Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio are better predictive risk factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index and body surface area.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether body fat distribution, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist/hip ratio (WHR), is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA). BACKGROUND: Obesity measured by BMI is not a consistent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity after abdominal surgery. Studies in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases have shown WC and WHR to be better outcome predictors than BMI. METHODS: A prospective multicenter international study was conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The WHR, BMI, and BSA were derived from body weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences measured preoperatively. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1349 patients (754 men) from 38 centers in 11 countries were included. Increasing WHR significantly increased the risk of conversion [odds ratio (OR) = 15.7, relative risk (RR) = 4.1], intraoperative complications (OR = 11.0, RR = 3.2), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 7.7, RR = 2.0), medical complications (OR = 13.2, RR = 2.5), anastomotic leak (OR = 13.7, RR = 3.3), reoperations (OR = 13.3, RR = 2.9), and death (OR = 653.1, RR = 21.8). Both BMI (OR = 39.5, RR = 1.1) and BSA (OR = 4.9, RR = 3.1) were associated with an increased risk of abdominal wound complication. In multivariate analysis, the WHR predicted intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reinterventions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach significance for any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The WHR is predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery. It should be used in routine clinical practice and in future risk-estimating systems.

Chronic stomal variceal bleeding after colonic surgery in patients with portal hypertension: efficacy of beta-blocking agents?

In patients with portal hypertension, ileostomy or colostomy carries the risk of the development of stomal varices at the site of the mucocutaneous junction of a stoma. Such varices are often the source of difficult-to-treat recurrent or chronic bleeding. In this setting, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion and embolisation is considered the best therapeutic approach in spite of relatively high mortality and morbidity rates. We report the cases of three consecutive patients with portal hypertension of various causes and chronic stomal variceal bleeding in whom beta-blocking therapy resulted in the drying up of bleeding and the prevention of its recurrence for periods of time ranging between 2 and 42 months.