Patient-Reported Impact of Symptoms in Fibromyalgia (PRISM-FM).

OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency and relative importance of symptoms experienced by adults with fibromyalgia (FM) and determine factors associated with a higher disease burden. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 participants with FM, collecting 1479 quotes regarding the symptomatic burden of FM. We then performed an international cross-sectional study involving 1085 participants with FM to determine the prevalence and relative importance (scale 0-4) of 149 symptoms representing 14 symptomatic themes. We performed subgroup analysis to determine how age, sex, disease duration, medication use, employment status, change in employment status, missing work due to FM, and ability level are related to symptomatic theme prevalence. RESULTS: The symptomatic themes with the highest prevalence in FM were pain (99.8%), muscle tenderness (99.8%), and fatigue (99.3%). The symptomatic themes that had the greatest effect on patients' lives were related to fatigue (2.88), pain (2.85), muscle tenderness (2.79), and impaired sleep and daytime sleepiness (2.70). Symptomatic theme prevalence was most strongly associated with the modified Rankin Scale level of disability, disability status, and change in employment status (on disability vs not on disability). CONCLUSION: Participants with FM identify a variety of symptoms that significantly affect their daily lives. Many of these symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and activity limitation, are life-altering and not related to traditional diagnostic criteria. Symptom prevalence in this population varies across subgroups based on demographic categories and disability status.

The Crohn's Disease-Health Index: Development and Evaluation of a Novel Outcome Measure.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and validate the Crohn's Disease-Health Index (CD-HI), a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure that serially measures Crohn's disease (CD) symptomatic burden in adults with CD. BACKGROUND: As therapeutic interventions are tested among patients with CD, responsive outcome measures are needed to track disease progression and therapeutic gain during clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional study of individuals with CD to identify the most prevalent and impactful symptoms of CD. The most relevant symptoms were included in the CD-HI. We used factor analysis, qualitative patient interviews, test-retest reliability evaluation, and known group validity testing to evaluate and optimize the CD-HI. RESULTS: The CD-HI contains 12 subscales that comprehensively measure CD burden using the patient's perspective. Fifteen adults with CD beta tested the CD-HI and found the instrument to be clear, easy to use, and relevant to them. Twenty-three adults with CD participated in an assessment of test-retest reliability, which indicated high reliability of individual questions, subscales, and the full instrument (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84 for the full instrument). The CD-HI and its subscales demonstrated a high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.98 for the full instrument). The CD-HI distinguished between groups of individuals with CD known to differ in disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: This research supports the use of the CD-HI as a valid, sensitive, reliable, and relevant patient-reported outcome to determine the multifactorial disease burden of those with CD, assess the relevance and merit of future CD therapies, and support drug labeling claims.

Using the Mobile Toolbox in child and adolescent samples: A feasibility study.

Cognitive research with developmental samples requires improved methods that support large-scale, diverse, and open science. This paper offers initial evidence to support the Mobile Toolbox (MTB), a self-administered remote smartphone-based cognitive battery, in youth populations, from a pilot sample of 99 children (Mage = 11.79 years; 36% female; 53% White, 33% Black or African American, 9% Asian, and 15% Hispanic). Completion rates (95%-99%), practice performance (96%-100%), internal consistency (0.60-0.98), and correlations with similar NIHTB measures (0.55-0.77) provide the first evidence to support the MTB in a youth sample, although there were some inconsistencies across measures. Preliminary findings provide promising evidence of the MTB in developmental populations, and further studies are encouraged.

How Are Age, Gender, and Country Differences Associated With PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference Scores?

