RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the cumulative risk of progression in glaucomatous eyes in the severe stage of disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients that had severe damage in at least one eye, as defined by three criteria including a mean deviation of ≤ - 20 dB, were included. Glaucoma progression was defined as a loss of ≥ 2 dB in mean deviation confirmed in three consecutive visual field tests, or a persistent loss of two or more lines of vision-not attributable to non-glaucomatous causes-in three consecutive follow-up examinations. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the cumulative incidence of progression of the first eye to reach endpoint in cases where both eyes were eligible. RESULTS: A total of 143 eyes from 119 patients, were studied over a mean period of 4.9 ± 2.9 years. Baseline mean deviation was - 25.3 ± 3.6 dB. Twenty-three eyes of 22 patients reached the progression endpoint: 14 eyes by visual field criteria and 9 by visual acuity criteria. The cumulative 5-year risk of progression estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 14.6% (95% confidence interval: 6.1-22.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In severe glaucoma patients, we found a cumulative incidence of progression of 2.9% per year during the first 5 years of follow-up. Similar incidences have been reported in other studies of glaucoma at different stages of severity.
Assuntos
Glaucoma , Campos Visuais , Progressão da Doença , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Glaucoma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Visão/epidemiologia , Testes de Campo VisualAssuntos
Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma/efeitos adversos , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Trabeculectomia/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to validate the Glaucoma Risk Stratification Tool (GLAUC-STRAT-fast) currently recommended by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists for the risk stratification of patients with glaucoma in the UK National Health Service Hospital Eye Service. METHODS: GLAUC-STRAT fast was applied to the LiGHT trial participants by risk-stratifying the worse eye of each patient at baseline and after 3 years of treatment. Metrics of disease severity or treatment intensity used for the validation were: increased number of monitoring visits or treatment escalations; needing a trabeculectomy; a reduction of >2 dB in visual field mean deviation (VF MD) during the monitoring period; identification of rapid VF loss on total (TD) and/or pattern deviation (PD). The proportion of eyes within each baseline stratum for each of the above markers was compared against the other strata, using a χ2 test for proportions. RESULTS: There was an association between the baseline stratification and the number of treatment escalations needed to maintain the eye-specific target intraocular pressure (p=0.001), the number of visits needed throughout the 3-year follow-up period (p=0.001), the need for trabeculectomy (p<0.001) and absolute loss of MD over the course of the monitoring period (p<0.001). The rate of VF progression was not associated with baseline risk stratification for TD or PD progression (p≥0.007, with Bonferroni correction). CONCLUSION: The GLAUC-STRAT fast tool is a useful tool for risk stratifying eyes with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma. Further research is needed to confirm and validate its applicability to more advanced glaucomas and generalisability to clinical use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The LiGHT trial is registered at controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN32038223).
Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Humanos , Medicina Estatal , Transtornos da Visão , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Pressão Intraocular , Progressão da Doença , Medição de Risco , Testes de Campo Visual , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Glaucoma is the leading cause of preventable sight loss in the United Kingdom and the provision of timely glaucoma care has been highlighted as a significant challenge in recent years. Following a recent high-profile investigation, The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch recommended the validation of risk stratification models to safeguard the vision-related quality of life of glaucoma patients. There continues to be no nationally agreed evidence-based risk stratification model for glaucoma care across the United Kingdom. Some models have used simple measures of disease staging such as visual field mean deviation as surrogates for risk, but more refined, individualised risk stratification models should include factors related to both visual impairment and visual disability. Candidate tools should also incorporate both ocular and systemic co-morbidities, rate of disease progression, visual needs and driving status and undergo clinical refinement and validation to justify implementation. The disruption to routine glaucoma care caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has only highlighted the importance of such risk stratification models and has accelerated their development, application and evaluation. This review aims to critically appraise the available evidence underpinning current approaches for glaucoma risk stratification and to discuss how these may be applied to contemporary glaucoma care within the United Kingdom. Further research will be essential to justify and validate the utility of glaucoma risk stratification models in everyday clinical practice.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glaucoma , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Pandemias , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
Importance: Calcium channel blocker (CCB) use has been associated with an increased risk of glaucoma in exploratory studies. Objective: To examine the association of systemic CCB use with glaucoma and related traits among UK Biobank participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study included UK Biobank participants with complete data (2006-2010) for analysis of glaucoma status, intraocular pressure (IOP), and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived inner retinal layer thicknesses. Data analysis was conducted in January 2023. Exposure: Calcium channel blocker use was assessed in a baseline touchscreen questionnaire and confirmed during an interview led by a trained nurse. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measures included glaucoma status, corneal-compensated IOP, and 2 OCT-derived inner retinal thickness parameters (macular retinal nerve fiber layer [mRNFL] and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer [mGCIPL] thicknesses). We performed logistic regression and linear regression analyses to test for associations with glaucoma status and IOP and OCT-derived inner retinal thickness parameters, respectively. Results: This study included 427â¯480 adults. Their median age was 58 (IQR, 50-63) years, and more than half (54.1%) were women. There were 33 175 CCB users (7.8%). Participants who had complete data for glaucoma status (n = 427â¯480), IOP (n = 97â¯100), and OCT-derived inner retinal layer thicknesses (n = 41â¯023) were eligible for respective analyses. After adjustment for key sociodemographic, medical, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors, use of CCBs (but not other antihypertensive agents) was associated with greater odds of glaucoma (odds ratio [OR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.69]; P = .001). Calcium channel blocker use was also associated with thinner mGCIPL (-0.34 µm [95% CI, -0.54 to -0.15 µm]; P = .001) and mRNFL (-0.16 µm [95% CI, -0.30 to -0.02 µm]; P = .03) thicknesses but not IOP (-0.01 mm Hg [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.07 mm Hg]; P = .84). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, an adverse association between CCB use and glaucoma was observed, with CCB users having, on average, 39% higher odds of glaucoma. Calcium channel blocker use was also associated with thinner mGCIPL and mRNFL thicknesses, providing a structural basis that supports the association with glaucoma. The lack of association of CCB use with IOP suggests that an IOP-independent mechanism of glaucomatous neurodegeneration may be involved. Although a causal relationship has not been established, CCB replacement or withdrawal may be considered should glaucoma progress despite optimal care.
