects; additionally, there were no reports of memory impairment, complex sleep behaviors, anticholinergic effects, weight gain, or increased appetite. CONCLUSIONS: DXP 1 mg and 3 mg administered nightly to elderly chronic insomnia patients for 12 weeks resulted in significant and sustained improvements in most endpoints. These improvements were not accompanied by evidence of next-day residual sedation or other significant adverse effects. DXP also demonstrated improvements in both patient- and physician-based ratings of global insomnia outcome. The efficacy of DXP at the doses used in this study is noteworthy with respect to sleep maintenance and early morning awakenings given that these are the primary sleep complaints of the elderly. This study, the longest placebo-controlled, double-blind, polysomnographic trial of nightly pharmacotherapy for insomnia in the elderly, provides the best evidence to date of the sustained efficacy and safety of an insomnia medication in older adults.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Doxepina/uso terapêutico , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxepina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Polissonografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Polissonografia/métodos , Polissonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Diabetes Care ; 38(7): 1189-96, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26049552

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Ranolazine is an antianginal drug that mediates its effects by inhibition of cardiac late sodium current. Although ranolazine is not approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, in post hoc analyses of pivotal angina trials, ranolazine was associated with reductions in percent glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in subjects with type 2 diabetes. The study prospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of ranolazine in subjects with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control managed by lifestyle alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted worldwide in 465 subjects, with baseline HbA1c of 7-10% (53-86 mmol/mol) and fasting serum glucose of 130-240 mg/dL, randomized to placebo versus ranolazine. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, there was a greater decline in HbA1c at week 24 from baseline (primary end point) in subjects taking ranolazine (mean difference -0.56% [-6.1 mmol/mol]; P < 0.0001). Moreover, the proportion of subjects achieving an HbA1c <7.0% was greater with ranolazine (25.6% vs. 41.2%; P = 0.0004). Ranolazine was associated with reductions in fasting (mean difference -8 mg/dL; P = 0.0266) and 2-h postprandial glucose (mean difference -19 mg/dL; P = 0.0008 vs. placebo). Subjects taking ranolazine trended toward a greater decrease from baseline in fasting insulin (P = 0.0507), a greater decrease in fasting glucagon (P = 0.0003), and a lower postprandial 3-h glucagon area under the curve (P = 0.0031 vs. placebo). Ranolazine was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, use of ranolazine monotherapy over 24 weeks, in subjects with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise alone, significantly reduced HbA1c and other measures of glycemic control.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Ranolazina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Ther ; 33(7): 851-62, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21722958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Doxepin tablets have recently been approved in the United States in doses of 3 and 6 mg for the treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulty with sleep maintenance. OBJECTIVE: Because no previous thorough QT evaluation of doxepin has been conducted, the primary objective of this study was to assess the highest recommended dose (6 mg) and a supratherapeutic amount (50 mg) of doxepin on cardiac repolarization under steady-state conditions in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: Male and female volunteers aged 18 to 45 years were randomized to receive double-blind doxepin or placebo for 7 days, or 6 days of double-blind placebo before one open-label administration of 400-mg moxifloxacin on day 7. Holter electrocardiograms were collected at baseline and on day 7 for up to 23.5 hours after dosing; the results were read at a central facility. The primary outcome measure was the time-matched change from baseline in individually corrected QT (QTcI) intervals. Additional outcome measures were used to evaluate outlying QTc values and the relationship of QTcI to plasma concentrations of doxepin and its primary demethylated metabolite, nordoxepin. RESULTS: A total of 206 healthy subjects (108 women, 98 men) were randomized to a study group; 192 subjects (93.2%) received all scheduled administrations of study drug, and 190 subjects (92.2%) completed the study. The study population was 47.6% male and 52.4% female, and the mean age was 30.3 years. Neither amount of administered doxepin increased QTcI, nor did the upper bound of the 95% CIs for the point estimates exceed 10 milliseconds at any time point. The results for moxifloxacin met the assay sensitivity criteria for a positive control. The predicted placebo-corrected change in QTcI at the mean doxepin C(max) values for both administered amounts (6 mg: -0.88 millisecond [upper CI: 0.37 millisecond]; 50 mg, 2.38 milliseconds [upper CI: 4.00 milliseconds]) did not suggest an effect on cardiac repolarization, and no doxepin-treated subject met specific criteria for outlying QTc values. CONCLUSION: This thorough QT study revealed no effects of doxepin on QTcI up to 50 mg, suggesting that doxepin therapy for insomnia is unlikely to increase QTc intervals.