BACKGROUND: The interpretation of patient-reported outcomes requires appropriate comparison data. Currently, no patient-specific reference data exist for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), and Pain Interference (PI) scales for individuals 50 years and older. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Can all PROMIS PF, UE, and PI items be used for valid cross-country comparisons in these domains among the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany? (2) How are age, gender, and country related to PROMIS PF, PROMIS UE, and PROMIS PI scores? (3) What is the relationship of age, gender, and country across individuals with PROMIS PF, PROMIS UE, and PROMIS PI scores ranging from very low to very high? METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews to collect custom PROMIS PF (22 items), UE (eight items), and PI (eight items) short forms, as well as sociodemographic data (age, gender, work status, and education level), with participants randomly selected from the general population older than 50 years in the United States (n = 900), United Kingdom (n = 905), and Germany (n = 921). We focused on these individuals because of their higher prevalence of surgeries and lower physical functioning. Although response rates varied across countries (14% for the United Kingdom, 22% for Germany, and 12% for the United States), we used existing normative data to ensure demographic alignment with the overall populations of these countries. This helped mitigate potential nonresponder bias and enhance the representativeness and validity of our findings. We investigated differential item functioning to determine whether all items can be used for valid crosscultural comparisons. To answer our second research question, we compared age groups, gender, and countries using median regressions. Using imputation of plausible values and quantile regression, we modeled age-, gender-, and country-specific distributions of PROMIS scores to obtain patient-specific reference values and answer our third research question. RESULTS: All items from the PROMIS PF, UE, and PI measures were valid for across-country comparisons. We found clinically meaningful associations of age, gender, and country with PROMIS PF, UE, and PI scores. With age, PROMIS PF scores decreased (age ß Median = -0.35 [95% CI -0.40 to -0.31]), and PROMIS UE scores followed a similar trend (age ß Median = -0.38 [95% CI -0.45 to -0.32]). This means that a 10-year increase in age corresponded to a decline in approximately 3.5 points for the PROMIS PF score-a value that is approximately the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Concurrently, we observed a modest increase in PROMIS PI scores with age, reaching half the MCID after 20 years. Women in all countries scored higher than men on the PROMIS PI and 1 MCID lower on the PROMIS PF and UE. Additionally, there were higher T-scores for the United States than for the United Kingdom across all domains. The difference in scores ranged from 1.21 points for the PROMIS PF to a more pronounced 3.83 points for the PROMIS UE. Participants from the United States exhibited up to half an MCID lower T-scores than their German counterparts for the PROMIS PF and PROMIS PI. In individuals with high levels of physical function, with each 10-year increase in age, there could be a decrease of up to 4 points in PROMIS PF scores. Across all levels of upper extremity function, women reported lower PROMIS UE scores than men by an average of 5 points. CONCLUSION: Our study provides age-, gender-, and country-specific reference values for PROMIS PF, UE, and PI scores, which can be used by clinicians, researchers, and healthcare policymakers to better interpret patient-reported outcomes and provide more personalized care. These findings are particularly relevant for those collecting patient-reported outcomes in their clinical routine and researchers conducting multinational studies. We provide an internet application ( www.common-metrics.org/PROMIS_PF_and_PI_Reference_scores.php ) for user-friendly accessibility in order to perform age, gender, and country conversions of PROMIS scores. Population reference values can also serve as comparators to data collected with other PROMIS short forms or computerized adaptive tests. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.

A psychometric evaluation of the NIH Toolbox fluid cognition tests adapted for Swahili and Dholuo languages in Kenyan children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the culturally adapted NIH Toolbox African Languages® when used in Swahili and Dholuo-speaking children in western Kenya. METHOD: Swahili-speaking participants were recruited from Eldoret and Dholuo-speaking participants from Ajigo; all were <14 years of age and enrolled in primary school. Participants completed a demographics questionnaire and five fluid cognition tests of the NIH Toolbox® African Languages program, including Flanker, Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS), Picture Sequence Memory, Pattern Comparison, and List Sorting tests. Statistical analyses examined aspects of reliability, including internal consistency (in both languages) and test-retest reliability (in Dholuo only). RESULTS: Participants included 479 children (n = 239, Swahili-speaking; n = 240, Dholuo-speaking). Generally, the tests had acceptable psychometric properties for research use within Swahili- and Dholuo-speaking populations (mean age = 10.5; SD = 2.3). Issues related to shape identification and accuracy over speed limited the utility of DCCS for many participants, with approximately 25% of children unable to match based on shape. These cultural differences affected outcomes of reliability testing among the Dholuo-speaking cohort, where accuracy improved across all five tests, including speed. CONCLUSIONS: There is preliminary evidence that the NIH Toolbox ® African Languages potentially offers a valid assessment of development and performance using tests of fluid cognition in Swahili and Dholuo among research settings. With piloting underway across other diverse settings, future research should gather additional evidence on the clinical utility and acceptability of these tests, specifically through the establishment of norming data among Kenyan regions and evaluating these psychometric properties.

