RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the unique perspective of pediatric intensivists caring for critically ill adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Academic medical center in New York City. PATIENTS: Coronavirus disease 2019 positive adults requiring admission to an ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In late March 2020, New York Presbyterian Hospital centralized all of its inpatient pediatric units (n = 4) from across the network to a single center, in order to create space to accommodate the increasing number of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019. Within 1 week, the PICU at New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine transferred or discharged all inpatients, underwent a transformation of the physical space, and began admitting adults of all ages with coronavirus disease 2019 related acute respiratory failure. The New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine PICU physician group continued to lead this unit. PICU nurses, respiratory therapists, social workers, and child life specialists joined their PICU physician colleagues to care for these critically ill adults. CONCLUSIONS: In the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, PICU physicians are well poised to care for adult patients in a surge capacity, and bring a unique perspective to the experience.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Estado Terminal/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Critically ill patients are at risk for short and long term morbidity. Early mobilization (EM) of critically ill adults is safe and feasible, with improvement in outcomes. There are limited studies evaluating EM in pediatric critical care patients. Provider beliefs and concerns must be evaluated prior to EM implementation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to PICU providers assessing beliefs and concerns with regards to EM of PICU patients. RESULTS: Seventy-one providers responded. Most staff believed EM would be beneficial. The largest perceived benefits were decreased length of both stay and mechanical ventilation. The largest perceived concerns were risk of both endotracheal tube and central venous catheter dislodgement. Surveyed clinicians felt significantly more comfortable mobilizing the oldest as compared to the youngest patients (p<0.0001). Clinicians also felt significantly more comfortable mobilizing patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the oldest as compared to the youngest patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is clear benefit to the EM of adult ICU patients, with evidence supporting its safety and feasibility. As pediatric patients pose different challenges, it is imperative to understand provider concerns prior to the implementation of EM. Our research demonstrates similar concerns between adult and pediatric programs, with the addition of significant concern surrounding EM in very young children. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding pediatric specific concerns with regards to EM will allow for the proper development and implementation of pediatric EM programs, allowing us to assess safety, feasibility, and ultimately outcomes.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cultura , Deambulação Precoce/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/organização & administração , Fatores Etários , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estado Terminal/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the effectiveness of training interventions to improve the delivery of bad news. METHODS: This preliminary research included pre-post assessments and an open-ended survey to evaluate the effectiveness and perceived value of training on delivering bad news for 26 first- and second-year fellows from five adult and pediatric fellowship programs. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in faculty assessment scores (34.5 vs. 41.0, respectively, Z = -3.661, p < 0.001) and Standardized Patient (SP) assessment scores (37.5 vs .44.5, respectively, Z = -2.244, p = 0.025). Fellows valued having a standard framework to aid in the delivery of bad news; receiving targeted feedback and having the opportunity to apply their skills in a subsequent case. CONCLUSIONS: A one-hour, four-phase lesson plan that includes an individualized training approach and simulation do-overs can be effective and valuable for preparing fellows to deliver bad news.