Patients risk for mortality at 90 days after proximal femur fracture - a retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Despite improving the management of proximal femur fractures (PFF) with legal requirements of timing the surgery within 24 h, mortality rates in these patients remain still high. The objective of our study was to analyze potential cofactors which might influence the mortality rate within 90 days after surgery in PFF to avoid adverse events, loss of quality of life and high rates of mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study all patients with PFF aged 65 years and older were included. We recorded gender, age, type of fracture, surgery and anesthesia, time, comorbidities and medication as well as complications and mortality rate at 90 days. Separate logistic regression models were used to assess which parameters were associated with patients' mortality. The mortality rate was neither associated with timing, time and type of surgery nor time and type of anesthesia, but with higher age (OR 1.08 per year; 95% CI 1.034-1.128), lower BMI (OR 0.915 per kg/m2; 95% CI 0.857-0.978), higher CCI (OR 1.170 per point; 95% CI 1.018-1.345), dementia (OR 2.805; 95% CI 1.616-4.869), non-surgical complications (OR 2.276; 95% CI 1.269-4.083) and if mobilization was impossible (OR 10.493; 95% CI 3.612-30.479). RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 734 patients (age ≥ 65 years) who had a PFF in 2019 and 2020 and received surgery. 129 patients (17.6%) died until 90 days at an median age of 89.7 years (range 65-101 years). CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients who died until 90 days after surgery is still high. It is less extend influenced by surgical and anaesthesiologic factors than by patient-related factors like age or lower BMI. Physicians should be aware of the importance of avoiding adverse events and the importance of patients' mobilization to reduce mortality and improve patients' outcome.

Synergistic Effects of Forensic Medicine and Traumatology: Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis Autopsy Findings in Trauma-Related Deaths.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the third leading cause of death worldwide after cardiovascular and oncologic diseases. Predominant causes of trauma-related death (TD) are severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), hemorrhagic shock, and multiple organ failure. An analysis of TD is required in order to review the quality of trauma care and grasp how well the entire trauma network functions, especially for the most severely injured patients. Furthermore, autopsies not only reveal hidden injuries, but also verify clinical assumed causes of death. MATERIAL: During the study period of 3 years, a total of 517 trauma patients were admitted to our supraregional University Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Dresden. 13.7% (71/517) of the patients died after trauma, and in 25 cases (35.2%), a forensic autopsy was instructed by the federal prosecutor. The medical records, death certificates, and autopsy reports were retrospectively evaluated and the clinical findings matched to autopsy results. RESULTS: The observed mortality rates (13.7%) were 4.2% less than expected by the calculated RISC II probability of survival (mortality rate of 17.9%). The most frequent trauma victims were due to falls >3 m (n = 29), followed by traffic accidents (n = 28). The median ISS was 34, IQR 25, and the median New ISS (NISS) was 50, IQR 32. Locations of death were in emergency department (23.9%), ICU (73.2%), OR and ward (1.4%, respectively). Clinicians classified 47.9% of deaths due to sTBI (n = 34), followed by 9.9% thoracic trauma and multiple organ failure (n = 7), 8.4% multiple trauma (n = 6), and 2.8% hypoxia and exsanguination (n = 2). In 18.3%, cases were unspecific or other causes of death recorded on the death certificates. Evident differences with evident clinical consequences were ascertained in 4% (n = 1) and marginal clinical consequences in 24% (6/25). In 16% (4/25), marginal differences with minor forensic consequences were revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a supraregional trauma center, specialized in multiple trauma management (4.2% survival benefit), room for improvement exists in more than a quarter of all casualties. This underlines the need for higher autopsy rates to uncover missed injuries and to understand the pathomechanism in each trauma fatality. This would also help to uncover potential insufficiencies in clinical routines with regard to diagnostics. The interdisciplinary cooperation of trauma surgeons and forensic pathologists can increase the quality of trauma patient care.

[Treatment of ankle fractures : Standards, tricks and pitfalls]. / Versorgung der Sprunggelenkfraktur : Standards, Tipps und Fallstricke.

Ankle fractures and associated ligamentous injuries are the most common injuries of a load-bearing joint. There is still no general consensus with respect to the pathomechanism, the treatment indications and surgical techniques. The medium and long-term results are affected by a particularly high risk of posttraumatic arthritis in bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures and fracture dislocations. There is consensus on the necessity of a thorough preoperative analysis and postoperative control of reduction for which 3D imaging is increasingly generously employed. This detects relevant pathologies, such as bony syndesmotic avulsion and partial impaction of the tibial plafond that may go unnoticed on plain radiographs. Anatomic reconstruction of the ankle mortise, the detection and treatment of syndesmotic instability, reconstruction of the tibial notch and exact placement of the distal fibula into the latter are important prognostic factors.

[Therapy of Humeral Shaft Fractures]. / Therapie von Humerusschaftfrakturen.

Humeral shaft fractures are a rare but challenging entity of injuries of the upper extremity. Despite all advances in the past decades - including improved imaging, adjusted surgical techniques and new implant designs - the treatment of humeral shaft fractures and especially the treatment choice remains challenging. Treatment options need to be evaluated individually under consideration of fracture morphology, soft tissue and potential neurological damage as well as patient-specific factors (i.e., age, comorbidities). Moreover, the risk of common complications such as radial nerve palsy, infection, non-union and malrotation needs to be evaluated in order to facilitate the best possible therapy for each patient. The regular available treatment options include conservative (cast, brace, etc.) and surgical measures (ante- and retrograde nailing, angle-stable plate osteosynthesis). Furthermore, (temporary) external fixation remains an option in emergency and complicative cases. However, none of the aforementioned options have proven a superior gold standard. This review evaluates the currently available treatment options and their individual advantages as well as the probability of possible complications and is aiming to supply a guide for individual treatment choice.

Injury to the posterior malleolus in Maisonneuve fractures.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and a complex pathoanatomy of posterior malleolus fractures in a Maisonneuve fracture. METHODS: The study included 100 prospectively collected patients with a complete clinical and radiological documentation of an ankle fracture or fracture-dislocation including a fracture of the proximal quarter of the fibula. RESULTS: A posterior malleolus fracture was identified in 74 patients, and in 27% of these cases it carried more than one quarter of the fibular notch. Displacement of the posterior fragment by more than 2 mm was shown by scans in 72% of cases. Small intercalary fragments were identified in 43% of cases. Fractures of the Tillaux-Chaput tubercle were identified in 20 patients. CONCLUSION: Our study has proved a high rate of posterior malleolus fractures associated with a Maisonneuve fracture, and documented their considerable variability in terms of involvement of the fibular notch, tibiotalar contact area, direction of displacement and frequency of intercalary fragments. Of no less importance is a combination of Tillaux-Chaput fractures with a Maisonneuve fracture.

Routine Use of Structured Reporting in Whole-body Trauma CT Facilitates Quality Improvement.

PURPOSE: Structured reporting (SR) is increasingly used. So far, there is minimal experience with SR in whole-body computed tomography (WBCT). The aim of this study was to investigate the value of routine use of SR in WBCT in trauma with a focus on reporting time, reporting errors, and referrer satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reporting time and reporting errors of CT reports were prospectively quantified for residents and board-certified radiologists 3 months before and for 6 months after implementation of a structured report in the clinical routine. Referrer satisfaction was prospectively quantified by means of a survey before and after the implementation period of SR using a 5-point Likert scale. Before and after results were compared to determine the effect of structured reporting on WBCT in trauma at our institution. RESULTS: The mean reporting time was lower when using SR (65 ±â€Š52 min. vs. 87 ±â€Š124 min., p = .25). After 4 months, the median reporting time was significantly lower with SR (p = .02). Consequently, the rate of reports that were finished within one hour rose from 55.1 % to 68.3 %. Likewise, reporting errors decreased (12.6 % vs. 8.4 %, p = .48). Residents and board-certified radiologists reported fewer errors when using SR with 16.4 % vs. 12.6 % and 8.8 % vs. 2.7 %, respectively. General referrer satisfaction improved (1.7 ±â€Š0.8 vs. 1.5 ±â€Š1.1, p = .58). Referrers graded improvements for standardization of reports (2.2 ±â€Š1.1 vs. 1.3 ±â€Š1.1, p = .03), consistency of report structure (2.1 ±â€Š1.1 vs. 1.4 ±â€Š1.1, p = .09), and retrievability of relevant pathologies (2.1 ±â€Š1.2 vs. 1.6 ±â€Š1.1, p = .32). CONCLUSION: SR has the potential to facilitate process improvement for WBCT in trauma in the daily routine with a reduction of reporting time and reporting mistakes while increasing referrer satisfaction. KEY POINTS: · SR for WBCT in trauma is feasable in clinical routine.. · Reporting time in WBCT in trauma decreases by SR.. · SR for WBCT in trauma has the potential to decrease reporting mistakes.. · SR for WBCT in trauma might increase referrer satisfaction.. CITATION FORMAT: · Blum SF, Hertzschuch D, Langer E et al. Routine Use of Structured Reporting in Whole-body Trauma CT Facilitates Quality Improvement. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 521 - 528.

"Double Maisonneuve fracture": an unknown fracture pattern.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe pathoanatomy and to raise awareness of a fracture of the lateral malleolus combined with a high subcapital fracture of the fibula caused by a dislocation mechanism. METHODS: The study comprised 11 patients, 5 men and 6 women, with the mean age of 57 years (range, 21-87), with a "Double Maisonneuve fracture". Individual lesions of ankle structures were described on the basis of radiographs, CT, and intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The distal fibular fracture was classified as Weber type B in 1 case and Weber type C in 10 cases. The proximal fibular fracture was described as a subcapital oblique spiral fracture with metadiaphyseal involvement in nine cases and a high short oblique fracture with fibular head involvement in two cases. Injury to the deltoid ligament was revealed in six cases; a bicollicular fracture of the medial malleolus was found in five patients. Posterior malleolar fractures were classified as type 1 in eight cases and type 2 in three cases. Avulsion of the Chaput tubercle was detected in four cases. Injury to the interosseous tibiofibular ligament was assessed in nine patients. CONCLUSION: Double Maisonneuve fracture is a rare but probably underreported injury that must be taken into consideration during examination, as it may be easily overlooked. The essential part of diagnosis is a careful clinical examination and radiological assessment of the lower leg with additional CT examination of the ankle.

[Fixation of displaced fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures]. / Osteosynthese dislozierter Metatarsale-V-Schaft- und -Halsfrakturen.

OBJECTIVE: Open reduction and internal fixation of grossly dislocated fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures aims at restoration of the anatomical structure of the forefoot. The goal is to restore length, axis, rotation and joint position, while observing the metatarsal index (Maestro curve). INDICATIONS: Grossly dislocated and/or open shaft/neck fractures of the fifth metatarsal; combined fractures of the forefoot involving the fifth metatarsal. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Lack of consent to surgery. Overall critical (life-threatening) general condition preventing surgery to the extremities. Contaminated or infected soft tissues. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Depending on the planned method of fixation, open reduction is usually conducted via a lateral approach centrally above the easily palpable metatarsal V shaft. The incision lies above the glabrous skin of the sole. For markedly shortened and multifragment subcapital and shaft fractures of the fifth metatarsal, open reduction and plate fixation is the method of choice. Interlocking plates with a screw diameter of 2.0-2.4 mm are preferred to avoid later soft tissue irritation. Anatomic reconstruction is carried out under longitudinal traction at the fifth toe using small reduction clamps and, if necessary, temporary K­wire fixation. If the fragments are large enough, one or more interfragmentary lag screws can be used for fracture compression. A straight or condylar plate is used for internal fixation. Long spiral fifth metatarsal shaft fractures may alternatively be fixed with screws. In the case of transverse or subcapital fractures, percutaneous antegrade or retrograde medullary wiring with two Kirschner wires should be considered. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Following surgical treatment, rest and elevation of the injured leg, and local cooling are indicated. Subsequently, mobilization with partial weight bearing (20 kg) in foot orthosis or cast shoe for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Even grossly displaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal shaft have a good to excellent prognosis following surgical treatment with high union rates and rare complications. Undisplaced and mildly displaced fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively with 6 weeks of weight bearing as tolerated in a stable orthosis or cast shoes.