Modifying the social responsiveness scale for adaptive administration.

PURPOSE: The social responsiveness scale (SRS) is frequently used to quantify the autism-related phenotype and is gaining use in health outcomes research. However, it has a high respondent burden (65 items) for large-scale studies. Further, most evaluations of it have focused on the school-age form, not the preschool form. More validity evidence of shortened forms is necessary in the general population to support the broader health outcomes context of use. METHODS: We evaluated the psychometrics of the SRS in 7030 individuals from multiple predominantly neurotypical samples in order to shorten it based on non-autistic sample metrics. Analyses included item factor analysis, differential item functioning (DIF), and multiple-group item response theory (IRT) to place the SRS items on a comparable scale, which was then simulated via computer adaptive testing (CAT) administration. RESULTS: The SRS was broadly unidimensional with few methodological residual dependencies. On average, males had more autistic characteristics than females, and preschoolers had fewer characteristics than school-age children. The final IRT calibration included 45 items equated across forms, and each form had 11 with significant wording discrepancies and 9 items with near-identical wording that exhibited form-related DIF. The CAT simulation suggested a median of 14 items was sufficient to reach a reliable score, demonstrating its feasibility across the range of impairments. CONCLUSION: IRT allows practitioners the ability to get highly reliable scores with fewer items than the full-length SRS. This supports the future application of the SRS in a computer adaptive testing mode in both neurotypical and ASD samples.

Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score ranges associated with descriptive labels (i.e., within normal limits, mild, moderate, severe) by using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients who have experienced a bone fracture. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We created vignettes comprised of six items and responses from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function, Physical Function, and Pain Interference item banks reflecting different levels of severity. Two groups of patients with fractures (n = 11) and two groups of orthopedic clinicians (n = 16) reviewed the vignettes and assigned descriptive labels independently and then discussed as a group until reaching consensus via a videoconference platform. RESULTS: PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference thresholds (T = 50, 40, 25/30 and T = 50/55, 60, 65/70, respectively) for patients with bone fractures were consistent with the results from other patient populations. Upper Extremity thresholds were about 10 points (1 SD) more severe (T = 40, 30, 25/20) compared to the other measures. Patient and clinician perspectives were similar. CONCLUSION: Bookmarking methods generated meaningful score thresholds for PROMIS measures. These thresholds between severity categories varied by domain. Threshold values for severity represent important supplemental information to interpret PROMIS scores clinically.

What is typical: Atypical in young children's attention regulation?: Characterizing the developmental spectrum with the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Attention Regulation Infant-Toddler (MAPS-AR-IT) Scale.

While attention dysregulation is a promising early indicator of neurodevelopmental risk, in particular attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), it is difficult to characterize clinical concern due to its developmental expectability at the transition to toddlerhood. Thus, explicating the typical:atypical continuum of risk indicators is among the key future directions for research to promote early identification and intervention, and prevent decrements in the attainment of developmental milestones into early childhood. In this paper, we present the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Attention Regulation Infant-Toddler (MAPS-AR-IT) Scale, a novel parent-report survey of dimensional, developmentally specified indicators of attention (dys)regulation. Item Response Theory was employed to characterize the typical:atypical spectrum of both normative and more concerning dysregulation (including the contexts in which behavior occurs). We provide evidence of the validity of this measure in capturing the full typical:atypical spectrum via a longitudinal sample of typically developing children at 12-18 months of age (baseline) via concurrent scores on well-validated temperament and clinical measures. We also examine longitudinal stability and predictive validity if the MAPS-AR-IT via a clinical interview of ADHD symptoms at 24-30 months (follow-up). While not diagnostic, we present evidence of the utility of the MAPS-AR-IT in explicating individual neurodevelopmental risk and elucidating the broader typicality of behaviors related to attention (dys)regulation.

