The cascade of care for patients with chronic hepatitis delta in Southern Stockholm, Sweden for the past 30 years.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies have shown suboptimal screening for hepatitis D virus (HDV) among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study presents the cascade of care for HDV infection in a major secondary referral centre in Southern Stockholm, Sweden. METHODS: HBsAg+ve patients attending Karolinska University Hospital (KUH) from 1992 to 2022 were identified. The prevalence of anti-HDV and/or HDV RNA positivity, interferon (IFN) therapy and maintained virological responses (MVR) after HDV treatment were assessed. Also, time to anti-HDV testing was analysed in relation to liver-related outcomes with logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 4095 HBsAg+ve persons, 3703 (90.4%) underwent an anti-HDV screening; within a median of 1.8 months (range 0.0-57.1) after CHB diagnosis. This screening rate increased over time, to 97.9% in the last decade. Overall, 310 (8.4%) were anti-HDV+ve, of which 202 (65.2%) were HDV RNA+ve. Eighty-five (42%) received IFN, and 9 (10.6%) achieved MVR at the last follow-up. The predictive factors for anti-HDV screening were Asian origin, diagnosis after the year 2012, HIV co-infection (negative factor) and HBV DNA level < 2000 IU/mL in univariable analysis, while HIV co-infection was the only remaining factor in multivariable analysis. Delayed anti-HDV test >5 years was independently associated with worsened liver-related outcomes (adjusted odds ratio = 7.6, 95% CI 1.8-31.6). CONCLUSION: Higher frequency of HDV screening than previously published data could be seen among CHB patients at KUH in a low-endemic setting. Receiving a delayed screening test seems to be associated with worse outcomes, stressing the need of a strategy for timely HDV diagnosis.

Frequent colonization of betahaemolytic streptococci at various body sites including the perineum and anal canal during erysipelas and cellulitis.

Background: Erysipelas and cellulitis are usually caused by betahaemolytic streptococci but the aetiology is often difficult to verify in clinical practice. Methods: Patients with erysipelas or cellulitis were analysed for betahaemolytic streptococci in samples from multiple body sites, including the perineum and the anal canal, during the acute episode and at follow up. Healthy control persons were sampled from the same sites. Results: Betahaemolytic streptococci group A, C or G were identified in 23/28 (82%) patients, most commonly group G. A wound or ulcer, present in 16/28 (57%), was colonized in 8/16 (50%). The perineum and anal canal were colonized in 11/28 (39%) and 10/28 (36%), respectively. At follow-up after about 4 weeks, only 4/28 (14%) were colonized (p<.001). In 39 healthy control persons, no betahaemolytic streptococci group A were found, groups C or G were found in 4/39 (10%). Group B streptococci were more often identified in controls, than in patients,12/39 (31%). Conclusions: Acute episodes of erysipelas or cellulitis are associated with colonization of betahaemolytic streptococci at multiple sites including the perineum and anal canal, in particular serogroup G. This may be important for choice of primary antibiotic therapy and possibilities for prevention of relapses.