[Minimally invasive fixation of distal fibular fractures with intramedullary nailing]. / Minimal-invasive Osteosynthese von distalen Fibulafrakturen mittels Marknagels.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of distal fibula fractures serves as a biomechanically stable and soft-tissue-friendly fixation method in the case of an unstable fracture, poor bone quality, and/or critical soft tissue conditions with restoration of the length, axis and rotation of the distal fibula as well as stabilization of the ankle mortise. The goal is to reduce and stabilize the distal fibular fracture in a quick and stable manner that protects the soft tissues in ankle fractures. INDICATIONS: Unstable malleolar fractures and fracture dislocations; fibular fractures in combination with distal tibia fractures; critical soft tissue conditions around the ankle. CONTRAINDICATIONS: No consent to surgery by the patient. Overall critical (life-threatening) general condition preventing surgery to the extremities. Very narrow medullary canal of the fibula (less than 3 mm, depending on the implant). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Percutaneous placement of a guidewire into the distal fibular tip, opening the medullary canal and drilling the medullary canal in the distal fragment. Reduction of the axis by introduction of the fibular nail, with additional percutaneous use of reduction clamps for restoration of fibular length and rotation, if necessary. Placement of distal locking screws over the targeting device while maintaining rotation and length, in addition proximal static locking is mandatory to maintain the length of the fibula. In case of residual syndesmotic instability after fracture fixation, syndesmotic screws are inserted through the fibular nail via the aiming device. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Following surgery, rest and elevation of the injured leg, and local cooling are indicated. Subsequently, mobilization with partial weight bearing (15-20 kg) in an ankle foot orthosis or plaster/cast for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Minimally invasive fibular fixation with an intramedullary nail results in a significantly lower rate of wound healing complications compared with lateral plating. Reported union rates range from 97.4 to 100% with current nail designs. The quality of reduction and functional outcome is comparable to that after plate fixation. A certain learning curve has to be respected.

[External fixator: temporary fixation and soft tissue management of the ankle]. / Fixateur externe: temporäre Fixation und Weichteilmanagement am oberen Sprunggelenk.

OBJECTIVE OF SURGERY: Joint-spanning transfixation of the ankle joint aims at mostly temporary retention of the reduction, i.e. restoring length and axial alignment and stabilization of the ankle mortise in highly unstable fractures around the ankle and under critical soft tissue conditions. In selected cases, external fixation serves as an additional stabilization also following completed internal fixation or the fracture can be treated in the external fixator. The goal of surgery is to allow quick soft tissue recovery, prevention of redislocation and stabilization of the ankle and adjacent structures. INDICATIONS: a) Fractures of the tibial pilon; b) very distal, extra-articular lower leg fractures (without the option for pin positioning in the distal fragment); c) highly unstable malleolar fractures with tendency to subluxation and dislocation fractures; d) critical soft tissue conditions around the ankle; e) dislocation fractures of the talus, Chopart and Lisfranc joints (if necessary with additional transarticular transfixation). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Missing consent to surgery by the conscious patient, life-threatening general condition by other prioritized injuries. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Percutaneous pin placement of the appropriate caliber into so-called safe zones of the tibia, metatarsus and calcaneus, as needed. Additional transfixation of the Chopart and Lisfranc joints with K­wires as needed. Fixation of the struts with the foot in a neutral position. Besides consideration of biomechanical principles, pin placement must be done in anticipation of the definitive stabilization and future approaches respecting the anatomical structures while achieving maximum stability and soft tissue protection. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Following initial transfixation, elevation of the injured leg for soft tissue protection, local cooling and bed rest are indicated. In cases of compartment syndrome and open fractures with temporary soft tissue coverage, second look surgery after 24-72 h is mandatory. For exact fracture analysis and optimal planning of the definitive surgical strategy, the indications for CT imaging should be generously considered. The timing of definitive care depends on the local soft tissue status and the overall condition of the patient. RESULTS: The presence of a dislocation at the time of the accident represents a negative prognostic factor for ankle fractures. Higher rates of posttraumatic arthrosis are also found in pilon fractures and trimalleolar fractures, direct cartilage damage and rupture of the syndesmosis. In cases of anatomic reconstruction of the mortice and ankle joint congruence, good to excellent results can be achieved in 75-89%.