Aunque la desregulación de la atención es un prometedor indicador temprano del riesgo neural de desarrollo, en particular el trastorno de déficit en la atención/hiperactividad (ADHD), es difícil caracterizar las preocupaciones clínicas debido al factor de expectativa de desarrollo al momento de la transición a la temprana niñez. De manera que explicar la progresión típica:atípica de indicadores de riesgo está entre las futuras directrices claves para la investigación con el fin de promover la temprana identificación e intervención, y prevenir disminuciones en el alcance de hitos críticos hacia la temprana niñez. En este ensayo, presentamos la Escala de Perfiles de Evaluación Multidimensional - Regulación de la Atención del Infante-Niño Pequeñito (MAPS-AR-IT) una novedosa encuesta de reporte del progenitor, acerca de la (des)regulación de la atención, dimensional y específica para el desarrollo. Aportamos evidencia de la validez de esta medida para captar la completa gama típica:atípica por medio de una muestra longitudinal de niños típicamente en desarrollo, a los 12-18 meses de edad (edad base) por medio de puntajes concurrentes sobre el temperamento bien validado y las medidas clínicas, así como también la estabilidad longitudinal y la validez de predicción por medio de una entrevista clínica de síntomas de ADHD a los 24-30 meses (seguimiento). Se empleó la Teoría de Respuesta al Asunto para caracterizar la gama típica:atípica tanto de la desregulación normativa como de la más preocupante (incluyendo los contextos en los cuales ocurre el comportamiento). Aunque no se trata de diagnóstico, presentamos evidencia de la utilidad de MAPS-AR-IT para explicar el riesgo individual de desarrollo neural y elucidar el más amplio aspecto típico de comportamientos relacionados con la (des)regulación de la atención.

Bien que la dysrégulation de l'attention soit un indicateur précoce prometteur du risque neurodéveloppemental, en particulier le trouble déficitaire de l'attention/hyperactivité (TDHA) il est difficile de caractériser la préoccupation clinique du fait de sa prévisibilité développementale à la transition à la petite enfance. Par conséquent, expliquer le continuum typique:atypique des indicateurs de risque s'avère être une des directions futures de recherches clé pour promouvoir l'identification et l'intervention précoce, et prévenir les baisses dans la réalisation d'étapes développementales importantes jusque dans la petite enfance. Dans cet article nous présentons l'Echelle Multidimensional Assessment Profiles - Attention Regulation Infant-Toddler (MAPS-AR-IT) (échelle de profils d'évaluation multidimensionnelle - régulation de l'attention bébé-petit enfant, abrégée selon l'anglais MAP-AR-IT), une étude nouvelle basée sur les rapports faits par les parents de la (dys)régulation de l'attention dimensionnelle et spécifiée selon le développement. Nous démontrons la validité de cette mesure en capturant l'éventail total typique:atypique au moyen d'un échantillon longitudinal d'enfants se développement typiquement, à 12-18 mois (ligne de case) au moyen de scores concurrents de mesures cliniques et de tempérament bien validées, ainsi qu''une stabilité longitudinale et d'une validité prédictive au moyen d'un entretien Clinique des symptômes THHA à 24-30 mois (suivi). La Item Response Theory (IRT) a été employée pour caractériser l'éventail typique:atypique de la dysrégulation à la fois normative et celle plus inquiétante (y compris les contextes dans lesquels le comportement prend place). Bien que cela ne soit pas diagnostique, nous présentons la preuve de l'utilité de la MAPS-AR-IT en expliquant le risqué neurodéveloppemental individuel et en élucidant la typicalité plus large de comportements liés à la (dys)régulation de l'attention.