Assuntos
Doxepina/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do QT Longo/induzido quimicamente , Administração Oral , Adulto , Compostos Aza/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxepina/administração & dosagem , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Moxifloxacina , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Sleep ; 34(10): 1433-42, 2011 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21966075

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin (DXP) 3 mg and 6 mg in adults diagnosed with primary insomnia. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Patients meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomized to 35 days of nightly treatment with DXP 3 mg (n=75), DXP 6 mg (n=73), or placebo (PBO; n=73), followed by 2 nights of single-blind PBO to evaluate discontinuation (DC) effects. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and patient reports. Efficacy data were examined for Night (N) 1, N15, and N29. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS: Compared with PBO, DXP 3 and 6 mg significantly improved wake time after sleep onset (WASO) on N1 (3 mg and 6 mg; P<0.0001), N15 (3 mg P=0.0025; 6 mg P=0.0009), and N29 (3 mg P=0.0248; 6 mg P=0.0009), latency to persistent sleep (LPS) on N1 (3 mg P=0.0047; 6 mg P=0.0007), and total sleep time (TST) on N1 (3 mg and 6 mg P<0.0001), N15 (6 mg P=0.0035), and N29 (3 mg P=0.0261; 6 mg P<0.0001). In terms of early morning awakenings, DXP 3 and 6 mg demonstrated significant improvements in SE in the final quarter of the night on N1, N15, and N29, with the exception of 3 mg on N29 (P=0.0691). Rates of discontinuation were low, and the safety profiles were comparable across the 3 treatment groups. There were no significant next-day residual effects, and there were no spontaneous reports of memory impairment, complex sleep behaviors, anticholinergic effects, weight gain, or increased appetite. Additionally, there was no evidence of rebound insomnia after DXP discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Five weeks of nightly administration of DXP 3 mg and 6 mg to adults with chronic primary insomnia resulted in significant and sustained improvements in sleep maintenance and early morning awakenings (with the exception of SE in the final quarter of the night on N29 for 3 mg [P=0.0691]). These sleep improvements were not accompanied by next-day residual effects or followed by rebound insomnia or withdrawal effects upon discontinuation. These findings confirm the unique profile of sleep maintenance efficacy and safety of DXP observed in prior studies.


Assuntos
Doxepina/uso terapêutico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxepina/administração & dosagem , Doxepina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polissonografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Sleep Med ; 11(9): 843-7, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20817598

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of doxepin (DXP) 6mg tablets were evaluated in healthy adults in a model of transient insomnia. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults using a model of transient insomnia. A first-night effect combined with a 3-h phase advance was implemented to induce transient insomnia in healthy adults. Subjects received a single night time dose of placebo (PBO; N=282) or DXP 6mg (N=283) in a sleep laboratory. Efficacy was evaluated objectively (polysomnography; PSG) and subjectively (morning questionnaire). Consistent with the model utilized, the primary endpoint was latency to persistent sleep (LPS); secondary PSG endpoints included wake after sleep onset (WASO; key secondary endpoint), total sleep time (TST), wake time after sleep (WTAS) and sleep efficiency (SE; overall, by quarter of the night and hourly); secondary subjective endpoints included latency to sleep onset (LSO), subjective WASO (sWASO), subjective TST (sTST) and sleep quality. RESULTS: DXP 6mg demonstrated statistically significant improvements in LPS (13min decrease versus PBO; p<0.0001), WASO (39min less than PBO; p<0.0001), TST (51min more than PBO; p<0.0001), WTAS (p<0.0001), overall SE (p<0.0001), SE in each quarter of the night (p<0.0001) and SE in each of the 8h (p⩽0.0003), all versus PBO. Additionally, DXP 6mg significantly improved subjective variables including LSO (p<0.0001), sWASO (p=0.0063), sTST (p<0.0001), and sleep quality (p=0.0004), versus PBO. There was no consistent evidence of next-day residual sedation and also minor sleep stages alterations. The incidence of adverse events was comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of transient insomnia, DXP 6mg demonstrated significant improvements in sleep onset, sleep maintenance, sleep duration and sleep quality, and also appeared to reduce early morning awakenings. These data suggest that DXP 6mg may be effective and well tolerated in adults experiencing transient insomnia.


Assuntos
Doxepina/uso terapêutico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Doxepina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Polissonografia , Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA