RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer are significant causes of mortality. Previous studies regarding skin cancer education in nonmedical professionals have shown increases in favorable attitudes and likelihood of approaching clients about concerning lesions with training. However, few studies have investigated the use of estheticians in skin cancer screening. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop an education course to train estheticians to recognize concerning lesions, to assess the baseline knowledge of estheticians toward skin cancer detection, and to determine the effect that our curriculum has on lesion detection. METHODS: We administered an education course and corresponding cross-sectional surveys to estheticians to evaluate current knowledge and assess for improvements in attitudes and behaviors regarding skin cancer detection. RESULTS: Of 504 estheticians, most estheticians (85-98%) indicated the correct level of concern for "extremely concerning" lesions on pre- and post-training surveys. Estheticians were more likely to recommend that their client see a medical professional if they previously attended a course on skin cancer (p = 0.012) or had greater than 1 year of work experience (p < 0.001). After completion of the training module, most participants felt "very comfortable," suggesting that clients see a doctor for a suspicious lesion. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that estheticians are capable of indicating the appropriate level of concern for abnormal lesions. Estheticians may serve as a valuable screening partner for dermatologists in the detection of skin cancer.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Pele , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Objectively determining tissue loss in craniofacial morphea is challenging. However, 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive modality that may be a useful adjunct. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate 3D stereophotogrammetry in the assessment of craniofacial linear morphea. METHODS: Participants underwent clinical, quality-of-life, and 3D-stereophotogrammetry assessments. Traditional photographs and 3D-stereophotogrammetry images were rated as mild, moderate, or severe by 2 experts and 2 nonexperts. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliability (on delayed rescoring) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 23 patients with craniofacial morphea, 3D stereophotogrammetry detected pathologic asymmetry in 14 (20.6%) patients. Providers rated patients as more severely affected when using 3D stereophotogrammetry versus when using traditional photographs (19% severe on 3D stereophotogrammetry vs 0% severe on traditional photographs, P = .004). Qualitative ratings of both traditional and 3D images showed high inter- and intrarater reliability between experts and nonexperts alike. Physicians' Global Assessment of Damage scores correlated with mouth asymmetry (P = .0021), cheek asymmetry (P = .04), and 3D-stereophotogrammetry ratings (median, mild: 27.5 vs moderate: 46.5 vs severe: 64, P = .0152). Lower face asymmetry correlated with worse quality-of-life scores (P = .013). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSION: 3D stereophotogrammetry can reliably detect and quantify asymmetry in craniofacial morphea with greater sensitivity than that observed with traditional assessment alone. 3D stereophotogrammetry may be a useful adjunct to clinical examination.
Assuntos
Esclerodermia Localizada , Humanos , Esclerodermia Localizada/complicações , Esclerodermia Localizada/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fotogrametria , FaceRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Latin American patients in the United States experience significant health disparities. Community health workers (promotoras de salud) reduce disparities by providing culturally appropriate education. While educational interventions have been studied in atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic dermatologic condition affecting children, none have evaluated the use of promotoras in Spanish-speaking pediatric patients in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To create and evaluate a promotora-led education program for Spanish-speaking caregivers of Latin American, pediatric patients with AD through a randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded study. METHODS: Children with moderate/severe AD (n = 48) were recruited from the pediatric dermatology clinic at Children's Healthâ in Dallas, TX and randomized to receive clinic education (n = 26) or clinic education plus promotora home visits (n = 22). The primary outcome was overall adherence to topical emollients over the 12-week study, quantified by MEMSCap™ devices; several secondary endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed a trend toward increased overall adherence to emollients over the 12-week study period in promotora (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 43% [26%-61%]) versus non-promotora (median [IQR]: 20% [11%-49%]) (p = .09) groups. SCORAD, AD knowledge, and Spanish-language Parental Quality of Life Questionnaire for AD (Sp-PIQoL-AD) improved in both groups, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups. There was a trend toward increased AD knowledge at Week 4 (p = .06) in the promotora group. CONCLUSIONS: A promotora-led educational intervention is a promising approach in increasing caregiver medication adherence in pediatric, Latin American patients with AD in the United States. Further research using creative and culturally appropriate strategies to increase medication adherence is necessary to reduce health disparities in other racial and ethnic minority populations in the United States.