Rare diseases - rare outcomes: Assessing communication abilities for the developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

OBJECTIVE: Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) entail moderate to profound communication and other impairments that are poorly measured by typical clinical outcomes assessments (COA). We examined the potential of alternative approaches, specifically, the use of raw scores and COAs outside of their intended age ranges. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, 120 parents of children with Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, KCNQ2-DEE, KCNB1-DEE, and SCN2A-DEE (ages 1-35 years) completed the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-3 for ages 0-5 years, modified checklist for autism (mCHAT), communication and social behavior scales (CSBS), communication matrix (CM), and several parent-reported classifiers of communication. Adaptive Behavior Assessment System communication and social raw scores were the primary and adjunctive outcomes. Floor and ceiling effects, dispersion and convergence with related measures were assessed with appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques. RESULTS: Median chronological age (CA) was 8.7 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 5.3-13.5). Adaptive Behavior Assessment Systemcommunication and social age equivalents were 12.5 months (IQR 7.5-28) and 16.5 months (IQR 9-31). Most raw scores corresponded to standardized scores indicating performance <3 standard deviations below the general population mean. Adaptive Behavior Assessment System raw scores demonstrated minimal floor and ceiling effects (<1-2.5%). In linear regression models, scores correlated with age under 6 years (communication, p = 0.001; social, p = 0.003) but significantly flattened out thereafter. Scores varied substantially by DEE group (both p < 0.001) and decreased with higher convulsive seizure frequency (communication, p = 0.01, social, p = 0.02). There was good convergence with mCHAT, CSBS, and CM scores (all r > 0.8). SIGNIFICANCE: Raw scores and out-of-range COAs may provide measures that are sensitive at the very limited levels of functioning typical of profoundly impaired, older patients with DEEs. To ensure that targeted trial outcomes are responsive to meaningful change, development of these approaches will be essential to clinical trial readiness for novel therapies for rare DEEs.

Measuring the inch stones for progress: Gross motor function in the developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

OBJECTIVE: Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) entail moderate to profound impairments in gross motor skills and mobility, which are poorly quantified with clinical outcomes assessments (COA) used in neuro-typical populations. We studied the motor domain of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-3 for ages 0-5 years (ABAS) used outside of its intended age range with a focus on raw scores. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, 117 parents of children with a variety of DEEs (ages 1-35 years, median = 9) completed the motor domain section of the ABAS. Floor and ceiling effects and associations with epilepsy-related factors were assessed with appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical techniques. The sensitivity of the ABAS and additional measures of mobility borrowed from the cerebral palsy literature (Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ-22) walking level (FAQ-WL)) to different levels of the Functional Mobility Scale was determined. RESULTS: ABAS motor scores corresponded to a median age equivalent of 20.5 months (Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) 8-34). Most raw scores corresponded to standardized scores > 2 standard deviations below the ABAS standardization sample mean. ABAS raw scores demonstrated minimal floor and ceiling effects (<5%). In linear regression models, scores increased with age under 6 years (p < 0.0001) but flattened out thereafter. Scores varied substantially by DEE group (p < 0.001) and decreased with higher convulsive seizure frequency (<0.0001) and number of seizure medications (p < 0.001). ABAS and other motor scores were sensitive to important differences in mobility as represented by the FMS at 5 yards. Further, they correlated with declines in mobility function from 5 to 500 yards. SIGNIFICANCE: An out-of-range COA with raw scores may provide a measure of motor ability and mobility sensitive within the range of moderate to profound impairment seen in patients with DEE. This approach could shorten the time to appropriate COA development and ensure timely clinical trial readiness for novel therapies for rare DEEs.

Psychometric properties of the PROMIS-57 questionnaire, Norwegian version.

PURPOSE: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to explore reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System®-Profile 57 (PROMIS-57) questionnaire in a general population sample, n = 408, and to examine Item Response properties and factor structure. METHODS: Reliability measures were obtained from factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) methods. Correlations between PROMIS-57 and RAND-36-item health survey (RAND36) were examined for concurrent and discriminant validity. Factor structure and IRT assumptions were examined with factor analysis methods. IRT Item and model fit and graphic plots were inspected, and differential item functioning (DIF) for language, age, gender, and education level were examined. RESULTS: PROMIS-57 demonstrated excellent reliability and satisfactory concurrent and discriminant validity. Factor structure of seven domains was supported. IRT assumptions were met for unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and invariance with no DIF of consequence for language or age groups. Estimated common variance (ECV) per domain and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model fit supported unidimensionality for all seven domains. The GRM IRT Model demonstrates acceptable model fit. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties and factor structure of Norwegian PROMIS-57 were satisfactory. Hence, the 57-item questionnaire along with PROMIS-29, and the corresponding 8 and 4 item short forms for physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation ability and pain interference, are considered suitable for use in research and clinical care in Norwegian populations. Further studies on longitudinal reliability and sensitivity in patient populations and for Norwegian item calibration and/or reference scores are needed.

Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) apps are revolutionizing the way clinicians and researchers monitor and manage the health of their participants. However, many studies using mHealth apps are hampered by substantial participant dropout or attrition, which may impact the representativeness of the sample and the effectiveness of the study. Therefore, it is imperative for researchers to understand what makes participants stay with mHealth apps or studies using mHealth apps. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the current peer-reviewed research literature to identify the notable factors and strategies used in adult participant engagement and retention. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases for mHealth studies that evaluated and assessed issues or strategies to improve the engagement and retention of adults from 2015 to 2020. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Notable themes were identified and narratively compared among different studies. A binomial regression model was generated to examine the factors affecting retention. RESULTS: Of the 389 identified studies, 62 (15.9%) were included in this review. Overall, most studies were partially successful in maintaining participant engagement. Factors related to particular elements of the app (eg, feedback, appropriate reminders, and in-app support from peers or coaches) and research strategies (eg, compensation and niche samples) that promote retention were identified. Factors that obstructed retention were also identified (eg, lack of support features, technical difficulties, and usefulness of the app). The regression model results showed that a participant is more likely to drop out than to be retained. CONCLUSIONS: Retaining participants is an omnipresent challenge in mHealth studies. The insights from this review can help inform future studies about the factors and strategies to improve participant retention.

P047 The Crohn's Disease-Health Index (CD-HI): Development and Validation of a Novel, Disease-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: In preparation for upcoming clinical trials involving patients with Crohn's disease (CD), we examine the validity, reliability and usability of the Crohn's Disease-Health Index (CD-HI). The CD-HI is a multifaceted, disease-specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to measure CD symptomatic disease burden during clinical trials. As promising therapeutic interventions are being tested among CD patients, there is a clear need for researchers to have access to a valid, sensitive, and reliable patient reported outcome tool to track disease burden. This research describes the development and validation of the CD-HI as an efficient mechanism to quantify how CD patients both feel and function. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with CD patients to identify potential symptoms of importance in CD. We then conducted a large, cross-sectional survey study with CD patients to identify the prevalence and importance of symptoms identified during the prior interviews. Symptom questions in the first version of the CD-HI were selected based on overall frequency and impact in a large population of CD patients, generalizability, and potential to respond to therapeutic intervention. Questions which measured a similar concept were grouped into subscales using factor analysis. The first version of the CD-HI was beta tested to explore the usability and relevance of the instrument to patients. We then performed test-retest reliability of each question and subscale. Lastly, we determined the internal consistency for each subscale and the overall instrument. The CD-HI is now finalized and available for use in upcoming clinical trials. RESULTS: Sixteen adults with CD participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews, providing 792 quotes regarding the symptomatic burden of CD. Four hundred and three adults with CD completed an online survey to determine the prevalence and relative importance of 148 patient identified symptoms. Questions were selected for the CD-HI based on their prevalence and relative importance to CD patients. Sixteen adults with CD participated in beta interview testing to address the usability and relevance of the instrument. Patients found the CD-HI to be clear, highly relevant, and easy to use. Test-retest reliability was conducted with twenty-three adults with CD, where participants completed the CD-HI at baseline and fourteen days later. One question was removed to optimize the overall reliability of the instrument. The final version of the CD-HI contains subscales that measure the following granular areas of CD health: 1) fatigue; 2) dietary restrictions; 3) gastrointestinal health; 4) sleep and daytime sleepiness; 5) bowel and bladder function; 6) emotional health; 7) joint health; 8) pain; 9) neck and back health; 10) activity participation; 11) social health; and 12) skin health. Total CD disease burden is measured using a weighted composite of these subscale scores. CONCLUSION: This research successfully demonstrates the ability of the CD-HI to report valid, reliable, and patient-relevant data as a disease-specific PROM. The CD-HI provides researchers and clinicians with an optimal mechanism to record relevant changes in CD health using the patient's perspective.