Assuntos
Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio , Glaucoma , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos , Biobanco do Reino Unido , Células Ganglionares da Retina , Glaucoma/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
AIMS: To recommend a list of complications of glaucoma surgery to be used in future glaucoma surgery research and reporting by exploring the spectrum of complications' names, the variety of definitions and time frames used for reporting them in glaucoma surgical trials. METHODS: Complications' names, definitions and time frames identified from a previously conducted systematic review of glaucoma surgery trials (registration number: CRD42019121226) were reviewed. Only postoperative complications were considered. Surgical techniques described in the papers from the previous systematic review were retrieved and grouped according their mechanism of action.Reviewers independently recommended each complication's inclusion or exclusion in a list to be proposed as a potential standard for reporting in glaucoma interventions. A literature-based definition of a 'surgical complication' was used to inform these decisions. Recorded complication's details were used to inform the development of clinically relevant definitions, a consensus-driven exercise between reviewers resolved disagreements. RESULTS: We identified 48/111 (43.2%) of the reported complications as suitable for inclusion, of which 17 were merged into other included complications having a broader meaning making up a final table of 32 postoperative complications. For 25 of them, the authors kept 'names' that were previously used in the systematic review, but provided a definition that was not mentioned in these papers. Five included complications were given both 'names' and definitions not previously mentioned. The authors maintained the name and definition for one complication. There were 16 complications that were in common to all the procedures retrieved from the previous review. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a table of revised names and comprehensive definitions of postoperative complications, to simplify the process of reporting complications after glaucoma surgery and to improve consistency among surgical trials.
Assuntos
Glaucoma , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Consenso , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
Presentation with advanced glaucoma is a significant risk factor for lifetime blindness. The asymptomatic nature of glaucoma, particularly in early disease, means that substantial vision loss in one eye does not always translate into a perceptible loss of visual function. This, along with the lack of an effective screening strategy, contributes to late presentation. Those most at risk of presenting with advanced glaucoma have asymptomatic high intraocular pressure (IOP), no family history of glaucoma, are socially disadvantaged, and do not attend sight testing. Patients with glaucoma may have impaired functionality for daily activities, such as reading, walking and driving. Quality of life measures have shown this to be significantly worse in patients with more severe visual field loss, particularly if bilateral. In addition, quality of life decreases faster with further bilateral visual field loss when advanced visual field damage is present. Management of these patients requires disproportionally more resources than those with earlier disease. Both medical and surgical options are used as the initial approach to treat patients presenting with advanced glaucoma. The most recently published National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that patients presenting with advanced disease should be offered trabeculectomy as a primary intervention. However, more evidence is required to determine the best initial management. The Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study (TAGS) is being conducted, comparing primary medical management with primary mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy for people presenting with advanced open-angle glaucoma. The results of TAGS will provide robust evidence for the most appropriate initial intervention.
Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Trabeculectomia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Glaucoma/tratamento farmacológico , Glaucoma/terapia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/tratamento farmacológico , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/terapia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
We report the case of a 23-month-old girl with bilateral retinoblastoma that demonstrated absence of retinal lesions in one eye but had an isolated white tumor in the posterior chamber. Genetic testing confirmed a novel and de novo RB1 germline mutation in the proband that was not carried by her parents. After intravenous chemotherapy and brachytherapy to the eye with apparently disease-free retina, anatomic and functional preservation of the eye was achieved. The patient has been in remission for 18 months.