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Etnicidade , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , América Latina , Grupos MinoritáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Community health workers (CHWs), or promotora de salud, have an important role in healthcare education and advocacy in the Latin American community. We aimed to determine the impact of a promotora de salud program on attitudes and beliefs regarding AD management among Latin American caregivers of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: This is a sub-study of an ongoing randomized, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Mann-Whitney U tests compared questionnaire responses in the standard education group to the promotora group. RESULTS: Caregivers in the promotora group were more likely to state that they knew how to apply wet wraps and use bleach (sodium hypochlorite) baths at 1 month (wet wraps p = .027, bleach baths p = .005) and 3 months (wet wraps p = .005, bleach baths p < .001) demonstrating greater self-efficacy, defined as an individual's belief in their capacity to execute a certain behavior to achieve a desired outcome, compared with the standard education group. CONCLUSIONS: Culturally competent and language concordant educational interventions may improve confidence in utilizing wet wraps and bleach baths among Latin-American caregivers of children with atopic dermatitis, which may improve AD outcomes in the Latin-American community.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Atitude , Cuidadores , Criança , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Humanos , IdiomaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune photosensitive skin condition. The impact of income on quality of life has been incompletely characterized in CLE. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess how annual income affects quality of life among CLE patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 238 patients with CLE, relationships between predictor variables including annual income and each SKINDEX-29 + 3 subdomain were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. In addition, answers to individual SKINDEX-29 + 3 questions were compared across income groups. Clinical factors in patients making less than <10,000 USD (N = 85) with worse SKINDEX-29 + 3 scores were also identified by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Patients making <10,000 USD annually experienced worse quality of life across multiple SKINDEX-29 + 3 subdomains (p < 0.05). These patients specifically experienced poorer quality of life relating to social isolation and self-consciousness. (p < 0.001). Among those making <10,000 USD, predictors for worse quality of life included females, smokers, and those with higher skin disease activity were identified (p < 0.05).Limitations: This is a single center study. Income was also self-reported and could not be verified. CONCLUSIONS: Lower income is related to poorer quality of life in patients with CLE. Specifically, patients experience limitations regarding social isolation and self-consciousness.
Assuntos
Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Isolamento Social , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune photosensitive disorder that affects the skin. CLE lesions can have signs of skin damage including dyspigmentation, scarring, atrophy and/or alopecia. Disease damage secondary to CLE can be cosmetically disfiguring and causes patients significant distress. While many current treatments for CLE focus primarily on reducing inflammation, there are few options for managing disease damage. Providers currently lack strong guidance on managing CLE damage due to the paucity of literature on this topic. Because of this knowledge gap, we aim to provide an overview of what is currently known about the pathogenesis and management of signs of disease damage in CLE. In this narrative review, Pubmed, Ovid Medline, and Google scholar were searched for relevant articles assessing pathogenesis and treatment of disease damage. Therapeutic options for CLE damage, including hyperpigmentation (laser and camouflage), hypopigmentation (melanocyte grafting and camouflage), scarring (laser, dermabrasion, and camouflage), atrophy (filler, fat transplantation, and flap procedures), and scarring alopecia (hair transplantation and camouflage) were identified. We found that investigations of therapeutics for CLE disease damage primarily consist of case reports and small case series. Reported adverse events due to treatment for CLE disease damage range from temporary erythema and discomfort to disease reactivation and pigmentary defects. There are various treatments for disease damage for each sign of disease damage. However, more robust investigations are needed to assess disease pathogenesis and improve treatments of disease damage due to CLE.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo , Transtornos da Pigmentação , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/patologia , Cicatriz/terapia , Eritema , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo/diagnóstico , Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo/terapia , Pele/patologiaRESUMO
This cross-sectional study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding skin cancer and sun exposure among homeless men (n = 75). A 21-item survey was given to men residing at Calvert Place Men's Shelter in Dallas, TX. Results indicated that 49% knew that a change in a mole's appearance and a sore that does not heal were signs of skin cancer. Black homeless men were less likely to know that people with dark skin could get skin cancer and that sunscreen should be applied 15-30 min before sun exposure compared to white and other subgroups (p < .05). People were more likely to agree that sun protection is important (median = 5.0), but less likely to agree that they were at risk for skin cancer (median = 3.0). White men had higher levels of agreement that melanoma was dangerous compared to other racial/ethnic groups (p = 0.0224). Over half (52%) of individuals reported being in the sun often, yet only 21% reported the use of sunscreen. Most (71%) homeless men had never checked themselves for skin cancer and only 13% reported ever being screened by a health professional for skin cancer. Increased skin cancer education and increased screening efforts should be implemented to better protect the homeless population at Calvert Place from skin cancer.