Sex differences in scores on standardized measures of autism symptoms: a multisite integrative data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that scores on standard measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms may differ as a function of sex. However, these findings are hindered by small female samples studied thus far. The current study evaluated if, after accounting for age, IQ, and language level, sex affects ASD severity estimates from diagnostic measures among children with ASD. METHODS: Data were obtained from eight sources comprising 27 sites. Linear mixed-effects models, including a random effect for site, were fit for 10 outcomes (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS] domain-level calibrated severity scores, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R] raw scores by age-based algorithm, and raw scores from the two indices on the Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS]). Sex was added to the models after controlling for age, NVIQ, and an indicator for language level. RESULTS: Sex significantly improved model fit for half of the outcomes, but least square mean differences were generally negligible (effect sizes [ES] < 0.20), increasing to small to moderate in adolescence (ES < 0.40). Boys received more severe RRB scores than girls on both the ADOS and ADI-R (age 4 + algorithm), and girls received more severe scores than boys on both SRS indices, which emerged in adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: This study combined several available databases to create the largest sample of girls with ASD diagnoses. We found minimal differences due to sex beyond other known influences on ASD severity indicators. This may suggest that, among children who ultimately receive a clinical ASD diagnosis, severity estimates do not systematically differ to such an extent that sex-specific scoring procedures would be necessary. However, given the limitations inherent in clinically ascertained samples, future research must address questions about systematic sex differences among children or adults who do not receive clinical diagnoses of ASD. Moreover, while the current study helps resolve questions about widely used diagnostic instruments, we could not address sex differences in phenotypic aspects outside of these scores.

Evaluation of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist for Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the suitability of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)-a common measure used in clinical trials for treatment of challenging behaviors of autism-as an outcome measure for pharmacological and behavioral interventions for young people with Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs). METHODS: We assessed score profiles on the ABC in a sample of 122 young people with DEEs, including Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes, and KCNQ2- SCN2A-, and KCNB1-associated disorders. Then we examined its internal structure using item cluster analysis. We used both unrestricted item cluster analysis to determine the number of item clusters that maximize reliability and restricted analyses in which we pre-specified models with 5-, 6-, and 7-clusters, to examine consistency with previous factor analytic studies. We also conducted validity analysis on the various scoring methods with age, sex, and autism spectrum screening measure scores. RESULTS: Unrestricted item cluster analysis suggested that three clusters maximized reliability of ABC scores. These broadly represented other-directed behaviors (i.e., "externalizing"), self-directed behaviors (i.e., "internalizing"), and inappropriate speech. Restricted models separated item clusters for stereotypy from other self-directed problem behaviors, and self-injurious behaviors from the other externalizing behaviors. Validity analysis also supported these structures. Overall, all scores were low, and less than 20% of DEE participants had symptoms severe enough to qualify for most randomized trials of behavioral therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: These results are broadly consistent with the extant ABC scoring algorithms. They suggest a high internal consistency reliability, which may support the use of the ABC in future clinical trials in patients with DEEs who exhibit the behaviors assessed by the ABC. Alternatively, concerns about overall low scores raise cautions about using the ABC as a measure of behavior in unselected populations with DEE.

Psychometric properties of a new self-report measure of medical student stress using classic and modern test theory approaches.

BACKGROUND: Medical students face significant stressors related to the intense rigors of their training and education. Accurate measurement of their stress is important to quickly identify, characterize and ameliorate these challenges. Existing measures have limitations that modern measurement approaches, such as item response theory (IRT), are able to address. This study presents the calibration and validation of a new IRT-based measure called the Medical Student Stress Scale (MSSS). METHODS: Following rigorous measurement development procedures described elsewhere, the authors created and tested a pool of 35 items with 348 1st - 4th year medical students along with demographic and external validity measures. Psychometric analysis included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, IRT modeling, and correlations with legacy measures. RESULTS: Of the original 35 items, 22 were retained based on their ability to discriminate, provide meaningful information, and perform well against legacy measures. The MSSS differentiated stress scores between male and female students, as well as between year in school. CONCLUSION: Developed with input from medical students, the MSSS represents a student-centered measurement tool that provides precise, relevant information about stress and holds potential for screening and outcomes-related applications.

