A modified Delphi approach to determine current treatment advances for the development of a resuscitation program for maternal cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: Maternal cardiac arrest is a rare and complex process requiring pregnancy-specific responses and techniques. The goals of this study were to (1) identify, evaluate, and determine the most current best practices to treat this patient population and (2) establish a standardized set of guidelines to serve as a foundation for a future educational simulation-based curriculum. STUDY DESIGN: We used a three-step modified Delphi process to achieve consensus. Twenty-two healthcare experts from across North America agreed to participate in the expert panel. In round 1, 12 pregnancy-specific best practice statements were distributed to the expert panel. Panelists anonymously ranked these using a 7-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Round 2 consisted of a face-to-face consensus meeting where statements that had not already achieved consensus were discussed and then subsequently voted upon by the panelists. RESULTS: Through two rounds, we achieved consensus on nine evidence-based pregnancy-specific techniques to optimize response to maternal cardiac arrest. Round one resulted in one of the 12 best practice statements achieving consensus. Round two resulted in six of the remaining 12 gaining consensus. Best practice techniques involved use of point-of care ultrasound, resuscitative cesarean delivery, cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques, and the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide the foundation to develop an optimal, long-term strategy to treat cardiac arrest in pregnancy. We propose these nine priorities for standard practice, curricula, and guidelines to treat maternal cardiac arrest and hope they serve as a foundation for a future educational curriculum.

Objective Evaluation of the Effects of Deployment on Laparoscopic Skills: The Simulation and Deployment Laparoscopic Skills Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of deployment on basic laparoscopic skills of general surgeons and obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) physicians. METHODS: This was a prospective 10-site study. Active duty Army OB/GYN and general surgery physicians scheduled to deploy were invited to participate. Before deployment, they performed fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) tasks and specialty-specific procedures on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Upon returning, physicians repeated the same evaluations. Questions about perceived comfort with laparoscopic procedures were asked before and after deployment. Statistical analysis included paired t tests for continuous variables and nonparametric for ordinal data with a p value of <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: 121 deploying providers were invited to participate; 35 agreed and 29 completed the predeployment skills assessment. After deployment, 15 providers had postassessment evaluation data collected, and their results were used for analysis. Though physicians reported a decrease in their perception of preparedness for advanced laparoscopic procedures and complications, there was no decrement in their performance of FLS tasks or the basic laparoscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: Time away from regular clinical practice during deployments did not significantly affect surgeons' performance as measured by a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Additional study on effects on advanced procedures should be considered.

Self-Reported Changes in Comfort Level With Basic OB/GYN Procedures After Deployment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the specialty-specific procedures and clinical encounters U.S. Army obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers felt were affected by deployment and identify skills and areas that may benefit from postdeployment training. METHODS: Active duty Army OB/GYN physicians were invited to participate in an anonymous web-based survey to rate their comfort level and experience performing specialty-specific procedures before and after military deployment. Physicians rated their comfort level on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 5 = completely comfortable). Statistical analysis included Pearson χ(2) and McNemar's χ(2) with a p value of <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 100 physicians eligible to complete the survey, 66 responded (response rate = 66%). Their responses demonstrated a statistically significant perception of decline in their comfort level with nearly every obstetric and gynecologic procedure and clinical encounter evaluated. CONCLUSION: Time away from regular clinical practice during deployment results in providers feeling less comfortable with many common OB/GYN procedures and clinical situations. Although these results are not a measure of actual performance, this information helps define targets to focus refresher training for providers who leave their normal scope of practice for deployment. These findings apply to civilian providers leaving practice for other reasons as well.

Perceived clinical skill degradation of Army family physicians after deployment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Deployment away from regular clinical practice is necessary for Army family physicians, but no current information identifies specific procedures or clinical encounters where they feel less comfortable after deployment. This study identifies specific clinical areas and amount of perceived degradation in skills after deployment to combat zones. METHODS: Active duty Army family physicians were invited to participate in a web-based and anonymous survey rating comfort level performing clinical encounters or procedures prior to and after military deployment. Participants rated their comfort level using a 5-point Likert scale. The analysis included descriptive statistics about each physician's deployment history. The composite data for each clinical encounter or procedure were analyzed with McNemar's Chi-Square test. RESULTS: A total of 179 eligible Army family physicians (54% of total) fully completed the instrument, with 39% deploying once and 10% deploying more than five times in their career. Deployments ranged from 1 to >24 months, with 42% having a last deployment of 12 months duration. With statistical significance, providers reported being less comfortable post-deployment with managing first-trimester bleeding, ACLS codes, acute abdominal pain, asthma exacerbations, central line placement, chest pain, COPD exacerbations, CVA/hypertensive emergency, lumbar puncture, neonatal fevers, pediatric codes, sepsis/septic shock, and vaginal delivery. These physicians reported statistically significant increased comfort with the care of major trauma after deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians deploying to support combat operations feel less comfortable with critical clinical skills across the spectrum of care. Refresher training could be provided with standardized approach to these needs with a goal of maintaining full scope primary care providers.