Assuntos
Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/psicologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/psicologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies have shown that discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) has a higher incidence and prevalence in racial/ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to identify the differences in DLE lesion distribution and characteristics in Black individuals compared with non-Black individuals. METHODS: 183 patients with DLE (112 Black patients and 71 non-Black patients) with a reported race/ethnicity and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) scores were included in this retrospective cohort study. Univariate analysis was performed to determine significant differences in demographic data, clinical characteristics, DLE lesion distribution and DLE lesion characteristics in Black and non-Black patients with DLE. Multivariable logistic regression was preformed to determine significant predictors of DLE lesion location and characteristics. RESULTS: Black patients with DLE had worse baseline CLASI damage scores compared with non-Black patients with DLE (median (IQR): 10.0 (6.0-14.5) vs 6.0 (3.0-10.0), p<0.001) and had 48.9 greater odds of dyspigmentation in any anatomical location (p<0.001). Black patients had 2.54 greater odds of having scalp involvement (p=0.015) and 1.97 greater odds of having ear involvement (p=0.032) compared with non-Black patients. Black patients also had greater odds of scalp dyspigmentation (OR=5.85, p<0.001), ear dyspigmentation (OR=2.89, p=0.001) and scarring alopecia (OR=3.00, p=0.001) compared with non-Black patients. CONCLUSIONS: Signs of disease damage, particularly ear dyspigmentation, scalp dyspigmentation and scarring alopecia, can more frequently affect Black patients with DLE. Recognising differences in clinical presentation of DLE among Black patients can assist future efforts with understanding biological, cultural, psychosocial and systemic factors that influence DLE presentation and outcomes in Black patients and may guide clinicians when counselling Black patients.
Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Discoide , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Etnicidade , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Discoide/complicações , Lúpus Eritematoso Discoide/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Discoide/patologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Grupos Minoritários , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Morphea is a rare autoimmune condition causing inflammation and sclerosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue. It is characterized by periods of activity (inflammation admixed with fibrosis), ultimately resulting in permanent damage (pigment change and tissue loss). Damage resulting from unchecked activity can lead to devastating, permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae including hair loss; cutaneous, soft tissue and bony atrophy; joint contractures; and growth restriction of the affected body site in children. This makes the early identification of activity and initiation of appropriate treatment crucial to limiting damage in morphea. To this end, recent investigative work has focused on validation of clinical, biomarker, imaging, and histologic outcomes aimed at accurately quantifying activity and damage. Despite promising results, further work is needed to better validate these measures before they can be used in the clinic and research settings. Although there has been recent approval of less toxic, targeted therapies for many inflammatory skin conditions, none have been systematically investigated in morphea. The mainstays of treatment for active morphea are corticosteroids and methotrexate. These are often limited by substantial toxicity. The paucity of new treatments for morphea is the result of a lack of studies examining its pathogenesis, with many reviews extrapolating from research in systemic sclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated the role of dysregulated immune and fibrotic pathways in the pathogenesis of morphea, particularly interferon (IFN) gamma related pathways. Active morphea lesions have been found to display an inflammatory morphea signature with CXCR3 receptor ligands, as well as a distinct fibrotic signature reflecting fibroblast activation and collagen production. CXCL9 and 10 have been associated with increased measures of disease activity. While immune dysfunction is thought to play the primary role in morphea pathogenesis, there are other factors that may also contribute, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and vascular dysregulation. There remains an essential need for further research to elucidate the pathogenesis of morphea and the mode of action of dysregulated upstream and downstream immune and fibrotic pathways. These studies will allow for the discovery of novel biomarkers and targets for therapeutic development.