Prerequisite Skills in Cognitive Testing: Innovations in theory and recommendations for practice.

Testing cognitive skill development is important for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes, especially for young children and individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Developmental tests have been created for infants and toddlers, while traditional IQ tests are often employed beginning in the later preschool period. However, IQ tests rely on developmental skills that are rapidly changing during early childhood. Here, we introduce the idea of prerequisite skills in developmental domains, which are discrete skills required for, but not explicitly tested by, traditional IQ tests. Focusing on general cognition, particularly among children with a chronological or mental age under 4 years, may fail to capture important nuances in skill development. New skill-based assessments are needed in general, and in particular for categorization, which is foundational to higher-order cognitive skills. Novel measures quantifying categorization skills would provide a more sensitive measure of development for young children and older individuals with low developmental levels.

PROMIS® Pediatric Depressive Symptoms as a Harmonized Score Metric.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based review of adolescent self-report depression measures and to demonstrate how various measures can be rescored onto a harmonized metric. METHOD: Six widely used person-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reviewed. Psychometric properties were evaluated using previously published guidance for PROMs. Next, two secondary data sources (from an outpatient behavioral health clinic and from the general population) were evaluated to harmonize scores across three of the measures. Both item response theory and equipercentile linking methods were used and compared. RESULTS: All six PROMs demonstrated a high evidence base for widespread use depending on the purpose of the assessments. Adolescent involvement when developing the PROM for content validity and floor or ceiling effects were the least frequent available evidence. Three of the PROMs were linked to the PROMIS® Pediatric Depressive Symptoms v2.0 (PROMIS-PedDepSx) metric. The scales were highly correlated and essentially unidimensional when aggregated. All linking methods were broadly comparable. Group-level score conversions are recommended to minimize linking bias. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of strong, widely used PROMs for the evidence-based assessment (EBD) of adolescent depression. However, score comparability is a concern whenever there is a proliferation of measures. Harmonized score metrics support data aggregation and re-analysis. Using four PROMs, one of which served as the scoring metric, we demonstrated the possibility of harmonized depression scores. Future directions for EBD should evaluate whether harmonized PROMs for other pediatric health domains would be useful.

Translation, cross-cultural and construct validity of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS® upper extremity item bank v2.0.

PURPOSE: To develop a Dutch-Flemish translation of the PROMIS® upper extremity (PROMIS-UE) item bank v2.0, and to investigate its cross-cultural and construct validity as well as its floor and ceiling effects in patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders. METHODS: State of the art translation methodology was used to develop the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0. The item bank and four legacy instruments were administered to 205 Dutch patients with musculoskeletal UE disorders visiting an orthopedic outpatient clinic. The validity of cross-cultural comparisons between English and Dutch patients was evaluated by studying differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) with ordinal logistic regression models and McFadden's pseudo R2-change of ≥ 2% as critical value. Construct validity was assessed by formulating a priori hypotheses and calculating correlations with legacy instruments. Floor/ceiling effects were evaluated by determining the proportion of patients who achieved the lowest/highest possible raw score. RESULTS: Eight items showed DIF for language, but their impact on the test score was negligible. The item bank correlated, as hypothesized, moderately with the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS pain intensity item (Pearson's r = - 0.43) and strongly with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Subscale Disability/Symptoms (Spearman's ρ = - 0.87), the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (ρ = - 0.86), and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Subscale Activities of Daily Living (ρ = 0.87). No patients achieved the lowest or highest possible raw score. CONCLUSIONS: A Dutch-Flemish PROMIS-UE item bank v2.0 has been developed that showed sufficient cross-cultural and construct validity as well as absence of floor and ceiling effects.